On 8/6/2024 10:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/6/24 10:49 PM, olcott wrote:
On 8/6/2024 9:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/6/24 9:48 PM, olcott wrote:
On 8/6/2024 8:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/6/24 1:16 PM, olcott wrote:
On 8/6/2024 12:02 PM, joes wrote:
Am Tue, 06 Aug 2024 09:43:30 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Understanding that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot
possibly reach
its own "return" instruction is a mandatory prerequisite to further >>>>>>>> discussion.
There is nothing to discuss after agreeing with your conclusion. >>>>>>>
Everyone remains convinced that HHH must report on the behavior >>>>>>>> of the
computation that itself is contained within and not the behavior >>>>>>>> that
its finite string input specifies.
The construction is not recursive if the description does not
describe
the surrounding computation. And that behaviour cannot depend on the >>>>>>> decider, as they should all give the same answer.
That is far too vague.
DDD correctly emulated by HHH according to the semantics
of the x86 programming language specifies a single exact
sequence of state changes. None of these state changes
ends up at the x86 machine language address of the "ret"
instruction of DDD.
Which would be meaningful if HHH actual did a correct emulation of the >>>>
HHH does emulate the exact sequence that the machine code
of DDD specifies. This has been conclusively proven by
the execution traces that the two instances of HHH provide.
Nope, because it didn't emulate the call instruction properly.
It is proved that it does emulate the call instruction
properly by the correct execution trace of the second
DDD derived by the second HHH.
Nope, just proves you don't know what you are talking about.
Because your rebuttals have always been pure bluster
you have only used double-talk and misdirection to dodge
pointing out any mistake in the following:
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
_main()
[00002192] 55 push ebp
[00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[000021a2] 50 push eax
[000021a3] 6843070000 push 00000743
[000021a8] e8b5e5ffff call 00000762
[000021ad] 83c408 add esp,+08
[000021b0] 33c0 xor eax,eax
[000021b2] 5d pop ebp
[000021b3] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0034) [000021b3]
machine stack stack machine assembly
address address data code language
======== ======== ======== ========= ============= [00002192][00103820][00000000] 55 push ebp [00002193][00103820][00000000] 8bec mov ebp,esp [00002195][0010381c][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD [0000219a][00103818][0000219f] e833f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
New slave_stack at:1038c4
Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:1138cc [00002172][001138bc][001138c0] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002173][001138bc][001138c0] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002175][001138b8][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD [0000217a][001138b4][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
New slave_stack at:14e2ec
[00002172][0015e2e4][0015e2e8] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002173][0015e2e4][0015e2e8] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002175][0015e2e0][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD [0000217a][0015e2dc][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped
[0000219f][00103820][00000000] 83c404 add esp,+04 [000021a2][0010381c][00000000] 50 push eax [000021a3][00103818][00000743] 6843070000 push 00000743 [000021a8][00103818][00000743] e8b5e5ffff call 00000762
Input_Halts = 0
[000021ad][00103820][00000000] 83c408 add esp,+08 [000021b0][00103820][00000000] 33c0 xor eax,eax [000021b2][00103824][00000018] 5d pop ebp [000021b3][00103828][00000000] c3 ret
Number of Instructions Executed(10069) == 150 Pages
*I had no idea that Mike was doing this same thing*
The former editor in chief of CASM did acknowledge
this to me. He said that was why he couldn't understand
what I was saying after many email exchanges.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)