• Another Great FOSS Software. Never On Winblows

    From Farley Flud@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 22 19:14:29 2024
    Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
    graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.

    Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
    compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
    doesn't stop the digital idiots.

    However, FOSS has an answer:

    https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png

    From the link:

    "jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved
    as JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."

    I have not tried this yet but I keep it in my toolbox.

    Man oh man! These FOSS people are always right on top of it!

    Micro$lop and its highly paid minions could never compete.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!



    --
    Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Farley Flud on Sun Dec 22 15:25:10 2024
    Farley Flud wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
    graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.

    Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
    compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
    doesn't stop the digital idiots.

    However, FOSS has an answer:

    https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png

    From the link:

    "jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved
    as JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."

    Installation

    A compiled Windows version is available on the "Releases" page.

    (It's jpeg2png.exe).

    Under Windows, you can also drag-and-drop JPEG files onto the program.

    Also, the example graphics really don't show any benefit. The first example, "Lena", the encoding is better than the bogus GIMP conversion, but the jpeg2png is worse than the original. Why not use an original JPEG as the base. And show numbers (file sizes).

    Just my quick assessment.

    --
    An eye in a blue face
    Saw an eye in a green face.
    "That eye is like this eye"
    Said the first eye,
    "But in low place,
    Not in high place."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From vallor@21:1/5 to Farley Flud on Sun Dec 22 21:26:07 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 19:14:29 +0000, Farley Flud <[email protected]> wrote in <pan$b93c0$1f07acd8$927f2cd1$[email protected]>:

    Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
    graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.

    Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
    compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
    doesn't stop the digital idiots.

    However, FOSS has an answer:

    https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png

    From the link:

    "jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved as
    JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."

    I have not tried this yet but I keep it in my toolbox.

    Man oh man! These FOSS people are always right on top of it!

    Micro$lop and its highly paid minions could never compete.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

    Now I know you're an anti-Linux troll.

    There's no way you don't know about ImageMagick.

    ImageMagick-im6.q16(General Commands ManuImageMagick-im6.q16(1)

    NAME
    ImageMagick - is a free software suite for the creation,
    modification and display of bitmap images.

    SYNOPSIS
    convert-im6.q16 input-file [options] output-file

    OVERVIEW
    Use ImageMagick® to create, edit, compose, or convert
    bitmap images. It can read and write images in a variety
    of formats (over 200) including PNG, JPEG, GIF, HEIC,
    TIFF, DPX, EXR, WebP, Postscript, PDF, and SVG. Use
    ImageMagick to resize, flip, mirror, rotate, distort,
    shear and transform images, adjust image colors, apply
    various special effects, or draw text, lines, polygons,
    ellipses and B\['e]zier curves.

    The functionality of ImageMagick is typically utilized
    from the command-line or you can use the features from
    programs written in your favorite language. Choose from
    these interfaces: G2F (Ada), MagickCore (C), MagickWand
    (C), ChMagick (Ch), ImageMagickObject (COM+), Magick++
    (C++), JMagick (Java), JuliaIO (Julia), L-Magick (Lisp),
    Lua (LuaJIT), NMagick (Neko/haXe), Magick.NET (.NET),
    PascalMagick (Pascal), PerlMagick (Perl), MagickWand for
    PHP (PHP), IMagick (PHP), PythonMagick (Python), magick
    (R), RMagick (Ruby), or TclMagick (Tcl/TK). With a lan‐
    guage interface, use ImageMagick to modify or create im‐
    ages dynamically and automagically.
    * * *
    (
    My distro has version 6. I see now that there is a version 7:

    https://imagemagick.org/
    )
    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
    OS: Linux 6.12.6 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
    "pixel, n.:
    A mischievous, magical spirit associated with screen displays.
    The computer industry has frequently borrowed from mythology:
    Witness the sprites in computer graphics, the demons in artificial
    intelligence, and the trolls in the marketing department."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Charles@21:1/5 to Farley Flud on Sun Dec 22 16:52:13 2024
    On 12/22/2024 2:14 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
    Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
    graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.

    No, because jpg is perfectly fine for charts.

    Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
    compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
    doesn't stop the digital idiots.

    However, FOSS has an answer:

    https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png

    From the link:

    "jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved
    as JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."

    I have not tried this yet but I keep it in my toolbox.

    Man oh man! These FOSS people are always right on top of it!

    Micro$lop and its highly paid minions could never compete.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

    The only digital idiot here is you. Going from a lossy format (jpg) to a
    higher quality format (png) does NOT make it look any better. All you
    will end up with is a larger file that looks exactly like the original.

    You need to encode the original in png, not jpg. Once its in jpg, the
    stuff that is lost is gone forever.

    You can pour 2 gallons of water into a 5 gallon bucket. But it is still
    2 gallons of water. You can take a crappy mpg file (at 64k for example)
    and convert it to a CD. But it is NOT CD-quality sound.

    And BTW, there are dozens of these useless utilities for Windows.
    Because there are LOTS of people just as stupid as you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Farley Flud@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun Dec 22 22:08:06 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 16:58:17 -0500, -hh wrote:


    Where the assumption is that because PNG is lossless, absence of
    compression artifacts is more noticeable in cartoonish graphics, so its
    worth the trade of larger file sizes.


    Holy shiite! My knowledgeable post has caused a firestorm of
    lunacy!

    Well, there is no sense in arguing with idiots.

    Believe what you will, but the reality is mine and mine alone.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! What stupid fucks!


    --
    Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From vallor@21:1/5 to Farley Flud on Sun Dec 22 22:14:50 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 22:08:06 +0000, Farley Flud <[email protected]> wrote in <pan$87e2$1888bc87$2efeefc0$[email protected]>:

    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 16:58:17 -0500, -hh wrote:


    Where the assumption is that because PNG is lossless, absence of
    compression artifacts is more noticeable in cartoonish graphics, so its
    worth the trade of larger file sizes.


    Holy shiite! My knowledgeable post has caused a firestorm of lunacy!

    Well, there is no sense in arguing with idiots.

    Believe what you will, but the reality is mine and mine alone.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! What stupid fucks!

    "Whenever you point a finger at someone, there are three
    fingers pointed back at you."

    In your case, you're the guy that said there were no
    even prime numbers -- and now you're the guy that thinks
    some new utility is the bee's knees, when ImageMagick
    has been around since 1999.

    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
    OS: Linux 6.12.6 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
    "Minds are like parachutes, they only work when open."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to vallor on Sun Dec 22 16:58:17 2024
    On 12/22/24 4:26 PM, vallor wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 19:14:29 +0000, Farley Flud <[email protected]> wrote in <pan$b93c0$1f07acd8$927f2cd1$[email protected]>:

    Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
    graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.

    Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
    compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
    doesn't stop the digital idiots.

    Where the assumption is that because PNG is lossless, absence of
    compression artifacts is more noticeable in cartoonish graphics, so its
    worth the trade of larger file sizes.

    However, FOSS has an answer:

    https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png

    From the link:

    "jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved as
    JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."

    I have not tried this yet but I keep it in my toolbox.

    Man oh man! These FOSS people are always right on top of it!

    Micro$lop and its highly paid minions could never compete.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

    Now I know you're an anti-Linux troll.

    Feeb's merely just a decade or so behind the times...


    There's no way you don't know about ImageMagick.

    ImageMagick-im6.q16(General Commands ManuImageMagick-im6.q16(1)

    NAME
    ImageMagick - is a free software suite for the creation,
    modification and display of bitmap images.

    SYNOPSIS
    convert-im6.q16 input-file [options] output-file

    OVERVIEW
    Use ImageMagick® to create, edit, compose, or convert
    bitmap images. It can read and write images in a variety
    of formats (over 200) including PNG, JPEG, GIF, HEIC,
    TIFF, DPX, EXR, WebP, Postscript, PDF, and SVG. Use
    ImageMagick to resize, flip, mirror, rotate, distort,
    shear and transform images, adjust image colors, apply
    various special effects, or draw text, lines, polygons,
    ellipses and B\['e]zier curves.

    The functionality of ImageMagick is typically utilized
    from the command-line or you can use the features from
    programs written in your favorite language. Choose from
    these interfaces: G2F (Ada), MagickCore (C), MagickWand
    (C), ChMagick (Ch), ImageMagickObject (COM+), Magick++
    (C++), JMagick (Java), JuliaIO (Julia), L-Magick (Lisp),
    Lua (LuaJIT), NMagick (Neko/haXe), Magick.NET (.NET),
    PascalMagick (Pascal), PerlMagick (Perl), MagickWand for
    PHP (PHP), IMagick (PHP), PythonMagick (Python), magick
    (R), RMagick (Ruby), or TclMagick (Tcl/TK). With a lan‐
    guage interface, use ImageMagick to modify or create im‐
    ages dynamically and automagically.
    * * *
    (
    My distro has version 6. I see now that there is a version 7:

    https://imagemagick.org/
    )

    Nice to see that it supports HEIC.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to vallor on Mon Dec 23 01:25:18 2024
    On 22 Dec 2024 21:26:07 GMT, vallor wrote:

    My distro has version 6. I see now that there is a version 7:

    Fedora 40 has 7.1.1-41, Ubuntu doesn't have it at all. It must be a Fedora default package. I've used it long ago but it isn't something I would have
    a use for and install.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Farley Flud@21:1/5 to vallor on Mon Dec 23 08:06:07 2024
    On 22 Dec 2024 22:14:50 GMT, vallor wrote:


    "there are three
    fingers pointed back at you."


    Yes. Fingers that would otherwise be stuck in their asses.


    --
    Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to RonB on Mon Dec 23 08:40:45 2024
    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 05:59:14 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I haven't checked my Fedora machine in a while. I guess I should.

    Thanks for reminding me. It's been a couple of days so it's only upgrading
    126 packages and a new kernel :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to rbowman on Mon Dec 23 07:43:32 2024
    rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On 22 Dec 2024 21:26:07 GMT, vallor wrote:

    My distro has version 6. I see now that there is a version 7:

    Fedora 40 has 7.1.1-41, Ubuntu doesn't have it at all. It must be a Fedora default package. I've used it long ago but it isn't something I would have
    a use for and install.

    I use imagemagick all the time. Sign the various spots in a document, then scan each page to JPEG format (better than PNG for emailing), save each one with an ordinal name, then:

    $ convert *.jpeg official-document.pdf

    Easy peasy!

    We also used imagemagick (and libreoffice) to convert a variety of documents to PDF for a project at work (years ago). This was on Windows.

    It's also an easy way to take a screen shot (root window or a specific window):

    $ import screenshot.png

    More options than you can shake a stick at.

    --
    If I could drop dead right now, I'd be the happiest man alive!
    -- Samuel Goldwyn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to rbowman on Mon Dec 23 07:50:15 2024
    rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 05:59:14 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I haven't checked my Fedora machine in a while. I guess I should.

    Thanks for reminding me. It's been a couple of days so it's only upgrading 126 packages and a new kernel :)

    Just upgraded on the Debian Sid box, and aptitude wanted to remove skanlite (the scanner I use for documents)!

    So I look at the next solution, which says to keep the related packages at their current version.

    Heh heh, the sig reminds me:

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dsandler/1259007648

    --
    <MFGolfBal> rit/ara: There's something really demented about UNIX underwear...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Farley Flud@21:1/5 to vallor on Mon Dec 23 13:43:15 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:26:07 +0000, vallor wrote:


    There's no way you don't know about ImageMagick.


    [snip assholery]

    It is useless to argue with total idiots but I have some time to waste.

    This program is NOT a converter. Understand assholes?

    This program addresses the following problem:

    Certain types of digital images such as line drawings, text, cartoons,
    graphs, etc. should not ever be compressed using JPEG compression.
    The reason is that such images contain a lot of very sharp edges
    that require extremely high spatial frequncies to reproduce. The
    nature of JPEG compression is to throw away those high frequncies.

    Needless to say, when such images are compressed with JPEG the
    result is chock full of highly visible artifacts and distortions.

    This jpeg2png program attempts to remove those artifacts and create
    a distortion-free result that is saved as a PNG image.

    There are idiots all over the Internet. Most, if not all, will
    use Microslop Winblows to do their production work. When the time
    comes to save their images they just stupudly press the JPEG compress
    button without enderstading the consequences.

    I encounter this idiotic junk all the time and now there is a specific
    program, jpeg2png, that is designed to provide a remedy.

    But one cannot fix stupid, just like one cannot argue with idiots.

    This group is FULL of total idiots.


    --
    Hail Linux! Hail FOSS! Hail Stallman!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DFS@21:1/5 to Lameass Larry P on Mon Dec 23 10:00:38 2024
    On 12/23/2024 8:43 AM, Lameass Larry P wrote:

    This group is FULL of total idiots.


    No doubt about that:

    * Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.

    * I need to train some stupid bitch to do the coding for me, but
    bitches have no aptitude for it. A bitch can be trained to cook,
    clean house, and even type up a document. But coding? Never.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Mon Dec 23 13:53:31 2024
    Chris Ahlstrom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 05:59:14 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I haven't checked my Fedora machine in a while. I guess I should.

    Thanks for reminding me. It's been a couple of days so it's only upgrading >> 126 packages and a new kernel :)

    Just upgraded on the Debian Sid box, and aptitude wanted to remove skanlite (the scanner I use for documents)!

    So I look at the next solution, which says to keep the related packages at their current version.

    It turned out that the update broke Qt. Skanlite, qsynth, skanlite.... none would work. I had to go back into aptitude, update again, and select a different solution.

    Hardware note: I saw a cheap ($7) USB-to-3.5mm headphone jack and bought it so that I could free up my Berhinger UCA202 audio codec box. Plugged into a USB-2 port on the back of the mini PC, plugged in my speakers, tweaked mpd.conf and used pavucontrol to make that dongle the default audio output.

    Also edited .xbindkeys (changed "CODEC" to "Audio" to reflect the new device's name as shown via "aplay -l") to control the new device using the amixer app.

    Nice change o' pace.

    --
    The early worm gets the bird.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Farley Flud on Mon Dec 23 14:01:06 2024
    Farley Flud wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:26:07 +0000, vallor wrote:

    There's no way you don't know about ImageMagick.

    [snip assholery]

    :-D More assholery to follow :-D

    It is useless to argue with total idiots but I have some time to waste.

    This program is NOT a converter. Understand assholes?

    This program addresses the following problem:

    Certain types of digital images such as line drawings, text, cartoons, graphs, etc. should not ever be compressed using JPEG compression.
    The reason is that such images contain a lot of very sharp edges
    that require extremely high spatial frequncies to reproduce. The
    nature of JPEG compression is to throw away those high frequncies.

    Needless to say, when such images are compressed with JPEG the
    result is chock full of highly visible artifacts and distortions.

    This jpeg2png program attempts to remove those artifacts and create
    a distortion-free result that is saved as a PNG image.

    :-D

    Cannot restore what is not there. One can, with knowledge, edit the
    image to add in a guess as to the missing information.

    This seems to be interesting, AI to upgrade a jpeg:

    https://www.upscale.media/product/jpeg-images-into-high-quality-photos

    This group is FULL of total idiots.

    Can't argue with that! :-D

    --
    Universities are places of knowledge. The freshman each bring a little
    in with them, and the seniors take none away, so knowledge accumulates.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Diego Garcia@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Mon Dec 23 21:34:01 2024
    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:01:06 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


    Cannot restore what is not there. One can, with knowledge, edit the
    image to add in a guess as to the missing information.


    That is true.

    But at least this program attempts to restore the lost info
    that should not have been lost save for "operator error," i.e.
    idiots.

    I have not yet tried this program but I have tried the program
    that is listed in his references. On the botched images that
    I have tried it didn't work that well. (Can't fix stupid.)



    This seems to be interesting, AI to upgrade a jpeg:

    https://www.upscale.media/product/jpeg-images-into-high-quality-photos


    This program is only the application of AI (neural networks)
    for image "upscaling" or enlargement.

    It does not address the problem of image RESTORATION that is the
    result of idiots not knowing how to properly compress a digital
    image.

    The programs to which I allude attempt to tackle image RESTORATION.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Diego Garcia on Tue Dec 24 07:58:00 2024
    Diego Garcia wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:01:06 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    Cannot restore what is not there. One can, with knowledge, edit the
    image to add in a guess as to the missing information.

    That is true.

    But at least this program attempts to restore the lost info
    that should not have been lost save for "operator error," i.e.
    idiots.

    I have not yet tried this program but I have tried the program
    that is listed in his references. On the botched images that
    I have tried it didn't work that well. (Can't fix stupid.)

    This seems to be interesting, AI to upgrade a jpeg:

    https://www.upscale.media/product/jpeg-images-into-high-quality-photos

    This program is only the application of AI (neural networks)
    for image "upscaling" or enlargement.

    It does not address the problem of image RESTORATION that is the
    result of idiots not knowing how to properly compress a digital
    image.

    The programs to which I allude attempt to tackle image RESTORATION.

    Claude Shannon is laughing his ass off at you.

    --
    A quarrel is quickly settled when deserted by one party; there is no battle unless there be two. -- Seneca

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Diego Garcia@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Wed Dec 25 12:27:03 2024
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:58:00 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


    The programs to which I allude attempt to tackle image RESTORATION.

    Claude Shannon is laughing his ass off at you.


    I hope not because if so his academic colleagues would suspect
    his competence.

    As the references in the web page attest, the information is not really
    lost but can be inferred from the stored quantization tables:

    "Our algorithm is based on an adapted total variation minimization approach constrained by the knowledge of the input intervals the unquantized cosine coefficients belong to. In this way, we reconstruct an image having the same quantized coefficients than the original one, but which is minimal in term
    of the total variation."

    If Shannon is laughing it's at someone else. Perhaps you?

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Diego Garcia on Wed Dec 25 10:49:02 2024
    Diego Garcia wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:58:00 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    The programs to which I allude attempt to tackle image RESTORATION.

    Claude Shannon is laughing his ass off at you.

    I hope not because if so his academic colleagues would suspect
    his competence.

    As the references in the web page attest, the information is not really
    lost but can be inferred from the stored quantization tables:

    "Our algorithm is based on an adapted total variation minimization approach constrained by the knowledge of the input intervals the unquantized cosine coefficients belong to. In this way, we reconstruct an image having the same quantized coefficients than the original one, but which is minimal in term of the total variation."

    Show the equations.

    --
    I've always felt sorry for people that don't drink -- remember,
    when they wake up, that's as good as they're gonna feel all day!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to DFS on Fri Dec 27 05:42:50 2024
    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:00:38 -0500, DFS wrote:

    * Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.

    Which one has to do with software?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Dec 27 07:52:16 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:00:38 -0500, DFS wrote:

    * Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.

    Which one has to do with software?

    One of these days, inevitably, DFS will "code". :-D

    --
    Maj. Bloodnok: Seagoon, you're a coward!
    Seagoon: Only in the holiday season.
    Maj. Bloodnok: Ah, another Noel Coward!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIE@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 15:13:45 2024
    Le 27-12-2024, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> a écrit :
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:00:38 -0500, DFS wrote:

    * Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.

    Which one has to do with software?

    One of these days, inevitably, DFS will "code". :-D

    You should be a little less obvious when you are lying about DFS. You
    know well he was quoting LP/NV/DG/FR/whatever.

    --
    Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
    https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 11:25:41 2024
    Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Le 27-12-2024, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> a écrit :
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:00:38 -0500, DFS wrote:

    * Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.

    Which one has to do with software?

    One of these days, inevitably, DFS will "code". :-D

    You should be a little less obvious when you are lying about DFS. You
    know well he was quoting LP/NV/DG/FR/whatever.

    It was a pun, son!

    --
    By long-standing tradition, I take this opportunity to savage other
    designers in the thin disguise of good, clean fun.
    -- P. J. Plauger, "Computer Language", 1988, April
    Fool's column.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)