maanantai 8. toukokuuta 2023 klo 18.31.25 UTC+3 Pertti Helander kirjoitti:
sunnuntai 7. toukokuuta 2023 klo 23.32.08 UTC+3 Louis Ohland kirjoitti:
Uh, how about an image of the card? Since you are kontuzed how W95 identifies it. Perhaps it self-identifies as a DS210?
Pertti Helander wrote:
sunnuntai 7. toukokuuta 2023 klo 21.58.06 UTC+3 Louis Ohland kirjoitti:
https://web.archive.org/web/19980203120208/http://www.networks.digital.com/dr/nics/drivers/
EtherWORKS 2 (DE100, DE200, DE201, DE202, DE210, DE212, DE422)
e2kit201.zip EtherWORKS 2 DOS-based Distribution Diskette V2.01
https://web.archive.org/web/19980203120208/http://www.networks.digital.com/dr/nics/drivers/e2kit201.zip
Hm, 203KB DL'd, looks to be real.
e2diags.zip EtherWORKS 2 Diagnostic Set
https://web.archive.org/web/19980203120208/http://www.networks.digital.com/dr/nics/drivers/e2diags.zip
57KB DL'd.
You might wish to give these a try.
Thank you Louis! I will make disks and try these.
I think my adapter is DE 212 but Win95 tells that it is DE210?
There is a picture in Ardent Tools and I have this:
Digital Ethernet Adapter "DE212", Adapter ID 628D, FCC ID AO9-DE212.
I made this EtherWorks Distribution Diskette v.2.01 and there is says that its 32 bit Win95 drived has no support for DE210/DE212.
So is this a pure 16 bit network adapter?
I uninstalled Win 95 from my 9577 and installed Dos 6.22 and Win 3.11 again.
I will try to set up those drivers from EtherWorks 2 diskette I made after Louis´ hint.
Lets see how this works for my Digital Ethernet Adapter A09-DE212.
Because this is an oldiest DEC adapter there in Ardent Tools.
I i can´t get it work I mus consider to purchase an IBM or 3Com ethernet adapter instead.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)