Islam is the enemy
John 14:6
W dniu 13.08.2025 o 20:28, CrudeSausage pisze:
Islam is the enemy
John 14:6
Did you know that Pope say the same about Jude?!? That was for many centuries.
Did you know that Pope and some kings made 9 crusades against Muslims in Palestine, but Pope with Deutschland made nearly 50 crusades against
Poland?
Did you know that you wrongly call Deutschland as Germany? Did you know
that true Germans were part of Slavic federation under Polish hegemony?
The same is true about Praust (for many years they were part of Slavic federation under Polish hegemony) and was nothing related with Prussia Kingdom. Simply because Praust was entirely annihilated by Deutschland.
Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy.
the only proper response to give them is wpierdalaj!
W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze:
the only proper response to give them is wpierdalaj!
In true "wpierdalaj" mean vulgar: eat fast.
But I know what do you mean "wypierdalaj", which vulgar mean "run away
fast".
W dniu 13.08.2025 o 20:28, CrudeSausage pisze:
Islam is the enemy John 14:6
Did you know that Pope say the same about Jude?!? That was for many centuries.
Did you know that Pope and some kings made 9 crusades against Muslims in Palestine, but Pope with Deutschland made nearly 50 crusades against
Poland?
Did you know that you wrongly call Deutschland as Germany? Did you know
that true Germans were part of Slavic federation under Polish hegemony?
The same is true about Praust (for many years they were part of Slavic federation under Polish hegemony) and was nothing related with Prussia Kingdom. Simply because Praust was entirely annihilated by Deutschland.
W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze:
Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy.
I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This
mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific
people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in
love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World
for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't
hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you
mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people -
they are agents.
In their scripture, they also claim that muhammmad (piss be upon him)
only waged defensive wars but they neglect to mention how the people
they killed and enslaved had attacked them first.
I also wonder what the
many civilizations and cultures the muslims destroyed and killed had
done to them when they were neighbours that could have resulted in these savages waging hundreds of wars into Europe. They are savages, nothing
more. Do not give them an inch.
W dniu 14.08.2025 o 02:46, CrudeSausage pisze:
In their scripture, they also claim that muhammmad (piss be upon him)
only waged defensive wars but they neglect to mention how the people
they killed and enslaved had attacked them first.
Probably you are right, that they started many offensive wars, but...
I also wonder what the many civilizations and cultures the muslims
destroyed and killed had done to them when they were neighbours that
could have resulted in these savages waging hundreds of wars into
Europe. They are savages, nothing more. Do not give them an inch.
... I know one evil imperium they destroyed: Persia. I read, poor in
many aspects, book about beginning of this first of massive cruel and pathology imperium: "Persians: Age Of Great Kings", by Lloyd Llewellyn- Jones. The Persians were incredible sadists even for us who known what
Nazi does.
In fact that first stage of cruel and pathology was ended by
Alexander The Great, but I don't suppose that in following ages Persians break entirely with they sadistic traditions. I think in this sense
Muslims had some positive achievements.
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-13 5:34 p.m., 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:
W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze:
Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy.
I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This
mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific
people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in
love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World
for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't
hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to
establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you
mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people - >>> they are agents.
You're wrong, unfortunately. Hating everyone who isn't a muslim is in
their scripture. They'll blame the govenrment, past events or whatever
else to gain our sympathy (because they are allowed to lie to us as long
as it leads to islam gaining ground) but the reality has always been the
same:: muslims must hate Christians, Jews and anyone who isn't muslim
and must wage war against them. They played this game before, notably
with Lebanon. That country used to be the center of the Christian world
in the Middle East and a peaceful one at that. Look at it now, after
they let in and tolerated muslims.
In their scripture, they also claim that muhammmad (piss be upon him)
only waged defensive wars but they neglect to mention how the people
they killed and enslaved had attacked them first. I also wonder what the
many civilizations and cultures the muslims destroyed and killed had
done to them when they were neighbours that could have resulted in these
savages waging hundreds of wars into Europe. They are savages, nothing
more. Do not give them an inch.
Not all Muslims are the same. There are big differences between the Shiite and Sunni branches.
On 2025-08-13, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <[email protected]> wrote:
W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze:
Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy.
I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This
mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific
people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in
love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World
for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't
hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to
establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you
mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people -
they are agents.
Isn't it the "normal" Muslims who are raping children and women in European countries? Or are all these migrants the leaders of Muslim countries? Crime in Sweden was almost unknown until the Muslim migrants arrived.
On 2025-08-13, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <[email protected]> wrote:
W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze:
Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy.
I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This
mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific
people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in
love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World
for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't
hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to
establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you
mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people
-
they are agents.
Isn't it the "normal" Muslims who are raping children and women in
European countries? Or are all these migrants the leaders of Muslim countries? Crime in Sweden was almost unknown until the Muslim migrants arrived.
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-14 3:29 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-13 5:34 p.m., 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote: >>>>> W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze:
Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy.
I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This
mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific
people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in >>>>> love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World >>>>> for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't >>>>> hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to >>>>> establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you >>>>> mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people - >>>>> they are agents.
You're wrong, unfortunately. Hating everyone who isn't a muslim is in
their scripture. They'll blame the govenrment, past events or whatever >>>> else to gain our sympathy (because they are allowed to lie to us as long >>>> as it leads to islam gaining ground) but the reality has always been the >>>> same:: muslims must hate Christians, Jews and anyone who isn't muslim
and must wage war against them. They played this game before, notably
with Lebanon. That country used to be the center of the Christian world >>>> in the Middle East and a peaceful one at that. Look at it now, after
they let in and tolerated muslims.
In their scripture, they also claim that muhammmad (piss be upon him)
only waged defensive wars but they neglect to mention how the people
they killed and enslaved had attacked them first. I also wonder what the >>>> many civilizations and cultures the muslims destroyed and killed had
done to them when they were neighbours that could have resulted in these >>>> savages waging hundreds of wars into Europe. They are savages, nothing >>>> more. Do not give them an inch.
Not all Muslims are the same. There are big differences between the Shiite >>> and Sunni branches.
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a murderous
pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the nice ones are,
they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it seems like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it comes to murdering and pedophilia.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it
seems like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it comes
to murdering and pedophilia.
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-14 3:29 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-13 5:34 p.m., 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote: >>>>> W dniu 13.08.2025 o 21:40, CrudeSausage pisze:
Nevertheless, I repeat that islam is the enemy.
I don't agree. The reason is that, "fish is rotten from head". This
mean, that in most cases I blame the governments, and not specific
people. Normal people wants the same in every place they live: "live in >>>>> love and peace". But governments wants something opposite "rule World >>>>> for ever, for all costs". The governments are insane greedy - I don't >>>>> hear about government without credits. That greedy lead governments to >>>>> establish "secret police". Probably when you say "these monsters" you >>>>> mean "secret police agents". But as I say - they are not normal people - >>>>> they are agents.
You're wrong, unfortunately. Hating everyone who isn't a muslim is in
their scripture. They'll blame the govenrment, past events or whatever >>>> else to gain our sympathy (because they are allowed to lie to us as long >>>> as it leads to islam gaining ground) but the reality has always been the >>>> same:: muslims must hate Christians, Jews and anyone who isn't muslim
and must wage war against them. They played this game before, notably
with Lebanon. That country used to be the center of the Christian world >>>> in the Middle East and a peaceful one at that. Look at it now, after
they let in and tolerated muslims.
In their scripture, they also claim that muhammmad (piss be upon him)
only waged defensive wars but they neglect to mention how the people
they killed and enslaved had attacked them first. I also wonder what the >>>> many civilizations and cultures the muslims destroyed and killed had
done to them when they were neighbours that could have resulted in these >>>> savages waging hundreds of wars into Europe. They are savages, nothing >>>> more. Do not give them an inch.
Not all Muslims are the same. There are big differences between the Shiite >>> and Sunni branches.
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a murderous
pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the nice ones are,
they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it seems like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it comes to murdering and pedophilia.
And I bet that they are proud of their murderous ways and don't see how
any of it is unethical. The muslim children, in particular, are so well indoctrinated that they don't see how any of the actions of islam in
general could be considered as anything but peaceful.
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a murderous
pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the nice ones are,
they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it seems like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it comes to murdering and pedophilia.
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:07:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
And I bet that they are proud of their murderous ways and don't see how
any of it is unethical. The muslim children, in particular, are so well
indoctrinated that they don't see how any of the actions of islam in
general could be considered as anything but peaceful.
True believers are like that and Islam doesn't have any monopoly in that department.
And I bet that they are proud of their murderous ways and don't see how
any of it is unethical. The muslim children, in particular, are so well indoctrinated that they don't see how any of the actions of islam in
general could be considered as anything but peaceful.
Le 14-08-2025, RonB <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a murderous
pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the nice ones are,
they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it seems >> like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it comes to
murdering and pedophilia.
Don't be jealous, your beloved Catholic Church is well versed in
pedophilia, they don't need Muslim help for that. https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
It's long gone the time where Christians were following Jesus Christ.
Now, they follow the money and the power, it's better for them.
On 2025-08-15 3:17 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 14-08-2025, RonB <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a murderous >>>> pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the nice ones are, >>>> they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it seems
like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it comes to
murdering and pedophilia.
Don't be jealous, your beloved Catholic Church is well versed in
pedophilia, they don't need Muslim help for that.
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
It's long gone the time where Christians were following Jesus Christ.
Now, they follow the money and the power, it's better for them.
The church and the states of Europe worked together since the very
beginning. If areas were poor, the church had its say in which bishop
would be installed there; if the area was rich, the state would install
a bishop that was loyal to the king instead. Since you brought it up
though, I'd like for you to find verses in the Holy Bible which allow
for Christians to have sexual relations with children. In the koran,
they are numerous, and the homosexual pedophile named muhammad (piss be
upon him) is known to have married a six-year-old and consummated the marriage when she was nine. Still, I'd like for you to come up with
examples since you're an expert on every topic under the sun.
I care about what people are doing today.
Le 15-08-2025, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> a écrit :
And I bet that they are proud of their murderous ways and don't see how
any of it is unethical. The muslim children, in particular, are so well
indoctrinated that they don't see how any of the actions of islam in
general could be considered as anything but peaceful.
Let say that your responsibility in the terrorism is the same as the responsibility of the Communists. For different reasons, but your complementarity give arguments to Islamists.
The Communists saying that Islamism doesn't exist and it concerned only
a very few people who don't count help them spreading their hatred. They
were thrown out of their Muslim countries because they were dangerous.
And Communisms pretending they must be protected from their countries
and should be able to leave and say what they want have a big
responsibility.
The far Right pretending that all Muslims are Islamists and must be
fought at all cost are giving them arguments to rally every Muslims to
their cause. The Far Right is so noisy about refusing to differentiate
the people that they can pretend that all Muslims are in danger if they
don't unit with Islamists.
And it's impressive to see how the Islamists are managing to increase
their followers thanks to you and your bodies. You can be proud of you.
Le 15-08-2025, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 2025-08-15 3:17 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 14-08-2025, RonB <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a murderous >>>>> pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the nice ones are, >>>>> they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it seems
like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it comes to
murdering and pedophilia.
Don't be jealous, your beloved Catholic Church is well versed in
pedophilia, they don't need Muslim help for that.
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
It's long gone the time where Christians were following Jesus Christ.
Now, they follow the money and the power, it's better for them.
The church and the states of Europe worked together since the very
beginning. If areas were poor, the church had its say in which bishop
would be installed there; if the area was rich, the state would install
a bishop that was loyal to the king instead. Since you brought it up
though, I'd like for you to find verses in the Holy Bible which allow
for Christians to have sexual relations with children. In the koran,
they are numerous, and the homosexual pedophile named muhammad (piss be
upon him) is known to have married a six-year-old and consummated the
marriage when she was nine. Still, I'd like for you to come up with
examples since you're an expert on every topic under the sun.
I don't care abut what was written more than thousand years ago. I care
about what people are doing today. I don't leave in the past, I leave in
the present with people around me.
Were my arguments responsible for muslims deciding to attack most of the known world and waging war against Constantinople already in 717?
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
I care about what people are doing today.
Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is
welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and
would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance.
Le 15-08-2025, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> a écrit :
Were my arguments responsible for muslims deciding to attack most of the
known world and waging war against Constantinople already in 717?
Like I said: I don't live in the past. What I care is about what people
do today. Not what their ancestors did more than thousand years ago. If
you want to follow that path: my ancestors did bad things not so long
ago. But it was done before I was born, I have no way of changing the
past. So I don't feel guilty about that. What's important is what I do
today. Not what has been done by others a long time ago.
St�phane CARPENTIER wrote:
I don't care abut what was written more than thousand years ago. I care
about what people are doing today. I don't leave in the past, I leave in
the present with people around me.
You're so concerned with the present that you seem wholly oblivious to
the fact that the muslims around you are committing most of the crimes
in your country. I imagine that you think they're decent people because
they haven't yet come after you. I'm sure your arrogant behaviour and >brilliant arguments will sway the savages when they have a machete at
your head.
Once again, get a clue.
chrisv wrote:
St�phane CARPENTIER wrote:
I care about what people are doing today.
Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is
welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and
would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance.
As I said, the west tries to help people who's life is unsafe in their >countries. Which is a good thing.
all Muslims are not the same, but it's a to difficult concept
for a limited far right guy to understand.
So with their hatred they help Islamists to gather every Muslims.
On 2025-08-15, Stéphane CARPENTIER <[email protected]> wrote:
Le 15-08-2025, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> a écrit :
And I bet that they are proud of their murderous ways and don't see how
any of it is unethical. The muslim children, in particular, are so well
indoctrinated that they don't see how any of the actions of islam in
general could be considered as anything but peaceful.
Let say that your responsibility in the terrorism is the same as the
responsibility of the Communists. For different reasons, but your
complementarity give arguments to Islamists.
The Communists saying that Islamism doesn't exist and it concerned only
a very few people who don't count help them spreading their hatred. They
were thrown out of their Muslim countries because they were dangerous.
And Communisms pretending they must be protected from their countries
and should be able to leave and say what they want have a big
responsibility.
The far Right pretending that all Muslims are Islamists and must be
fought at all cost are giving them arguments to rally every Muslims to
their cause. The Far Right is so noisy about refusing to differentiate
the people that they can pretend that all Muslims are in danger if they
don't unit with Islamists.
And it's impressive to see how the Islamists are managing to increase
their followers thanks to you and your bodies. You can be proud of you.
Would you say crime has gone up or down in France since the mass migrations of mostly Muslims? Would you say your women and girls (and young boys) are now safer on the streets than they were before that Muslim invasion? (This question could be asked of all Europeans.)
On 2025-08-16, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-15 6:18 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 15-08-2025, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> a écrit :
Were my arguments responsible for muslims deciding to attack most of the >>>> known world and waging war against Constantinople already in 717?
Like I said: I don't live in the past. What I care is about what people
do today. Not what their ancestors did more than thousand years ago. If
you want to follow that path: my ancestors did bad things not so long
ago. But it was done before I was born, I have no way of changing the
past. So I don't feel guilty about that. What's important is what I do
today. Not what has been done by others a long time ago.
And I repeat that they are _still_ doing that stuff *today*.
Only now self-loathing Europeans are apologizing for being preyed upon instead of growing a set and fighting back. (And they think they can take on the Russians? What a joke.)
On 2025-08-15, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-15 3:17 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 14-08-2025, RonB <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a murderous >>>>> pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the nice ones are, >>>>> they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it seems
like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it comes to
murdering and pedophilia.
Don't be jealous, your beloved Catholic Church is well versed in
pedophilia, they don't need Muslim help for that.
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
It's long gone the time where Christians were following Jesus Christ.
Now, they follow the money and the power, it's better for them.
The church and the states of Europe worked together since the very
beginning. If areas were poor, the church had its say in which bishop
would be installed there; if the area was rich, the state would install
a bishop that was loyal to the king instead. Since you brought it up
though, I'd like for you to find verses in the Holy Bible which allow
for Christians to have sexual relations with children. In the koran,
they are numerous, and the homosexual pedophile named muhammad (piss be
upon him) is known to have married a six-year-old and consummated the
marriage when she was nine. Still, I'd like for you to come up with
examples since you're an expert on every topic under the sun.
Besides the Koran you can go to the Talmud for examples of excusing pedophilia against young girls in these so-called "holy books."
On 2025-08-15, chrisv <[email protected]d> wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
I care about what people are doing today.
Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is
welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and
would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance.
It's right in their "holy books." Tolerate other religions until you're in the majority. The self-loathing Europeans are starting to experience Muslims in the majority now — things will get worse, unless they grow spines and fight back.
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
I care about what people are doing today.
Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is
welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and
would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance.
As I said, the west tries to help people who's life is unsafe in their >>countries. Which is a good thing.
But you should know that that is not what is happening. What is
happening is hordes of mostly military-aged men are allowed to flood
in, with almost all of them are "economic" refuges (if not, in fact,
the Vanguard of an invasion).
all Muslims are not the same, but it's a to difficult concept
for a limited far right guy to understand.
Everyone understands that.
But in every Muslim society, the radicals run the show and make the
rules. Iran, Afghanistan, Gaza, you name it.
A small group of
violent men control the direction of those societies.
So with their hatred they help Islamists to gather every Muslims.
It's the Muslims who are the haters.
They are the invaders, not us.
We must fight back,
before it's too late, or they will run right over us.
Le 16-08-2025, chrisv <[email protected]d> a écrit :
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
I care about what people are doing today.
Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is
welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and
would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance.
As I said, the west tries to help people who's life is unsafe in their
countries. Which is a good thing.
But you should know that that is not what is happening. What is
happening is hordes of mostly military-aged men are allowed to flood
in, with almost all of them are "economic" refuges (if not, in fact,
the Vanguard of an invasion).
Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by
Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by
Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm
hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be
kept as a secret.
all Muslims are not the same, but it's a to difficult concept
for a limited far right guy to understand.
Everyone understands that.
No. The Canadian don't and your message proves you don't.
But in every Muslim society, the radicals run the show and make the
rules. Iran, Afghanistan, Gaza, you name it.
You see? You don't make the difference. From what I read here I guess
you have been operated to change your sex. If that's right, you should
be careful with the body you choose to side on. Because, if that's
right, far right people want to kill you as much as Islamists.
In France Islamists don't come from Islamists societies. They come from Muslims societies like Morocco and Egypt from which they are fought.
A small group of
violent men control the direction of those societies.
So with their hatred they help Islamists to gather every Muslims.
It's the Muslims who are the haters.
You mean RonB and the Canadian are Muslims? Because all of their
messages are full of hatred.
They are the invaders, not us.
I guessed you are living in the US. If so, you are an invader. Ask the
native what they think about it. Well ask the natives you didn't kill
because they are not that many today.
We must fight back,
You are a Muslim? Because it's a hatred message and you claim that the
haters are the Muslims. The US are the enemy of the rest of the world.
They developed drug trafic in Latin America and in Afghanistan. They
invaded Irak for fun pretending they have mass destruction weapons but
stay there when they didn't found any. They help Israel kill people for
fun to reinforce Hamas.
before it's too late, or they will run right over us.
If you are an American, as I believe, keep away from other countries. You only help Islamists and I don't want advise from people who are happy
with Trump.
But remember: if you have been operated to change your sexe, the far
right are not your friends. You'll discover it the hard way one day.
Get a clue, St�phane. You're embarrassing yourself here. Find God.
(idiocy snipped)
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
I care about what people are doing today.
Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is
welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and
would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance.
As I said, the west tries to help people who's life is unsafe in their
countries. Which is a good thing.
But you should know that that is not what is happening. What is
happening is hordes of mostly military-aged men are allowed to flood
in, with almost all of them are "economic" refuges (if not, in fact,
the Vanguard of an invasion).
Any particular reason why the country with the largest Muslim populationall Muslims are not the same, but it's a to difficult concept
for a limited far right guy to understand.
Everyone understands that. But in every Muslim society, the radicals
run the show and make the rules. Iran, Afghanistan, Gaza, you name
it. A small group of violent men control the direction of those
societies.
On 2025-08-15, rbowman <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 23:51:04 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it
seems like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it
comes to murdering and pedophilia.
That may because at least in Iran the Shi'a aren't Arabs. The Semitic
tribes seem to be big on that. I've read a book where their tribal god
recommends genocide on several occasions.
I think it's more than that. The Alawites in Syria (a Shiite offshoot)
would not only tolerate Christians, they would also sometimes attend Christmas services with them. And the Shiites in Iraq seem much more
united than the Sunnis. (Admittedly, I haven't studied this too
closely.)
On 2025-08-15, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-15 3:35 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 15-08-2025, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> a écrit :
And I bet that they are proud of their murderous ways and don't see
how any of it is unethical. The muslim children, in particular, are
so well indoctrinated that they don't see how any of the actions of
islam in general could be considered as anything but peaceful.
Let say that your responsibility in the terrorism is the same as the
responsibility of the Communists. For different reasons, but your
complementarity give arguments to Islamists.
The Communists saying that Islamism doesn't exist and it concerned
only a very few people who don't count help them spreading their
hatred. They were thrown out of their Muslim countries because they
were dangerous. And Communisms pretending they must be protected from
their countries and should be able to leave and say what they want
have a big responsibility.
The far Right pretending that all Muslims are Islamists and must be
fought at all cost are giving them arguments to rally every Muslims to
their cause. The Far Right is so noisy about refusing to differentiate
the people that they can pretend that all Muslims are in danger if
they don't unit with Islamists.
And it's impressive to see how the Islamists are managing to increase
their followers thanks to you and your bodies. You can be proud of
you.
Were my arguments responsible for muslims deciding to attack most of
the known world and waging war against Constantinople already in 717?
muslims don't need for us to rally them into killing us, they do a
splendid job themselves through the soiled toilet paper they call the
koran. Your own country is currently being conquered by these savages
and here you are in your infinite wisdom blaming the West for angering
the perpetually angered. Get a clue.
Why are so many Europeans self-loathing?
On 2025-08-15, Stéphane CARPENTIER <[email protected]> wrote:
Le 14-08-2025, RonB <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a
murderous pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the
nice ones are,
they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But it
seems like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it
comes to murdering and pedophilia.
Don't be jealous, your beloved Catholic Church is well versed in
pedophilia, they don't need Muslim help for that.
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
It's long gone the time where Christians were following Jesus Christ.
Now, they follow the money and the power, it's better for them.
So basically you're reveling in the destruction of the Catholic Church,
which built the (now crumbling) society you live in. What was once
referred to as Christendom. More more self-loathing and sniveling
cowardice.
On 2025-08-15, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-15 3:17 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 14-08-2025, RonB <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 2025-08-14, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit by the very fact that they see a
murderous pedophile as an example to follow. I don't care who the
nice ones are,
they should all be kicked out of the West.
Can't deny anything on these counts against the Muslim founder. But
it seems like the Shiites are a bit better than their founder when it
comes to murdering and pedophilia.
Don't be jealous, your beloved Catholic Church is well versed in
pedophilia, they don't need Muslim help for that.
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
It's long gone the time where Christians were following Jesus Christ.
Now, they follow the money and the power, it's better for them.
The church and the states of Europe worked together since the very
beginning. If areas were poor, the church had its say in which bishop
would be installed there; if the area was rich, the state would install
a bishop that was loyal to the king instead. Since you brought it up
though, I'd like for you to find verses in the Holy Bible which allow
for Christians to have sexual relations with children. In the koran,
they are numerous, and the homosexual pedophile named muhammad (piss be
upon him) is known to have married a six-year-old and consummated the
marriage when she was nine. Still, I'd like for you to come up with
examples since you're an expert on every topic under the sun.
Besides the Koran you can go to the Talmud for examples of excusing pedophilia against young girls in these so-called "holy books."
Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by
Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by
Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm
hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be
kept as a secret.
... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth.
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from>
Using 50/50 for gender and ages 20-39 for military age, gender excludes
18% of those within-age and 63% are excluded as too young or too old:
18% + 63% = 81% = ~80% of refugees just aren't "military-aged men".
To me, all muslims are shit ...
Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning
pedophilia ...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:13:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit ...
But you need their oil, don’t you. Which means you have to be nice to
them.
Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money talks” ...
On 2025-08-17, Stéphane CARPENTIER <[email protected]> wrote:
Le 17-08-2025, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]d> a écrit :
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:13:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit ...
But you need their oil, don’t you. Which means you have to be nice to
them.
Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money >>> talks” ...
He's not a Christian: he's a Catholic. Which switched from following God
to following money a long time ago.
Then he's serving mammon and not God and has exiled himself from the Catholic Church. But, unless you're reading a different Bible than I read, you're
told not to judge, that is God prerogative. Although you can certainly judge actions.
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
(idiocy snipped)
The only thing in your post that wasn't complete gibberish was about
the whites being the invaders in North America. But how about
England? How about Germany? How about France? How about Portugal?
The Muslims are invading and ruining every Western democracy that has
allowed it.
All the other points that I made you side-stepped by spewing
gibberish.
Since you clearly have no interest in reasoned debate, your response
will be deleted, unread.
CrudeSausage wrote:
Get a clue, Stéphane. You're embarrassing yourself here. Find God.
I'm wondering if he has a daughter or a sister that he could ask about
the Muslim creeps that make it unsafe for them to walk outside. Or
maybe he's out in the rural areas where things are still OK.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:13:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit ...
But you need their oil, don’t you.
Which means you have to be nice to
them.
Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money talks” ...
On 16 Aug 2025 14:44:29 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't
seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took
control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by
Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by
Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm
hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be
kept as a secret.
Jean Raspail wrote the book over 50 years ago but you didn't listen. He
did have the wrong group of invaders though. India was in dire straits in
the '70s but it survived and has prospered, at least some of the classes.
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth.
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from>
No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing
developers ready to step forward and fill the breach.
You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”, after your favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by line, purging any that
you cannot guarantee was produced by 100% heterosexual, binary-gendered hands.
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning
pedophilia ...
<https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html>
Numbers 31:1-18: “But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.”
Deuteronomy 20:10-14: “But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take
unto thyself.”
Judges 21:7-11: “And they found among the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead four hundred young virgins, that had known no man by lying with any male: and
they brought them unto the camp to Shiloh.”
Judges 21:20-23: “Go and lie in wait in the vineyards; And see, and, behold, if the daughters of Shiloh come out to dance in dances, then come
ye out of the vineyards, and catch you every man his wife of the daughters
of Shiloh ... And the children of Benjamin did so, and took them wives, according to their number, of them that danced, whom they caught.”
Exodus 21:7-10: “if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant ... If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he
let her be redeemed ... If he take him another wife; her food, her
raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.”
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning
pedophilia ...
<https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html>
Numbers 31:1-18: “But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.”
Deuteronomy 20:10-14: “But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take
unto thyself.”
Judges 21:7-11: “And they found among the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead four hundred young virgins, that had known no man by lying with any male: and
they brought them unto the camp to Shiloh.”
Judges 21:20-23: “Go and lie in wait in the vineyards; And see, and, behold, if the daughters of Shiloh come out to dance in dances, then come
ye out of the vineyards, and catch you every man his wife of the daughters
of Shiloh ... And the children of Benjamin did so, and took them wives, according to their number, of them that danced, whom they caught.”
Exodus 21:7-10: “if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant ... If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he
let her be redeemed ... If he take him another wife; her food, her
raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.”
On 2025-08-16, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-16 3:34 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2025-08-15, chrisv <[email protected]d> wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
I care about what people are doing today.
Same here, which is why it's so perplexing that the West is
welcoming-in hoards of Muslim invaders who hate their society and
would/will gladly subjugate or kill them, when they have a chance.
It's right in their "holy books." Tolerate other religions until you're in >>> the majority. The self-loathing Europeans are starting to experience Muslims
in the majority now — things will get worse, unless they grow spines and >>> fight back.
I think France needs to be conquered for seven centuries like Spain was
to eventually realize why muslims shouldn't be in the West. Of course, I
say that but the Spanish are themselves letting this garbage in.
They have been letting them in, but there seems to a rumblings of revolt against this policy in Spain recently. Even the Germans seem to be waking
up a little (probably too late).
Le 17-08-2025, RonB <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 2025-08-17, Stéphane CARPENTIER <[email protected]> wrote:
Le 17-08-2025, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]d> a écrit :
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:13:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit ...
But you need their oil, don’t you. Which means you have to be nice to >>>> them.
Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money >>>> talks” ...
He's not a Christian: he's a Catholic. Which switched from following God >>> to following money a long time ago.
Then he's serving mammon and not God and has exiled himself from the Catholic
Church. But, unless you're reading a different Bible than I read, you're
told not to judge, that is God prerogative. Although you can certainly judge >> actions.
I didn't want to answer any more but I can't let that.
You are the one pretending to follow the Bible, so you are the one who
have to follow its rules. Not me.
Then, why do you refuse me the right to judge when you allow yourself
the right to judge? You don't judge only actions, you judge every people unlike you who should be fought whatever what they do and who they are,
just depending on their religion.
And if you want to follow the Bible as you pretend you do, Jesus told
you to love your ennemies. Try to love Muslims, they are not your
ennemies.
Only a few part of them are and as you want to fight them all,
you can't tell the difference. So much for your Bible which must be
followed. Your messages are full of hatred, not of the love that Jesus
told you to apply.
You imagine hordes of Muslims invading France and raping women because
it's written in their book. For a fact, I know a lot of people who have
been raped, all of them have been raped by one of your beloved Catholic pedophiles.
I didn't knew it at the time. I just discovered it a few
months ago and I was chocked. He was a real good Catholic, going to the
mass and telling people to go to the mass. He was working in a Catholic school. Like you he was judging people not following God and the right
way. But a rapist anyway and I had no clue at the time.
And that's the reality: most of the rapes aren't done in the street.
they're done in close circles, friends of families and the like. That's
why there are so many rapes not reported: because a child telling his
father his best friend father was abusing him would have issues. He or
she wouldn't be believed. But if, by know more rapes are reported, it's
not because of your Muslims invasions, it's because reports are taken
more seriously into account. It's because a woman reporting a rape
doesn't have to prove it's her fault anymore. So, yes, some Muslims are rapist, but they are not enough to be statically consequent in France.
They have been letting them in, but there seems to a rumblings of revolt against this policy in Spain recently. Even the Germans seem to be
waking up a little (probably too late).
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:13:14 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
To me, all muslims are shit ...
But you need their oil, don’t you. Which means you have to be nice to
them.
This "Judeo-Christian" "Christian-Zionist" BS was the result of the Rothschild bought and paid for Scofield and his lying commentaries in
the "Scofield Bible."
Ask any of these people Zionist "Christians" why the Jewish Temple
should be rebuilt since Jesus made the final sacrifice and they'll be clueless. They've got about ten "proof verses" (taken out of context)
and that's about all they know about the Bible.
RonB knows the Bible better than you or I do. This statement is a
complete lie on your part.
Jesus told us to love our enemies, but He never told us to lower our
guards and let them walk all over us. Your inability to understand Christianity beyond "turn the other cheek" is the reason Western Europe
is letting these monsters in.
You might want to consider Matthew 21:12-13
"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold
and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money
changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It
is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have
made it a den of thieves."
Please provide evidence that it was Catholicism that made them
pedophiles ...
On 2025-08-16 8:58 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money
talks” ...
I understand that trying to work with people who conquered our lands ...
Also, first line right at the top of your link: The Bible has nothing to
say against pedophilia.
On 2025-08-16 11:26 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning
pedophilia ...
<https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html>
Pray tell, which of those is from the New Testament?
On 2025-08-16 9:01 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth.
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from>
No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing
developers ready to step forward and fill the breach.
You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”, after
your favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by line, purging
any that you cannot guarantee was produced by 100% heterosexual,
binary-gendered hands.
I prefer to stick to an operating system that I know works well and sit
this one out.
Inevitably, the Marxists and homosexuals who took over
Linux development will eat one another before long, once it becomes
clear that truly productive developers have no more interest in doing
any of the work.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:10:01 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-08-16 8:58 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
Some Christian folk don’t understand any principle other than “money >>> talks” ...
I understand that trying to work with people who conquered our lands ...
You conquered theirs, remember. Think about why, to this day, “Crusade” remains a bad word in the Middle East.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:50:15 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
RonB knows the Bible better than you or I do. This statement is a
complete lie on your part.
Everything in the Bible (or any other religious book) is already a “lie”. Religious argument is basically circular argument, trying to justify a viewpoint by assuming it is true to begin with.
Jesus told us to love our enemies, but He never told us to lower our
guards and let them walk all over us. Your inability to understand
Christianity beyond "turn the other cheek" is the reason Western Europe
is letting these monsters in.
See, that’s what I mean by circular reasoning: you don’t think “turn the
other cheek” refutes your argument, so you try to argue that by assuming
it doesn’t in the first place.
You might want to consider Matthew 21:12-13
"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold
and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money
changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It
is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have
made it a den of thieves."
But Ecclesiastes 10:19 says “A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.”.
<https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/money.html>
“It is written” about things long before your “Jesus” was supposed to have
existed.
Please provide evidence that it was Catholicism that made them
pedophiles ...
Ah, now you’re trying to change the argument from denying that there are pedophiles among Christians, to trying to claim that the two are not connected.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:16:22 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Also, first line right at the top of your link: The Bible has nothing to
say against pedophilia.
You freely admit that??
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:15:33 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-08-16 11:26 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:06:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Still waiting for you to provide biblical passages condoning
pedophilia ...
<https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/Pedophilia.html>
Pray tell, which of those is from the New Testament?
You did ask for “biblical passages”, did you not? Is the Old Testament somehow less “Biblical” than the New?
<https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/otlaw.html>
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:11:38 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-08-16 9:01 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth.
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from>
No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing
developers ready to step forward and fill the breach.
You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”, after
your favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by line, purging
any that you cannot guarantee was produced by 100% heterosexual,
binary-gendered hands.
I prefer to stick to an operating system that I know works well and sit
this one out.
Pragmatism wins out over ideaology, eh?
That attitude won’t go down well
with the current regime in power in Dumbfuckistan, that’s for sure.
Inevitably, the Marxists and homosexuals who took over
Linux development will eat one another before long, once it becomes
clear that truly productive developers have no more interest in doing
any of the work.
It does seem to be going the other way, doesn’t it? Judging from how you try to keep infesting these newsgroups with more and more examples of your ideological cant. So where are the right-wing-subscribing developers with
the knowledge and skills to do the work? Because the right-wingers seem to
be more and more preoccupied with “culture wars”, instead of doing useful work. They are the ones eating themselves.
On 2025-08-17, rbowman <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:18:56 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
This "Judeo-Christian" "Christian-Zionist" BS was the result of the
Rothschild bought and paid for Scofield and his lying commentaries in
the "Scofield Bible."
Ask any of these people Zionist "Christians" why the Jewish Temple
should be rebuilt since Jesus made the final sacrifice and they'll be
clueless. They've got about ten "proof verses" (taken out of context)
and that's about all they know about the Bible.
My religious education as a kid was Catholic and all my friends were in
some mainstream Protestant church. In the small town where I grew up you
were either Catholic or Dutch Reformed. My mother and my maternal uncle's >> family were the latter.
When all that rapture, dispensationalism, Zionism and so forth started to
become a focus I had no idea where it all came from. At least back then
the Catholics had a pretty good idea of who killed Christ.
Yep. And now, unfortunately, they participate in Seder meals (even some have "Christian versions" of the Seder meal) and they water down the prayer for the "perfidious Jews." There is nothing Biblical the Seder meal and the Jews of the time accepted responsibility for shedding Christ's blood. "Let it be on our hands." Though, of course, the Romans were not blameless (but Jesus said to Pilate that he had the "lesser blame."
But Ecclesiastes 10:19 says “A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh >> merry: but money answereth all things.”.
<https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/money.html>
“It is written” about things long before your “Jesus” was supposed to have
existed.
We're living under the New Covenant, not the old. The Old Law was imperfect, waiting for the Messiah and the New Covenant, written on our hearts — which is perfect. Find a quote in the New Testament that in any way condones pedophilia. Hint... you won't.
But you will find such filth in the Koran and the Talmud, both of which were written AFTER the New Testament.
Please provide evidence that it was Catholicism that made them
pedophiles ...
Ah, now you’re trying to change the argument from denying that there are >> pedophiles among Christians, to trying to claim that the two are not
connected.
Are you so myopic that you only see pedophilia in the Catholic Church and
not anywhere else? (Unfortunately the modern Catholic Church was severely weakened by Modernism, i.e., a compromise with the satanic world, in Vatican II.) But pedophile filth spills out everywhere in our satanic world.
On 2025-08-17, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-16 8:48 p.m., rbowman wrote:
On 16 Aug 2025 14:44:29 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:I think that he didn't specifically target the Muslims because he knew
Yes, but it's a secret, nobody should know about it. In France we aren't >>>> seventy millions anymore. We are two hundred millions. The Muslims took >>>> control of everything. All the French women are raped twice a day by
Muslims. All the churches have been either burned or replaced by
Mosques. All Christians have been killed, only Muslims stay here. I'm
hiding to stay alive. But it's too difficult to say aloud, it must be
kept as a secret.
Jean Raspail wrote the book over 50 years ago but you didn't listen. He
did have the wrong group of invaders though. India was in dire straits in >>> the '70s but it survived and has prospered, at least some of the classes. >>
that they would gladly cut off his head for criticizing him in the
slightest. However, what he imagined has turned to reality and the
world's garbage is now flooding the West looking for a handout. They
expect us to happily give them money and a free home because that's what
the traffickers tell them to expect upon their arrival. Since they also
believe that white women exist solely for their amusement, it shouldn't
be surprising that they're harassing them looking for "a kiss" which
always translates to free sex.
Meanwhile, you have emasculated people believing that it is the West's
responsibility to take them in because we somehow caused their poverty.
Somehow, we were the ones telling them to have ten children per woman
despite having no way of taking care of themselves much less children.
We were also the ones telling them to eat the seeds we sent them to
plant rather than do any kind of agriculture. Apparently, we were also
the ones telling them to pray five times a day and kill anyone who
prayed slightly differently.
This was planned by the Rothschilds to destroy the West. The destruction of Libya and the following "Arab Spring" revolts were yet more engineered
mob uprisings by the same slimeballs who engineered the mob uprising against Jesus, nearly 2000 years ago. Their methods never change. Satan and his myrmidons are nothing if not monotonous.
(See Revelation 2:9 and 3:9)
I have to admit that when I read Revelation as a teenager, I could not imagine how any of the things described could come to pass. Now, I am
shaken by how accurate much of it turned out to be. What's more shocking
is that people like Lawrence could have access to this prophecy, see it happening before his eyes and _still_ deny that there is validity to the Bible.
On 8/18/25 5:45 AM, RonB wrote:
Murdering unborn babies is evil.
Abortion rights protect women from harm, and cancel rape-babies.
If Jews accepted the blame for Jesus's crucifixion ...
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:04:03 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
If Jews accepted the blame for Jesus's crucifixion ...
He was a fake “Messiah”. Remember “he shall be called Emmanuel”? Only this
one never was ...
On 2025-08-18, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-08-17 6:13 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:50:15 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
RonB knows the Bible better than you or I do. This statement is a
complete lie on your part.
Everything in the Bible (or any other religious book) is already a “lie”.
Religious argument is basically circular argument, trying to justify a
viewpoint by assuming it is true to begin with.
Feel free to debunk it. Smarter people have already attempted to do so
and failed, but I'm sure that you'll prove them all wrong. After all,
you installed Linux successfully and none of those other people ever
managed to do so. You're firing the big guns. Before you begin, I would
start with the Shroud of Turin. I'm sure you will be able to explain why
there is both pre-mortem and post-mortem blood on there and which force
was used to make Jesus's image appear without destroying the linen.
Jesus told us to love our enemies, but He never told us to lower our
guards and let them walk all over us. Your inability to understand
Christianity beyond "turn the other cheek" is the reason Western Europe >>>> is letting these monsters in.
See, that’s what I mean by circular reasoning: you don’t think “turn the
other cheek” refutes your argument, so you try to argue that by assuming >>> it doesn’t in the first place.
See below.
You might want to consider Matthew 21:12-13
"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold >>>> and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money
changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It >>>> is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have
made it a den of thieves."
But Ecclesiastes 10:19 says “A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh
merry: but money answereth all things.”.
<https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/money.html>
“It is written” about things long before your “Jesus” was supposed to have
existed.
Like I said, start with the Shroud of Turin and explain why the visible
injuries on whoever was covered by the Shroud are consistent with what's
written in the Holy Bible.
There are so many of these that the only thing atheists can do is ignore them. Oh, they'll make snarky comments on the side, but they won't deal with the facts.
The miracle connected with Our Lady of Las Lajas (Our Lady of the Rocks) is pretty much impossible to deny. And there's absolutely no scientific explanation for it.
Imprinted on the face of the cliff was an image of the Blessed Virgin
holding her infant Son in her arms. Both are smiling sweetly. The
Virgin’s hair is long and dark brown, extending to about the elbow. Her
eyes are large and innocent, and her garments beautiful to behold. On one
side of them is an image of Saint Dominic and on the other is Saint
Francis of Assisi. Mary is extending her hand toward Saint Dominic,
holding a Rosary. The Holy Infant holds a Franciscan cord which he
appears to be giving to Saint Francis. The spiritual sons of these two
holy saints were responsible for the conversion of the people of Central
and South America. ...
This image, known as Our Lady of Las Lajas, is clearly of miraculous
origin. The colors have not lost any of their brilliance over the
centuries, and they are not a paint or coloring that has been applied to
the surface of the stone. Geological samples collected have proven that
the color actually permeates the rock, for, as impossible as it may
sound, the colors of the image are perfectly evenly distributed and reach
several feet into the face of the cliff. Scientists cannot explain it,
while those who hate God deny the obvious and attempt to distort the
truth of its miraculous origin.
https://www.roman-catholic-saints.com/our-lady-of-las-lajas.html
This image appeared in the late 1700s. There's a story behind it (see the link) but fact that they've taken core samples and find the colors go
several feet into the stone can not be explained (as mentioned at the beginning). This is just one of many miracles atheists ignore.
Link to image using Tiny URL ... https://tinyurl.com/nhzjtueh
The golden crowns have been painted on. (Not really a fan of that, but it is what it is.)
After all, the Spanish themselves share genes with the invaders and look
a lot like them ...
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:36:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
After all, the Spanish themselves share genes with the invaders and
look a lot like them ...
Had a DNA test yourself?
I can remember a bunch of white supremacists in the USA getting DNA
testing a few years ago to prove their “whiteness”, only to discover
that part of their ancestry came, not just from slaveowners, but from
their slaves as well.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:36:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
After all, the Spanish themselves share genes with the invaders and look
a lot like them ...
Had a DNA test yourself?
On 2025-08-20, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:36:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
After all, the Spanish themselves share genes with the invaders and look >>> a lot like them ...
Had a DNA test yourself?
I can remember a bunch of white supremacists in the USA getting DNA
testing a few years ago to prove their “whiteness”, only to discover that
part of their ancestry came, not just from slaveowners, but from their
slaves as well.
Big surprise, that when you put people living and working side-by-side
over centuries, that in spite of any kind of ideological indoctrination
and insistence that one side is inferior and isn’t even supposed to be
considered human, they start creating some offspring together?
They were furious and in major denial, claiming the DNA testing was all
lies. Of course it wasn’t.
I know just about everyone in the world is a mongrel. But that doesn't
change the fact that Europe (formerly Christendom), formerly a "white" civilization, is where everyone (all over the world) wants to migrate to.
Has to be some reason for that, don't you think?
Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many
personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty
dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome.
And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many
personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty
dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in
reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome.
I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum.
If anybody were to accuse me of having “racist” beliefs, I would say I am a “culturist”, not a “racist”. Different cultures can have some characteristics that are superior to others (and some characteristics that are inferior), that’s not a genetic thing. Anyway, “culture” is not something you are born into (like the genes you get from your parents), it
is something you acquire. Cultures pick up things from each other over
time, that’s inherent in the human capacity for learning new ideas.
And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept.
On 2025-08-20, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many
personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty
dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in >>> reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome.
I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum.
So do I. Most of us do. We're all mongrels. It doesn't change the fact that Muslim thugs are overruning Europe and raping and killing the native population.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept.
Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth based on?
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept.
Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth
based on?
Uh, Lawrence merely noted it is not a scientific concept.
It's just a rough grouping of people by various characterstics.
Race depends on who is doing the categorizing.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:03:08 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept.
Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth
based on?
Uh, Lawrence merely noted it is not a scientific concept.
It's just a rough grouping of people by various characterstics.
Race depends on who is doing the categorizing.
Thank you for the non-answer.
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:03:08 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:33:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>>>
And besides, “race” is not a scientific concept.
Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so forth
based on?
Uh, Lawrence merely noted it is not a scientific concept.
It's just a rough grouping of people by various characterstics.
Race depends on who is doing the categorizing.
Thank you for the non-answer.
"Then what, exactly, is affirmative action, reparations, and so
forth based on?"
Thank you for the unanswerable question.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many
personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty
dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have in
reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome.
I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum.
Le 20-08-2025, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]d> a écrit :
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many
personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty
dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have
in reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome.
I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum.
You are sure about that? The human spectrum is huge. In some parts of
Africa, there is more diversity than in the rest of the all world
combined.
And you shouldn't be proud about that. The purity is the most important
thing in the world. Look at the purest finest king Charles II of Spain
proved it only by existing. The ultimate proof: the purest, the best.
Whereas someone like me or my rellies, on the other hand, could have
been right in the gas ovens if we had been around the wrong place at the wrong time ...
On 23 Aug 2025 09:48:56 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 20-08-2025, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]d> a écrit :
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:52:19 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
Yup, I have a tiny shred of black DNA myself, one of my many
personalities is a Nubian prince, the idea of racial purity is pretty
dumb when one looks at the simple fact that "interracial" people have
in reality a superior, healthier, more resilient genome.
I have blood relatives of just about every shade of the human spectrum.
You are sure about that? The human spectrum is huge. In some parts of
Africa, there is more diversity than in the rest of the all world
combined.
Genetic diversity, yes. Skin colour ... how much blacker than black can
you get? They seem no darker than many South Indians, to me.
On 2025-08-17 6:19 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 09:11:38 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-08-16 9:01 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:28:21 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
... Linux development nowadays can't handle the truth.
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/bcachefs-dev-might-be-banned-from>
No doubt there is no shortage of suitably right-wing-subscribing
developers ready to step forward and fill the breach.
You could fork the entire Linux kernel, and name it “Lundix”,
after your favourite Thought Leader. Go over the code line by
line, purging any that you cannot guarantee was produced by 100%
heterosexual, binary-gendered hands.
I prefer to stick to an operating system that I know works well
and sit this one out.
Pragmatism wins out over ideaology, eh?
Ideology. While I believe in software freedom, I am strongly against Communism. If the people developing free software subscribe to the
latter, then I have no interest in using it.
Inevitably, the Marxists and homosexuals who took over Linux
development will eat one another before long, once it becomes
clear that truly productive developers have no more interest in
doing any of the work.
It does seem to be going the other way, doesn’t it? Judging from
how you try to keep infesting these newsgroups with more and more
examples of your ideological cant. So where are the
right-wing-subscribing developers with the knowledge and skills to
do the work? Because the right-wingers seem to be more and more
preoccupied with “culture wars”, instead of doing useful work. They
are the ones eating themselves.
The right-wing developers are employed at top dollar producing
software for big companies that make profits. They live in big
houses with their large families. They don't feel like sacrificing
that to please some freeloaders who subscribe to Communsim.
Ideology. While I believe in software freedom, I am strongly against
Communism. If the people developing free software subscribe to the
latter, then I have no interest in using it.
Then why are you still here?
The right-wing developers are employed at top dollar producing
software for big companies that make profits. They live in big
houses with their large families. They don't feel like sacrificing
that to please some freeloaders who subscribe to Communsim.
Why are you not with them, then, basking in your success, and theirs?
Why are you still here, continuing to try our patience with your
vacuous and feckless moaning?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 25:16:10 |
| Calls: | 12,106 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,180 |