• Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech

    From CrudeSausage@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 6 18:06:16 2025
    <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>

    Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
    is sad.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MummyChunk@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 7 04:40:11 2025
    CrudeSausage wrote: https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech

    Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
    is sad.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative


    Care to share why you have your opinion?


    This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From CrudeSausage@21:1/5 to MummyChunk on Fri Feb 7 09:11:08 2025
    On 2025-02-06 11:40 p.m., MummyChunk wrote:
    CrudeSausage wrote:
    https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech

    Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
    is sad.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative


    Care to share why you have your opinion?

    This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

    Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
    improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
    they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
    desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
    heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
    people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
    them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
    in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
    use whatever works best.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From CrudeSausage@21:1/5 to RonB on Fri Feb 7 09:14:43 2025
    On 2025-02-07 2:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-02-06, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
    <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>

    Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
    is sad.

    As "lunduke" I've had enough of his "the sky is falling" crap. I'm not going to bother to follow your links.

    He makes Linux look bad, so he must be ignored or suppressed! Right?

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From CrudeSausage@21:1/5 to RonB on Fri Feb 7 09:13:16 2025
    On 2025-02-07 2:39 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-02-06, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
    <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech>

    Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
    is sad.

    "Open Source" is not an entity. It can't be anti anything. I agree that
    there are too many talking head, Woke drones heading too many open source projects, but I'm guessing the majority of open source developers are apolitical. There not the ones getting the headlines.

    I'm sure that they're feeling more and more unwelcome with every passing
    day. It would be alright if projects like Haiku were apolitical, but
    even they have made it clear that they don't believe in a meritocracy.
    Whites and heterosexuals have to be suppressed in favour of "the
    minorities" whose populations across the planet are much larger than
    that of the whites.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MummyChunk@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 7 14:46:44 2025
    RonB wrote:
    On 2025-02-07, MummyChunk <mummycullen> wrote:
    CrudeSausage wrote:
    https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech

    Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
    is sad.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative


    Care to share why you have your opinion?


    This is a response to the post seen at:
    http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

    I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the "checker
    box" and it
    wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a stupid verification system.

    Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?

    --
    "Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good." J.R.R. Tolkien


    Check your spelling


    This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MummyChunk@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 7 18:12:20 2025
    Joel wrote:
    [email protected]d (MummyChunk) wrote:
    RonB wrote:

    This is a response to the post seen at:
    http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

    I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the
    "checker
    box" and it
    wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a >> stupid verification system.

    Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?

    Check your spelling


    I spelled it right and it didn't work for me, either.

    --
    Joel W. Crump

    Amendment XIV
    Section 1.

    [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
    abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
    United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
    life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
    nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
    protection of the laws.

    Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
    liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.



    If you look at what he posted, he didn't spell it correctly.


    This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From CrudeSausage@21:1/5 to RonB on Fri Feb 7 20:14:49 2025
    On 2025-02-07 12:47 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-02-07, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2025-02-06 11:40 p.m., MummyChunk wrote:
    CrudeSausage wrote:
    https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech

    Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly >>>> is sad.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative


    Care to share why you have your opinion?

    This is a response to the post seen at:
    http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

    Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
    improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
    they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
    desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
    heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
    people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
    them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
    conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
    in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
    use whatever works best.

    You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is
    Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment.

    You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity — he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.

    Actually, he's very much an advocate for Linux. Heck, he was on the
    openSUSE board of directors for a while and even worked on the LibreM
    from Purism. The guys is definitely not open-source, just anti-woke in open-source.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pothead@21:1/5 to RonB on Sat Feb 8 01:54:18 2025
    On 2025-02-07, RonB <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2025-02-07, CrudeSausage <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2025-02-06 11:40 p.m., MummyChunk wrote:
    CrudeSausage wrote:
    https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech

    Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly >>>> is sad.

    --
    CrudeSausage
    Gab: @CrudeSausage
    Telegram: @CrudeSausage
    Unapologetic paleoconservative


    Care to share why you have your opinion?

    This is a response to the post seen at:
    http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

    Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
    improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
    they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
    desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
    heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
    people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
    them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
    conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
    in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
    use whatever works best.

    You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is
    Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment.

    You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity — he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.


    I've never liked Lunduke. To me he was an opportunists playing both
    sides of the debate between Linux and other operating systems.
    As I have not watched him in a few years maybe things have changed but in the past he seemed to focus on minor things that maybe most Linux users would
    not encounter or if they did, easy work around would exist.
    He is interesting but not my cup of whisky.
    I'm a MX Linux user running kde.
    --
    pothead

    Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
    Read below to learn the reason.
    The Biden Crime Family Timeline here: https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)