On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 2:12:49 AM UTC-7, Diesel / Gremlin wrote:
These losers get their enjoyment out of eliciting emotional reactions
to their lies, which is the very definition of a troll.
Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
Functionally Illiterate Fraud: <https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
Steve Carroll Petruzzellis: <https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis>
Narcissistic Bigot:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=narcissistic+bigot> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=narcissistic+bigot> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=narcissistic+bigot>
Some time ago I did work on and showed some Objective-C for the front
end (only works on Windows) which is the only thing you can do when trying
to avoid Jeff Relf's immature crap while reading with Google Groups.
The one skill Jeff Relf learned sufficiently is to work to guilt Snit
Glasser Michael into back peddling and if that does not work, troll so
hard the thread is ignored or completely change the argument.
And in retaliation you have nothing but an attempt to start more flooding.
--
Best CMS Solution of 2017 https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis
I don't follow that. Ignorance is ignorance and there are "advocates" who
are okay with it. A few are even doctors. His goal is to see me irritated
by the spraying of the groups outside. And hey, that could happen. Rbowman
has gone the extra mile, essentially hand holding Glasser Michael Snit
on coding practices only for Glasser Michael Snit to blindly attack him
and continue to show that he has no real interest in the subject. In all reality, it's too hard for snit. For others I would think the comment is dubious. Given that it's Glasser Michael Snit I would ignore that doubt
and go straight to 'trolling' because that's most of what he does. Meaning
no evidence is required to deem it dishonest.
A shadow of cognition, projected wisely, at the wrong time. How is wasting synaptic connections tied to a random neuron generator in any way going
to lead to valuable newsgroup conversation?
--
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 https://v5.yc.edu/webtools/search/srchproc.asp
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)