1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.MAC.SYSTEM

  • Re: How did Apple do it?

    From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to Lewis on Tue Mar 29 05:08:30 2022
    On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 5:15:58 PM UTC-7, Lewis wrote:
    In message <t1t1de$umo$[email protected]> sms <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 3/28/2022 10:13 AM, Alan wrote:
    How in the world did Apple dupe ZDNet?

    <https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-mac-studio-review/?ftag=CAD-03-10abf6j>


    'But, of course, it's the M1 processors inside the Mac Studio that
    really set it apart from the more compact Mac Mini. As mentioned, the
    Mac Studio is available with either an M1 Max or M1 Ultra, the latter
    providing a 20-core CPU, 48 or 64 GPU cores, and a 32-core Neural Engine. >>
    The top-end M1 Ultra is essentially two M1 Max chips bolted together
    using Apple's on-die UltraFusion architecture.'

    Or did Apple bribe them to stay quiet?

    Because nowhere does the article mention TSMC.

    No bribes, ZDNet's authors just aren't technology experts or
    semiconductor geeks that understand about chip technology. You can't
    expect many journalists to know the details about this kind of stuff.
    They certainly know the details better than you do.

    Only a completely brain-dead troll would try to claim that Apple's chips
    are not Apple.

    --
    Vitamins are a waste of money, you can eat like $200 worth and still feel hungry.


    Contrary to William Poaster's claim that he has "no interest in making trouble" (a lie as demonstrated by the fact that he slammed Snit's site) he was quoted asking IT departments how they would install a virus remotely. Having to
    put up with the use of 3d printers is too much for William Poaster to deal with. William Poaster is the only person I know who had a 'site' intended
    to embarrass me that quickly turned into a dizzying array of lorem ipsum
    text with rectangles where photos/scripts used to be, and if you clicked
    it, you would be reading about a DMCA that was deleted for slander. You do realize that the massive floods ending up in multiple groups started out
    when William Poaster was quoted lying. You are quick as a tuna on ice.


    -
    Best CMS Solution of 2017! <http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090505/https://www.usphonebook.com/dustin- cook/UQjN2UTM5IzM1ADM0czNwMjMyYzR?Gremlin=&Diesel=>
    Dustin Cook the Fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stephen Carroll - frelwizzen@21:1/5 to nospam on Tue Mar 29 21:18:27 2022
    On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 7:44:19 PM UTC-7, nospam wrote:
    In article <t20cet$6dn$[email protected]>, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:

    If you're going to start calling it "TSMC Silicon" because they
    manufacture it, there's a lot more you're going to have to rename

    including intel, who plans to use tsmc to fab some of intel's own chips.

    And then there are Qualcomm, Nvidia...
    yep, but intel is surprising given that they have their own fabs.

    unfortunately, intel is well behind the curve, thus the need to sub it
    out to tsmc.
    ...and lots of other who have no fabs either.

    According to our Arlen, every Qualcomm chip--every Nvidia chip...

    ...is actually "TSMC Silicon"?
    he has absolutely no idea about pretty much everything.


    What's the group coming to when a Mr. Brooks flood post can't get any responses... Richard Stallman is a false advocate's only reason for living.
    Mr. Brooks must know that others can go get whatever software he has found, right, medhead? And, of course, anyone can go get a real newsreader with
    proper filtering, which renders _his_ usenet group attack meaningless,
    just like Mr. Brooks.

    How many more chances does Mr. Brooks's very dumb ass (a worm knows more
    than Mr. Brooks and is useful) need to prove their Mike Easter sock accusation with evidence?


    -
    My Snoring Solution!! https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfkup/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)