Does Kegs v1.xx (I'm using kegs 1.16) support TCP/IP (via marinetti emulating uthernet or uthernet2)? I had to turn off tcp in system.setup in order to boot my sweet16 disk image.
On 8/9/2022 6:32 PM, Steven Nelson wrote:Yes, I am aware of uthernet support in gsport. I just wonder if Kent brought that support into the newer Kegs (even though they are separate projects).
Does Kegs v1.xx (I'm using kegs 1.16) support TCP/IP (via marinetti emulating uthernet or uthernet2)? I had to turn off tcp in system.setup in order to boot my sweet16 disk image.GSPort, a KEGS 0.91 fork, supports an emulated Uthernet in slot 3.
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:56:13 PM UTC-5, Christopher G. Mason wrote:It has not been ported to the main tree. The current versions of KEGS
On 8/9/2022 6:32 PM, Steven Nelson wrote:Yes, I am aware of uthernet support in gsport. I just wonder if Kent brought that support into the newer Kegs (even though they are separate projects).
Does Kegs v1.xx (I'm using kegs 1.16) support TCP/IP (via marinetti emulating uthernet or uthernet2)? I had to turn off tcp in system.setup in order to boot my sweet16 disk image.GSPort, a KEGS 0.91 fork, supports an emulated Uthernet in slot 3.
On 8/11/2022 2:37 PM, Steven Nelson wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:56:13 PM UTC-5, Christopher G. Mason wrote:in order to boot my sweet16 disk image.
On 8/9/2022 6:32 PM, Steven Nelson wrote:
Does Kegs v1.xx (I'm using kegs 1.16) support TCP/IP (via marinetti >emulating uthernet or uthernet2)? I had to turn off tcp in system.setup
It has not been ported to the main tree. The current versions of KEGSGSPort, a KEGS 0.91 fork, supports an emulated Uthernet in slot 3.Yes, I am aware of uthernet support in gsport. I just wonder if Kent >brought that support into the newer Kegs (even though they are separate >projects).
have VOC support residing in slot 3. Maybe the Uthernet link layer
poking around in $C0B0-C0BF is causing a problem?
What is it you want to do with KEGS if it had ethernet emulation?
KEGS 1.16 has a bug where it "halts" on some Uthernet detection accesses
due to it doing some odd things to the VOC in slot 3.
[...]
Uthernet could be in any slot and can’t be detected.
On 8/16/22 9:10 AM, Andrew Roughan wrote:
[...]
Uthernet could be in any slot and can’t be detected.
Sure it can.
David Schmidt wrote:
On 8/16/22 9:10 AM, Andrew Roughan wrote:
[...]
Uthernet could be in any slot and can’t be detected.
Sure it can.
I'm sure he meant that neither model of Uthernet has an identifying magic number or signature in firmware. :-)
David Schmidt wrote:
On 8/16/22 9:10 AM, Andrew Roughan wrote:
[...]
Uthernet could be in any slot and can’t be detected.
Sure it can.
I'm sure he meant that neither model of Uthernet has an identifying magic number or signature in firmware. :-)
I'm sure he meant that neither model of Uthernet has an identifying magic
number or signature in firmware. :-)
Yes, thanks for clarifying my intent.
Detecting it without clobbering something else unintentionally.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 714 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 141:49:57 |
| Calls: | 12,088 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,998 |
| Messages: | 6,517,448 |