Who has the fucking time to fiddle with themes?
But virtually all criticisms of the GIMP are directed to the
UI as if the UI is somehow highly significant.
A true image pro wouldn't even notice the UI
but the hordes of dilettantes certainly do.
Outwardly, the only difference is that the UI is now based in
GTK3 and hence it is themeable. Who has the fucking time to
fiddle with themes?
But virtually all criticisms of the GIMP are directed to the
UI as if the UI is somehow highly significant.
A true image pro wouldn't even notice the UI but the hordes
of dilettantes certainly do.
Outwardly, the only difference is that the UI is now based in
GTK3 and hence it is themeable. Who has the fucking time to
fiddle with themes?
But virtually all criticisms of the GIMP are directed to the
UI as if the UI is somehow highly significant.
A true image pro wouldn't even notice the UI but the hordes
of dilettantes certainly do.
On 2025-03-22 09:16, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Outwardly, the only difference is that the UI is now based inI wasn't aware that one had to be a "true image pro" to use GIMP. Good
GTK3 and hence it is themeable. Who has the fucking time to
fiddle with themes?
But virtually all criticisms of the GIMP are directed to the
UI as if the UI is somehow highly significant.
A true image pro wouldn't even notice the UI but the hordes
of dilettantes certainly do.
to know.
Guess that means I'll have to stop. I'm not now, nor have I ever been, a "true image pro." That must be why I hate the dark theme that's been the
UI default for some time. I find it distracting. First thing I do when installing on a new computer is restore it to the lighter "System"
theme. Sacrilege.
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
Very useful when describing the plan to those entrusted with carrying it
out. But now I have to give all that up, because GIMP is only for "true
image pros."
On 2025-03-24 10:17, TJ wrote:
On 2025-03-22 09:16, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Outwardly, the only difference is that the UI is now based inI wasn't aware that one had to be a "true image pro" to use GIMP. Good
GTK3 and hence it is themeable. Who has the fucking time to
fiddle with themes?
But virtually all criticisms of the GIMP are directed to the
UI as if the UI is somehow highly significant.
A true image pro wouldn't even notice the UI but the hordes
of dilettantes certainly do.
to know.
Guess that means I'll have to stop. I'm not now, nor have I ever been,
a "true image pro." That must be why I hate the dark theme that's been
the UI default for some time. I find it distracting. First thing I do
when installing on a new computer is restore it to the lighter
"System" theme. Sacrilege.
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare
planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
Very useful when describing the plan to those entrusted with carrying
it out. But now I have to give all that up, because GIMP is only for
"true image pros."
I imagine that the tone of what's written above is sarcastic, but if you aren't already aware, Larry "Lester Thorpe Diego Garcia Fabian Russell" Pietraskiewicz is a laughing stock. Stéphane Carpentier seems to come to Usenet strictly to make fun of him and his poor ideas.
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
I wasn't aware that one had to be a "true image pro" to use GIMP. Good
A true image pro wouldn't even notice the UI but the hordes
of dilettantes certainly do.
to know.
Guess that means I'll have to stop. I'm not now, nor have I ever been, a "true image pro."
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:17:11 -0400, TJ wrote:
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepareYou would probably be better served with GIS (Geographic Information
planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
System)
software such as GRASS GIS for Linux:
https://grass.osgeo.org/download/linux/
GIMP is for basic image manipulation on plain old raster image formats.
Attempting to shoehorn such a program into GIS analysis is just asking
for problems.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:17:11 -0400, TJ wrote:
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare
planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
You would probably be better served with GIS (Geographic Information System) software such as GRASS GIS for Linux:
https://grass.osgeo.org/download/linux/
GIMP is for basic image manipulation on plain old raster image formats. Attempting to shoehorn such a program into GIS analysis is just asking
for problems.
Now get back into your harness and plow those fields. Maybe one day
your master will be able to afford a tractor.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
How mature of you.
He did the Richard Nixon "I'm leaving and you won't have me to kick
around any more" thing but, apparently, he forgot where the exit was.
He's been in my killfile for a long, long time.
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:06:44 +0000
Farley Flud <[email protected]> wrote:
Witness the billions of junk spreadsheets that are created by the
hordes of untrained Calc/Excel users. It is the same with the GIMP.
Now get back into your harness and plow those fields. Maybe one day
your master will be able to afford a tractor.
It's always a Special Occasion when the c.o.l.a. troglodytes cross-post
to c.o.l.m. *Sterling* rhetoric, as usual o_O
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:17:11 -0400, TJ wrote:
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare
planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
You would probably be better served with GIS (Geographic Information System) software such as GRASS GIS for Linux:
https://grass.osgeo.org/download/linux/
GIMP is for basic image manipulation on plain old raster image formats. Attempting to shoehorn such a program into GIS analysis is just asking
for problems.
On 2025-03-24, rbowman <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:46:09 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
He did the Richard Nixon "I'm leaving and you won't have me to kick
around any more" thing but, apparently, he forgot where the exit was.
He's been in my killfile for a long, long time.
He must have gotten lonely over on that abandoned news group.
I was hoping he would entertain himself by responding to his own posts.
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:17:11 -0400, TJ wrote:
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare
planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
Let me suggest looking at Inkscape. That does vector drawing, which is resolution-independent, and is easier to modify.
I recently did something similar to what you’ve been doing (except a bit simpler), drawing a diagram of a car accident I was in for an insurance claim. The satellite photo was in a background layer, and I added various annotation layers on top, including lines with different colours and dash styles indicating the paths of the vehicles etc. Inkscape has some nice design functions to let me get text blocks neatly aligned and distributed etc.
And it’s all nondestructive. Which means I can change things (e.g. the sizes and rotations of objects) without losing any image quality.
I use GIMP, too, when appropriate. The thing with Free software is, it doesn’t cost you any extra to learn more than one tool.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:17:11 -0400, TJ wrote:
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare
planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
Let me suggest looking at Inkscape. That does vector drawing, which is resolution-independent, and is easier to modify.
I recently did something similar to what you’ve been doing (except a bit simpler), drawing a diagram of a car accident I was in for an insurance claim. The satellite photo was in a background layer, and I added various annotation layers on top, including lines with different colours and dash styles indicating the paths of the vehicles etc. Inkscape has some nice design functions to let me get text blocks neatly aligned and distributed etc.
And it’s all nondestructive. Which means I can change things (e.g. the sizes and rotations of objects) without losing any image quality.
I use GIMP, too, when appropriate. The thing with Free software is, it doesn’t cost you any extra to learn more than one tool.
On 2025-03-24 12:45, Farley Flud wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:17:11 -0400, TJ wrote:I'll look into it, but at a glance it looks like it's far more elaborate
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare
planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified
farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields
drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
You would probably be better served with GIS (Geographic Information System) >> software such as GRASS GIS for Linux:
https://grass.osgeo.org/download/linux/
GIMP is for basic image manipulation on plain old raster image formats.
Attempting to shoehorn such a program into GIS analysis is just asking
for problems.
and feature-packed than I really need for my purposes. I've been using
The GIMP for this since 2006, so I pretty much know how to make it work
for me.
Assuming, of course, that GIMP 3.0 hasn't been changed so radically that
the UI is completely new. Even so, I don't expect my distro's stable
release to move away from 2.10 for a little while yet, so I should be
good for this year's cropping plans.
TJ
candycanearter07 <[email protected]>
wrote:
TJ <[email protected]ss> wrote at 17:32 this Monday (GMT):
Assuming, of course, that GIMP 3.0 hasn't been changed so radically that >>> the UI is completely new. Even so, I don't expect my distro's stable
release to move away from 2.10 for a little while yet, so I should be
good for this year's cropping plans.
If it's Debian, then you won't have to worry about GIMP 3.0 for at least >>another year!
I still enjoy Debian, but the outdatded pages is a bit annoying
sometimes.
https://i.imgur.com/6EYxO3X.png
Just use the AppImage of 3.x.
If it's Debian, then you won't have to worry about GIMP 3.0 for at least another year!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 26:15:31 |
| Calls: | 12,106 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,193 |