Hello,


More of my philosophy about president Putin..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and i have just listened to the following new video
about president Putin in the USA media:

What’s driving Russia’s Vladimir Putin?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw4GkC-aQH8

I think that i am smart, and i have looked carefully at Putin in
in some important videos about his life and his life as president,
and i have read many of his sayings, and i think that president Putin is not a bad guy, but from his sayings and such, i think that president Putin wants like a spirit that is in accordance with morality, so he for example views the western culture as
lacking on morality, so i think that he is fighting for a spirit that wants morality as a very important ingredient, so i think Putin is and was misunderstood by USA and other western countries.

More of my philosophy about Russia..

I invite you to listen to this beautiful music
from Russia, and it shows how Russia is beautiful sensibility
and is a beautiful spirit that has not to be lost, since Russia
is like a beautiful poetry of Love with its spirit, so listen
to this beautiful music from Russia:

Russian Folk Music-Kalinka (balalaika)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qn06W-iBfkQ



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello,



More of my philosophy about president Putin..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I have just looked at all the following video
of the speech of president Putin about Ukraine
and about NATO etc.:

Discours de Poutine en entier non censuré et non coupé.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWe8YcjFxpY


And i think i am smart, and i have understood president
Putin, so i think that president Putin is a Russian nationalist
that is interpreting NATO(The North Atlantic Treaty Organization) as
a tool that wants to hurt Russia and attack Russia, but i think that it is not truth, since NATO just wants to protect the freedom of Ukraine and not to attack Russia and this freedom of Ukraine is interpreted by NATO as being like the values of western
countries that are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

Also president Putin wants to protect the Russians that lives
in Ukraine since he says that those Russians were attacked
by the government of Ukraine and by extremist groups in Ukraine,
also president Putin says that he doesn't want the be the decadent morality of USA in Russia, and he is then refusing this kind of morality of Liberalism, so he is like both a kind of conservatism and nationalism.

And here is more of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:

"Western Values" Explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA


I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:

I think that Western values are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change, since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid the radical form, where we have to re-
engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western
countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational reforms into society and then to undertake
evidence-based assessments, so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist is not thinking correctly, since
Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of speech
in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so this is why i think that we have to analyse
it like i am analysing it and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that the requirements of
European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a realistic and objective way of doing.




Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Vladimir Putin is a very exemplary leader.

To tell the truth, I want to go to visit Russia this summer or a little bit later. I have been in the Russia only 1 or 2 times.



***************************************************************************** My telephone number: 372 53900660


Amine Moulay Ramdane kirjutas Reede, 11. märts 2022 kl 01:00:13 UTC+2:

Hello,

More of my philosophy about president Putin..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just looked at all the following video
of the speech of president Putin about Ukraine
and about NATO etc.:

Discours de Poutine en entier non censuré et non coupé.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWe8YcjFxpY

And i think i am smart, and i have understood president
Putin, so i think that president Putin is a Russian nationalist
that is interpreting NATO(The North Atlantic Treaty Organization) as
a tool that wants to hurt Russia and attack Russia, but i think that it is not truth, since NATO just wants to protect the freedom of Ukraine and not to attack Russia and this freedom of Ukraine is interpreted by NATO as being like the values of

western countries that are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

Also president Putin wants to protect the Russians that lives
in Ukraine since he says that those Russians were attacked
by the government of Ukraine and by extremist groups in Ukraine,
also president Putin says that he doesn't want the be the decadent morality of USA in Russia, and he is then refusing this kind of morality of Liberalism, so he is like both a kind of conservatism and nationalism.

And here is more of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:

"Western Values" Explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA

I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:

I think that Western values are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change, since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid the radical form, where we have to re-

engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western
countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational reforms into society and then to undertake
evidence-based assessments, so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg

I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist is not thinking correctly, since

Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of speech
in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,

this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so this is why i think that we have to

analyse it like i am analysing it and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that the
requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a realistic and objective way of doing.

Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)