Seems Microsoft is bringing back the option for ordinary Windows usersformat-option-found-in-windows-11-preview-build-refs-supports-up-to-35- petabytes>.
to format volumes as ReFS <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/new-advanced-filesystem-
This filesystem made its first appearance years ago, but then Microsoft
began removing the option for using it from various non-“Enterprise” versions of Windows where it had been introduced.
NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is
really enough to take Windows forward. It seems a bit lacklustre
compared to the options that have long been available on Linux, for
example.
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:20:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote in <vs4iug$186dc$[email protected]>:
Seems Microsoft is bringing back the option for ordinary Windows usersformat-option-found-in-windows-11-preview-build-refs-supports-up-to-35- petabytes>.
to format volumes as ReFS
<https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/new-advanced-filesystem-
This filesystem made its first appearance years ago, but then Microsoft
began removing the option for using it from various non-“Enterprise”
versions of Windows where it had been introduced.
NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is
really enough to take Windows forward. It seems a bit lacklustre
compared to the options that have long been available on Linux, for
example.
I reported on ReFS a month or two ago, when I tried it with my (then)
new Windows 11 Pro Workstation virtual host.
It wasn't resizable. I wrote it off as a primitive toy, and reformated
the partition with NTFS.
It's got a lotta versions, but I bet not much has changed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReFS
3.14: Default version formatted by Windows 11 (build 26047 and newer).[23]
And yeah, I just bought a 35 petabyte hard drive yesterday.
What a coincidence :-)
Paul
NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is
really enough to take Windows forward.
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:20:00 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is
really enough to take Windows forward.
Whatever the case, it will be another proprietary format that GNU/Linux cannot (easily) access.
IIRC, it tooks many years befor GNU/Linux was able to correctly access
and write NTFS files.
I still would not trust the Linux kernel module for writing NTFS even
though it is regarded to be stable and free from error.
In the not-so-rare times that I must interchange files between Winblows
and GNU/Linux I will use either VFAT or EXFAT format.
And yeah, I just bought a 35 petabyte hard drive yesterday.
What a coincidence :-)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 716 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 52:05:13 |
| Calls: | 12,115 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 15,010 |
| Messages: | 6,518,580 |
| Posted today: | 1 |