• clash between acronym and twocolumn

    From Dr. Engelbert Buxbauum@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 15 12:25:04 2025
    Hi,

    as the following example shows, the expansion of acronyms in twocolumn
    mode leads to an ugly clash when the full form exceeds the column width.
    How can this situation be avoided?

    %% =====================================================================
    % !Mode:: "TeX:UK:UTF-8"
    % !TEX program = LuaLaTeX
    % !BIB program = biblatex
    % --------------------------------------------------------------------

    \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
    \documentclass[british,final,twocolumn]{scrbook}

    \usepackage{polyglossia,%foreign language support
    acronym,% handles acronyms
    microtype,%micro-typesetting
    siunitx,%correct typesetting of units
    widetext,%switch between onecolumn and twocolumn without
    pagebreak
    hyperref}%hyperrefs in PDF, must be last package called

    \newcommand{\skalar}[1]{\ensuremath{#1}}

    \title{Example}
    \author{I, Me and Myself}
    \date{\today}

    \begin{document}

    \frontmatter
    \maketitle

    \mainmatter

    \chapter{Microscopy}\index{microscope|(}

    \section{Light microscopy beyond the \textsc{Abbe} limit}

    The following techniques are deterministic:
    \begin{description}
    \item[\acf{STED}\index{STED}]{Since in a confocal microscope the lens projecting the \acs{laser} light onto the specimen shows diffraction,
    spot size is limited to about \qty{200}{nm}, this limits the resolution
    of the confocal microscope. In \acs{STED}-microscopes, two \acs{laser}
    beams are coupled into the microscope, one to excite fluorescence and
    one to stimulate the emission of fluorescent light. Stimulated emission
    returns the electron from the excited S\textsubscript{1} state to a
    higher vibrational level of the ground state S\textsubscript{0}, the
    emitted light is therefore red-shifted compared to that produced by fluorescence (do not mix up stimulated emission, which is reversible,
    with irreversible bleaching). The emission-stimulating beam has low
    intensity in the centre but high intensity in the periphery, the higher
    the power of this beam, the smaller the dark spot in the centre. Thus fluorescence is observed only in a spot much smaller than the
    diffraction spot. The new resolution becomes:
    \begin{equation}
    \Delta d = \frac{\lambda}{2 n \sin{\alpha} \sqrt{1 + I/I_ \mathrm{sat}}}
    \end{equation}
    with \skalar{I} the intensity of the emission stimulating beam and \skalar{I_\mathrm{sat}} the saturation intensity (intensity that reduces fluorescence probability by \qty{63}{\%} in the order of \unit{GW/cm},
    achieved for very short times (\unit{ps})) for the emission stimulating
    beam. This is a constant which depends on the fluorescent dye. Of
    course, the second beam is also diffraction-limited, however, the
    intensity of that beam is much higher than that of the exciting beam; in addition, photons from the second beam can turn off several dye
    molecules. As a result, the excited dye molecules are concentrated in a
    spot much smaller than the diffraction limit, the size of this spot is controlled by the intensity of the second beam. With this technique a resolution down to \qty{2.5}{nm} has been achieved and several \qty{10}
    {nm} are routine. \num{200} images can be taken per second. \textsc
    {Stefan W. Hell} received the \textsc{Nobel}-Prize in Chemistry in \num
    {2014} for this technique, together with \textsc{R.E. Betzig} and
    \textsc{W. E. Moerner}. MINIFLUX (minimal photon flux) is a newer
    development using the same principle, it allows \qty{2}{nm} resolution
    in all three dimensions and with two colours. }
    \item[\acf{SSIM}]{The sample is illuminated with patterned light,
    often stripes. The pattern is moved over the sample and the resulting
    signal measured repeatedly (about 15 times). The interaction of sub- diffraction details in the sample and the pattern of the light produces
    a moir�-effect, whose \acf{FT} can be used to extract the structure of
    the sample with twice the resolution obtainable by standard microscopy.
    With light patterned in three dimensions, 3D images of the object can be obtained. Newer approaches use a sinusoidal light pattern with a peak
    intensity that exceeds the saturation of the dye used. }
    \end{description}

    \backmatter
    \appendix

    \chapter{Appendix}

    \section*{Acronyms used}

    \begin{acronym}
    \acro{FT}{\textsc{Fourier} transform}{, modern way of obtaining
    spectra fast and with high resolution}
    \acro{GSD}{ground state depletion}{, method of super-resolution
    microscopy}
    \acro{laser}{light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation}
    {, method to produce collimated, monochromatic, linear polarised light
    beams},
    \acro{SPEM}{saturated pattern excitation}{, method of super-
    resolution microscopy}
    \acro{SPIM}{single plane imaging microscopy}{, technique to increase contrast in fluorescence microscopy by eliminating out-of-focus light}
    \acro{SSIM}{saturated structured illumination microscopy}{, method of super-resolution microscopy}
    \acro{STED}{Stimulated emission depletion}{, method of super-
    resolution microscopy}
    \end{acronym}

    \end{document}

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stefan Ram@21:1/5 to Dr. Engelbert Buxbauum on Tue Apr 15 12:50:54 2025
    "Dr. Engelbert Buxbauum" <[email protected]> wrote or quoted: >\begin{description}
    \item[\acf{STED}\index{STED}]{Since in a confocal microscope the lens

    It's possible that "\item" throws a wrench in the line break.
    One workaround might be to use something else instead, like:

    \documentclass[twocolumn]{scrbook}
    \usepackage{acronym}
    \begin{document}
    The following techniques are deterministic:
    \minisec{\acf{SSIM}}The sample is illuminated with patterned light, \begin{acronym}
    \acro{SSIM}{saturated structured illumination microscopy}{, method of super-resolution microscopy}
    \end{acronym}
    \end{document}

    .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ulrike Fischer@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 15 18:12:19 2025
    Am Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:25:04 +0200 schrieb Dr. Engelbert Buxbauum:

    Hi,

    as the following example shows, the expansion of acronyms in twocolumn
    mode leads to an ugly clash when the full form exceeds the column width.
    How can this situation be avoided?

    \usepackage{enumitem}

    ...

    \begin{description}[style=unboxed]


    --
    Ulrike Fischer
    http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dr. Engelbert Buxbauum@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 17 09:45:19 2025
    In article <6i7pofyfu8dd$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
    \usepackage{enumitem}

    ...

    \begin{description}[style=unboxed]


    yes, that works, thenks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)