Bradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
| WASHINGTON, April 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's
| administration wants to strike 90 trade deals in 90 days,
| but the challenges to quickly resolving the president's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | trade war are already apparent.
23 days, zero tariff deals.
|
| At This Humble Used Car Lot, Tariffs Are Beginning to Sting
|
| Antonio Austin is trying to hold his car business together
| as President Trump's tariffs drive up costs -- and drive
| his customers deeper into crisis.
Tell them not to buy 30 dolls for Christmas.
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Bradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how*used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
Same explanation I gave to Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness: as tariffs raise the price of new cars beyond the reach of some consumers, they'll switch their demand to used cars. Higher demand + static supply = higher prices for used cars.Bradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
On 5/6/2025 4:17 AM, chrisv wrote:
Same explanation I gave to Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness: as tariffs raise >the price of new cars beyond the reach of some consumers, they'll switch their >demand to used cars. Higher demand + static supply = higher prices forBradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
used cars.
Tell us you don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand without >literally
saying "I don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand."
chrisv wrote:
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
Same explanation I gave to Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness: as tariffs raise >the price of new cars beyond the reach of some consumers, they'll switch their >demand to used cars. Higher demand + static supply = higher prices for used cars.
Tell us you don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand without literally
saying "I don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand."
chrisv wrote:
Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
New car sales would slow as prices go up. Those customers would enter
the used car market. More demand + lowered supply = higher used car
prices.
On Tue, 6 May 2025 16:33:27 -0000 (UTC), [email protected] (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
George Stigler <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/6/2025 4:17 AM, chrisv wrote:
Same explanation I gave to Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness: as tariffs raiseBradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
the price of new cars beyond the reach of some consumers, they'll switch their
demand to used cars. Higher demand + static supply = higher prices for >>>used cars.
Tell us you don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand without >>>literally
saying "I don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand."
Also the cost of parts and tools.
Parts, tools, labor, repairing will become more expensive as tariffs
reduce the number of new cars replacing old.
On Tue, 6 May 2025 16:33:27 -0000 (UTC), [email protected] (Bradley K.Spot-on correct. Used cars require more repair services and more replacement parts than new cars. As a lot of replacement parts are imported, the cost of those is going to rise with tariffs. As the supply of mechanics' services is constrained in the short term, labor rates will rise as demand for car repairs rises. The prices of *everything* about cars — new car prices, used car prices,
Sherman) wrote:
George Stigler <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/6/2025 4:17 AM, chrisv wrote:
Same explanation I gave to Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness: as tariffs raiseBradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
the price of new cars beyond the reach of some consumers, they'll switch their
demand to used cars. Higher demand + static supply = higher prices for
used cars.
Tell us you don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand without
literally
saying "I don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand."
Also the cost of parts and tools.
Parts, tools, labor, repairing will become more expensive as tariffs
reduce the number of new cars replacing old.
George Stigler <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/6/2025 4:17 AM, chrisv wrote:
Same explanation I gave to Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness: as tariffs raiseBradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
the price of new cars beyond the reach of some consumers, they'll switch their
demand to used cars. Higher demand + static supply = higher prices for
used cars.
Tell us you don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand without
literally
saying "I don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand."
Also the cost of parts and tools.
Governor Swill wrote:
You're the one who asked the stupid question.
"... perhaps I should have thought about it a little longer before >>posting."
You should consider doing that with every post.
Chris V. is right, actually, George's outburst was unnecessary, not to
say Chris is entirely innocent of posting negative thoughts himself,
but I think he at least has some control of the hormonal reactionary
tendency to flame someone, as George did here.
Was that really deserved, "George"? You just told us that you're a
piece of shit, without saying "I'm a piece of shit", "George".
Jeezuz.
*plonk*
You're the one who asked the stupid question.
"... perhaps I should have thought about it a little longer before
posting."
You should consider doing that with every post.
George Stigler wrote:People who announce kill-filing, like you and AlleyPussyBitch, are weak-minded narcissists. No one cares whose posts you read or don't read. If you're going to
chrisv wrote:
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
Same explanation I gave to Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness: as tariffs raise
the price of new cars beyond the reach of some consumers, they'll switch their
demand to used cars. Higher demand + static supply = higher prices for used cars.
OK, perhaps I should have thought about it a little longer before
posting.
Tell us you don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand without literally
saying "I don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand."
Was that really deserved, "George"? You just told us that you're a
piece of shit, without saying "I'm a piece of shit", "George".
Jeezuz.
*plonk*
Allahu Snackbar <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/6/2025 4:11 PM, chrisv wrote:
*plonk*
People who announce kill-filing, like you and AlleyPussyBitch, are weak-minded
narcissists. No one cares whose posts you read or don't read. If you're going to
kill-file someone, just do it and keep your stupid fucking mouth shut about it.
Christ, you made chrisv look up-to-date. Bravo at pissing in the
wind, in 2025, on Usenet, just funny to see someone so trapped in the
past.
On 5/7/2025 10:18 AM, Joel wrote:
Allahu Snackbar <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/6/2025 4:11 PM, chrisv wrote:
*plonk*
People who announce kill-filing, like you and AlleyPussyBitch, are
weak-minded
narcissists. No one cares whose posts you read or don't read. If
you're going to
kill-file someone, just do it and keep your stupid fucking mouth shut
about it.
Christ, you made chrisv look up-to-date. Bravo at pissing in the
wind, in 2025, on Usenet, just funny to see someone so trapped in the
past.
What is "trapped in the past" about *correctly* pointing out that people
who announce their kill-filing are weak-minded narcissists? It's a true statement. It's also true that no one cares which posters another Usenet participant reads or doesn't read. I imagine you also think it's normal
that Kremlin Girl responds to a dozen or so of her own posts every day
to piss and moan about an opponent — her intellectual superior —
ignoring her.
You're kind of a Usenet bitch yourself, aren't you?
George Stigler wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
Same explanation I gave to Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness: as tariffs raise
the price of new cars beyond the reach of some consumers, they'll switch their
demand to used cars. Higher demand + static supply = higher prices for used cars.
OK, perhaps I should have thought about it a little longer before
posting.
Tell us you don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand without literally
saying "I don't know a fucking thing about supply and demand."
Was that really deserved, "George"?
(snipped, unread)
chrisv wrote:
For the "crime" of posting a "stupid" question, I would cut some slack
to someone that I didn't know to be an asshole. Assholes get treated >>differently, of course.
Which is why you get treated as you do so often here.
You're a thoughtless asshole.
Excuse me, but Chris posts exactly such outbursts often enough.
His replies on topical subjects tend to be ill thought out, lacking
factual backing and extremely insulting.
This very post of his shows
an utter lack of thought not to mention inconsiderate of others he's
tolled into a useless exchange.
Tell you what, Joel, you keep sucking him off and I'll keep treating
him the way he treats everybody else.
Governor Swill wrote:
Was that really deserved, "George"? You just told us that you're a
piece of shit, without saying "I'm a piece of shit", "George".
Jeezuz.
*plonk*
You're the one who asked the stupid question.
Better stupid than some fucking asshole who viciously attacks whenever
given the chance.
"... perhaps I should have thought about it a little longer before >>posting."
You should consider doing that with every post.
We all make mistakes. You should have thought about it a little
longer before voting. 8)
Bradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
Governor Swill wrote:
chrisv wrote:
For the "crime" of posting a "stupid" question, I would cut some slack
to someone that I didn't know to be an asshole. Assholes get treated >>>differently, of course.
Which is why you get treated as you do so often here.
It's a lie to claim that I'm mistreated "so often" in here. It's also
a lie to claim that "George Stigler" knew anything about me.
So that's what you've got. Lies. Just like "George", you've managed
to lose to me, despite my initial mistake.
You're a thoughtless asshole.
In an asshole's opinion, anyway.
Your response will be deleted, unread.
On Wed, 7 May 2025 11:13:47 -0700, Allahu Snackbar wrote:
What is "trapped in the past" about *correctly* pointing out that people who >> announce their kill-filing are weak-minded narcissists?
It is helpful to let posters know what, exactly, lands them in
killfiles.
On 2025-05-05, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
Bradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
| WASHINGTON, April 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's
| administration wants to strike 90 trade deals in 90 days,
| but the challenges to quickly resolving the president's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | trade war are already apparent.
23 days, zero tariff deals.
|
| At This Humble Used Car Lot, Tariffs Are Beginning to Sting
|
| Antonio Austin is trying to hold his car business together
| as President Trump's tariffs drive up costs -- and drive
| his customers deeper into crisis.
Tell them not to buy 30 dolls for Christmas.
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html> >>
I'll bet you have quite the Barbie Doll collection Chris Ahlstrom.You do appear to be a girly boy.
Allahu Snackbar wrote:
(snipped, unread)
I'm too smart for you, appearently.
Follow-ups to the above by Joel and "Allahu" were also deleted,
unread.
Cue outraged screams of "Liar! You really read it!" from some POS
realizing that I've turned "defeat" into victory.
This is what it's like to be superior.
chrisv wrote:
Since the article is behind a paywall, I'm left wondering how *used*
car prices would be affected by tariffs.
Getting around a paywall is usually pretty simple.
chrisv wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
Was that really deserved, "George"? You just told us that you're a >>>>piece of shit, without saying "I'm a piece of shit", "George".
Jeezuz.
*plonk*
You're the one who asked the stupid question.
Better stupid than some fucking asshole who viciously attacks whenever >>given the chance.
"... perhaps I should have thought about it a little longer before >>>posting."
You should consider doing that with every post.
We all make mistakes. You should have thought about it a little
longer before voting. 8)
The Gov responses to the above, made at 4:02 and 4:03 were deleted,
unread, as was his 4:04 post, as will all subsequent Gov posts in this thread.
Just *raging* he is, folks! He thinks he's "got me", and he's not
letting go! But I will not go around and around with an unreasonable, butthurt dipshit.
Any claim that I viciously attack whenever given the chance would be a
lie. I treat all respectful people with respect.
Swilly, Gov, is actually capable of posting interesting information however >he ruins it via all the ultra left wing propaganda garbage he posts.
It's basically an online insane asylum here.
Get some nice cheese and a fine wine, sit back and enjoy the show.
It don't cost anything.
On Tue, 06 May 2025 21:36:25 -0400, Joel <[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 06 May 2025 18:11:37 -0500, chrisv <[email protected]d> >>>>George Stigler wrote:
<snip>
Tell you what, Joel, you keep sucking him off and I'll keep treating
him the way he treats everybody else.
On 2025-05-05 15:49, pothead wrote:
On 2025-05-05, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
Bradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
| WASHINGTON, April 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's
| administration wants to strike 90 trade deals in 90 days,
| but the challenges to quickly resolving the president's
| trade war are already apparent.
23 days, zero tariff deals.
|
| At This Humble Used Car Lot, Tariffs Are Beginning to Sting
|
| Antonio Austin is trying to hold his car business together
| as President Trump's tariffs drive up costs -- and drive
| his customers deeper into crisis.
Tell them not to buy 30 dolls for Christmas.
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html> >>>
I'll bet you have quite the Barbie Doll collection Chris Ahlstrom.You do
appear to be a girly boy.
Really: what is it with your type?
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Tue, 06 May 2025 21:36:25 -0400, Joel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 06 May 2025 18:11:37 -0500, chrisv <[email protected]d> >>>>>George Stigler wrote:
<snip>
Tell you what, Joel, you keep sucking him off and I'll keep treating
him the way he treats everybody else.
Can't we all just get along?
Alan wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 2025-05-05 15:49, pothead wrote:
On 2025-05-05, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
Bradley K. Sherman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
| WASHINGTON, April 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's
| administration wants to strike 90 trade deals in 90 days,
| but the challenges to quickly resolving the president's
| trade war are already apparent.
23 days, zero tariff deals.
|
| At This Humble Used Car Lot, Tariffs Are Beginning to Sting
|
| Antonio Austin is trying to hold his car business together
| as President Trump's tariffs drive up costs -- and drive
| his customers deeper into crisis.
Tell them not to buy 30 dolls for Christmas.
<https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/04/us/trump-tariffs-used-car-dealer.html>
I'll bet you have quite the Barbie Doll collection Chris Ahlstrom.You do >>> appear to be a girly boy.
Really: what is it with your type?
It's just stock silly-assed trolling. Nothing to see here.
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
You might try one of the soy boy groups Linonut.
Can't we all just get along?
They will accept you.
I'm still left-wing, personally, but I'm down with Trump as far as
this term he's serving. He won fair and square. Jan6'21 is I guess
just irrelevant, the other charges irrelevant. The voters gave him a
pass. And I embrace that rather than calling for some World War III
bullshit scenario. Americans have to come together even as it's so >difficult.
pothead wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
You might try one of the soy boy groups Linonut.
Can't we all just get along?
They will accept you.
Chris A is a good person, I believe. And a good Linux advocate.
Joel wrote:
I'm still left-wing, personally, but I'm down with Trump as far as
this term he's serving. He won fair and square. Jan6'21 is I guess
just irrelevant, the other charges irrelevant. The voters gave him a
pass. And I embrace that rather than calling for some World War III >>bullshit scenario. Americans have to come together even as it's so >>difficult.
I hope for our sake that some charismatic leader will come along and
be somewhere near the common-sense middle. It will take someone or
something special get us back together after all the acrimony.
Governor Swill wrote:
chrisv wrote:
For the "crime" of posting a "stupid" question, I would cut some slack
to someone that I didn't know to be an asshole. Assholes get treated
differently, of course.
Which is why you get treated as you do so often here.
It's a lie to claim that I'm mistreated "so often" in here.
It's also
a lie to claim that "George Stigler" knew anything about me.
So that's what you've got. Lies. Just like "George", you've managed
to lose to me, despite my initial mistake.
You're a thoughtless asshole.
In an asshole's opinion, anyway.
Your response will be deleted, unread.
chrisv wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chrisv wrote:
For the "crime" of posting a "stupid" question, I would cut some slack >>>> to someone that I didn't know to be an asshole. Assholes get treated
differently, of course.
Which is why you get treated as you do so often here.
It's a lie to claim that I'm mistreated "so often" in here.
Nah, just a wee bit of hyperbola, such as if I've been bothering to pay
any attention to you or not. Lately, I've been busy with other
endeavors, so its been "not".
It's also
a lie to claim that "George Stigler" knew anything about me.
Doesn't really matter too much, because the obvious answer to the
Economics question is that used cars will become more expensive too.
But if one is wondering why it was condescending, perhaps "George" is
one of the regular posters who knows you, but is just hiding behind a >sockpuppet name.
Or perhaps they just did some research on your posting style first, and
did a preemptive strike because of how you react so poorly when you get >corrected ..
as we can see in effect in your reply below:
So that's what you've got. Lies. Just like "George", you've managed
to lose to me, despite my initial mistake.
You're a thoughtless asshole.
In an asshole's opinion, anyway.
Your response will be deleted, unread.
TL;DR: your poor online reputation precedes you.
I'm like a judge, I call the balls and strikes as it were,
-hh wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chrisv wrote:
For the "crime" of posting a "stupid" question, I would cut some slack >>>>> to someone that I didn't know to be an asshole. Assholes get treated >>>>> differently, of course.
Which is why you get treated as you do so often here.
It's a lie to claim that I'm mistreated "so often" in here.
Nah, just a wee bit of hyperbola, such as if I've been bothering to pay
any attention to you or not. Lately, I've been busy with other
endeavors, so its been "not".
One butthurt loser/liar defending another.
It's also
a lie to claim that "George Stigler" knew anything about me.
Doesn't really matter too much, because the obvious answer to the
Economics question is that used cars will become more expensive too.
But if one is wondering why it was condescending, perhaps "George" is
one of the regular posters who knows you, but is just hiding behind a
sockpuppet name.
Yeah, let's give the "benefit of the doubt" to whomever attacks your superior.
Or perhaps they just did some research on your posting style first, and
did a preemptive strike because of how you react so poorly when you get
corrected ..
You are lying again, -highhorse. I react just fine to being
corrected, as we see in my response to Gov Swill's first post to the
thread, where he explained respectfully.
<[email protected]>
as we can see in effect in your reply below:
What we see below is my response to being called a "thoughtless
asshole" who is undeserving of respect, you friggen idiot.
Unlike you, -highhorse, I do deserve respect. Unlike you, I don't
get-off on attacking people.
So that's what you've got. Lies. Just like "George", you've managed
to lose to me, despite my initial mistake.
You're a thoughtless asshole.
In an asshole's opinion, anyway.
Your response will be deleted, unread.
TL;DR: your poor online reputation precedes you.
In an asshole's opinion, anyway.
Rather ironic, considering the hundreds of times your idiocy and your
lies have been exposed and documented. Almost all of it attacking a
group of decent, honest, reasonable people (FOSS advocates).
"Poor online reputation" indeed!
Your response will be deleted, unread.
(snipped, unread)
-hh wrote:
(snipped, unread)
Was anyone fooled by -highhorse's garbage? I'm so confident that he's
got nothin' that I don't need to read it.
This is a glimpse into the upside-down world of a trolling loser, like -highhorse, folks. A world where advocates of Free and Open Source
Software are "bad" and the trolls who attack them with idiocy and
lies, like -highhorse, are "good".
In this thread, Swill's first post to me was respectful and I
responded respectfully. But after the initial pleasant exchange,
Swill went after me not once, not twice, not three times, but at least
*four* times (there were more that I deleted without reading and can't provide message-ID's for).
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
The first couple attacks I let go, but Swill got progressively more insulting, arguing that I don't deserve to be treated with respect
because I treat "everybody else" with disrespect, which is nothing but
a lie. I finally had enough and called him out for his lying
assholery.
Along comes -highhorse, another attacking asshole who I've spanked
countless times over the years, claiming that I'm the "bad guy"
because I allegedly "react poorly" to being "corrected". But that's
just his lie, typical of trolls who attack others with idiocy and lies
and then claim that they are disrespected because they "disagree" or
that they "tell the truth".
It's amazing that, after all these years, -highhorse still hasn't
figured out that he can't beat me. I am, simply, better than him.
Yeah, let's give the "benefit of the doubt" to whomever [sic]
attacks your
superior.
*whoever*, you illiterate Nazi shitbag.
-hh wrote:
(snipped, unread)
Was anyone fooled by -highhorse's garbage? I'm so confident that he's
got nothin' that I don't need to read it.
This is a glimpse into the upside-down world of a trolling loser, like >-highhorse, folks. A world where advocates of Free and Open Source
Software are "bad" and the trolls who attack them with idiocy and
lies, like -highhorse, are "good".
In this thread, Swill's first post to me was respectful and I
responded respectfully. But after the initial pleasant exchange,
Swill went after me not once, not twice, not three times, but at least
*four* times (there were more that I deleted without reading and can't >provide message-ID's for).
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
The first couple attacks I let go, but Swill got progressively more >insulting, arguing that I don't deserve to be treated with respect
because I treat "everybody else" with disrespect, which is nothing but
a lie. I finally had enough and called him out for his lying
assholery.
Along comes -highhorse, another attacking asshole who I've spanked
countless times over the years, claiming that I'm the "bad guy"
because I allegedly "react poorly" to being "corrected". But that's
just his lie, typical of trolls who attack others with idiocy and lies
and then claim that they are disrespected because they "disagree" or
that they "tell the truth".
It's amazing that, after all these years, -highhorse still hasn't
figured out that he can't beat me. I am, simply, better than him.
On Sun, 11 May 2025 06:59:13 -0500, chrisv <[email protected]d>
wrote:
If anyone doesn't like that, that's too bad.
Did you have some delusion that anybody cared?
Clearly, your dedication to adult conversation didn't last long.
On Sun, 11 May 2025 16:30:03 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/11/25 15:44, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2025 06:59:13 -0500, chrisv <[email protected]d>
wrote:
If anyone doesn't like that, that's too bad.
Did you have some delusion that anybody cared?
YA instance of "The lady doth protest too much..." (from Hamlet)
Clearly, your dedication to adult conversation didn't last long.
Sadly, it rarely does.
He needs self-esteem & anger management training.
Ironically he'd get some of that self esteem if he'd stop acting like
a child.
On Sun, 11 May 2025 19:58:39 -0400, Joel <[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
[chrisv] is an advocate of Linux and has said some very
profound things to that effect, and in that regard is an ally.
Why? Is his Linux box transexual?
That isn't really funny. "Transsexuals" need allies, you ought to be
one, if you were as good as you sell yourself to be.
I'm an ally to the extent that I support, "you do you".
But I will not support trans in women's sports or pre-op trans in
women's restrooms.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 07:40:59 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/11/25 19:11, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2025 16:30:03 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/11/25 15:44, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2025 06:59:13 -0500, chrisv <[email protected]d>
wrote:
If anyone doesn't like that, that's too bad.
Did you have some delusion that anybody cared?
YA instance of "The lady doth protest too much..." (from Hamlet)
Clearly, your dedication to adult conversation didn't last long.
Sadly, it rarely does.
He needs self-esteem & anger management training.
Ironically he'd get some of that self esteem if he'd stop acting like
a child.
Agreed, but a dollop of fear from having an inferiority complex doesn't
all himself to do that. You may have noticed his recurring pattern of
trying to claim that lowlifes are attacking their 'superiors' (him).
Yes, and it's especially noteworthy that he makes such claims even
when there was no attack to start with. Near as I can tell, chrisv,
like Trump, considers anything short of 100% agreement, compliance and admiration to be an "attack".
People aren't adjudged "good" or "bad" based on how they feel about
transexuals.
I think it's a reasonable thing to ask, actually, if they have enough awareness of the issue, whether they're tolerant or not. I would tend
to judge people who are phobes, despite being presented the evidence,
as mean-spirited.
<snip>
I do not care whether you think I am good or bad with respect to
trans. What matters is if I respect the freedom of other people.
On 12/5/25 16:44, Joel wrote:
People aren't adjudged "good" or "bad" based on how they feel about
transexuals.
I think it's a reasonable thing to ask, actually, if they have enough
awareness of the issue, whether they're tolerant or not. I would tend
to judge people who are phobes, despite being presented the evidence,
as mean-spirited.
I do not care whether you think I am good or bad with respect to
trans. What matters is if I respect the freedom of other people.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 10:56:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Sun, 11 May 2025 19:58:39 -0400, Joel <[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:
[chrisv] is an advocate of Linux and has said some very
profound things to that effect, and in that regard is an ally.
Why? Is his Linux box transexual?
That isn't really funny. "Transsexuals" need allies, you ought to be >>>>one, if you were as good as you sell yourself to be.
I'm an ally to the extent that I support, "you do you".
But I will not support trans in women's sports or pre-op trans in
women's restrooms.
How about the other way around?
https://youtu.be/-ZYDDFnUjeM?t=55
Boxing.
:-D
Boxing has weight classes that help neutralize the disadvantage.
Swimming, for example does not.
Further, trans use hormones and steroids as part of their transition
care. Would this not be illegal in most sports associations?
On Mon, 12 May 2025 20:55:54 -0700, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 12/5/25 16:44, Joel wrote:
People aren't adjudged "good" or "bad" based on how they feel about
transexuals.
I think it's a reasonable thing to ask, actually, if they have enough
awareness of the issue, whether they're tolerant or not. I would tend
to judge people who are phobes, despite being presented the evidence,
as mean-spirited.
I do not care whether you think I am good or bad with respect to
trans. What matters is if I respect the freedom of other people.
Oh good. So then you're against policies that force people to humor
these people and treat them as if they're really something they
aren't.
Perfect!
On Mon, 12 May 2025 20:55:54 -0700, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 12/5/25 16:44, Joel wrote:
People aren't adjudged "good" or "bad" based on how they feel about
transexuals.
I think it's a reasonable thing to ask, actually, if they have enough
awareness of the issue, whether they're tolerant or not. I would tend
to judge people who are phobes, despite being presented the evidence,
as mean-spirited.
I do not care whether you think I am good or bad with respect to
trans. What matters is if I respect the freedom of other people.
Oh good. So then you're against policies that force people to humor
these people and treat them as if they're really something they
aren't.
Perfect!
On 5/13/25 7:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 20:55:54 -0700, Siri Cruz
<[email protected]>
wrote:
On 12/5/25 16:44, Joel wrote:
People aren't adjudged "good" or "bad" based on how they
feel about
transexuals.
I think it's a reasonable thing to ask, actually, if they
have enough
awareness of the issue, whether they're tolerant or not. I
would tend
to judge people who are phobes, despite being presented the
evidence,
as mean-spirited.
I do not care whether you think I am good or bad with respect to
trans. What matters is if I respect the freedom of other people.
Oh good. So then you're against policies that force people to
humor
these people and treat them as if they're really something they
aren't.
Perfect!
Wokie Madness still exists.
Fewer and fewer, but still
SOON the energetic counter-response, but
that's tomorrow.
As for car prices ... hey ... the more USA
you are the BETTER. That's sensible.
On 13/5/25 22:00, c186282 wrote:
On 5/13/25 7:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 20:55:54 -0700, Siri Cruz
<[email protected]>
wrote:
On 12/5/25 16:44, Joel wrote:
People aren't adjudged "good" or "bad" based on how they
feel about
transexuals.
I think it's a reasonable thing to ask, actually, if they
have enough
awareness of the issue, whether they're tolerant or not. I
would tend
to judge people who are phobes, despite being presented the
evidence,
as mean-spirited.
I do not care whether you think I am good or bad with respect to
trans. What matters is if I respect the freedom of other people.
Oh good. So then you're against policies that force people to
humor
these people and treat them as if they're really something they
aren't.
Perfect!
Wokie Madness still exists.
Fewer and fewer, but still
SOON the energetic counter-response, but
that's tomorrow.
As for car prices ... hey ... the more USA
you are the BETTER. That's sensible.
You spend so much energy worrying what others think.
On 13/5/25 4:03, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 20:55:54 -0700, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 12/5/25 16:44, Joel wrote:
People aren't adjudged "good" or "bad" based on how they feel about >>>>>> transexuals.
I think it's a reasonable thing to ask, actually, if they have enough
awareness of the issue, whether they're tolerant or not. I would tend >>>> to judge people who are phobes, despite being presented the evidence,
as mean-spirited.
I do not care whether you think I am good or bad with respect to
trans. What matters is if I respect the freedom of other people.
Oh good. So then you're against policies that force people to humor
these people and treat them as if they're really something they
aren't.
Perfect!
You can be a coward. I do not mind.
I am bisexual, but psychologically speaking, getting fucked by my GF
doesn't feel "gay", it's the same act, same parts involved, but it's a
woman giving me cock, not a man.
chrisv wrote:
It's amazing that, after all these years, -highhorse still hasn't
figured out that he can't beat me. I am, simply, better than him.
All responses to the above were deleted, unread. As will any response
to this post. -highhorse and Gov Swill lost when they *lied* to
attack me. I'm in the right, and that's the end of it.
If anyone doesn't like that, that's too bad.
chrisv wrote:
chrisv wrote:
It's amazing that, after all these years, -highhorse still hasn't
figured out that he can't beat me. I am, simply, better than him.
All responses to the above were deleted, unread. As will any response
to this post. -highhorse and Gov Swill lost when they *lied* to
attack me. I'm in the right, and that's the end of it.
If anyone doesn't like that, that's too bad.
48 (!) posts deleted, unread.
On 2025-05-16 11:30, chrisv wrote:
chrisv wrote:
chrisv wrote:
It's amazing that, after all these years, -highhorse still hasn't
figured out that he can't beat me. I am, simply, better than him.
All responses to the above were deleted, unread. As will any response
to this post. -highhorse and Gov Swill lost when they *lied* to
attack me. I'm in the right, and that's the end of it.
If anyone doesn't like that, that's too bad.
48 (!) posts deleted, unread.
And yet you feel the need to crow about it!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 26:15:41 |
| Calls: | 12,106 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,193 |