Reviving a long-dead thread - what would it take to make a 'mini-MAU'
now? - RJ45 connections, a passive device much like a scaled-down 8228.
Reviving a long-dead thread - what would it take to make a 'mini-MAU'My understanding is that you can't make a /purely/ /passive/ MAU in that
now? - RJ45 connections, a passive device much like a scaled-down 8228.
the ring opens and closes as part of testing during insertion into the ring. I think I've read that you can approximate it, but it's really a hack at best.
[Retracted] showed me a picture of the inside of an 8228 - definitely
more complex than I thought. So I'm looking (and probably Kevin
Moonlight too) for an 8226 I guess. Maybe for where it falls for the Canadian-U.S. border so we aren't fighting over one unit.
On 1/2/22 1:47 PM, IBMMuseum wrote:
[Retracted] showed me a picture of the inside of an 8228 - definitely
more complex than I thought. So I'm looking (and probably Kevin
Moonlight too) for an 8226 I guess. Maybe for where it falls for the
Canadian-U.S. border so we aren't fighting over one unit.
I think that it is possible to make a minimal MAU that supports the
insertion testing that is necessary to have two Token-Ring hosts talk to
each other a la. a two port MAU. ;-)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 741 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 46:31:18 |
| Calls: | 12,444 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,192 |
| Messages: | 6,537,109 |