1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.MAC.ADVOCACY

  • Re: Apple continues to lead in CPUs

    From -hh@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Wed Mar 16 12:53:45 2022
    On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 2:45:54 PM UTC-4, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    it's apple silicon. full stop.

    It TSMC Silicon.
    It's Apple marketi

    Oh, look: "Andy" doesn't know what a Trusted Foundry is.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Thu Mar 17 12:26:57 2022
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2022-03-17 9:34 a.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Lewis wrote:

    <insert appropriate gif>

    Adults notice iKooks can never respond to facts without turning into what they are, which is childish low-IQ uneducated ignorant kindergarten kids.

    The facts remain Apple's R&D is the _lowest_ in all of high tech bar none. And Apple's propaganda machine is the highest.

    Apple likely spends ten times more in touting their crappy CPUs than in actually doing the design work even as almost everything they bought.

    It's TSMC Silicon (which Apple tries to rebrand as their own)

    It's Apple-designed chips being manufactured by TSMC...

    ...just as they do for lots of other companies.

    It's ARM technology (which Apple tries to rebrand as their own)

    It's the ARM instruction set implemented by Apple using it's own designs.


    Apple has _never_ made a best-in-class SOC in its entire history.
    And Apple never will.

    Why?
    Because Apple is all marketing and almost zero R&D, that's why.

    And you iKooks fall for it.
    Ask me why and you'll find three reasons for why:
    a. You're uneducated
    b. You're of low IQ
    c. You have low self esteem

    You gain all your self esteem off of what Apple feeds you to feel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan laughing at Arlen for not keep@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Thu Mar 17 12:28:05 2022
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2022-03-17 9:30 a.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Lewis wrote:

    And no one else can buy Apple' chips because they are APPLE'S CHIPS.

    That's like saying the 5G modem that Apple can't integrate is Apple's
    modem.

    Sure, Apple spends more per phone on just the Qualcomm modem than my entire Android phone costs, and yet my Android phone does more than the most expensive iPhone ever designed can do.

    then anyone could buy an M1 Ultra, but the fact
    is that no one can buy that chip and no other chips on the market come
    close to the capabilities of the M1 any of the M1s).

    Apple brands their "TSMC Silicon" chip as if that's a big deal.
    Apple touts that they use "ARM technology" as if that's a big deal.

    Earth to iKooks: Everyone uses TSMC fabs and ARM technology. Not just
    Apple.

    It's faster... ...and uses less power.

    Far beyond that, even. the way the SoC is designed is far beyond what
    anyone else is doing. Not only can you not get a chip like the M1 you
    cannot get a chip anything like the M1.

    Apple has never designed a best-in-class SOC in its entire history.
    The reason is that Apple is all MARKETING and almost no R&D to speak of.

    Even Apple's vaunted CPUs are so unstable that Apple felt _desperate_ to secretly throttle them (and to secretly change the release notes).

    Suddenly they're Apple's CPUs?

    Weren't you just telling us that they are actually TSMC's CPUs?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)