Le 07-08-2025, Farley Flud <
[email protected]> a écrit :
I compiled and installed kernel 6.16 on one of my workstations.
Maybe.
Then I tried to start my network connection. FAILED!
That was to be expected. Any time you do something on your computer, you
break it and something fails to run.
WTF! This NEVER happened before. NEVER!
For that part, I can acknowledge: you are unable to do anything
technical, but you are very resourceful and imaginative when it comes to
do stupid things. You never fail to surprise me.
I checked the modules. The Intel network driver "igc" was gone. Why
was it not built?
My guess: you will find the reason.
Fortunately, thanks to the Gentoo community, I quickly found the answer:
I should have known better, sorry for my mistake. Of course you don't
know what's running on your computer and you can't fix anything. You
have to ask for help. My bad. Won't happen again.
<https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8868356.html?sid=aa35db8d6de62496b7aaa38f28b84582>
Whew! What a relief!
With kernel 6.16 the option ETHTOOL_NETLINK is now a dependency for the "igc" driver. By enabling ETHTOOL_NETLINK the "igc" driver can now be built.
So, thanks for your proof, that's exactly what I claim since a long
time. Unlike your claim, you don't choose every options in the kernel,
you are just using old options until they fail. You don't know the
options you are using when you compile your kernel. So your kernel is
compiled using options which were maybe good long time ago, but not
anymore. And your kernel is not optimized. And you don't know how to
manage the options on your kernel configuration.
You claim the opposite, but you just proved it's a lie. And so, your
kernel is slower than any default kernel provided by competent distro
managers.
Thanks go to Gentoo, the best distro with the best supportive community.
Yes. Exactly. That was the words I was looking for: you are a distro
lackey.
(Fortunately, my motherboard has two network interfaces.
What for? On a server, I see why it's useful/important but on a
personal workstation, I don't.
Let say things differently: I'm pretty sure you used an usb live distro
with ubuntu (which is protected against you) which allowed you to access Internet and find the answer.
You are an ubuntu lackey: I knew that all along.
One requires "igc"
but the other requires "e1000e." I was able to start the network connection using "e1000e" which then enabled me to seach online for a solution.)
I don't believe in that part. If it was true, you wouldn't have lost
your network connection. You may have lost your Internet connection, but
it's not the same error and the same thing as loosing your network
connection.
As I said, you lost your network connection, used an Ubuntu usb live CD
(thanks for ubuntu distro), found out the answer thanks (thanks for
Gentoo distro), corrected your options (proving you are not the master
of your kernel) and invented a scenario to make believe you are in
charge.
But all that proves is only you are in charge in finding new ways to
break your computer. And in that, you are good, keep going, I'm really
having fun.
--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)