Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.
Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
doesn't stop the digital idiots.
However, FOSS has an answer:
https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png
From the link:
"jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved
as JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."
Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.
Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
doesn't stop the digital idiots.
However, FOSS has an answer:
https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png
From the link:
"jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved as
JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."
I have not tried this yet but I keep it in my toolbox.
Man oh man! These FOSS people are always right on top of it!
Micro$lop and its highly paid minions could never compete.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.
Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
doesn't stop the digital idiots.
However, FOSS has an answer:
https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png
From the link:
"jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved
as JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."
I have not tried this yet but I keep it in my toolbox.
Man oh man! These FOSS people are always right on top of it!
Micro$lop and its highly paid minions could never compete.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
Where the assumption is that because PNG is lossless, absence of
compression artifacts is more noticeable in cartoonish graphics, so its
worth the trade of larger file sizes.
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 16:58:17 -0500, -hh wrote:
Where the assumption is that because PNG is lossless, absence ofHoly shiite! My knowledgeable post has caused a firestorm of lunacy!
compression artifacts is more noticeable in cartoonish graphics, so its
worth the trade of larger file sizes.
Well, there is no sense in arguing with idiots.
Believe what you will, but the reality is mine and mine alone.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! What stupid fucks!
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 19:14:29 +0000, Farley Flud <[email protected]> wrote in <pan$b93c0$1f07acd8$927f2cd1$[email protected]>:
Don't you just hate it when these digital idiots present charts,
graphs, and even text imagery as JPEG files? I sure as fuck do.
Do to the nature of the compression (which I won't describe) JPEG
compression is not suitable for charts, graphs, and text. But that
doesn't stop the digital idiots.
However, FOSS has an answer:
https://github.com/victorvde/jpeg2png
From the link:
"jpeg2png gives best results for pictures that should never be saved as
JPEG. Examples are charts, logo's, and cartoon-style digital drawings."
I have not tried this yet but I keep it in my toolbox.
Man oh man! These FOSS people are always right on top of it!
Micro$lop and its highly paid minions could never compete.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
Now I know you're an anti-Linux troll.
There's no way you don't know about ImageMagick.
ImageMagick-im6.q16(General Commands ManuImageMagick-im6.q16(1)
NAME
ImageMagick - is a free software suite for the creation,
modification and display of bitmap images.
SYNOPSIS
convert-im6.q16 input-file [options] output-file
OVERVIEW
Use ImageMagick® to create, edit, compose, or convert
bitmap images. It can read and write images in a variety
of formats (over 200) including PNG, JPEG, GIF, HEIC,
TIFF, DPX, EXR, WebP, Postscript, PDF, and SVG. Use
ImageMagick to resize, flip, mirror, rotate, distort,
shear and transform images, adjust image colors, apply
various special effects, or draw text, lines, polygons,
ellipses and B\['e]zier curves.
The functionality of ImageMagick is typically utilized
from the command-line or you can use the features from
programs written in your favorite language. Choose from
these interfaces: G2F (Ada), MagickCore (C), MagickWand
(C), ChMagick (Ch), ImageMagickObject (COM+), Magick++
(C++), JMagick (Java), JuliaIO (Julia), L-Magick (Lisp),
Lua (LuaJIT), NMagick (Neko/haXe), Magick.NET (.NET),
PascalMagick (Pascal), PerlMagick (Perl), MagickWand for
PHP (PHP), IMagick (PHP), PythonMagick (Python), magick
(R), RMagick (Ruby), or TclMagick (Tcl/TK). With a lan‐
guage interface, use ImageMagick to modify or create im‐
ages dynamically and automagically.
* * *
(
My distro has version 6. I see now that there is a version 7:
https://imagemagick.org/
)
My distro has version 6. I see now that there is a version 7:
"there are three
fingers pointed back at you."
I haven't checked my Fedora machine in a while. I guess I should.
On 22 Dec 2024 21:26:07 GMT, vallor wrote:
My distro has version 6. I see now that there is a version 7:
Fedora 40 has 7.1.1-41, Ubuntu doesn't have it at all. It must be a Fedora default package. I've used it long ago but it isn't something I would have
a use for and install.
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 05:59:14 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
I haven't checked my Fedora machine in a while. I guess I should.
Thanks for reminding me. It's been a couple of days so it's only upgrading 126 packages and a new kernel :)
There's no way you don't know about ImageMagick.
This group is FULL of total idiots.
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 05:59:14 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
I haven't checked my Fedora machine in a while. I guess I should.
Thanks for reminding me. It's been a couple of days so it's only upgrading >> 126 packages and a new kernel :)
Just upgraded on the Debian Sid box, and aptitude wanted to remove skanlite (the scanner I use for documents)!
So I look at the next solution, which says to keep the related packages at their current version.
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:26:07 +0000, vallor wrote:
There's no way you don't know about ImageMagick.
[snip assholery]
It is useless to argue with total idiots but I have some time to waste.
This program is NOT a converter. Understand assholes?
This program addresses the following problem:
Certain types of digital images such as line drawings, text, cartoons, graphs, etc. should not ever be compressed using JPEG compression.
The reason is that such images contain a lot of very sharp edges
that require extremely high spatial frequncies to reproduce. The
nature of JPEG compression is to throw away those high frequncies.
Needless to say, when such images are compressed with JPEG the
result is chock full of highly visible artifacts and distortions.
This jpeg2png program attempts to remove those artifacts and create
a distortion-free result that is saved as a PNG image.
This group is FULL of total idiots.
Cannot restore what is not there. One can, with knowledge, edit the
image to add in a guess as to the missing information.
This seems to be interesting, AI to upgrade a jpeg:
https://www.upscale.media/product/jpeg-images-into-high-quality-photos
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:01:06 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Cannot restore what is not there. One can, with knowledge, edit the
image to add in a guess as to the missing information.
That is true.
But at least this program attempts to restore the lost info
that should not have been lost save for "operator error," i.e.
idiots.
I have not yet tried this program but I have tried the program
that is listed in his references. On the botched images that
I have tried it didn't work that well. (Can't fix stupid.)
This seems to be interesting, AI to upgrade a jpeg:
https://www.upscale.media/product/jpeg-images-into-high-quality-photos
This program is only the application of AI (neural networks)
for image "upscaling" or enlargement.
It does not address the problem of image RESTORATION that is the
result of idiots not knowing how to properly compress a digital
image.
The programs to which I allude attempt to tackle image RESTORATION.
The programs to which I allude attempt to tackle image RESTORATION.
Claude Shannon is laughing his ass off at you.
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:58:00 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
The programs to which I allude attempt to tackle image RESTORATION.
Claude Shannon is laughing his ass off at you.
I hope not because if so his academic colleagues would suspect
his competence.
As the references in the web page attest, the information is not really
lost but can be inferred from the stored quantization tables:
"Our algorithm is based on an adapted total variation minimization approach constrained by the knowledge of the input intervals the unquantized cosine coefficients belong to. In this way, we reconstruct an image having the same quantized coefficients than the original one, but which is minimal in term of the total variation."
* Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:00:38 -0500, DFS wrote:
* Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.
Which one has to do with software?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:00:38 -0500, DFS wrote:
* Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.
Which one has to do with software?
One of these days, inevitably, DFS will "code". :-D
Le 27-12-2024, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> a écrit :
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:00:38 -0500, DFS wrote:
* Computer programming has absolutely NOTHING to do with coding.
Which one has to do with software?
One of these days, inevitably, DFS will "code". :-D
You should be a little less obvious when you are lying about DFS. You
know well he was quoting LP/NV/DG/FR/whatever.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 44:40:43 |
| Calls: | 12,111 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 15,010 |
| Messages: | 6,518,460 |