• Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less

    From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 4 08:33:36 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669
    Enter "Samsung" in the "Brand or trademark" field.
    Battery endurance per cycle
    SM-S937B/DS 40h 05min
    SM-X210R 98h 32min
    SM-X216R 55h 14min
    SM-G766B 38h 15min
    SM-X350 142h 50min
    SM-X356B 142h 50min
    SM-X526E 96h 32min
    SM-X620 99h 06min
    SM-X520 96h 32min
    SM-X626B 99h 06min
    SM-X526B 96h 32min
    SM-A266B/DS 37h 05min
    SM-A566B/DS 44h 34min
    SM-A366B/DS 41h 28min
    SM-S936B/DS 43h 38min
    SM-S938B/DS 44h 54min
    SM-A165F/DSB 45h 10min
    SM-A166B/DS 43h 30min
    SM-X820 73h 44min
    SM-X920 85h 18min
    SM-X826B 73h 44min
    SM-X926B 85h 18min
    SM-S721B/DS 42h 00min
    SM-G556B 41h 22min
    SM-S921B/DS 41h 26min
    SM-X300 62h 31min
    SM-X306B 62h 31min

    Total hours: 2,056.96
    Average = Total / 28 models = 2,056.96 ÷ 28 ˜ 73.46 hours

    Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669
    Enter "Apple" in the "Brand or trademark" field.
    A3267 62h 00min
    A3268 72h 00min
    A3355 67h 00min
    A3269 72h 00min
    A3354 67h 00min
    A3266 62h 00min
    A3409 41h 00min
    A2993 67h 00min
    A2995 67h 00min
    A3293 37h 00min
    A3290 48h 00min
    A3296 48h 00min
    A3287 37h 00min
    A2836 73h 00min
    A2837 73h 00min
    A2925 77h 00min
    A2926 77h 00min
    A3090 34h 00min
    A3094 45h 00min

    Total battery hours = 1,199 hours
    Average per model = 1,199 ÷ 19 ˜ 63.1 hours

    Overall, Samsung models, based on EPREL data, have a 10 hour advantage.
    That's a whopping ~16% higher average battery endurance per cycle.

    Where is the fabled endurance that Apple marketing so highly touted?
    Could it possibly be that Apple marketing cherry picked the results?
    --
    But wait...there's more... I'm waiting for the inevitable excuses... :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 4 13:26:30 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 4, 2025 at 4:33:36 AM EDT, "Marion" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669
    Enter "Samsung" in the "Brand or trademark" field.
    Battery endurance per cycle
    SM-S937B/DS 40h 05min
    SM-X210R 98h 32min
    SM-X216R 55h 14min
    SM-G766B 38h 15min
    SM-X350 142h 50min
    SM-X356B 142h 50min
    SM-X526E 96h 32min
    SM-X620 99h 06min
    SM-X520 96h 32min
    SM-X626B 99h 06min
    SM-X526B 96h 32min
    SM-A266B/DS 37h 05min
    SM-A566B/DS 44h 34min
    SM-A366B/DS 41h 28min
    SM-S936B/DS 43h 38min
    SM-S938B/DS 44h 54min
    SM-A165F/DSB 45h 10min
    SM-A166B/DS 43h 30min
    SM-X820 73h 44min
    SM-X920 85h 18min
    SM-X826B 73h 44min
    SM-X926B 85h 18min
    SM-S721B/DS 42h 00min
    SM-G556B 41h 22min
    SM-S921B/DS 41h 26min
    SM-X300 62h 31min
    SM-X306B 62h 31min

    Total hours: 2,056.96
    Average = Total / 28 models = 2,056.96 ÷ 28 ˜ 73.46 hours

    Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669
    Enter "Apple" in the "Brand or trademark" field.
    A3267 62h 00min
    A3268 72h 00min
    A3355 67h 00min
    A3269 72h 00min
    A3354 67h 00min
    A3266 62h 00min
    A3409 41h 00min
    A2993 67h 00min
    A2995 67h 00min
    A3293 37h 00min
    A3290 48h 00min
    A3296 48h 00min
    A3287 37h 00min
    A2836 73h 00min
    A2837 73h 00min
    A2925 77h 00min
    A2926 77h 00min
    A3090 34h 00min
    A3094 45h 00min

    Total battery hours = 1,199 hours
    Average per model = 1,199 ÷ 19 ˜ 63.1 hours

    Overall, Samsung models, based on EPREL data, have a 10 hour advantage. That's a whopping ~16% higher average battery endurance per cycle.

    Where is the fabled endurance that Apple marketing so highly touted?
    Could it possibly be that Apple marketing cherry picked the results?

    Oh look. Arlen is cherry picking the results. AGAIN. Those numbers include tablets. Filter on phones only, and you get a much different story.

    Samsung has 13 phones, 539.91 total hours = 41:32 average. Apple has 7
    phones, 290 total hours = 41:26 average. Basically identical. 6 minutes difference.

    BUT, Apple is doing this on SMALLER BATTERIES than Samsung. Which means
    iPhones are lighter, more portable and MORE EFFICIENT.

    Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk? Are they running Intel space heaters and using fans to keep cool?

    If the iPhone 16 Pro Max had a 6000 mAh battery, it would run for more than 22 hours. 3 to 4 hours longer than any Android phone with a 6000 mAh battery.
    For these facts, see the thread "iPhone 17 Pro Max Battery Capacity Leaked". Which Arlen started and then abandoned because the facts got in the way of his absurd-claim-of-the-day.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Fri Jul 4 08:30:16 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-04 06:26, Tyrone wrote:
    On Jul 4, 2025 at 4:33:36 AM EDT, "Marion" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669 >> Enter "Samsung" in the "Brand or trademark" field.
    Battery endurance per cycle
    SM-S937B/DS 40h 05min
    SM-X210R 98h 32min
    SM-X216R 55h 14min
    SM-G766B 38h 15min
    SM-X350 142h 50min
    SM-X356B 142h 50min
    SM-X526E 96h 32min
    SM-X620 99h 06min
    SM-X520 96h 32min
    SM-X626B 99h 06min
    SM-X526B 96h 32min
    SM-A266B/DS 37h 05min
    SM-A566B/DS 44h 34min
    SM-A366B/DS 41h 28min
    SM-S936B/DS 43h 38min
    SM-S938B/DS 44h 54min
    SM-A165F/DSB 45h 10min
    SM-A166B/DS 43h 30min
    SM-X820 73h 44min
    SM-X920 85h 18min
    SM-X826B 73h 44min
    SM-X926B 85h 18min
    SM-S721B/DS 42h 00min
    SM-G556B 41h 22min
    SM-S921B/DS 41h 26min
    SM-X300 62h 31min
    SM-X306B 62h 31min

    Total hours: 2,056.96
    Average = Total / 28 models = 2,056.96 ÷ 28 ˜ 73.46 hours

    Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669 >> Enter "Apple" in the "Brand or trademark" field.
    A3267 62h 00min
    A3268 72h 00min
    A3355 67h 00min
    A3269 72h 00min
    A3354 67h 00min
    A3266 62h 00min
    A3409 41h 00min
    A2993 67h 00min
    A2995 67h 00min
    A3293 37h 00min
    A3290 48h 00min
    A3296 48h 00min
    A3287 37h 00min
    A2836 73h 00min
    A2837 73h 00min
    A2925 77h 00min
    A2926 77h 00min
    A3090 34h 00min
    A3094 45h 00min

    Total battery hours = 1,199 hours
    Average per model = 1,199 ÷ 19 ˜ 63.1 hours

    Overall, Samsung models, based on EPREL data, have a 10 hour advantage.
    That's a whopping ~16% higher average battery endurance per cycle.

    Where is the fabled endurance that Apple marketing so highly touted?
    Could it possibly be that Apple marketing cherry picked the results?

    Oh look. Arlen is cherry picking the results. AGAIN. Those numbers include tablets. Filter on phones only, and you get a much different story.

    Samsung has 13 phones, 539.91 total hours = 41:32 average. Apple has 7 phones, 290 total hours = 41:26 average. Basically identical. 6 minutes difference.

    BUT, Apple is doing this on SMALLER BATTERIES than Samsung. Which means iPhones are lighter, more portable and MORE EFFICIENT.

    Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk? Are they running Intel space heaters and using fans to keep cool?

    If the iPhone 16 Pro Max had a 6000 mAh battery, it would run for more than 22
    hours. 3 to 4 hours longer than any Android phone with a 6000 mAh battery. For these facts, see the thread "iPhone 17 Pro Max Battery Capacity Leaked". Which Arlen started and then abandoned because the facts got in the way of his
    absurd-claim-of-the-day.

    Did I not call it?

    😎

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)