https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who
gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software company Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."
gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software company
Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated periodically.' >>
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."
gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software company >> Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."
gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software company >> Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who >>>> gets a basic term wrong:
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software company >>>> Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated periodically.' >>>>
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.
I get it. Challenged to not insult me with Liarboy, now I'm Little Shit!
On 2022-11-27 07:34, Thomas E. wrote:Name callers rarely have a sound technical argument.
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who >>>>> gets a basic term wrong:
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found >>>>>> that the company collects personally identifiable information
while explicitly promising not to."
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software
company
Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated
periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can
tie that number to your device.
I get it. Challenged to not insult me with Liarboy, now I'm Little Shit!
You're still lying, Lying Little Shit.
At no time did you make such a challenge.
But I'll happily call you "Lying Little Shit" from here on out.
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:useful data and can be tied to things like a device serial number. Knowing that the growing Apple advertising revenue enterprise can use that data to target ads to a device. Here is a take on what is going on in that area of Apple:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who >>>> gets a basic term wrong:
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software company >>>> Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated periodically.' >>>>
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult. It would be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to maintain a history of potentially useful user information. The identified iCloud account contains your Apple ID that has all kinds of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
On 11/27/2022 9:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 07:34, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who >>>>> gets a basic term wrong:
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found >>>>>> that the company collects personally identifiable information
while explicitly promising not to."
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software
company
Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated
periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can
tie that number to your device.
I get it. Challenged to not insult me with Liarboy, now I'm Little Shit!
You're still lying, Lying Little Shit.
At no time did you make such a challenge.
But I'll happily call you "Lying Little Shit" from here on out.Name callers rarely have a sound technical argument.
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:useful data and can be tied to things like a device serial number. Knowing that the growing Apple advertising revenue enterprise can use that data to target ads to a device. Here is a take on what is going on in that area of Apple:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who >>>> gets a basic term wrong:
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software company >>>> Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult. It would be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to maintain a history of potentially useful user information. The identified iCloud account contains your Apple ID that has all kinds of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqkSo you assume that when some gets basic facts right, you can still trust their conclusions, you Lying Little Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
On 2022-11-27 07:34, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who >>>> gets a basic term wrong:
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that the company collects personally identifiable information while explicitly promising not to."
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software company >>>> Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.
I get it. Challenged to not insult me with Liarboy, now I'm Little Shit!You're still lying, Lying Little Shit.
At no time did you make such a challenge.
But I'll happily call you "Lying Little Shit" from here on out.
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:33:29 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
So:Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from
someone who gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it
includes a permanent, unchangeable ID number called a
Directory Services Identifier, or DSID, according to
researchers from the software company Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination
Signaling Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and
rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web>
So you assume that when some gets basic facts right, you can stillI'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple
can tie that number to your device.
shit.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult. It would
be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to maintain a
history of potentially useful user information. The identified
iCloud account contains your Apple ID that has all kinds of
useful data and can be tied to things like a device serial
number. Knowing that the growing Apple advertising revenue
enterprise can use that data to target ads to a device. Here is a
take on what is going on in that area of Apple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
trust their conclusions, you Lying Little Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
You just implied one of Apple's major fans is a lying little shit! I
don't think Rene would appreciate that. Your grammar "some gets basic
facts" is also an error. Some is plural and gets is singular. You
must be in a real snit. Love it.
On 2022-11-28 07:00, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:33:29 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
the company collects personally identifiable information while
explicitly promising not to."
So:Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from
someone who gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it
includes a permanent, unchangeable ID number called a
Directory Services Identifier, or DSID, according to
researchers from the software company Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination
Signaling Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and
rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>>
So you assume that when some gets basic facts right, you can stillI'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple
can tie that number to your device.
shit.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult. It would
be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to maintain a
history of potentially useful user information. The identified
iCloud account contains your Apple ID that has all kinds of
useful data and can be tied to things like a device serial
number. Knowing that the growing Apple advertising revenue
enterprise can use that data to target ads to a device. Here is a
take on what is going on in that area of Apple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
trust their conclusions, you Lying Little Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
You just implied one of Apple's major fans is a lying little shit! INope. I've implied that you've accepted the conclusions in the earlier article when that researcher has gotten basic facts wrong, you Lying
don't think Rene would appreciate that. Your grammar "some gets basic facts" is also an error. Some is plural and gets is singular. You
must be in a real snit. Love it.
Little Shit.
And you've drawn a connection from that fallacious security report to Ritchie's talk about Apple's ad strategy.
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:48:11 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 07:00, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:33:29 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
the company collects personally identifiable information while
explicitly promising not to."
So:Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from
someone who gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it
includes a permanent, unchangeable ID number called a
Directory Services Identifier, or DSID, according to
researchers from the software company Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination
Signaling Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and
rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>>>>
Nope. I've implied that you've accepted the conclusions in the earlierSo you assume that when some gets basic facts right, you can stillI'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple
can tie that number to your device.
shit.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult. It would
be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to maintain a
history of potentially useful user information. The identified
iCloud account contains your Apple ID that has all kinds of
useful data and can be tied to things like a device serial
number. Knowing that the growing Apple advertising revenue
enterprise can use that data to target ads to a device. Here is a
take on what is going on in that area of Apple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
trust their conclusions, you Lying Little Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
You just implied one of Apple's major fans is a lying little shit! I
don't think Rene would appreciate that. Your grammar "some gets basic
facts" is also an error. Some is plural and gets is singular. You
must be in a real snit. Love it.
article when that researcher has gotten basic facts wrong, you Lying
Little Shit.
And you've drawn a connection from that fallacious security report to
Ritchie's talk about Apple's ad strategy.
Alan, the two are directly related. And you know that.
On 2022-11-28 10:22, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:48:11 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 07:00, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:33:29 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that >> the company collects personally identifiable information while
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
explicitly promising not to."
So:Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from
someone who gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it
includes a permanent, unchangeable ID number called a
Directory Services Identifier, or DSID, according to
researchers from the software company Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination
Signaling Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and >>>>>>>> rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>>>>
Nope. I've implied that you've accepted the conclusions in the earlierSo you assume that when some gets basic facts right, you can stillI'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple >>>>>>> can tie that number to your device.
shit.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult. It would >>>>> be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to maintain a
history of potentially useful user information. The identified
iCloud account contains your Apple ID that has all kinds of
useful data and can be tied to things like a device serial
number. Knowing that the growing Apple advertising revenue
enterprise can use that data to target ads to a device. Here is a >>>>> take on what is going on in that area of Apple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
trust their conclusions, you Lying Little Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
You just implied one of Apple's major fans is a lying little shit! I
don't think Rene would appreciate that. Your grammar "some gets basic >>> facts" is also an error. Some is plural and gets is singular. You
must be in a real snit. Love it.
article when that researcher has gotten basic facts wrong, you Lying
Little Shit.
And you've drawn a connection from that fallacious security report to
Ritchie's talk about Apple's ad strategy.
Alan, the two are directly related. And you know that.Since KNOW that the security researcher got basic, simple facts wrong,
we cannot trust that researchers conclusions.
And as always, just like the lying little shit you've always been, you
lie by claiming with certainty that which you know you cannot know with certainty.
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that
On 2022-11-28 10:22, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:48:11 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 07:00, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:33:29 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
So:the company collects personally identifiable information while
explicitly promising not to."
Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a
report from someone who gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows
it includes a permanent, unchangeable ID number
called a Directory Services Identifier, or DSID,
according to researchers from the software company
Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID
(Destination Signaling Identifier) that’s tied to
the iCloud account and rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>>>>>>
Since KNOW that the security researcher got basic, simple factsNope. I've implied that you've accepted the conclusions in theSo you assume that when some gets basic facts right, youI'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy,
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if
rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.
little shit.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult.
It would be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to
maintain a history of potentially useful user
information. The identified iCloud account contains your
Apple ID that has all kinds of useful data and can be
tied to things like a device serial number. Knowing that
the growing Apple advertising revenue enterprise can use
that data to target ads to a device. Here is a take on
what is going on in that area of Apple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
can still trust their conclusions, you Lying Little Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
You just implied one of Apple's major fans is a lying little
shit! I don't think Rene would appreciate that. Your grammar
"some gets basic facts" is also an error. Some is plural and
gets is singular. You must be in a real snit. Love it.
earlier article when that researcher has gotten basic facts
wrong, you Lying Little Shit.
And you've drawn a connection from that fallacious security
report to Ritchie's talk about Apple's ad strategy.
Alan, the two are directly related. And you know that.
wrong, we cannot trust that researchers conclusions.
And as always, just like the lying little shit you've always been,
you lie by claiming with certainty that which you know you cannot
know with certainty.
Just another Baker Lie!
The evidence is circumstantial. I said that Apple could be using that information to track you. So does the article:
"It’s possible that Apple processes DSID data to shelter personally identifying details when the company receives the information,
separating your personal information from other data. But there’s no
way to know, because so far Apple seems unwilling to explain its
practices. The company may not use the data if you turn the related
privacy settings off, despite still receiving it, but that’s not how
the company explains what the settings do in its privacy policy."
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:26:02 PM UTC-5, John wrote:
On 11/27/2022 9:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 07:34, Thomas E. wrote:Name callers rarely have a sound technical argument.
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:You're still lying, Lying Little Shit.
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy, little shit.
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a report from someone who >>>>>>> gets a basic term wrong:
"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found >>>>>>>> that the company collects personally identifiable information
while explicitly promising not to."
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows it includes a
permanent, unchangeable ID number called a Directory Services
Identifier, or DSID, according to researchers from the software
company
Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID (Destination Signaling
Identifier) that’s tied to the iCloud account and rotated
periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>>>
So:
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if rotated Apple can
tie that number to your device.
I get it. Challenged to not insult me with Liarboy, now I'm Little Shit! >>>
At no time did you make such a challenge.
But I'll happily call you "Lying Little Shit" from here on out.
Alan uses harassment and name calling when he needs to deflect from a losing argument. He simply cannot stand to see Apple criticized or to be on the losing side.
His behavior makes him smaller and smaller.
On 2022-11-29 07:15, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that
On 2022-11-28 10:22, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:48:11 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 07:00, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:33:29 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
So:the company collects personally identifiable information while
explicitly promising not to."
Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a
report from someone who gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows
it includes a permanent, unchangeable ID number
called a Directory Services Identifier, or DSID,
according to researchers from the software company
Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID
(Destination Signaling Identifier) that’s tied to
the iCloud account and rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>>>>>>
Since KNOW that the security researcher got basic, simple factsNope. I've implied that you've accepted the conclusions in theSo you assume that when some gets basic facts right, youI'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy,
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if
rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.
little shit.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult.
It would be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to
maintain a history of potentially useful user
information. The identified iCloud account contains your
Apple ID that has all kinds of useful data and can be
tied to things like a device serial number. Knowing that
the growing Apple advertising revenue enterprise can use
that data to target ads to a device. Here is a take on
what is going on in that area of Apple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
can still trust their conclusions, you Lying Little Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
You just implied one of Apple's major fans is a lying little
shit! I don't think Rene would appreciate that. Your grammar
"some gets basic facts" is also an error. Some is plural and
gets is singular. You must be in a real snit. Love it.
earlier article when that researcher has gotten basic facts
wrong, you Lying Little Shit.
And you've drawn a connection from that fallacious security
report to Ritchie's talk about Apple's ad strategy.
Alan, the two are directly related. And you know that.
wrong, we cannot trust that researchers conclusions.
And as always, just like the lying little shit you've always been,
you lie by claiming with certainty that which you know you cannot
know with certainty.
Just another Baker Lie!
The evidence is circumstantial. I said that Apple could be using that information to track you. So does the article:
"It’s possible that Apple processes DSID data to shelter personally identifying details when the company receives the information,Let me help you, you Lying Little Shit:
separating your personal information from other data. But there’s no
way to know, because so far Apple seems unwilling to explain its practices. The company may not use the data if you turn the related privacy settings off, despite still receiving it, but that’s not how
the company explains what the settings do in its privacy policy."
'Alan, the two are directly related.'
That's not saying "could be", is it?
And since the article incorrectly states what the DSID IS...
...why would one trust their conclusion about what can be DONE with it?
On 2022-11-29 07:15, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that
On 2022-11-28 10:22, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:48:11 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 07:00, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:33:29 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM UTC-5,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
So:the company collects personally identifiable information while
explicitly promising not to."
Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a
report from someone who gets a basic term wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple shows
it includes a permanent, unchangeable ID number
called a Directory Services Identifier, or DSID,
according to researchers from the software company
Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID
(Destination Signaling Identifier) that’s tied to
the iCloud account and rotated periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>>>>>>
Since KNOW that the security researcher got basic, simple factsNope. I've implied that you've accepted the conclusions in theSo you assume that when some gets basic facts right, youI'm glad you're such an expert on computer privacy,
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if
rotated Apple can tie that number to your device.
little shit.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by insult.
It would be trivial for Apple to use the DSID history to
maintain a history of potentially useful user
information. The identified iCloud account contains your
Apple ID that has all kinds of useful data and can be
tied to things like a device serial number. Knowing that
the growing Apple advertising revenue enterprise can use
that data to target ads to a device. Here is a take on
what is going on in that area of Apple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
can still trust their conclusions, you Lying Little Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
You just implied one of Apple's major fans is a lying little
shit! I don't think Rene would appreciate that. Your grammar
"some gets basic facts" is also an error. Some is plural and
gets is singular. You must be in a real snit. Love it.
earlier article when that researcher has gotten basic facts
wrong, you Lying Little Shit.
And you've drawn a connection from that fallacious security
report to Ritchie's talk about Apple's ad strategy.
Alan, the two are directly related. And you know that.
wrong, we cannot trust that researchers conclusions.
And as always, just like the lying little shit you've always been,
you lie by claiming with certainty that which you know you cannot
know with certainty.
Just another Baker Lie!
The evidence is circumstantial. I said that Apple could be using that information to track you. So does the article:
"It’s possible that Apple processes DSID data to shelter personally identifying details when the company receives the information,Let me help you, you Lying Little Shit:
separating your personal information from other data. But there’s no
way to know, because so far Apple seems unwilling to explain its practices. The company may not use the data if you turn the related privacy settings off, despite still receiving it, but that’s not how
the company explains what the settings do in its privacy policy."
'Alan, the two are directly related.'
That's not saying "could be", is it?
And since the article incorrectly states what the DSID IS...
...why would one trust their conclusion about what can be DONE with it?
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 11:50:58 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:"A new test of how Apple gathers usage data from iPhones has found that
On 2022-11-29 07:15, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 10:22, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:48:11 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-28 07:00, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 1:33:29 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-27 07:33, Thomas E. wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:53:16 PM UTC-5,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-26 06:09, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:47:23 PM
UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-22 07:48, Thomas E. wrote:
https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-privacy-dsid-analytics-personal-data-test-1849807619
So:the company collects personally identifiable information
while explicitly promising not to."
Perhaps you shouldn't assume the accuracy of a
report from someone who gets a basic term
wrong:
'But an analysis of the data sent to Apple
shows it includes a permanent, unchangeable ID
number called a Directory Services Identifier,
or DSID, according to researchers from the
software company Mysk.'
Only one problem:
'The identifier is generated from a DSID
(Destination Signaling Identifier) that’s tied
to the iCloud account and rotated
periodically.'
<https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/security/seca4b33e8c9/web> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Let me help you, you Lying Little Shit:Since KNOW that the security researcher got basic, simpleNope. I've implied that you've accepted the conclusions inSo you assume that when some gets basic facts right,I'm glad you're such an expert on computer
Not what they say it is.
Not unchangeable.
It's still a signal tied to an account. Even if
rotated Apple can tie that number to your
device.
privacy, little shit.
There you go again, trying to win an argument by
insult. It would be trivial for Apple to use the DSID
history to maintain a history of potentially useful
user information. The identified iCloud account
contains your Apple ID that has all kinds of useful
data and can be tied to things like a device serial
number. Knowing that the growing Apple advertising
revenue enterprise can use that data to target ads to
a device. Here is a take on what is going on in that
area of Apple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aXRtl2aqk
you can still trust their conclusions, you Lying Little
Shit?
Is that what you've learned in your life?
You just implied one of Apple's major fans is a lying
little shit! I don't think Rene would appreciate that.
Your grammar "some gets basic facts" is also an error.
Some is plural and gets is singular. You must be in a
real snit. Love it.
the earlier article when that researcher has gotten basic
facts wrong, you Lying Little Shit.
And you've drawn a connection from that fallacious
security report to Ritchie's talk about Apple's ad
strategy.
Alan, the two are directly related. And you know that.
facts wrong, we cannot trust that researchers conclusions.
And as always, just like the lying little shit you've always
been, you lie by claiming with certainty that which you know
you cannot know with certainty.
Just another Baker Lie!
The evidence is circumstantial. I said that Apple could be using
that information to track you. So does the article:
"It’s possible that Apple processes DSID data to shelter
personally identifying details when the company receives the
information, separating your personal information from other
data. But there’s no way to know, because so far Apple seems
unwilling to explain its practices. The company may not use the
data if you turn the related privacy settings off, despite still
receiving it, but that’s not how the company explains what the
settings do in its privacy policy."
'Alan, the two are directly related.'
That's not saying "could be", is it?
And since the article incorrectly states what the DSID IS...
...why would one trust their conclusion about what can be DONE with
it?
Directly related. Just because a detail is not true does not mean
that the entire premise is false. Rene is talking about an Apple
effort aimed at increasing third party ad content sales. The article
is about how Apple might be collecting data to customize that ad
content to make it more attractive to customers.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 10:30:32 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,978 |