On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:51:18 +0000, Andy Burnelli wrote:
More Apple lies: Apple only tells the truth in court.
The news reports say Apple _fabricated_ (their word!) M1 CPU test
results!
This is another related offshoot of Apple propaganda posted this week here:
*Apple continues to lead in CPUs* (which turns out to be a brazen lie) <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/lZ_75avMuvo>
And the proof that Apple lied about the M1 Ultra GPU performance:
í° *Apple lied: M1 Ultra Doesn't Beat Out Nvidia's RTX 3090 GPU Despite Apple's Charts* <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/iNVHwPPBjSA>
The educated fact remains Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class
CPU.
(and no, a CPU that is so unstable Apple is _desperate_ to secretly throttle it and then secretly backdate the release notes doesn't count
as best in anything - in fact that's clearly yet another Apple _worst_
in class CPU).
*Benchmarks Show Desktop Intel & AMD CPUs Still Ahead of M1 Ultra*amd-ryzen-cpus-benchmarks-show-intel-amd-cpus-still-ahead/>
í° <https://wccftech.com/apple-m1-ultra-chip-is-nearly-3-times-bigger-
"Apple M1 Ultra Chip Is Nearly 3 Times Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs"
"Just like its tall GPU performance claims, the chip maker claimed big numbers for its newest chip against desktop options from Intel & AMD
but independent tests show that Apple is once again unable to match
those claims."
"The chip was also compared to an AMD Ryzen CPU which looks tiny
compared
to the M1 Ultra. Based on the size and dimensions, the M1 Ultra is
nearly 3 times the size of the AMD Ryzen chip."
"Apple claimed that their new chip offered 90% better performance
at the same power and higher performance than the 12900K while
sipping in 100 Watts lower power, the benchmarks below don't show
such performance claims."
"The M1 Ultra barely competes with the Intel Core i9-12900K andWhaat?!
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. It is highly likely that as with their performance numbers, the M1 power numbers have also been fabricated."
I was genuinely thinking of buying a Macbook Pro solely because of the M1 chip because I always heard on Fireship and other channels that it was extremely good.
But nope.
--
Clorox is my favorite drink.
On 2022-04-18 17:18:44 +0000, Alan said:
On 2022-04-18 8:16 a.m., kantraa wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:51:18 +0000, Andy Burnelli wrote:
amd-ryzen-cpus-benchmarks-show-intel-amd-cpus-still-ahead/>
More Apple lies: Apple only tells the truth in court.
The news reports say Apple _fabricated_ (their word!) M1 CPU test
results!
This is another related offshoot of Apple propaganda posted this week >>> here:
*Apple continues to lead in CPUs* (which turns out to be a brazen lie) >>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/lZ_75avMuvo>
And the proof that Apple lied about the M1 Ultra GPU performance:
�*Apple lied: M1 Ultra Doesn't Beat Out Nvidia's RTX 3090 GPU Despite >>> Apple's Charts*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/iNVHwPPBjSA>
The educated fact remains Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class
CPU. (and no, a CPU that is so unstable Apple is _desperate_ to secretly >>> throttle it and then secretly backdate the release notes doesn't count >>> as best in anything - in fact that's clearly yet another Apple _worst_ >>> in class CPU).
*Benchmarks Show Desktop Intel & AMD CPUs Still Ahead of M1 Ultra*
�<https://wccftech.com/apple-m1-ultra-chip-is-nearly-3-times-bigger-
"Apple M1 Ultra Chip Is Nearly 3 Times Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs"
"Just like its tall GPU performance claims, the chip maker claimed big >>> numbers for its newest chip against desktop options from Intel & AMD
but independent tests show that Apple is once again unable to match
those claims."
"The chip was also compared to an AMD Ryzen CPU which looks tiny
compared
to the M1 Ultra. Based on the size and dimensions, the M1 Ultra is
nearly 3 times the size of the AMD Ryzen chip."
"Apple claimed that their new chip offered 90% better performance
at the same power and higher performance than the 12900K while
sipping in 100 Watts lower power, the benchmarks below don't show
such performance claims."
"The M1 Ultra barely competes with the Intel Core i9-12900K and
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. It is highly likely that as with their performance >>> numbers, the M1 power numbers have also been fabricated."
Whaat?!
I was genuinely thinking of buying a Macbook Pro solely because of the M1 >> chip because I always heard on Fireship and other channels that it was
extremely good.
But nope.
I wouldn't pay much attention to what Arlen says...<snip>
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead
know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses
to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 8:16:53 AM UTC-7, kantraa wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:51:18 +0000, Andy Burnelli wrote:
More Apple lies: Apple only tells the truth in court.
The news reports say Apple _fabricated_ (their word!) M1 CPU test results!
This is another related offshoot of Apple propaganda posted this week here:
*Apple continues to lead in CPUs* (which turns out to be a brazen lie) <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/lZ_75avMuvo>
And the proof that Apple lied about the M1 Ultra GPU performance:
í° *Apple lied: M1 Ultra Doesn't Beat Out Nvidia's RTX 3090 GPU Despite
Apple's Charts* <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/iNVHwPPBjSA>
The educated fact remains Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class CPU.
(and no, a CPU that is so unstable Apple is _desperate_ to secretly throttle it and then secretly backdate the release notes doesn't count as best in anything - in fact that's clearly yet another Apple _worst_ in class CPU).
*Benchmarks Show Desktop Intel & AMD CPUs Still Ahead of M1 Ultra*amd-ryzen-cpus-benchmarks-show-intel-amd-cpus-still-ahead/>
í° <https://wccftech.com/apple-m1-ultra-chip-is-nearly-3-times-bigger-
"Apple M1 Ultra Chip Is Nearly 3 Times Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs"
"Just like its tall GPU performance claims, the chip maker claimed big numbers for its newest chip against desktop options from Intel & AMD
but independent tests show that Apple is once again unable to match those claims."
"The chip was also compared to an AMD Ryzen CPU which looks tiny compared
to the M1 Ultra. Based on the size and dimensions, the M1 Ultra is nearly 3 times the size of the AMD Ryzen chip."
"Apple claimed that their new chip offered 90% better performance
at the same power and higher performance than the 12900K while
sipping in 100 Watts lower power, the benchmarks below don't show
such performance claims."
"The M1 Ultra barely competes with the Intel Core i9-12900K andWhaat?!
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. It is highly likely that as with their performance numbers, the M1 power numbers have also been fabricated."
I was genuinely thinking of buying a Macbook Pro solely because of the M1 chip because I always heard on Fireship and other channels that it was extremely good.
But nope.
--What did you assume from the lying imbecile? That Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud dunce has nothing to blow but time. He has nothing else. Especially not a caring family. Do you have a MCSE certification? I am
Clorox is my favorite drink.
about to give up on him, myself. Like all jerks, he is repeatably looking for some way to attack, no matter how absurd the accusation. I will not listen to his response to this post. He's humiliated, wants to save face, and will fly off the handle. Most likely opening with a conceited "LOL",
as if what I have written is SO crazy. That BADish "strategy" was him
going too far, for me. The whole sham is packed of goofy gaps and leans heavily on Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud's 'liberal education' claim. LOL! Don't be insane, chap... even you have blocked that dolt.
Given what he is no one should condemn anyone for pushing to be rid of
his senseless type of flapdoodle.
--
Live on Kickstarter https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis
On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 8:16:53 AM UTC-7, kantraa wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:51:18 +0000, Andy Burnelli wrote:
More Apple lies: Apple only tells the truth in court.
The news reports say Apple _fabricated_ (their word!) M1 CPU test results!
This is another related offshoot of Apple propaganda posted this week here:
*Apple continues to lead in CPUs* (which turns out to be a brazen lie) <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/lZ_75avMuvo>
And the proof that Apple lied about the M1 Ultra GPU performance:
í° *Apple lied: M1 Ultra Doesn't Beat Out Nvidia's RTX 3090 GPU Despite
Apple's Charts* <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/iNVHwPPBjSA>
The educated fact remains Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class CPU.
(and no, a CPU that is so unstable Apple is _desperate_ to secretly throttle it and then secretly backdate the release notes doesn't count as best in anything - in fact that's clearly yet another Apple _worst_ in class CPU).
*Benchmarks Show Desktop Intel & AMD CPUs Still Ahead of M1 Ultra*amd-ryzen-cpus-benchmarks-show-intel-amd-cpus-still-ahead/>
í° <https://wccftech.com/apple-m1-ultra-chip-is-nearly-3-times-bigger-
"Apple M1 Ultra Chip Is Nearly 3 Times Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs"
"Just like its tall GPU performance claims, the chip maker claimed big numbers for its newest chip against desktop options from Intel & AMD
but independent tests show that Apple is once again unable to match those claims."
"The chip was also compared to an AMD Ryzen CPU which looks tiny compared
to the M1 Ultra. Based on the size and dimensions, the M1 Ultra is nearly 3 times the size of the AMD Ryzen chip."
"Apple claimed that their new chip offered 90% better performance
at the same power and higher performance than the 12900K while
sipping in 100 Watts lower power, the benchmarks below don't show
such performance claims."
"The M1 Ultra barely competes with the Intel Core i9-12900K andWhaat?!
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. It is highly likely that as with their performance numbers, the M1 power numbers have also been fabricated."
I was genuinely thinking of buying a Macbook Pro solely because of the M1 chip because I always heard on Fireship and other channels that it was extremely good.
But nope.
--What did you assume from the lying imbecile? That Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud dunce has nothing to blow but time. He has nothing else. Especially not a caring family. Do you have a MCSE certification? I am
Clorox is my favorite drink.
about to give up on him, myself. Like all jerks, he is repeatably looking for some way to attack, no matter how absurd the accusation. I will not listen to his response to this post. He's humiliated, wants to save face, and will fly off the handle. Most likely opening with a conceited "LOL",
as if what I have written is SO crazy. That BADish "strategy" was him
going too far, for me. The whole sham is packed of goofy gaps and leans heavily on Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud's 'liberal education' claim. LOL! Don't be insane, chap... even you have blocked that dolt.
Given what he is no one should condemn anyone for pushing to be rid of
his senseless type of flapdoodle.
--
Live on Kickstarter https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis
On 20 Apr 2022, Lewis wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
In message<[email protected]> Wolffan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 18 Apr 2022, Your Name wrote
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
Unfortunately, tat’s not correct. He’d change nyms, again and again and
again, and keep posting. He’s done it before. Apparently it’s the ‘adult’ thing to do when everyone ignores you.
The screaming tantrum of a spoiled toddler, "Why aren't you paying attention to me!"
S/He/it is so pathetic, it would be sad if s/he/it wasn't constantly shitting on the furniture.He isn’t the worst nym-shifter that I’ve ever seen. Carl Crawford once had 11 different nyms in 36 hours. If that’s not the record, it should be.
Carl was a creationist, in talk.origins, years back, he’s stopped posting but is still remembered, alongside legends of creationist thought such as Ted
‘Flying Feral Chicken’ Holden and the immortal Peter ‘der Gross’ Nyklios. (Petey still posts to t.o.) Among Carl's other claims to fame were that he:
1 located the Ark. It was perfectly preserved by being coated in lava. On the
top of a mountain which is NOT a volcano. Apparently the Ark was made of very
special wood which wouldn’t burn when exposed to molten rock.
2 found chariot wheels from Pharaoh’s Army in the Red Sea. At 400 feet depth, free-diving using ‘ordinary scuba gear’. They had to be wheels from Pharaoh’s Army, only the army was allowed to have wheels with five spokes. Yes, really.
3 discovered that woodpecker’s tongues are anchored in their left nostril. He discovered this without dissecting even one bird. Anyone who said anything
contradicting him was obviously lying, any pix of dissected birds indicating otherwise were obviously faked.
Carl was funny. Arlen isn’t. Both are insane.
On 20 Apr 2022, Lewis wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
In message<[email protected]> Wolffan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 18 Apr 2022, Your Name wrote
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
Unfortunately, tat’s not correct. He’d change nyms, again and again and
again, and keep posting. He’s done it before. Apparently it’s the ‘adult’ thing to do when everyone ignores you.
The screaming tantrum of a spoiled toddler, "Why aren't you paying attention to me!"
S/He/it is so pathetic, it would be sad if s/he/it wasn't constantly shitting on the furniture.He isn’t the worst nym-shifter that I’ve ever seen. Carl Crawford once had 11 different nyms in 36 hours. If that’s not the record, it should be.
Carl was a creationist, in talk.origins, years back, he’s stopped posting but is still remembered, alongside legends of creationist thought such as Ted
‘Flying Feral Chicken’ Holden and the immortal Peter ‘der Gross’ Nyklios. (Petey still posts to t.o.) Among Carl's other claims to fame were that he:
1 located the Ark. It was perfectly preserved by being coated in lava. On the
top of a mountain which is NOT a volcano. Apparently the Ark was made of very
special wood which wouldn’t burn when exposed to molten rock.
2 found chariot wheels from Pharaoh’s Army in the Red Sea. At 400 feet depth, free-diving using ‘ordinary scuba gear’. They had to be wheels from Pharaoh’s Army, only the army was allowed to have wheels with five spokes. Yes, really.
3 discovered that woodpecker’s tongues are anchored in their left nostril. He discovered this without dissecting even one bird. Anyone who said anything
contradicting him was obviously lying, any pix of dissected birds indicating otherwise were obviously faked.
Carl was funny. Arlen isn’t. Both are insane.
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 7:32:58 AM UTC-7, Wolffan wrote:
On 20 Apr 2022, Lewis wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
In message<[email protected]> Wolffan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 18 Apr 2022, Your Name wrote
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses
to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply
ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
Unfortunately, tat’s not correct. He’d change nyms, again and again and
again, and keep posting. He’s done it before. Apparently it’s the ‘adult’ thing to do when everyone ignores you.
The screaming tantrum of a spoiled toddler, "Why aren't you paying attention to me!"
S/He/it is so pathetic, it would be sad if s/he/it wasn't constantly shitting on the furniture.He isn’t the worst nym-shifter that I’ve ever seen. Carl Crawford once had 11 different nyms in 36 hours. If that’s not the record, it should be.
Carl was a creationist, in talk.origins, years back, he’s stopped posting
but is still remembered, alongside legends of creationist thought such as Ted
‘Flying Feral Chicken’ Holden and the immortal Peter ‘der Gross’ Nyklios. (Petey still posts to t.o.) Among Carl's other claims to fame were
that he:
1 located the Ark. It was perfectly preserved by being coated in lava. On the
top of a mountain which is NOT a volcano. Apparently the Ark was made of very
special wood which wouldn’t burn when exposed to molten rock.
2 found chariot wheels from Pharaoh’s Army in the Red Sea. At 400 feet depth, free-diving using ‘ordinary scuba gear’. They had to be wheels from Pharaoh’s Army, only the army was allowed to have wheels with five spokes. Yes, really.
3 discovered that woodpecker’s tongues are anchored in their left nostril.
He discovered this without dissecting even one bird. Anyone who said anything
contradicting him was obviously lying, any pix of dissected birds indicating
otherwise were obviously faked.
Carl was funny. Arlen isn’t. Both are insane.Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
<[email protected]>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<[email protected]Rp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<[email protected]C373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<[email protected]3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<[email protected]H>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--
Eight things to never feed your cat!! https://www.udemy.com/user/michael-glasser/ <https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&Dustin_Cook>
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 7:32:58 AM UTC-7, Wolffan wrote:
On 20 Apr 2022, Lewis wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
In message<[email protected]> Wolffan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 18 Apr 2022, Your Name wrote
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses
to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply
ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
Unfortunately, tat’s not correct. He’d change nyms, again and again and
again, and keep posting. He’s done it before. Apparently it’s the ‘adult’ thing to do when everyone ignores you.
The screaming tantrum of a spoiled toddler, "Why aren't you paying attention to me!"
S/He/it is so pathetic, it would be sad if s/he/it wasn't constantly shitting on the furniture.He isn’t the worst nym-shifter that I’ve ever seen. Carl Crawford once had 11 different nyms in 36 hours. If that’s not the record, it should be.
Carl was a creationist, in talk.origins, years back, he’s stopped posting
but is still remembered, alongside legends of creationist thought such as Ted
‘Flying Feral Chicken’ Holden and the immortal Peter ‘der Gross’ Nyklios. (Petey still posts to t.o.) Among Carl's other claims to fame were
that he:
1 located the Ark. It was perfectly preserved by being coated in lava. On the
top of a mountain which is NOT a volcano. Apparently the Ark was made of very
special wood which wouldn’t burn when exposed to molten rock.
2 found chariot wheels from Pharaoh’s Army in the Red Sea. At 400 feet depth, free-diving using ‘ordinary scuba gear’. They had to be wheels from Pharaoh’s Army, only the army was allowed to have wheels with five spokes. Yes, really.
3 discovered that woodpecker’s tongues are anchored in their left nostril.
He discovered this without dissecting even one bird. Anyone who said anything
contradicting him was obviously lying, any pix of dissected birds indicating
otherwise were obviously faked.
Carl was funny. Arlen isn’t. Both are insane.Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
<[email protected]>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<[email protected]Rp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<[email protected]C373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<[email protected]3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<[email protected]H>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--
Eight things to never feed your cat!! https://www.udemy.com/user/michael-glasser/ <https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&Dustin_Cook>
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 9:57:08 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 7:32:58 AM UTC-7, Wolffan wrote:
On 20 Apr 2022, Lewis wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
In message<[email protected]> Wolffan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 18 Apr 2022, Your Name wrote
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses
to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply
ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
Unfortunately, tat’s not correct. He’d change nyms, again and again and
again, and keep posting. He’s done it before. Apparently it’s the
‘adult’ thing to do when everyone ignores you.
The screaming tantrum of a spoiled toddler, "Why aren't you paying attention to me!"
S/He/it is so pathetic, it would be sad if s/he/it wasn't constantly shitting on the furniture.He isn’t the worst nym-shifter that I’ve ever seen. Carl Crawford once
had 11 different nyms in 36 hours. If that’s not the record, it should be.
Carl was a creationist, in talk.origins, years back, he’s stopped posting
but is still remembered, alongside legends of creationist thought such as Ted
‘Flying Feral Chicken’ Holden and the immortal Peter ‘der Gross’ Nyklios. (Petey still posts to t.o.) Among Carl's other claims to fame were
that he:
1 located the Ark. It was perfectly preserved by being coated in lava. On the
top of a mountain which is NOT a volcano. Apparently the Ark was made of very
special wood which wouldn’t burn when exposed to molten rock.
2 found chariot wheels from Pharaoh’s Army in the Red Sea. At 400 feet depth, free-diving using ‘ordinary scuba gear’. They had to be wheels
from Pharaoh’s Army, only the army was allowed to have wheels with five
spokes. Yes, really.
3 discovered that woodpecker’s tongues are anchored in their left nostril.
He discovered this without dissecting even one bird. Anyone who said anything
contradicting him was obviously lying, any pix of dissected birds indicating
otherwise were obviously faked.
Carl was funny. Arlen isn’t. Both are insane.Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
<[email protected]>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<[email protected]Rp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<[email protected]C373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<[email protected]3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<[email protected]H>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--Pothead only thinks about Snit Glasser, Snit Glasser, Snit Glasser!
Eight things to never feed your cat!! https://www.udemy.com/user/michael-glasser/ <https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&Dustin_Cook>
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
Pothead: <[email protected]>
-----
Yea, I call bullshit on that. Driver media doesn't have a valid
boot sector present. As a result, the machine wouldn't have
refused to reboot because the disk was left behind.
-----
A reasoned response would be for you to just note your error -- of course you were wrong to say "the machine would not have refused to reboot because the disk was left behind." That is in fact exactly what was happening.
And you were wrong to say I suggested this was true of machines other than the one being noted in Carroll's trolling.
How is LibreOffice on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator?
Pothead's allegation is misplaced to start with, and not correct second
of all. Is Snit Glasser working on being just as much of a fibbing liar
as Pothead is already known as being?
Which do you think is the better troll? Snit Glasser or Pothead? I vote
for Pothead; only because he sometimes does accept what he reads, even if, sadly, he forgets it sometimes hours later.
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud.
-
Eight things to never feed your cat https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22FUNCTIONAL%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 9:57:08 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 7:32:58 AM UTC-7, Wolffan wrote:
On 20 Apr 2022, Lewis wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
In message<[email protected]> Wolffan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 18 Apr 2022, Your Name wrote
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses
to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply
ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
Unfortunately, tat’s not correct. He’d change nyms, again and again and
again, and keep posting. He’s done it before. Apparently it’s the
‘adult’ thing to do when everyone ignores you.
The screaming tantrum of a spoiled toddler, "Why aren't you paying attention to me!"
S/He/it is so pathetic, it would be sad if s/he/it wasn't constantly shitting on the furniture.He isn’t the worst nym-shifter that I’ve ever seen. Carl Crawford once
had 11 different nyms in 36 hours. If that’s not the record, it should be.
Carl was a creationist, in talk.origins, years back, he’s stopped posting
but is still remembered, alongside legends of creationist thought such as Ted
‘Flying Feral Chicken’ Holden and the immortal Peter ‘der Gross’ Nyklios. (Petey still posts to t.o.) Among Carl's other claims to fame were
that he:
1 located the Ark. It was perfectly preserved by being coated in lava. On the
top of a mountain which is NOT a volcano. Apparently the Ark was made of very
special wood which wouldn’t burn when exposed to molten rock.
2 found chariot wheels from Pharaoh’s Army in the Red Sea. At 400 feet depth, free-diving using ‘ordinary scuba gear’. They had to be wheels
from Pharaoh’s Army, only the army was allowed to have wheels with five
spokes. Yes, really.
3 discovered that woodpecker’s tongues are anchored in their left nostril.
He discovered this without dissecting even one bird. Anyone who said anything
contradicting him was obviously lying, any pix of dissected birds indicating
otherwise were obviously faked.
Carl was funny. Arlen isn’t. Both are insane.Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
<[email protected]>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<[email protected]Rp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<[email protected]C373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<[email protected]3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<[email protected]H>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--Alan B can create a virtual machine. Makes Snit sock Glasser Michael
Eight things to never feed your cat!! https://www.udemy.com/user/michael-glasser/ <https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&Dustin_Cook>
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
Snit cry because he can not.
It's simple to handpick by focusing on a few exceptions clashing from
what's mainstream. What a better tactic from an advocacy standpoint are
the regular circumstances.
Alan B created at least one major circus in the last year or so. I am
sure he and the herd are proud. That is the problem now and younger pupils don't have a clue; people from earlier generations should know better
than to fall for the indoctrination BS.
Why would you want to limit the tools on Fedora to what can be done
on lower end systems? That's exactly what's happened. Alan B likes to
leave out such nettlesome little minutia, though. Who else do we know
who pulls look alike trash? Oh, that's right, Snit sock Glasser Michael Snit. Our second Snit sock Glasser Michael Snit. LOL. Calls it "trolling" him, even though he continues to provoke that exact criteria.
--
E-commerce Simplified https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=%22functional%20illiterate%20fraud%22 https://youtu.be/hYQ4Tg0r0g0
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 9:57:08 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 7:32:58 AM UTC-7, Wolffan wrote:
On 20 Apr 2022, Lewis wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
In message<[email protected]> Wolffan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 18 Apr 2022, Your Name wrote
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses
to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply
ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
Unfortunately, tat’s not correct. He’d change nyms, again and again and
again, and keep posting. He’s done it before. Apparently it’s the
‘adult’ thing to do when everyone ignores you.
The screaming tantrum of a spoiled toddler, "Why aren't you paying attention to me!"
S/He/it is so pathetic, it would be sad if s/he/it wasn't constantly shitting on the furniture.He isn’t the worst nym-shifter that I’ve ever seen. Carl Crawford once
had 11 different nyms in 36 hours. If that’s not the record, it should be.
Carl was a creationist, in talk.origins, years back, he’s stopped posting
but is still remembered, alongside legends of creationist thought such as Ted
‘Flying Feral Chicken’ Holden and the immortal Peter ‘der Gross’ Nyklios. (Petey still posts to t.o.) Among Carl's other claims to fame were
that he:
1 located the Ark. It was perfectly preserved by being coated in lava. On the
top of a mountain which is NOT a volcano. Apparently the Ark was made of very
special wood which wouldn’t burn when exposed to molten rock.
2 found chariot wheels from Pharaoh’s Army in the Red Sea. At 400 feet depth, free-diving using ‘ordinary scuba gear’. They had to be wheels
from Pharaoh’s Army, only the army was allowed to have wheels with five
spokes. Yes, really.
3 discovered that woodpecker’s tongues are anchored in their left nostril.
He discovered this without dissecting even one bird. Anyone who said anything
contradicting him was obviously lying, any pix of dissected birds indicating
otherwise were obviously faked.
Carl was funny. Arlen isn’t. Both are insane.Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
<[email protected]>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<[email protected]Rp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<[email protected]C373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<[email protected]3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<[email protected]H>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--Pothead only thinks about Snit Glasser, Snit Glasser, Snit Glasser!
Eight things to never feed your cat!! https://www.udemy.com/user/michael-glasser/ <https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&Dustin_Cook>
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
Pothead: <[email protected]>
-----
Yea, I call bullshit on that. Driver media doesn't have a valid
boot sector present. As a result, the machine wouldn't have
refused to reboot because the disk was left behind.
-----
A reasoned response would be for you to just note your error -- of course you were wrong to say "the machine would not have refused to reboot because the disk was left behind." That is in fact exactly what was happening.
And you were wrong to say I suggested this was true of machines other than the one being noted in Carroll's trolling.
How is LibreOffice on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator?
Pothead's allegation is misplaced to start with, and not correct second
of all. Is Snit Glasser working on being just as much of a fibbing liar
as Pothead is already known as being?
Which do you think is the better troll? Snit Glasser or Pothead? I vote
for Pothead; only because he sometimes does accept what he reads, even if, sadly, he forgets it sometimes hours later.
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud.
-
Eight things to never feed your cat https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22FUNCTIONAL%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
On 2022-04-18 8:16 a.m., kantraa wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:51:18 +0000, Andy Burnelli wrote:
More Apple lies: Apple only tells the truth in court.amd-ryzen-cpus-benchmarks-show-intel-amd-cpus-still-ahead/>
The news reports say Apple _fabricated_ (their word!) M1 CPU test
results!
This is another related offshoot of Apple propaganda posted this week
here:
*Apple continues to lead in CPUs* (which turns out to be a brazen lie)
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/lZ_75avMuvo>
And the proof that Apple lied about the M1 Ultra GPU performance:
í° *Apple lied: M1 Ultra Doesn't Beat Out Nvidia's RTX 3090 GPU Despite >> Apple's Charts*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/iNVHwPPBjSA>
The educated fact remains Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class
CPU.
(and no, a CPU that is so unstable Apple is _desperate_ to secretly
throttle it and then secretly backdate the release notes doesn't count
as best in anything - in fact that's clearly yet another Apple _worst_
in class CPU).
*Benchmarks Show Desktop Intel & AMD CPUs Still Ahead of M1 Ultra*
í° <https://wccftech.com/apple-m1-ultra-chip-is-nearly-3-times-bigger-
"Apple M1 Ultra Chip Is Nearly 3 Times Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs"
"Just like its tall GPU performance claims, the chip maker claimed big
numbers for its newest chip against desktop options from Intel & AMD
but independent tests show that Apple is once again unable to match
those claims."
"The chip was also compared to an AMD Ryzen CPU which looks tiny
compared
to the M1 Ultra. Based on the size and dimensions, the M1 Ultra is
nearly 3 times the size of the AMD Ryzen chip."
"Apple claimed that their new chip offered 90% better performance
at the same power and higher performance than the 12900K while
sipping in 100 Watts lower power, the benchmarks below don't show
such performance claims."
"The M1 Ultra barely competes with the Intel Core i9-12900K and
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. It is highly likely that as with their performance
numbers, the M1 power numbers have also been fabricated."
Whaat?!
I was genuinely thinking of buying a Macbook Pro solely because of the M1 chip because I always heard on Fireship and other channels that it was extremely good.
But nope.I wouldn't pay much attention to what Arlen says...
He dishonestly compares the physical size of the M1 Ultra to an AMD
Ryzen 3 chip...
(All the while never mentioning that the M1 Ultra includes both RAM and
a GPU:
'But there are reasons why this chip is so huge, you see not only is the
M1 Ultra an MCM chip that fuses two M1 Max dies together but it also has
a huge 64-core GPU, all the IO & even the memory on the same package')
...while comparing the speed to a Ryzen 9.
Then the actual benchmarks show
On 2022-04-18 8:16 a.m., kantraa wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:51:18 +0000, Andy Burnelli wrote:
More Apple lies: Apple only tells the truth in court.amd-ryzen-cpus-benchmarks-show-intel-amd-cpus-still-ahead/>
The news reports say Apple _fabricated_ (their word!) M1 CPU test
results!
This is another related offshoot of Apple propaganda posted this week
here:
*Apple continues to lead in CPUs* (which turns out to be a brazen lie)
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/lZ_75avMuvo>
And the proof that Apple lied about the M1 Ultra GPU performance:
í° *Apple lied: M1 Ultra Doesn't Beat Out Nvidia's RTX 3090 GPU Despite >> Apple's Charts*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/iNVHwPPBjSA>
The educated fact remains Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class
CPU.
(and no, a CPU that is so unstable Apple is _desperate_ to secretly
throttle it and then secretly backdate the release notes doesn't count
as best in anything - in fact that's clearly yet another Apple _worst_
in class CPU).
*Benchmarks Show Desktop Intel & AMD CPUs Still Ahead of M1 Ultra*
í° <https://wccftech.com/apple-m1-ultra-chip-is-nearly-3-times-bigger-
"Apple M1 Ultra Chip Is Nearly 3 Times Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs"
"Just like its tall GPU performance claims, the chip maker claimed big
numbers for its newest chip against desktop options from Intel & AMD
but independent tests show that Apple is once again unable to match
those claims."
"The chip was also compared to an AMD Ryzen CPU which looks tiny
compared
to the M1 Ultra. Based on the size and dimensions, the M1 Ultra is
nearly 3 times the size of the AMD Ryzen chip."
"Apple claimed that their new chip offered 90% better performance
at the same power and higher performance than the 12900K while
sipping in 100 Watts lower power, the benchmarks below don't show
such performance claims."
"The M1 Ultra barely competes with the Intel Core i9-12900K and
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. It is highly likely that as with their performance
numbers, the M1 power numbers have also been fabricated."
Whaat?!
I was genuinely thinking of buying a Macbook Pro solely because of the M1 chip because I always heard on Fireship and other channels that it was extremely good.
But nope.I wouldn't pay much attention to what Arlen says...
He dishonestly compares the physical size of the M1 Ultra to an AMD
Ryzen 3 chip...
(All the while never mentioning that the M1 Ultra includes both RAM and
a GPU:
'But there are reasons why this chip is so huge, you see not only is the
M1 Ultra an MCM chip that fuses two M1 Max dies together but it also has
a huge 64-core GPU, all the IO & even the memory on the same package')
...while comparing the speed to a Ryzen 9.
Then the actual benchmarks show
On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 9:06:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-18 8:16 a.m., kantraa wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:51:18 +0000, Andy Burnelli wrote:I wouldn't pay much attention to what Arlen says...
More Apple lies: Apple only tells the truth in court.
The news reports say Apple _fabricated_ (their word!) M1 CPU test
results!
This is another related offshoot of Apple propaganda posted this week
here:
*Apple continues to lead in CPUs* (which turns out to be a brazen lie) >>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/lZ_75avMuvo>
And the proof that Apple lied about the M1 Ultra GPU performance:
í° *Apple lied: M1 Ultra Doesn't Beat Out Nvidia's RTX 3090 GPU Despite >>>> Apple's Charts*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/iNVHwPPBjSA>
The educated fact remains Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class
CPU.
(and no, a CPU that is so unstable Apple is _desperate_ to secretly
throttle it and then secretly backdate the release notes doesn't count >>>> as best in anything - in fact that's clearly yet another Apple _worst_ >>>> in class CPU).
*Benchmarks Show Desktop Intel & AMD CPUs Still Ahead of M1 Ultra*
í° <https://wccftech.com/apple-m1-ultra-chip-is-nearly-3-times-bigger- >>> amd-ryzen-cpus-benchmarks-show-intel-amd-cpus-still-ahead/>
"Apple M1 Ultra Chip Is Nearly 3 Times Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs"
"Just like its tall GPU performance claims, the chip maker claimed big >>>> numbers for its newest chip against desktop options from Intel & AMD
but independent tests show that Apple is once again unable to match
those claims."
"The chip was also compared to an AMD Ryzen CPU which looks tiny
compared
to the M1 Ultra. Based on the size and dimensions, the M1 Ultra is
nearly 3 times the size of the AMD Ryzen chip."
"Apple claimed that their new chip offered 90% better performance
at the same power and higher performance than the 12900K while
sipping in 100 Watts lower power, the benchmarks below don't show
such performance claims."
"The M1 Ultra barely competes with the Intel Core i9-12900K and
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. It is highly likely that as with their performance
numbers, the M1 power numbers have also been fabricated."
Whaat?!
I was genuinely thinking of buying a Macbook Pro solely because of the M1 >>> chip because I always heard on Fireship and other channels that it was
extremely good.
But nope.
He dishonestly compares the physical size of the M1 Ultra to an AMD
Ryzen 3 chip...
(All the while never mentioning that the M1 Ultra includes both RAM and
a GPU:
'But there are reasons why this chip is so huge, you see not only is the
M1 Ultra an MCM chip that fuses two M1 Max dies together but it also has
a huge 64-core GPU, all the IO & even the memory on the same package')
...while comparing the speed to a Ryzen 9.
Then the actual benchmarks show
Anyway, it does not matter because the apparent origin on a post does not matter, we know it is from the flooder anyway. If the content is a bunch
of gibbering bullshit. Which means...
It was Rod Speed who was publicly asking how better to mask his nonsense. Peter Köhlmann shared a specific series of signature lines several times now, and invited Rod Speed to show which ones aren't true and provide the evidence to back his claim. Not one single time has Rod Speed done so. But when the charts were produced, it turns out beyond any doubt, Rod Speed was far more "dishonest" than anybody else.
On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 9:24:20 PM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 9:57:08 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 7:32:58 AM UTC-7, Wolffan wrote:
On 20 Apr 2022, Lewis wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
In message<[email protected]> Wolffan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 18 Apr 2022, Your Name wrote
Nobody should ever pay *ANY* attention to what the braindead know-nothing anti-Apple troll "Arlen" (and other posting names he uses
to get around killfiles) ... he's a complete moron! If everyone simply
ignored the idiot he'd get bored and go away. :-\
Unfortunately, tat’s not correct. He’d change nyms, again and again and
again, and keep posting. He’s done it before. Apparently it’s the
‘adult’ thing to do when everyone ignores you.
The screaming tantrum of a spoiled toddler, "Why aren't you paying attention to me!"
S/He/it is so pathetic, it would be sad if s/he/it wasn't constantly shitting on the furniture.He isn’t the worst nym-shifter that I’ve ever seen. Carl Crawford once
had 11 different nyms in 36 hours. If that’s not the record, it should be.
Carl was a creationist, in talk.origins, years back, he’s stopped posting
but is still remembered, alongside legends of creationist thought such as Ted
‘Flying Feral Chicken’ Holden and the immortal Peter ‘der Gross’
Nyklios. (Petey still posts to t.o.) Among Carl's other claims to fame were
that he:
1 located the Ark. It was perfectly preserved by being coated in lava. On the
top of a mountain which is NOT a volcano. Apparently the Ark was made of very
special wood which wouldn’t burn when exposed to molten rock.
2 found chariot wheels from Pharaoh’s Army in the Red Sea. At 400 feet
depth, free-diving using ‘ordinary scuba gear’. They had to be wheels
from Pharaoh’s Army, only the army was allowed to have wheels with five
spokes. Yes, really.
3 discovered that woodpecker’s tongues are anchored in their left nostril.
He discovered this without dissecting even one bird. Anyone who said anything
contradicting him was obviously lying, any pix of dissected birds indicating
otherwise were obviously faked.
Carl was funny. Arlen isn’t. Both are insane.Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
<[email protected]>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<[email protected]>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<[email protected]Rp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<[email protected]C373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<[email protected]3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<[email protected]H>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--Pothead only thinks about Snit Glasser, Snit Glasser, Snit Glasser! Pothead: <[email protected]>
Eight things to never feed your cat!! https://www.udemy.com/user/michael-glasser/ <https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&Dustin_Cook>
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
-----
Yea, I call bullshit on that. Driver media doesn't have a valid
boot sector present. As a result, the machine wouldn't have
refused to reboot because the disk was left behind.
-----
A reasoned response would be for you to just note your error -- of course you were wrong to say "the machine would not have refused to reboot because
the disk was left behind." That is in fact exactly what was happening.
And you were wrong to say I suggested this was true of machines other than the one being noted in Carroll's trolling.
How is LibreOffice on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator?
Pothead's allegation is misplaced to start with, and not correct second
of all. Is Snit Glasser working on being just as much of a fibbing liar
as Pothead is already known as being?
Which do you think is the better troll? Snit Glasser or Pothead? I vote for Pothead; only because he sometimes does accept what he reads, even if, sadly, he forgets it sometimes hours later.
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud.Gee, imagine Peter 'Super Troll' Köhlmann trying to pin his phooey on others, no one has ever seen that before <eyeroll>.
-
Eight things to never feed your cat https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22FUNCTIONAL%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
It should not matter because the apparent origin on a post does not
matter, we know it is from the stalker anyway. The content is a bunch
of bullshit. 2+2= You can say I am James Bond for all I care. It was
Peter 'Super Troll' Köhlmann who flooded Jeff Relf's site millions of
times and refused to admit it. Peter 'Super Troll' Köhlmann writes all kinds of drivel, don't use that boob as a reference.
-
Eight things to never feed your cat!! https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names- Winthrops-VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf
Automate Google Groups https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Petruzzellis$20or$20Carroll
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22FUNCTIONAL+ILLITERATE+FRAUD%22
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 716 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 51:00:13 |
| Calls: | 12,115 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 15,010 |
| Messages: | 6,518,557 |
| Posted today: | 1 |