http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohland/communications/NuBus_vs_MCA_Performance.html
I have most images. Not linked yet. The identification of images /
tables / figures wasn't the most consistent...
The period terminology was "d.m.a.", "d.m.a.c", "i/o".
The MC-GPIB shown in the article was the earlier one with the 8MHz
uPD7210C, not the later 4882BPL at 20MHz.
Images Linked. Tom, there are four chunks of code in green boxes in the article.
MacII I/O Write
MacII I/O Read
PS/2 Model 80 I/O Write
On 5/4/2022 11:55, Louis Ohland wrote:
http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohland/communications/NuBus_vs_MCA_Performance.html >>
I have most images. Not linked yet. The identification of images /
tables / figures wasn't the most consistent...
The period terminology was "d.m.a.", "d.m.a.c", "i/o".
The MC-GPIB shown in the article was the earlier one with the 8MHz
uPD7210C, not the later 4882BPL at 20MHz.
Oh boy, that color. The OCR didn't even detect the text...
On 04.05.2022 19:59, Louis Ohland wrote:
Images Linked. Tom, there are four chunks of code in green boxes in
the article.
MacII I/O Write
MacII I/O Read
PS/2 Model 80 I/O Write
On 5/4/2022 11:55, Louis Ohland wrote:
http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohland/communications/NuBus_vs_MCA_Performance.html >>>
I have most images. Not linked yet. The identification of images /
tables / figures wasn't the most consistent...
The period terminology was "d.m.a.", "d.m.a.c", "i/o".
The MC-GPIB shown in the article was the earlier one with the 8MHz
uPD7210C, not the later 4882BPL at 20MHz.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 741 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 70:54:32 |
| Calls: | 12,448 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 15,194 |
| Messages: | 6,537,610 |