• Google Android "DSID" cookie, Android ID & Android System SafetyCore

    From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 6 23:22:41 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    *How Google tracks Android device users before they've even opened an app*
    <https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/04/google_android/>

    "Leith said he wasn't able to ascertain the purpose of the identifier
    but his paper notes a code comment, presumably made by a Google dev,
    acknowledging that this identifier is considered personally identifiable
    information (PII), likely bringing it into the scope of European privacy
    law GDPR - still mostly intact in British law as UK GDPR."

    Not the best of sources, and it doesn't even mention the most important
    factor, which is nobody who cares about privacy sets up a Google Account
    on the phone (they can have a google account - just not in the settings).

    "Doug Leith, professor and chair of computer systems at Trinity College
    Dublin, who carried out the research..."

    "The DSID cookie is "almost certainly" the primary method Google
    uses to link analytics and advertising events, such as ad clicks,
    to individual users, Leith writes in his paper"
    ��� <https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/cookies_identifiers_and_other_data.pdf>

    Leith specifically mentions these apps, one of which nobody ever needs:
    1. Google Play Services
    2. Google Play store

    Note the existence of a 'DSID' cookie, which Google explains in its documentation is used to identify a "signed in user on non-Google websites
    so that the user's preference for personalized advertising is respected accordingly. The 'DSID' cookie lasts for two weeks."

    Note that this DSID cookie apparently only exist for those who sign into a Google Account (which is usually as part of the Android startup process).

    Likewise, "Another tracker which cannot be removed once created is the
    Google Android ID, a device identifier that's linked to a user's Google
    account and created after the first connection made to the device by Google Play Services. It continues to send data about the device back to Google
    even after the user logs out of their Google account and the only way to
    remove it, and its data, is to factory-reset the device."

    Notice none of this (likely) happens if you're smart enough to simply not
    list a Google Account in the Android account settings, which, is so trivial
    not to do, that it needs no explanation. The phone works better without it.

    Note that the article concludes with "The findings come amid something of a recent uproar about another process called Android System SafetyCore...
    which scans a user's sent and received images.. for explicit images and displays content warnings before the user views them.
    <https://support.google.com/product-documentation/answer/16001929>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Mar 7 10:14:22 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 06/03/2025 23:22, Marion wrote:
    *How Google tracks Android device users before they've even opened an app*
    <https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/04/google_android/>

    "Leith said he wasn't able to ascertain the purpose of the identifier
    but his paper notes a code comment, presumably made by a Google dev,
    acknowledging that this identifier is considered personally identifiable
    information (PII), likely bringing it into the scope of European privacy
    law GDPR - still mostly intact in British law as UK GDPR."

    Not the best of sources, and it doesn't even mention the most important factor, which is nobody who cares about privacy sets up a Google Account
    on the phone (they can have a google account - just not in the settings).

    "Doug Leith, professor and chair of computer systems at Trinity College
    Dublin, who carried out the research..."

    "The DSID cookie is "almost certainly" the primary method Google
    uses to link analytics and advertising events, such as ad clicks,
    to individual users, Leith writes in his paper"
    ��� <https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/cookies_identifiers_and_other_data.pdf>

    Leith specifically mentions these apps, one of which nobody ever needs:
    1. Google Play Services
    2. Google Play store

    Note the existence of a 'DSID' cookie, which Google explains in its documentation is used to identify a "signed in user on non-Google websites
    so that the user's preference for personalized advertising is respected accordingly. The 'DSID' cookie lasts for two weeks."

    Note that this DSID cookie apparently only exist for those who sign into a Google Account (which is usually as part of the Android startup process).

    Likewise, "Another tracker which cannot be removed once created is the
    Google Android ID, a device identifier that's linked to a user's Google account and created after the first connection made to the device by Google Play Services. It continues to send data about the device back to Google
    even after the user logs out of their Google account and the only way to remove it, and its data, is to factory-reset the device."

    Notice none of this (likely) happens if you're smart enough to simply not list a Google Account in the Android account settings, which, is so trivial not to do, that it needs no explanation. The phone works better without it.

    Note that the article concludes with "The findings come amid something of a recent uproar about another process called Android System SafetyCore...
    which scans a user's sent and received images.. for explicit images and displays content warnings before the user views them.
    <https://support.google.com/product-documentation/answer/16001929>

    Hardly surprising given Google's history! It would be interesting to
    know if Graphene, Lineage, Calyx, or any of the other android-based OSs
    suffer from these cookies too.

    Unfortunately, most people have a Google account and automatically log
    on when they get a new phone (if for no other reason than to transfer
    all their old phone info to the new one via a Google backup).

    If you want to be free from Google, probably the way to go is Sailfish,
    Pure, or Pine.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Fri Mar 7 11:50:14 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In uk.telecom.mobile Jeff Layman <[email protected]d> wrote:
    Hardly surprising given Google's history! It would be interesting to
    know if Graphene, Lineage, Calyx, or any of the other android-based OSs suffer from these cookies too.

    There's a thread on the GrapheneOS forum about this: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/20495-googles-dsid-cookie

    If I understand it correctly:

    On a stock install without Sandboxed Google Play installed: no
    SGP installed but not logged into a Google account: no
    Apps that don't use SGP: no
    Apps that use GOS' hardened Webview without logging into Google's website:
    no (I think)

    so it's only when the profile is logged into a Google account that it's relevant. Since GOS allows you to have multiple profiles (similar to how multiple user accounts work on desktops) you can always create a separate profile where you're logged into a Google account and install awkward apps
    in there. When you're finished with them for today, power button and 'end session' (which switches back to another profile) and the apps are
    completely stopped until you switch to that profile again.

    The SafetyCore app is not installed as part of installing Sandboxed Google Play, but you can install it yourself if you want to.

    The point of SGP is that it runs Google Play Services as a regular app,
    without any privileged access. So GPS can't do sneaky things to the system behind your back as it can on a regular Android OS.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Sat Mar 8 03:06:36 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:14:22 +0000, Jeff Layman wrote :


    Unfortunately, most people have a Google account and automatically log
    on when they get a new phone (if for no other reason than to transfer
    all their old phone info to the new one via a Google backup).

    Hi Jeff,

    You taught me a lot in the past, and below, I see you taught me more.
    That's good as we can each learn from others so we know everything we can.

    I've asked why people put a Google Account on the phone in the past, and
    mostly I get two answers, neither of which is what I'd do but I understand.

    a. Most people just don't think - they don't both to hit the "skip" option
    b. Some people want the "convenience" of being 24/7/365 connected to Google

    I get it. But then those people should never complain that they "can't"
    have privacy. It's ok for them to complain that they "don't" have privacy.

    But "can't" is very different from "don't".

    Me?
    I can have privacy from Google in terms of what this thread is about.
    I don't have a Google Account set up on my phone.

    If there's anything other people can do with that Google Account set up on
    the phone that I can't do without that account being set up, let me know.

    Note: Having a Google Account & having it set up on the phone are different things that a lot of people seem to thing are the same - but they're not.

    You can still get all the apps off of the Google Play Store repo without a Google Account set up on the phone, just like you can get all your Google
    Mail you want without an account on the phone, just like YouTube, etc.

    If you want to be free from Google, probably the way to go is Sailfish,
    Pure, or Pine.

    I think the *simplest* way to be "free from Google" is to hit the "skip"
    button when you set up a phone, or, hit the "delete" button in settings.

    However, to address "Sailfish", "Pure" & "Pine", looking them up, is this a good characterization of what they are in terms of what you're suggesting?

    Sailfish OS:
    A Linux-based OS developed by Jolla that runs only some Android apps.

    PureOS:
    A Debian-based privacy OS developed by Purism that runs its own apps only.

    PinePhone:
    An open phone developed by Pine64 that runs Sailfish OS (& other OS's).

    Thanks for bringing them up, but as with those who say "there is no
    privacy" on Android who also have a Google Account set up on Android,
    naturally I disagree that we have to go "that far" to get some privacy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Cine@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Mar 7 20:22:11 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:41 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote:

    "The DSID cookie is "almost certainly" the primary method Google
    uses to link analytics and advertising events, such as ad clicks,
    to individual users, Leith writes in his paper"
    ��� <https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/cookies_identifiers_and_other_data.pdf>

    The DSID cookie's primary function is to track signed-in Google users for
    ad personalization. Without a Google account actively logged in on the
    device, there's no user identity for the cookie to associate with. https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en-US#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20the%20'DSID',personalization%20setting%20is%20respected%20accordingly.'

    Without a Google account on the phone, while Google may still gather some generic data (e.g., device identifiers & network information) for basic analytics and service functionality, the DSID cookie's personalized
    tracking capabilities are effectively disabled.

    If you use a web browser on your Android device, websites (including those
    with Google ads) might still attempt to set cookies. However, without a
    Google account logged into that browser, the DSID cookie won't link your browsing activity to a specific Google user profile.

    If you use applications that rely on googles advertising framework, some
    data may still be collected, but it will be far less than if a google
    account was associated with the device.

    In essence, without a Google account, the DSID cookie becomes largely
    inert. It cannot perform its intended purpose of personalized user
    tracking.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Theo on Sun Mar 9 05:11:38 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 07 Mar 2025 11:50:14 +0000 (GMT), Theo wrote :


    There's a thread on the GrapheneOS forum about this: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/20495-googles-dsid-cookie

    Thanks for that link in the graphene group on the DSID cookie.

    The DSID cookie is apparently used by Google to identify a user who is
    signed into Google (& whether they've agreed to ad personalization) when they're visiting non-Google sites (so Google can provide targeted ads).

    Nobody seems to know what the letters mean, but it could be that it means
    DSID === DataSet Identifier
    Until/unless someone finds a better description, that's what I'll assume.

    I'd like to see if I can install GrapheneOS but my bootloader version has
    never been unlocked according to the searches that I've been able to run.
    Samsung Galaxy A32-6U Baseband A326USQSHDXL1 (the "H" is the key character
    as nothing after 5 is rootable as far as I can find on the net).

    It's build number TP1A.220624.014.A326USQSHDXL1 where
    "TP1A" indicates it's based on Android 11 or later.
    "220624" indicates the build date of June 24th 2022.
    "A326U" identifies the device model.
    "SQSHDXL1" is the baseband version.
    where the fifth-character-from-the-right is the critical character.

    So the best I can do, to avoid the DSID cookie implications, is NOT set up
    a Google Account in the Android settings. Luckily that's trivial.

    Just hit the "skip" button when it asks you to set up Android with it.
    I don't know why everyone doesn't do that - but it's what I do.

    I wish I could root it though... sigh.
    People on the Pixel are lucky because they can root it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Marion on Sun Mar 9 09:04:25 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 09/03/2025 05:11, Marion wrote:
    On 07 Mar 2025 11:50:14 +0000 (GMT), Theo wrote :


    There's a thread on the GrapheneOS forum about this:
    https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/20495-googles-dsid-cookie

    Thanks for that link in the graphene group on the DSID cookie.

    The DSID cookie is apparently used by Google to identify a user who is
    signed into Google (& whether they've agreed to ad personalization) when they're visiting non-Google sites (so Google can provide targeted ads).

    Nobody seems to know what the letters mean, but it could be that it means
    DSID === DataSet Identifier
    Until/unless someone finds a better description, that's what I'll assume.

    I think that's right: <https://help.ivanti.com/ps/help/en_US/nSA/22.x/msp/api/api-dsid.htm>

    I'd like to see if I can install GrapheneOS but my bootloader version has never been unlocked according to the searches that I've been able to run.
    Samsung Galaxy A32-6U Baseband A326USQSHDXL1 (the "H" is the key character as nothing after 5 is rootable as far as I can find on the net).

    As far as I can tell not only GrapheneOS, but also LineageOS and CalyxOS
    cannot be installed on a Samsung A32.
    <https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/> <https://calyxos.org/docs/guide/device-support/>

    People on the Pixel are lucky because they can root it.

    Yes, but it's still a Google device. Are there any Google backdoors?
    Troubling Pixel backdoors have been discovered: <https://www.wired.com/story/google-android-pixel-showcase-vulnerability/>

    "It raises questions about why third-party software that runs with such
    high privileges so deep in the operating system was not tested more
    deeply. It seems to me that Google has been pushing bloatware to Pixel
    devices around the world.”

    “A well-resourced adversary like a nation state could exploit this—it
    has the potential to be a backdoor into basically any Pixel in the world.”

    "Stuckey says that the discovery and what he describes as Google's slow,
    opaque response has prompted Palantir to phase out not just Pixel
    phones, but all Android devices across the company."

    Wow! Phasing out *all Android devices*!

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Marion on Sun Mar 9 09:29:22 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 08/03/2025 03:06, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:14:22 +0000, Jeff Layman wrote :


    Unfortunately, most people have a Google account and automatically log
    on when they get a new phone (if for no other reason than to transfer
    all their old phone info to the new one via a Google backup).

    Hi Jeff,

    You taught me a lot in the past, and below, I see you taught me more.
    That's good as we can each learn from others so we know everything we can.

    I only know what I can read from an internet search!

    I've asked why people put a Google Account on the phone in the past, and mostly I get two answers, neither of which is what I'd do but I understand.

    a. Most people just don't think - they don't both to hit the "skip" option

    When I got my Android phones I didn't know any better (although it's not
    /my/ Google account being used with the phones - I don't have an
    account). I think most users don't know any better. I soon realised that
    I shouldn't use the phone for anything that required privacy. I've never
    used it to buy anything or use a banking app, etc.

    b. Some people want the "convenience" of being 24/7/365 connected to Google

    I get it. But then those people should never complain that they "can't"
    have privacy. It's ok for them to complain that they "don't" have privacy.

    But "can't" is very different from "don't".

    Me?
    I can have privacy from Google in terms of what this thread is about.
    I don't have a Google Account set up on my phone.

    If there's anything other people can do with that Google Account set up on the phone that I can't do without that account being set up, let me know.

    Note: Having a Google Account & having it set up on the phone are different things that a lot of people seem to thing are the same - but they're not.

    Well, yes, but I wonder, for example, if using something like a gmail
    account would be enough to identify that person as a Google account
    holder even if that Google account isn't specifically used with the
    phone, only the gmail account.

    You can still get all the apps off of the Google Play Store repo without a Google Account set up on the phone, just like you can get all your Google Mail you want without an account on the phone, just like YouTube, etc.

    If you want to be free from Google, probably the way to go is Sailfish,
    Pure, or Pine.

    I think the *simplest* way to be "free from Google" is to hit the "skip" button when you set up a phone, or, hit the "delete" button in settings.

    Even when using GrapheneOS, LineageOS, etc can you be /certain/ you're
    free of Google's tentacles? See my other reply to you in the thread
    concerning showcase.apk backdoor. Yes, I see that Graphene OS has
    covered this (see <https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/14984-is-grapheneos-an-answer-to-recent-wired-headline-about-showcaseapk/12>),and
    have tended to debunk it as an issue as physical access is (probably)
    required to turn it on but there are still unanswered questions, such as
    what /else/ might be there?

    However, to address "Sailfish", "Pure" & "Pine", looking them up, is this a good characterization of what they are in terms of what you're suggesting?

    Sailfish OS:
    A Linux-based OS developed by Jolla that runs only some Android apps.

    PureOS:
    A Debian-based privacy OS developed by Purism that runs its own apps only.

    PinePhone:
    An open phone developed by Pine64 that runs Sailfish OS (& other OS's).

    Basically they are all Linux-based OSs (as, up to a point, is Android
    itself!). Whether or not any prospective user is going to accept a lower
    level of usability for a higher price is a something only they can answer.

    Thanks for bringing them up, but as with those who say "there is no
    privacy" on Android who also have a Google Account set up on Android, naturally I disagree that we have to go "that far" to get some privacy.

    Every bit of privacy helps, but the only way to be fairly sure is to use
    a non-Android based OS.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Marion on Sun Mar 9 10:26:23 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 09/03/2025 6:11, Marion wrote:
    On 07 Mar 2025 11:50:14 +0000 (GMT), Theo wrote :


    There's a thread on the GrapheneOS forum about this:
    https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/20495-googles-dsid-cookie

    Thanks for that link in the graphene group on the DSID cookie.

    The DSID cookie is apparently used by Google to identify a user who is
    signed into Google (& whether they've agreed to ad personalization) when they're visiting non-Google sites (so Google can provide targeted ads).

    ...


    So the best I can do, to avoid the DSID cookie implications, is NOT set up
    a Google Account in the Android settings. Luckily that's trivial.

    Just hit the "skip" button when it asks you to set up Android with it.
    I don't know why everyone doesn't do that - but it's what I do.


    Probably because when we have a new phone we want the backup with the
    contacts and apps from our previous phone.....


    I wish I could root it though... sigh.
    People on the Pixel are lucky because they can root it.


    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to David Wade on Sun Mar 9 15:36:41 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 10:26:23 +0100, David Wade wrote :


    Just hit the "skip" button when it asks you to set up Android with it.
    I don't know why everyone doesn't do that - but it's what I do.


    Probably because when we have a new phone we want the backup with the contacts and apps from our previous phone.....

    Thanks for that explanation of why people set up a Google Account on their phone, one reason being that contacts are automatically backed up.

    I can completely understand that concept, which is that contacts can be
    backed up, as certainly, a Google Account, by default, will do that feat.

    But so can just about any program that claims to "back up contacts" right?
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.simpler.backup>
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.contacts.backup.sim.phone.number.transfer.restore>
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dktlabs.contacts>

    Note: I don't use those apps (some of which have their own cloud account)
    as I simply export/import (i.e., backup/restore) my contacts sqlite
    database directly to/from the PC as I don't have a Google Account set up on
    my phone (although I have plenty of "Google Accounts" for the email).

    To transfer my entire homescreen, from one phone to the other, including
    all the folders, shortcuts and widgets, I simply use an intelligent
    launcher (where I use the last known good version of Nova but others work).
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.teslacoilsw.launcher>

    With these intelligent launchers, you simply save the entire homescreen to
    a file on your PC and then you load that file on the new phone & voila!

    All your app icons are on the new phone EXACTLY where they were on the old!
    Of course, by default, that installs the *latest* version of all those apps
    (so what I do to keep my old versions, is slide them over from the PC).
    <https://i.postimg.cc/wvsbcNBz/scrcpy05.jpg> Drag APK from Windows

    I manage my iPads & Android devices & data by sliding back and forth
    between the device and the PC using the PC mouse and keyboard.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TYvqdxCT/vysor35.jpg> iOS & Android PC mirroring
    But I get it that people who don't have a PC use Google defaults instead.

    Thanks for helping me understand why people set up a Google Account on the phone, where the loss in privacy from that one act, unfortunately, is huge.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Marion on Sun Mar 9 17:56:39 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 09/03/2025 16:36, Marion wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 10:26:23 +0100, David Wade wrote :


    Just hit the "skip" button when it asks you to set up Android with it.
    I don't know why everyone doesn't do that - but it's what I do.


    Probably because when we have a new phone we want the backup with the
    contacts and apps from our previous phone.....

    Thanks for that explanation of why people set up a Google Account on their phone, one reason being that contacts are automatically backed up.

    I can completely understand that concept, which is that contacts can be backed up, as certainly, a Google Account, by default, will do that feat.

    But so can just about any program that claims to "back up contacts" right? <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.simpler.backup> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details? id=com.contacts.backup.sim.phone.number.transfer.restore> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dktlabs.contacts>

    Note: I don't use those apps (some of which have their own cloud account)
    as I simply export/import (i.e., backup/restore) my contacts sqlite
    database directly to/from the PC as I don't have a Google Account set up on my phone (although I have plenty of "Google Accounts" for the email).
    To transfer my entire homescreen, from one phone to the other,
    including
    all the folders, shortcuts and widgets, I simply use an intelligent
    launcher (where I use the last known good version of Nova but others work). <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.teslacoilsw.launcher>

    With these intelligent launchers, you simply save the entire homescreen to
    a file on your PC and then you load that file on the new phone & voila!

    All your app icons are on the new phone EXACTLY where they were on the old! Of course, by default, that installs the *latest* version of all those
    apps (so what I do to keep my old versions, is slide them over from the
    PC).
    <https://i.postimg.cc/wvsbcNBz/scrcpy05.jpg> Drag APK from Windows

    I manage my iPads & Android devices & data by sliding back and forth
    between the device and the PC using the PC mouse and keyboard. <https://i.postimg.cc/TYvqdxCT/vysor35.jpg> iOS & Android PC mirroring
    But I get it that people who don't have a PC use Google defaults instead.

    Thanks for helping me understand why people set up a Google Account on the phone, where the loss in privacy from that one act, unfortunately, is huge.

    Is it really that huge? What on earth is google going to do with my
    personal info? Lets take my contacts. Because everyone else does not
    hide their contacts from google, pretty sure google can work out who my contacts are by cross tabulating info from every one else.

    Take my location, well my car tracks that any way. Usually I am with one
    of my contacts, I bet their phone allows tracking. So again google can
    figure out where I am without access to my GPS...

    .. I think the real reason people just sign into a google account is
    because they don't see a need to maintain privacy. They have paid for functionality, and they want it all too work without having to research
    other options, which are likely to be less secure than google...

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Sun Mar 9 16:52:06 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:29:22 +0000, Jeff Layman wrote :


    a. Most people just don't think - they don't both to hit the "skip" option

    When I got my Android phones I didn't know any better (although it's not
    /my/ Google account being used with the phones - I don't have an
    account). I think most users don't know any better. I soon realised that
    I shouldn't use the phone for anything that required privacy. I've never
    used it to buy anything or use a banking app, etc.

    Hi Jeff,
    Yup. Most people do whatever marketing tells them to do.

    In the case of setting up a device, they do whatever Google (or Apple) marketing tells them to do, which is in the interest of Google & Apple.

    But not them.
    Me? I hit the 'skip' button during setup.
    It's that easy (even on iOS, but Apple is a different beast altogether).

    I'm fine with people who do not hit the skip button; I am just annoyed when they claim they "can't" have privacy. They should say they "don't" instead.

    A huge amount of privacy is gained simply by hitting that "skip" button.
    For example, it appears the DSID cookie is useless w/o an account set up.

    Note: Having a Google Account & having it set up on the phone are different >> things that a lot of people seem to thing are the same - but they're not.

    Well, yes, but I wonder, for example, if using something like a gmail
    account would be enough to identify that person as a Google account
    holder even if that Google account isn't specifically used with the
    phone, only the gmail account.

    Heh heh heh... We've covered that situation in gory detail quite a few
    times on this newsgroup. The short summary is that certain Google apps will automatically set a Google account on the phone, Gmail being one of them.

    But you can use any other mail user agent than the GMail app to get mail.
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=eu.faircode.email>
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fsck.k9>

    Offhand, only the Google Voice & the GMail apps create that setup account.
    Most people would never know this. But most people don't think.

    Because most people don't think, they don't know anything about Google.
    And then they erroneously claim you "can't" have privacy from Google.

    That's always my point. They can have privacy. But they have to think.
    The DSID cookie, as far as I can tell, is inactive without that account.

    You can still get all the apps off of the Google Play Store repo without a >> Google Account set up on the phone, just like you can get all your Google
    Mail you want without an account on the phone, just like YouTube, etc.

    If you want to be free from Google, probably the way to go is Sailfish,
    Pure, or Pine.

    I think the *simplest* way to be "free from Google" is to hit the "skip"
    button when you set up a phone, or, hit the "delete" button in settings.

    Even when using GrapheneOS, LineageOS, etc can you be /certain/ you're
    free of Google's tentacles? See my other reply to you in the thread concerning showcase.apk backdoor. Yes, I see that Graphene OS has
    covered this (see <https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/14984-is-grapheneos-an-answer-to-recent-wired-headline-about-showcaseapk/12>),and
    have tended to debunk it as an issue as physical access is (probably) required to turn it on but there are still unanswered questions, such as
    what /else/ might be there?

    I don't disagree that the only way to be "sure" of being free of Google is
    to use some other operating system than one based on Android.

    But I'm not the person to ascertain that. All I can do is divorce from
    Google in the most obvious ways (e.g., hit the "skip" button).

    Also I strive to not install any apps that have GSF incorporated into them. This is easy with the free Google Play Store replacement apps like Aurora.

    However, to address "Sailfish", "Pure" & "Pine", looking them up, is this a >> good characterization of what they are in terms of what you're suggesting?

    Basically they are all Linux-based OSs (as, up to a point, is Android itself!). Whether or not any prospective user is going to accept a lower level of usability for a higher price is a something only they can answer.

    Understood. The beauty of Android are the free apps. These linux-based
    distros don't have the plethora of free app functionality of Android.

    I love Android, even though I have plenty of iOS devices; the vast
    availability of the free functionality on Android is impressive indeed.

    Thanks for bringing them up, but as with those who say "there is no
    privacy" on Android who also have a Google Account set up on Android,
    naturally I disagree that we have to go "that far" to get some privacy.

    Every bit of privacy helps, but the only way to be fairly sure is to use
    a non-Android based OS.

    Understood. And agreed. But... we don't have to have "perfect" privacy. :)

    IMHO, anyone who doesn't hit the "skip" button isn't qualified to talk
    about privacy since they won't even do the minimum to obtain that privacy.

    Notice the "theme" I'm proposing which is that people "complain" about lack
    of privacy, but they don't actually do anything about it.

    They don't even hit the "skip" button, which is shockingly trivial to do.
    So they do NOTHING about privacy except complain that it bothers them.

    In a way, it's like the weather. :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to David Wade on Sun Mar 9 23:39:19 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 17:56:39 +0100, David Wade wrote :


    Thanks for helping me understand why people set up a Google Account on the >> phone, where the loss in privacy from that one act, unfortunately, is huge.

    Is it really that huge?

    You're making a keen observation, & I don't necessarily disagree with you.

    However... in the *context* of this thread, it's huge in that the DSID
    cookie is active as soon as the user logs into their Google Account.

    My beef is people complaining that they "can't" have privacy when they
    really mean they don't bother to do anything about having privacy.

    What on earth is google going to do with my personal info?

    Again, you bring up an astute point about what's the real threat here.

    Unfortunately, the answer to that question could fill a book even if we
    only look at lawsuits which Google lost, so I won't even try to answer.

    But I get your point that you're not worried about Google getting your
    data, and let's be clear, I have plenty of Google Accounts myself.

    I even have Google Voice (but I use it only on the iPad for privacy
    reasons), so I get your point that Google can have "some" of your data.

    I weigh the threat against the benefit, which, for example, is why I won't
    ever use Google Voice on Android but I'm happy to use Google Voice on iOS.

    Lets take my contacts. Because everyone else does not
    hide their contacts from google, pretty sure google can work out who my contacts are by cross tabulating info from every one else.

    I'm always in amazement at how many apps want access to our contacts.

    I get it that it's a phone, and phones contact people, and nobody remembers everyone by their phone number, so we all maintain a contacts database.

    Where I take umbrage is everyone who has "my contact information" is
    uploading it to the whole world without asking my permission to do that.

    Alas, those same people are uploading my Wi-Fi unique BSSID & GPS location (although I hide my broadcast & I add "_nomap" to the end of the SSID & I
    set my phone to not seek out my hidden SSID for automatic connection, and I have the MAC on every connection randomized etc., so I do my part for
    privacy - but the vast majority of people wouldn't even understand a single clause in that sentence above - because they know nothing about privacy.

    All I can do is try to keep as little of that information available to them since the vast majority of people do EXACTLY what marketing tells them to.

    My main beef is people claim they "can't" have privacy from Google.
    And yet, they can.

    They just have to stop doing EXACTLY what marketing people tell them to do. They need to think.

    Take my location, well my car tracks that any way. Usually I am with one
    of my contacts, I bet their phone allows tracking. So again google can
    figure out where I am without access to my GPS...

    I again agree with you that even if YOU don't allow Google to track you,
    all the people around you are so incredibly stupid, that THEY are letting Google track you (see my example above of the Wi-Fi access point data).

    I don't disagree that the vast majority of people are so unfathomably
    stupid, that they are really the direct threat to your privacy - not Google directly.

    As an example, if you don't hide your SSID broadcast, then those stupid
    people are sending Google your unique BSSID & GPS location every time they drive by your house. You can't fix stupid people. All you can do is ensure
    that the information they get is of no use to Google & that takes work.

    1. Set your SSID to a unique name (for butterfly hash obfuscation)
    2. Set your SSID to end with "_nomap" in case it gets uploaded
    3. Set your SSID to be "hidden" (as in not automatically broadcast)
    4. Randomize the MAC for every access point (which is now the default)
    5. Randomize your MAC upon every connection (which is NOT the default)
    6. Set your phone to NOT automatically reconnect (again, not the default)
    etc.

    Since stupid people outnumber you a million to one, the onus is on you to prevent your unique information from being uploaded to the google servers.

    .. I think the real reason people just sign into a google account is
    because they don't see a need to maintain privacy. They have paid for functionality, and they want it all too work without having to research
    other options, which are likely to be less secure than google...

    Here's where I agree and disagree with you.
    a. I agree that signing into Google is the *easy* way to get functionality
    b. But I disagree that it's the more secure way of doing things

    For every Google app, there's a FOSS privacy-aware replacement, which is
    *more secure*, so I must take umbrage at your claim that it's less secure.

    But I do agree with you that the easy way out is to just log into a Google Account; however, I wonder if people realize their phone actually works
    better without it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Mar 10 10:02:36 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 10/03/2025 0:39, Marion wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 17:56:39 +0100, David Wade wrote :


    Thanks for helping me understand why people set up a Google Account
    on the
    phone, where the loss in privacy from that one act, unfortunately, is
    huge.

    Is it really that huge?

    You're making a keen observation, & I don't necessarily disagree with you.

    However... in the *context* of this thread, it's huge in that the DSID
    cookie is active as soon as the user logs into their Google Account.

    My beef is people complaining that they "can't" have privacy when they
    really mean they don't bother to do anything about having privacy.

    What on earth is google going to do with my personal info?

    Again, you bring up an astute point about what's the real threat here.

    Unfortunately, the answer to that question could fill a book even if we
    only look at lawsuits which Google lost, so I won't even try to answer.

    But I get your point that you're not worried about Google getting your
    data, and let's be clear, I have plenty of Google Accounts myself.

    I even have Google Voice (but I use it only on the iPad for privacy
    reasons), so I get your point that Google can have "some" of your data.

    I weigh the threat against the benefit, which, for example, is why I won't ever use Google Voice on Android but I'm happy to use Google Voice on iOS.

    Lets take my contacts. Because everyone else does not hide their
    contacts from google, pretty sure google can work out who my contacts
    are by cross tabulating info from every one else.

    I'm always in amazement at how many apps want access to our contacts.

    I get it that it's a phone, and phones contact people, and nobody remembers everyone by their phone number, so we all maintain a contacts database.

    Where I take umbrage is everyone who has "my contact information" is uploading it to the whole world without asking my permission to do that.

    Alas, those same people are uploading my Wi-Fi unique BSSID & GPS location (although I hide my broadcast & I add "_nomap" to the end of the SSID & I
    set my phone to not seek out my hidden SSID for automatic connection, and I have the MAC on every connection randomized etc., so I do my part for
    privacy - but the vast majority of people wouldn't even understand a single clause in that sentence above - because they know nothing about privacy.

    All I can do is try to keep as little of that information available to them since the vast majority of people do EXACTLY what marketing tells them to.

    My main beef is people claim they "can't" have privacy from Google. And
    yet, they can.
    They just have to stop doing EXACTLY what marketing people tell them to do. They need to think.

    Take my location, well my car tracks that any way. Usually I am with
    one of my contacts, I bet their phone allows tracking. So again google
    can figure out where I am without access to my GPS...

    I again agree with you that even if YOU don't allow Google to track you,
    all the people around you are so incredibly stupid, that THEY are letting Google track you (see my example above of the Wi-Fi access point data).

    I don't disagree that the vast majority of people are so unfathomably
    stupid, that they are really the direct threat to your privacy - not Google directly.

    As an example, if you don't hide your SSID broadcast, then those stupid people are sending Google your unique BSSID & GPS location every time they drive by your house. You can't fix stupid people. All you can do is ensure that the information they get is of no use to Google & that takes work.

    1. Set your SSID to a unique name (for butterfly hash obfuscation)
    2. Set your SSID to end with "_nomap" in case it gets uploaded 3. Set
    your SSID to be "hidden" (as in not automatically broadcast)
    4. Randomize the MAC for every access point (which is now the default)
    5. Randomize your MAC upon every connection (which is NOT the default)
    6. Set your phone to NOT automatically reconnect (again, not the default) etc.

    Since stupid people outnumber you a million to one, the onus is on you to prevent your unique information from being uploaded to the google servers.

    .. I think the real reason people just sign into a google account is
    because they don't see a need to maintain privacy. They have paid for
    functionality, and they want it all too work without having to
    research other options, which are likely to be less secure than google...

    Here's where I agree and disagree with you. a. I agree that signing into Google is the *easy* way to get functionality
    b. But I disagree that it's the more secure way of doing things

    For every Google app, there's a FOSS privacy-aware replacement, which is *more secure*, so I must take umbrage at your claim that it's less secure.

    Because such apps receive less scrutiny from the "ethical hacker"
    community, and have much less use, I would argue that they are more
    liable to contain security vulnerabilities than googles code and so be
    more vulnerable. One has to balance this with reward, so as they are
    lightly used when compared to google they are less likely to be
    targetting by hackers...




    But I do agree with you that the easy way out is to just log into a Google Account; however, I wonder if people realize their phone actually works better without it?

    Really? How so? How can for example having to copy my contacts every
    time I save one be "better". I should have that I do own more than one
    PC so keeping the whole lot in sync? Export and re-import into my house
    voip phone?

    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist its
    in my google calendar on all my PCs.



    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 10 10:34:21 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:02:36 +0100, David Wade wrote :


    For every Google app, there's a FOSS privacy-aware replacement, which is
    *more secure*, so I must take umbrage at your claim that it's less secure.

    Because such apps receive less scrutiny from the "ethical hacker"
    community, and have much less use, I would argue that they are more
    liable to contain security vulnerabilities than googles code and so be
    more vulnerable. One has to balance this with reward, so as they are
    lightly used when compared to google they are less likely to be
    targetting by hackers...

    Well, I get your point that you feel Google must have the best coders in
    the world, but we're weighing privacy here, where Google's coders aren't
    likely all that worried about our privacy - whereas the coders for, oh,
    say, FairEmail, Aurora & NewPipe & Bromite (just to name a few) are.

    Again, I'm not annoyed by anyone who says "I don't have privacy from Google because I don't know what I'm doing so I do whatever Google tells me to
    do"; but it bothers me when someone says they "can't" have privacy from
    Google - because you can.

    Just ditching the Google apps that those five open source replacements
    replace alone, plus ditching the Google Account set up on the phone alone provides tremendous privacy from Google - and you *gain* functionality.

    But I do agree with you that the easy way out is to just log into a Google >> Account; however, I wonder if people realize their phone actually works
    better without it?

    Really? How so?

    Um... everyone knows that...
    FairEmail is more functionality than the GMail app is.
    Aurora is more functional than the Google Play Store app is.
    NewPipe is more functional than the Google YouTube app is.
    Bromite functional than the Chrome browser app is.

    If they don't know that, then they know nothing about privacy.
    And therefore, they're not qualified to say you "can't" have privacy.

    All they are qualified to say is that they do exactly what Google tells
    them to do, and as a result, they "don't" have any privacy from Google.

    How can for example having to copy my contacts every
    time I save one be "better". I should have that I do own more than one
    PC so keeping the whole lot in sync? Export and re-import into my house
    voip phone?

    I manage my contacts database outside the default sqlite location and I
    have no problem managing them. But then I know how Android works so I have
    an advantage over most people who do not know how Android manages contacts.

    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist its
    in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    I have no problem managing my calendar either. What makes you think only
    Google knows how to create a calendar app?

    I think you're confused since you seem to think that the "cloud" is an app.

    But I do get your point which is if you do EXACTLY what Google tells you to
    do, Google has everything all figured out for you. And that's easy for you.

    Because you don't have to think.
    And not thinking has an immense value for you, which I get is useful.

    Me?
    I prefer to think about what's the best way to manage contacts & calendars.

    But I've been in computers since the sixties and you might be a young kid. Young kids don't have any concept of thinking about how to do things.

    They just do whatever the marketing people tell them to do.
    Without even thinking about what the implications are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Mar 10 12:47:06 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 10/03/2025 11:34, Marion wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:02:36 +0100, David Wade wrote :


    For every Google app, there's a FOSS privacy-aware replacement, which is >>> *more secure*, so I must take umbrage at your claim that it's less
    secure.

    Because such apps receive less scrutiny from the "ethical hacker"
    community, and have much less use, I would argue that they are more
    liable to contain security vulnerabilities than googles code and so be
    more vulnerable. One has to balance this with reward, so as they are
    lightly used when compared to google they are less likely to be
    targetting by hackers...

    Well, I get your point that you feel Google must have the best coders in
    the world, but we're weighing privacy here, where Google's coders aren't likely all that worried about our privacy - whereas the coders for, oh,
    say, FairEmail, Aurora & NewPipe & Bromite (just to name a few) are.

    Not at all, what I said was that googles code gets more external
    scrutiny. It has a bug finders program that pays out to those who find
    bugs and security vulnerabilities, which is why we found the "DSID"
    cookie. The others don´t have this...



    Again, I'm not annoyed by anyone who says "I don't have privacy from Google because I don't know what I'm doing so I do whatever Google tells me to
    do"; but it bothers me when someone says they "can't" have privacy from Google - because you can.


    You can, but it takes a lot of work to duplicate all the things google
    does, and for most people they may miss something important, like a find
    my phone app,


    Just ditching the Google apps that those five open source replacements replace alone, plus ditching the Google Account set up on the phone alone provides tremendous privacy from Google - and you *gain* functionality.


    what funcionality do you gain?


    But I do agree with you that the easy way out is to just log into a
    Google
    Account; however, I wonder if people realize their phone actually works
    better without it?

    Really? How so?

    Um... everyone knows that... FairEmail is more functionality than the
    GMail app is.
    Aurora is more functional than the Google Play Store app is.
    NewPipe is more functional than the Google YouTube app is.
    Bromite functional than the Chrome browser app is.

    If they don't know that, then they know nothing about privacy.
    And therefore, they're not qualified to say you "can't" have privacy.

    All they are qualified to say is that they do exactly what Google tells
    them to do, and as a result, they "don't" have any privacy from Google.

    How can for example having to copy my contacts every time I save one
    be "better". I should have that I do own more than one PC so keeping
    the whole lot in sync? Export and re-import into my house voip phone?

    I manage my contacts database outside the default sqlite location and I
    have no problem managing them. But then I know how Android works so I have
    an advantage over most people who do not know how Android manages contacts.

    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist its
    in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    I have no problem managing my calendar either. What makes you think only Google knows how to create a calendar app?
    I think you're confused since you seem to think that the "cloud" is an app.


    I don´t. In fact I use Thunderbird on my PC, BUT I need calendars I can
    share with other people who use google calendars.

    But I do get your point which is if you do EXACTLY what Google tells you to do, Google has everything all figured out for you. And that's easy for you.

    Because you don't have to think.
    And not thinking has an immense value for you, which I get is useful.

    Me? I prefer to think about what's the best way to manage contacts & calendars.


    Perhaps you are not blessed with a wife with an iPad addiction.

    But I've been in computers since the sixties and you might be a young kid. Young kids don't have any concept of thinking about how to do things.


    I started on Fortran II as my first high level language...


    They just do whatever the marketing people tell them to do.
    Without even thinking about what the implications are


    No , I think they don´t see the extra privacy invasion as a privacy
    invasion. A few people opting out isn't going to reduce googles
    knowledge base about me by much.

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 10 19:39:38 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:47:06 +0100, David Wade wrote :


    Not at all, what I said was that googles code gets more external
    scrutiny. It has a bug finders program that pays out to those who find
    bugs and security vulnerabilities, which is why we found the "DSID"
    cookie. The others don't have this...

    Ah. My fault. I see now. You did say that. My mistake. I went off on a
    tangent. Sorry. You're saying there are a lot of eyes on Google's code
    base, which, you're saying, isn't on the open source code base. Right?

    I guess it depends on how much of the Google apps are open source.
    Are all the Google packages open source?

    I'm not sure if they are, e.g., is the YouTube app open source?
    The YouTube app replacements *are* open source.

    Likewise, is the Google Mail app open source?
    The Google Mail app replacements *are* open source.

    Similarly, is the Google Play Store app open source?
    The Google Play Store app replacement *is* open source.

    Indeed, is the Google Maps app open source?
    The Google Maps replacement apps *are* open source.

    Is the Chrome app (which is based on Chromium which is open source) open?
    The google chrome replacement apps *are* open source.

    This goes on for a while since none of those Google apps are open source. Meanwhile, the replacements are open source.

    So the eyes-on-the-code issue you kindly bring up is quite apropos.

    Q: Which has more independent eyes on the code?
    a. These apps which only Google has the code to? or,
    b. Those apps which the whole world can see the code for?

    Again, I'm not annoyed by anyone who says "I don't have privacy from Google >> because I don't know what I'm doing so I do whatever Google tells me to
    do"; but it bothers me when someone says they "can't" have privacy from
    Google - because you can.


    You can, but it takes a lot of work to duplicate all the things google
    does, and for most people they may miss something important, like a find
    my phone app,

    I think you answered the question of why people don't hit the "skip"
    button. And it's that they have to think. They don't want to think.

    And that's OK.
    Google will be happy to tell them exactly how to think & what to do.

    Luckily, the approach I promulgate doesn't require all that much thinking. Since someone else already determined the 1:1 replacement for Google apps.

    An example is the Chrome app (which definitely has proprietary elements)
    can be replaced by Bromite (which doesn't have those proprietary elements).

    But I agree with you and appreciate that you explain why people don't do
    that. It's easier to use Chrome than it is to download & install Bromite.

    It's easier to use the YouTube app than it is to install NewPipe.
    It's easier to use the GMail app than it is to install open source MUAs.
    It's easier to use the Google Play Store app than it is to install Aurora.
    etc.

    Thanks for the information. Much appreciated.

    Just ditching the Google apps that those five open source replacements
    replace alone, plus ditching the Google Account set up on the phone alone
    provides tremendous privacy from Google - and you *gain* functionality.


    what funcionality do you gain?

    Hmmm.... that's a rather strange question to ask. The answer is obvious.
    Why do you think those 1:1 open source replacements exist for Google apps?

    Google app functionality sucks like you can't believe compared to what the
    open source apps do. There's no comparison. Most Google apps are terrible.

    For example, the Aurora app can automatically save the installer APK, and
    the Aurora app can give you a far better search engine (although not as
    good a search engine that Skyica provides to the user).

    When you try a real search engine for apps (like Skyica), you'll see how astoundingly crappy the Google Play Store search engine is. It's horrid.

    When you delete Google apps to replace them with the open source apps, you *gain* functionality because the open source apps give you what you want.

    For example, the NewPipe app can download (& rip) every video stream.
    Do you think the Google YouTube app is going to allow that functionality?

    In addition, I've never seen a Google-inserted advertisement while watching YouTube videos. This is astoundingly useful functionality, don't you think?

    Do you think the Google YouTube app is going to let you watch videos on
    YouTube all day, every day, without ever seeing a Google-inserted ad?

    C'mon. Google is *never* going to give you that functionality (for free).
    Yes, I'm aware that for about $75 a month, there's YouTube+ that does some
    of that, but still, even for $75/month you don't get free download/ripping.

    The fact you're asking 'if' the Google replacements have more functionality means you don't know anything about them. Which is OK, as only probably one
    in a million people (my estimate) know anything outside Google propaganda.

    Suffice to say ditching Google apps instantly gives you *more*
    functionality, and hitting the "skip" button is the single most important
    thing a (non-rooted) Android owner can do to enhance privacy from Google.

    I have no problem managing my calendar either. What makes you think only
    Google knows how to create a calendar app?
    I think you're confused since you seem to think that the "cloud" is an app. >>

    I don't. In fact I use Thunderbird on my PC, BUT I need calendars I can
    share with other people who use google calendars.

    Well, there's a vCal/iCal files.
    What's wrong with sharing calendars with those?
    That's why they exist. Right?

    Me? I prefer to think about what's the best way to manage contacts &
    calendars.


    Perhaps you are not blessed with a wife with an iPad addiction.

    Heh heh heh... we all have a wife - which takes a *lot* of time, I agree!

    As for Apple stuff, I might have more iPads & iPhones than you do, which
    you can see from my many posts on the Apple newsgroups - and - while I only have one wife, I have plenty of grandkids, and even one great grandchild -
    so we're both probably quite busy with other things than our Android phone.

    To give you an idea about the wifey, Amazon picks only four people out of a million to invite to Amazon Vine (Silver) & in the past five months, she's amassed over eight-thousand dollars of free "stuff" ordering from Amazon.
    <https://www.amazon.com/vine/about>

    No sales tax. No shipping. No returns allowed. You have to hold it for six months. But then you can do whatever you want with all that free stuff.
    <https://www.estorefactory.com/blog/amazon-vine-program/>

    But I have to do the reviews for all that free stuff she orders from
    Amazon; my point being that having a wife keeping you busy is nothing
    compared to having a wife who is on Amazon Vine keeping you busy! :)
    <https://www.ecomengine.com/blog/how-vine-works>

    I should be happy as the total she's allowed to get for free from Amazon,
    at the moment, is only $54,000/year, but if Amazon promotes me from Silver
    to Gold, that maximum amount of free stuff off Amazon jumps to infinity.
    <https://www.junglescout.com/resources/articles/amazon-vine-program/>


    But I've been in computers since the sixties and you might be a young kid. >> Young kids don't have any concept of thinking about how to do things.

    I started on Fortran II as my first high level language...

    Yeah. Me too. Fortran 77 was my first language (before Fortran IV existed!)
    See this thread where we discussed our computer-coding histories together. ���<https://www.novabbs.com/rocksolid/article-flat.php?id=85560&group=alt.comp.os.windows-10#85560>

    so we're both old men, wizened by experience, where my experience was
    always to "think" about what I'm doing and not accept propaganda as fact.

    Unfortunately, my estimate is only one out of million people realizes that almost everything Apple/Google say is propaganda, where the problem with
    that (brilliant) propaganda is it's so pervasive they don't question it.

    They just do whatever the marketing people tell them to do.
    Without even thinking about what the implications are

    No , I think they don´t see the extra privacy invasion as a privacy invasion. A few people opting out isn't going to reduce googles
    knowledge base about me by much.

    I agree with you that the one in a million people who don't fall for
    Google's propaganda isn't going to reduce Google's data collection.

    Yet, it still amazes me that people complain about lack of privacy and yet,
    at the same time they don't bother to hit the "skip" button when Google
    asks to invade it.

    They get *more* functionality by hitting the "skip" button, and they don't
    even know it. Sigh. Anyway, thanks for explaining why they do that.

    It's anathema to me NOT to hit the skip button, just as much as it's
    "natural" to the sheep to be led to the abattoir by not hitting "skip".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 10 23:25:44 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-10 10:02, David Wade wrote:
    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist its
    in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    And in Thunderbird.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Mar 10 23:22:06 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-09 16:36, Marion wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 10:26:23 +0100, David Wade wrote :


    Just hit the "skip" button when it asks you to set up Android with it.
    I don't know why everyone doesn't do that - but it's what I do.


    Probably because when we have a new phone we want the backup with the
    contacts and apps from our previous phone.....

    Thanks for that explanation of why people set up a Google Account on their phone, one reason being that contacts are automatically backed up.

    I can completely understand that concept, which is that contacts can be backed up, as certainly, a Google Account, by default, will do that feat.

    But so can just about any program that claims to "back up contacts" right? <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.simpler.backup> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details? id=com.contacts.backup.sim.phone.number.transfer.restore> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dktlabs.contacts>


    Why would we use "any program" when the phone does it on its own with
    the default software and the google account, as designed?

    It is plain simple. It happens automatically even for people that don't understand a word about computing and can not follow instructions.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 11 05:45:34 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:14:22 +0000, Jeff Layman <[email protected]d>
    wrote:

    Unfortunately, most people have a Google account and automatically log
    on when they get a new phone (if for no other reason than to transfer
    all their old phone info to the new one via a Google backup).

    One of the extremely annoying things I have found is linking of one's
    Gmail contacts to one's phone contacts. I don't like my phone contacts
    list being filled with people I am never likey to phone because I
    don't have phone numbers for them, only email addresses. So I delete
    them from my phone, and then when I want to email them from my
    computer I find their addreswses gone -- one reason why I hardly ever
    use Gmail any more, other than to give an address to people who want
    to spam me.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Mar 11 05:54:40 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:22:06 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :


    Why would we use "any program" when the phone does it on its own with
    the default software and the google account, as designed?

    It is plain simple. It happens automatically even for people that don't understand a word about computing and can not follow instructions.

    Thanks for explaining that the main reason, if not the only reason, people
    set up a Google Account on the phone is that it's simply the easy way out.

    And there's nothing wrong with taking the easy way out of any situation.
    Unless the detrimental drawbacks of being lazy greatly affects others.

    And, in this case, not hitting the skip button is lazy & rude (IMHO).

    Within the context of this thread (which is mainly about DSID cookies),
    my main objections proposed to people who take the easy way out are:
    1. They should not ever complain that they "can't" have privacy;
    2. And, they're being supremely rude to every human around them.

    Again, it's fine for people to be lazy & rude, but it's also fine for me to point out that anyone so lazy as to accept the defaults, is a rude person.

    a. They're uploading my contacts to servers without my permission;
    b. They're uploading my private information (such as my home location) too;
    c. They're often uploading pictures that may have my photo in them, etc.

    Unfortunately, probably one out of a million people are NOT lazy & rude.

    And that's just about the way to summarize this problem set, since the
    single most obvious way to prevent DSID tracking is to hit the skip button.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Rance@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Mar 11 09:22:34 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 10/03/2025 22:25, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-03-10 10:02, David Wade wrote:
    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist its
    in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    And in Thunderbird.


    ?? Really? Doesn't happen on my Thunderbird. What have I missed?

    David

    --
    David Rance writing from Caversham, Reading, UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Tue Mar 11 10:25:11 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 11/03/2025 4:45, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:14:22 +0000, Jeff Layman <[email protected]d>
    wrote:

    Unfortunately, most people have a Google account and automatically log
    on when they get a new phone (if for no other reason than to transfer
    all their old phone info to the new one via a Google backup).

    One of the extremely annoying things I have found is linking of one's
    Gmail contacts to one's phone contacts. I don't like my phone contacts
    list being filled with people I am never likey to phone because I
    don't have phone numbers for them, only email addresses. So I delete
    them from my phone, and then when I want to email them from my
    computer I find their addreswses gone -- one reason why I hardly ever
    use Gmail any more, other than to give an address to people who want
    to spam me.



    This annoyed me for a while, but I have got over it now. What does annoy
    me is the fact that I know multiple people called "David Thomas" and it
    keeps wanting merge them....

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to David Rance on Tue Mar 11 11:45:53 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 11/03/2025 10:22, David Rance wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 22:25, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-03-10 10:02, David Wade wrote:
    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist
    its in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    And in Thunderbird.


    ?? Really? Doesn't happen on my Thunderbird. What have I missed?

    David

    Not sure latest Thunderbird brings in Calendars from Google & Outlook..
    .. just not iCloud....

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Marion on Tue Mar 11 13:35:50 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-11 06:54, Marion wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:22:06 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :


    Why would we use "any program" when the phone does it on its own with
    the default software and the google account, as designed?

    It is plain simple. It happens automatically even for people that
    don't understand a word about computing and can not follow instructions.

    Thanks for explaining that the main reason, if not the only reason, people set up a Google Account on the phone is that it's simply the easy way out.

    And there's nothing wrong with taking the easy way out of any situation. Unless the detrimental drawbacks of being lazy greatly affects others.

    And, in this case, not hitting the skip button is lazy & rude (IMHO).

    Within the context of this thread (which is mainly about DSID cookies),
    my main objections proposed to people who take the easy way out are:
    1. They should not ever complain that they "can't" have privacy;
    2. And, they're being supremely rude to every human around them.

    Again, it's fine for people to be lazy & rude, but it's also fine for me to point out that anyone so lazy as to accept the defaults, is a rude person.

    a. They're uploading my contacts to servers without my permission;
    b. They're uploading my private information (such as my home location) too; c. They're often uploading pictures that may have my photo in them, etc.

    Unfortunately, probably one out of a million people are NOT lazy & rude.

    And that's just about the way to summarize this problem set, since the
    single most obvious way to prevent DSID tracking is to hit the skip button.


    Thanks for insulting 99% of the population calling them rude.


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to David Rance on Tue Mar 11 13:33:22 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-11 10:22, David Rance wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 22:25, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-03-10 10:02, David Wade wrote:
    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist
    its in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    And in Thunderbird.


    ?? Really? Doesn't happen on my Thunderbird. What have I missed?

    An addon.

    Provider for Google Calendar
    Allows bidirectional access to Google Calendar

    This extension allows Thunderbird to read and write events and tasks to
    a Google Calendar.

    Please read the FAQ for frequent questions and troubleshooting before requesting support or filing a bug.

    Community Support is available here. If you are certain you found a bug
    please file an issue.


    Author Philipp Kewisch
    Version 128.0.0
    Last Updated 15 July 2024


    Homepage https://addons.thunderbird.net/thunderbird/addon/provider-for-google-calendar/


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Rance@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Mar 11 13:41:38 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 11/03/2025 12:33, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-03-11 10:22, David Rance wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 22:25, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-03-10 10:02, David Wade wrote:
    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist
    its in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    And in Thunderbird.


    ?? Really? Doesn't happen on my Thunderbird. What have I missed?

    An addon.

    Provider for Google Calendar
    Allows bidirectional access to Google Calendar

    This extension allows Thunderbird to read and write events and tasks to
    a Google Calendar.

    Thanks, Carlos. I've downloaded the add-on and installed it but it still doesn't work. I read somewhere on the download page that it doesn't work
    with the latest update to Thunderbird. :-(

    David

    --
    David Rance writing from Caversham, Reading, UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to David Rance on Tue Mar 11 16:04:32 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-11 14:41, David Rance wrote:
    On 11/03/2025 12:33, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-03-11 10:22, David Rance wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 22:25, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-03-10 10:02, David Wade wrote:
    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist
    its in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    And in Thunderbird.


    ?? Really? Doesn't happen on my Thunderbird. What have I missed?

    An addon.

    Provider for Google Calendar
    Allows bidirectional access to Google Calendar

    This extension allows Thunderbird to read and write events and tasks
    to a Google Calendar.

    Thanks, Carlos. I've downloaded the add-on and installed it but it still doesn't work. I read somewhere on the download page that it doesn't work
    with the latest update to Thunderbird.  :-(

    Dunno. It is working here, using 128.7.0esr

    The first time it connects it may ask for permission on the phone.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Mar 11 15:39:59 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:35:50 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :


    And that's just about the way to summarize this problem set, since the
    single most obvious way to prevent DSID tracking is to hit the skip button.

    Thanks for insulting 99% of the population calling them rude.

    What do YOU call people who do those three things without your permission?
    Caring? Thoughtful? Considerate? Attentive?
    Choose none of the above.

    Nonetheless, keeping this in context of this privacy-related thread, it's
    clear the single most effective way to ameliorate the privacy loss inherent
    in the Google DSID cookie is simply to hit that "skip" button.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Mar 11 16:26:57 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 11/03/2025 16:04, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-03-11 14:41, David Rance wrote:
    On 11/03/2025 12:33, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-03-11 10:22, David Rance wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 22:25, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-03-10 10:02, David Wade wrote:
    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist >>>>>> its in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    And in Thunderbird.


    ?? Really? Doesn't happen on my Thunderbird. What have I missed?

    An addon.

    Provider for Google Calendar
    Allows bidirectional access to Google Calendar

    This extension allows Thunderbird to read and write events and tasks
    to a Google Calendar.

    Thanks, Carlos. I've downloaded the add-on and installed it but it
    still doesn't work. I read somewhere on the download page that it
    doesn't work with the latest update to Thunderbird.  :-(

    Dunno. It is working here, using 128.7.0esr

    The first time it connects it may ask for permission on the phone.

    You don't need the add-in on the current Thunderbird for events. I see
    my calendar with no add-ons. If you have a google e-mail account set up
    in Thunderbird go to the calendar pane, click "new calendar", chose
    "network" and out your google account name in the user box, leave the
    URL blank and click "Find Calendars" and chose which you want to sync.

    Dave

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Rance@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Mar 11 15:49:21 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 11/03/2025 15:04, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-03-11 14:41, David Rance wrote:
    On 11/03/2025 12:33, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-03-11 10:22, David Rance wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 22:25, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-03-10 10:02, David Wade wrote:
    Then the calendar/diary. When I book an appointment in the dentist >>>>>> its in my google calendar on all my PCs.

    And in Thunderbird.


    ?? Really? Doesn't happen on my Thunderbird. What have I missed?

    An addon.

    Provider for Google Calendar
    Allows bidirectional access to Google Calendar

    This extension allows Thunderbird to read and write events and tasks
    to a Google Calendar.

    Thanks, Carlos. I've downloaded the add-on and installed it but it
    still doesn't work. I read somewhere on the download page that it
    doesn't work with the latest update to Thunderbird.  :-(

    Dunno. It is working here, using 128.7.0esr

    Mine is 128.8.0esr

    --
    David Rance writing from Caversham, Reading, UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Mar 12 15:21:54 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-11 16:39, Marion wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:35:50 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :


    And that's just about the way to summarize this problem set, since the
    single most obvious way to prevent DSID tracking is to hit the skip
    button.

    Thanks for insulting 99% of the population calling them rude.

    What do YOU call people who do those three things without your permission?
        Caring? Thoughtful? Considerate? Attentive?
        Choose none of the above.

    Normal people. We don't need your permission. We are the huge majority,
    you are outvoted.

    And I live in the EU, so what Google can do here is limited. The EU has
    a narrow view on data protection, and they don't see an issue with
    Android phones address/phone book.


    Nonetheless, keeping this in context of this privacy-related thread, it's clear the single most effective way to ameliorate the privacy loss inherent in the Google DSID cookie is simply to hit that "skip" button.


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Wed Mar 12 17:42:14 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:21:54 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :


    What do YOU call people who do those three things without your permission? >> ��� Caring? Thoughtful? Considerate? Attentive?
    ��� Choose none of the above.

    Normal people. We don't need your permission. We are the huge majority,
    you are outvoted.

    Hi Carlos,

    I agree.

    There are many famous quotes that agree with your astute observation that intelligent people are outvoted by the unwashed masses a million to one.

    Just one of those is termed "The Tyranny of the Majority" but Henrik Ibsen
    more closely agreed with us when he quipped "the majority is always wrong"
    just as George Bernard Shaw is said to have calculated "2% of the people
    think; 3% think they think; and 95% would rather die than think".

    To wit: 95% of Android owners would rather die than think of the
    implications of their supremely rude actions toward all people around them.

    Only 5% are kindhearted to others such that they hit that "skip" button.

    And I live in the EU, so what Google can do here is limited.

    Thank God for the EU. Not so much for what they make Google do, but more
    for how they tell Apple that its fundamental strategy of exploiting the consumer's lack of intelligence has to be curtailed by someone powerful.

    The US government would never tell Apple to use the same cord everyone else uses like the EU did, where Apple consumers (somehow, inexplicably so)
    believed the propaganda that having to buy proprietary cords was good for
    them.

    Nor would the US force Apple to put in batteries that meet the bare minimum
    for longevity, nor to force Apple to make parts available to the consumer,
    as Apple convinces the consumer to pay a hundred dollars a year extra for
    the privilege of Apple replacing the crappy batteries in all the iPhones.

    I worry about England, since they're no longer part of the EU; but the
    British people (thankfully) seem to have kept some of the EU rules intact.

    Apple can still sell the iPhone 14 & older in the UK, for example, as far
    as I'm aware, even as the EU will halt their sales by the summer deadline.

    Thank God the EU has the power to force Apple to care about people.

    The EU has
    a narrow view on data protection, and they don't see an issue with
    Android phones address/phone book.

    Given how brilliant the marketing ploys are of both Apple & Google, I definitely appreciate that the EU (and California to some extent) curtail
    their openly abusive practices, which are always anti-consumer oriented.

    Thank God for the rule-making power of the EU (and the UK, & California).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank@21:1/5 to Nick Cine on Sat Mar 15 20:00:23 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    Nick Cine wrote to us on Fri, 7 Mar 2025 20:22:11 -0700:

    The DSID cookie's primary function is to track signed-in Google users for
    ad personalization. Without a Google account actively logged in on the device, there's no user identity for the cookie to associate with.

    It's as simple as this. No Google account in the setup = no tracking

    You can still have Google accounts. Just don't set them as a default.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Marion on Sun Mar 16 09:40:29 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 09/03/2025 15:36, Marion wrote:
    Thanks for that explanation of why people set up a Google Account on their phone, one reason being that contacts are automatically backed up.

    I can completely understand that concept, which is that contacts can be backed up, as certainly, a Google Account, by default, will do that feat.

    But so can just about any program that claims to "back up contacts" right? <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.simpler.backup> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.contacts.backup.sim.phone.number.transfer.restore>
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dktlabs.contacts>

    Note: I don't use those apps (some of which have their own cloud account)
    as I simply export/import (i.e., backup/restore) my contacts sqlite
    database directly to/from the PC as I don't have a Google Account set up on my phone (although I have plenty of "Google Accounts" for the email).

    To transfer my entire homescreen, from one phone to the other, including
    all the folders, shortcuts and widgets, I simply use an intelligent
    launcher (where I use the last known good version of Nova but others work). <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.teslacoilsw.launcher>

    But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a
    Google account on the phone ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Sun Mar 16 10:47:12 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In uk.telecom.mobile Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:

    But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool
    Google account.

    It doesn't count as 'installed from Play' for Play Integrity checks, but is otherwise functionally equivalent.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Theo on Sun Mar 16 11:34:40 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 16/03/2025 10:47, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:

    But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a
    Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool Google account.

    It doesn't count as 'installed from Play' for Play Integrity checks, but is otherwise functionally equivalent.

    Possibly, but that is not just hit the "skip" button.

    (Play store does seem to allow updates without an account).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Sun Mar 16 17:25:57 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:34:40 +0000, Nick Finnigan wrote :


    But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a >>> Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool
    Google account.

    It doesn't count as 'installed from Play' for Play Integrity checks, but is >> otherwise functionally equivalent.

    Possibly, but that is not just hit the "skip" button.

    (Play store does seem to allow updates without an account).

    Good ideas both of you. I'm impressed by your inquisitiveness & acumen.

    These are good questions, and a good answer, although there's more to the
    story since I have Google Play Store uninstalled from the user partition.

    It's also a sign of good critical analysis capabilities, which I admire.
    Very few people, maybe one out of a million, can answer what you just did.

    Here's my quick assessment (in one line each) of the answers given above:
    1. The Aurora pooled anonymous login account answer was correct.
    2. The Aurora explanation that it scrapes the Google repo was correct.
    3. The Play Store integrity checks answer was not correct (AFAIK).
    4. The Play Store update observation was partially correct (see below).
    5. Specifically, nobody realizes how *bad* the Google Play Update is!
    6. The observation about the "skip" button was spot on the money!

    Below is a more detailed assessment of the answers provided, where I'm impressed at not only the answers, but the attempt at learning more.

    Good for you; and good for everyone, as Android knowledge is lacking in
    this world where most people "assume" too much & as a result, know nothing.

    When I last did the research, it turned out that the so-called "integrity checks" happen, no matter what, with or without the Google Play Store app.

    Yes, an "activity" for the so-called "integrity checks" shows up *inside*
    the Google Play Store GUI, but the integrity checks are a completely
    separate system-wide undeniable action completely outside the app itself.

    Even Google will tell you that since Google says *every* package is checked daily and *every* APK is checked, no matter where it comes from, upon
    initial installation (which is how "sideloaded" apps also get checked).

    With respect to updating apps, the Aurora Store updates apps if you want it
    to, just as F-Droid Basic does (if you bother to use it, which I don't
    since you can use a PC web browser to obtain all your F-Droid apps).

    But most people don't have any clue how *bad* the Google Play Store update
    is, which, always amazes me that people *assume* it updates all the apps.

    The Google Play Store updates almost nothing, it turns, out, which we've
    proven in the past by comparing all the apps that "can" be updated versus
    the apps that the (almost laughably incomplete) Google Play Store app
    updates. It's shocking, actually, that nobody tests this stuff like I do.

    Suffice to say anyone who is relying on the Google Play Store "update" mechanism, has absolutely no idea of how that mechanism actually works.

    If you really want all the apps updated that can be updated, there are
    plenty of system-wide open source updaters, which actually do that task.

    As for the observation that the "skip" button solves the DSID problem, but
    not every problem, that's an example of critical thought processes. Good.

    Yes. Sure, the DSID cookie is emasculated without signing into a system
    wide Google Account on the phone, but in order to have twice as much functionality without Google on the phone as with, you need the 1:1 apps.

    As an example of where you get not twice, but ten or one hundred times the functionality of the Google Play Store search, try this free app for me.
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=scadica.aq>

    Note: I get that app for free, but my phone is set up without a google
    account, so I don't know what happens if someone with an account gets it.
    <https://skyica.com/appfinder/get/>

    Let me know.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Sun Mar 16 19:36:55 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 16/03/2025 11:34, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:47, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:

       But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a >>> Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool
    Google account.


    So how does that work for geofenced apps? I have two play store accounts
    on my Samsung as some apps are Spanish only....


    It doesn't count as 'installed from Play' for Play Integrity checks,
    but is
    otherwise functionally equivalent.

     Possibly, but that is not just hit the "skip" button.

     (Play store does seem to allow updates without an account).


    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to David Wade on Sun Mar 16 21:35:09 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In comp.mobile.android David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 11:34, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:47, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:

       But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a
    Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool
    Google account.


    So how does that work for geofenced apps? I have two play store accounts
    on my Samsung as some apps are Spanish only....

    https://auroraoss.gitbook.io/wiki/troubleshooting-and-faqs/faqs/aurora-store last question.

    Google use the connecting IP to determine location. Normally Aurora connects for you so you get the country of their server, but you can set it to
    connect direct, in which case Google use your country. To change that, use a VPN.

    You can also spoof device model and language, to avoid other blocks.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 17 01:17:33 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 16 Mar 2025 21:35:09 +0000 (GMT), Theo wrote :


    You can also spoof device model and language, to avoid other blocks.

    There's nothing stopping David Wade from logging into Google from Aurora
    using any login he wants to use. It's not just for anonymous logins.

    There's 10X the functionality in Aurora than in the Google Play Store app.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/CL9GpzVc/aurora01.jpg> FOSS Google Play Store client
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Jz5fpXx4/aurora02.jpg> Aurora has useful filters
    <https://i.postimg.cc/PrvDyT8Y/aurora03.jpg> Spoof hardware & geolocation
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Z5kdD2rg/aurora04.jpg> APKs autosaved to sdcard
    <https://i.postimg.cc/RF06HBB3/aurora05.jpg> Basic filters for software
    <https://i.postimg.cc/NMZGQXWv/aurora06.jpg> Google Play updates suck
    <https://i.postimg.cc/66HLfpCJ/aurora07.jpg> Google Play updates stink
    <https://i.postimg.cc/7PdGfdQ6/aurora08.jpg> Save filter selection
    <https://i.postimg.cc/cJQPvngN/aurora09.jpg> Aurora saves all APKs
    <https://i.postimg.cc/NG5pHyBx/aurora10.jpg> No need for a Google Account
    <https://i.postimg.cc/wvkvQMrC/aurora11.jpg> Far better updaters abound
    <https://i.postimg.cc/t4r8WjDB/aurora12.jpg> Disable/Delete Google Play
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zX9TnVkp/aurora13.jpg> FOSS Google Play Store client
    <https://i.postimg.cc/P5YYKT3H/aurora14.jpg> Filter out apps linked to GSF
    <https://i.postimg.cc/FRsS9c9F/aurora15.jpg> Update any app using Aurora
    <https://i.postimg.cc/gjcTf6j1/aurora16.jpg> Filter out Google Apps though
    <https://i.postimg.cc/V6tyDpNd/aurora17.jpg> Don't delete APKs postinstall
    <https://i.postimg.cc/SQ2DS1wd/aurora18.jpg> Spoof any device & OS version
    <https://i.postimg.cc/c4PrjSwx/aurora19.jpg> Save all APKs during install

    Aurora is just one of the many 1:1 apps which replace the Google APKs.

    Hitting that "skip" button and using 1:1 Google replacements gives you
    *more* functionality, not less. I estimate it at 10X but that's a swag.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 17 09:38:12 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 16/03/2025 21:35, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 11:34, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:47, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:

       But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a
    Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool >>>> Google account.


    So how does that work for geofenced apps? I have two play store accounts
    on my Samsung as some apps are Spanish only....

    https://auroraoss.gitbook.io/wiki/troubleshooting-and-faqs/faqs/aurora-store last question.

    Google use the connecting IP to determine location. Normally Aurora connects for you so you get the country of their server, but you can set it to
    connect direct, in which case Google use your country. To change that, use a VPN.

    It does not, it uses the country of the account used to log in...

    https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en-GB

    so if I log with my Spanish account I see Spanish apps even when in the
    UK. If I log in with my UK account I can see UK only apps when in Spain.

    I tried a VPN and it changes nothing. Many of my "Facebook Friends" who
    own second homes in Spain have the same issues...



    You can also spoof device model and language, to avoid other blocks.

    Theo

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 17 10:43:31 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In uk.telecom.mobile David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 21:35, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 11:34, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:47, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:

       But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a
    Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool >>>> Google account.


    So how does that work for geofenced apps? I have two play store accounts >> on my Samsung as some apps are Spanish only....

    https://auroraoss.gitbook.io/wiki/troubleshooting-and-faqs/faqs/aurora-store
    last question.

    Google use the connecting IP to determine location. Normally Aurora connects
    for you so you get the country of their server, but you can set it to connect direct, in which case Google use your country. To change that, use a
    VPN.

    It does not, it uses the country of the account used to log in...

    https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en-GB

    *Google Play Store* does. But according to the Aurora docs the backend
    server appears to do something different.

    (As an illustration without evidence that it works this way) it could be
    that you have a Spanish Play account, so the Play client says 'hey Google server, show me all the Spanish apps'. But the Aurora client says 'hey
    server, show me all the apps without a filter'. If the filtering is in the client, using a non-Google client can potentially bypass it.

    so if I log with my Spanish account I see Spanish apps even when in the
    UK. If I log in with my UK account I can see UK only apps when in Spain.

    I tried a VPN and it changes nothing. Many of my "Facebook Friends" who
    own second homes in Spain have the same issues...

    I don't have a VPN, but tell me the ID (com.example.whatever) of a Spanish
    app that you can't see on the UK store and I can see if it can download it.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 17 13:56:37 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17/03/2025 10:43, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 21:35, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 11:34, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:47, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:

       But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a
    Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool >>>>>> Google account.


    So how does that work for geofenced apps? I have two play store accounts >>>> on my Samsung as some apps are Spanish only....

    https://auroraoss.gitbook.io/wiki/troubleshooting-and-faqs/faqs/aurora-store
    last question.

    Google use the connecting IP to determine location. Normally Aurora connects
    for you so you get the country of their server, but you can set it to
    connect direct, in which case Google use your country. To change that, use a
    VPN.

    It does not, it uses the country of the account used to log in...

    https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en-GB

    *Google Play Store* does. But according to the Aurora docs the backend server appears to do something different.

    (As an illustration without evidence that it works this way) it could be
    that you have a Spanish Play account, so the Play client says 'hey Google server, show me all the Spanish apps'. But the Aurora client says 'hey server, show me all the apps without a filter'. If the filtering is in the client, using a non-Google client can potentially bypass it.

    so if I log with my Spanish account I see Spanish apps even when in the
    UK. If I log in with my UK account I can see UK only apps when in Spain.

    I tried a VPN and it changes nothing. Many of my "Facebook Friends" who
    own second homes in Spain have the same issues...

    I don't have a VPN, but tell me the ID (com.example.whatever) of a Spanish app that you can't see on the UK store and I can see if it can download it.

    Theo


    Theo,
    This is one..

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tempos21.eroskiclub.pro

    I can see it in my UK account but it says not compatible with my Device.
    If I sign in with my Spanish Account it says its already installde...

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 17 15:31:36 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In uk.telecom.mobile David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 17/03/2025 10:43, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:

    so if I log with my Spanish account I see Spanish apps even when in the
    UK. If I log in with my UK account I can see UK only apps when in Spain. >>
    I tried a VPN and it changes nothing. Many of my "Facebook Friends" who
    own second homes in Spain have the same issues...

    I don't have a VPN, but tell me the ID (com.example.whatever) of a Spanish app that you can't see on the UK store and I can see if it can download it.
    Theo,
    This is one..

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tempos21.eroskiclub.pro

    I can see it in my UK account but it says not compatible with my Device.
    If I sign in with my Spanish Account it says its already installde...

    Hmm, so if I take that link and share it to Aurora Store it brings up the
    entry for the app, but the version number is zero. If I press Install it
    says 'App not available for your device'. If I fiddle with language or
    device spoofing, no change.

    Aurora allows a manual download option if you know the integer versionCode
    for the app (often it's something like 010203 for version 1.2.3, but not always). A bit of digging around 'mirror' sites suggested the versionCode
    for Eroski 4.3.1 XAPK is '20250128' and for 4.2.3 APK it's '20240710'. But neither of those versionCodes work - 'the version code you are requesting is unavailable'.

    I don't have a Spanish VPN to see if this changes if I geolocate to Spain.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 17 15:38:59 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    Theo wrote:

    I don't have a Spanish VPN to see if this changes if I geolocate to Spain.

    Doesn't Opera Browser provide a free VPN?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 17 15:44:15 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 21:35, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 11:34, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 16/03/2025 10:47, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:

    �� But how do you install from google play store without signing in to a
    Google account on the phone ?

    Aurora Store uses the Play Store app catalogue with an 'anonymous' pool >>>> Google account.


    So how does that work for geofenced apps? I have two play store accounts >> on my Samsung as some apps are Spanish only....

    https://auroraoss.gitbook.io/wiki/troubleshooting-and-faqs/faqs/aurora-store
    last question.

    Google use the connecting IP to determine location. Normally Aurora connects
    for you so you get the country of their server, but you can set it to connect direct, in which case Google use your country. To change that, use a
    VPN.

    It does not, it uses the country of the account used to log in...

    https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en-GB

    so if I log with my Spanish account I see Spanish apps even when in the
    UK. If I log in with my UK account I can see UK only apps when in Spain.

    I tried a VPN and it changes nothing. Many of my "Facebook Friends" who
    own second homes in Spain have the same issues...

    In my experience, it (the 'Play Store' app) does - or at least can -
    do *both*, i.e. 1) the country of the account [1] used to log in or/and
    2) the connecting IP address.

    For example, I had no access to certain Australian apps from The
    Netherlands, because when I was still in NL, I was geofenced on my
    Dutch IP and when I was in Australia I was geofenced because my Google
    Account has a Dutch address. Catch-22. (In the end, I got the app from apkpure.com.)

    I had contact with one of the developers and what I could determine
    from their info is that an app developer can specify which of these two geofencing blocks they want to use.

    You can also spoof device model and language, to avoid other blocks.

    [1] IIRC, Google has a specific term for this "country of the account" attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort to try
    to dig it up again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Mar 17 16:33:55 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In uk.telecom.mobile Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
    Theo wrote:

    I don't have a Spanish VPN to see if this changes if I geolocate to Spain.

    Doesn't Opera Browser provide a free VPN?

    You can't select a specific country without paying, it seems.

    A slight amendment to my previous post, it seems like the 'not finding a version number' was a glitch (my end or theirs, I'm not sure). I can now see the version number of Eroski, but it just says 'Download failed' when I try
    to install it. The manual downloads still fail in the same way.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 17 16:19:49 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    [...]

    Theo,
    This is one..

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tempos21.eroskiclub.pro

    I can see it in my UK account but it says not compatible with my Device.
    If I sign in with my Spanish Account it says its already installde...

    To nitpick: It probably says "This app is not available for any of
    your devices", i.e. not available, not not compatible.

    If it's not compatible, for example too old Android version, it
    normally says so. For example when I try to install the 'F1 TV' app [1]
    on my Android 5.0.2 tablet: "This item is not compatible with your
    device".

    [1] <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.formulaone.production>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 17 17:55:17 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17/03/2025 16:33, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
    Theo wrote:

    I don't have a Spanish VPN to see if this changes if I geolocate to Spain. >>
    Doesn't Opera Browser provide a free VPN?

    I don't believe it makes any difference. I am currently in the UK. With
    my Spanish account it offers to install on more devices, with my UK
    account it, as you corrected me says:-

    "This app is not available for your device"

    when clearly it is because its installed.


    You can't select a specific country without paying, it seems.

    A slight amendment to my previous post, it seems like the 'not finding a version number' was a glitch (my end or theirs, I'm not sure). I can now see the version number of Eroski, but it just says 'Download failed' when I try to install it. The manual downloads still fail in the same way.


    You might also want to try this :-

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lluraferi.tiendanimal

    &

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cmc.aqualiacontact.fcc

    They appear top behave in the same way. As I said my experience with
    Spanish only apps is that they use the play-id country code rather than
    the network id for geolocation.

    Dave

    Theo

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 17 18:04:59 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In uk.telecom.mobile David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    You might also want to try this :-

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lluraferi.tiendanimal

    &

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cmc.aqualiacontact.fcc

    They appear top behave in the same way. As I said my experience with
    Spanish only apps is that they use the play-id country code rather than
    the network id for geolocation.

    I get the same for all. Install button says 'download failed' and the
    manual download with the versioncode provided by Aurora says 'The version
    code you are requesting is unavailable'.

    (UK IP address in all cases)

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 17 18:19:36 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17/03/2025 18:04, Theo wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    You might also want to try this :-

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lluraferi.tiendanimal

    &

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cmc.aqualiacontact.fcc

    They appear top behave in the same way. As I said my experience with
    Spanish only apps is that they use the play-id country code rather than
    the network id for geolocation.

    I get the same for all. Install button says 'download failed' and the
    manual download with the versioncode provided by Aurora says 'The version code you are requesting is unavailable'.

    (UK IP address in all cases)

    Theo

    Theo,
    I don't believe the IP makes any difference. I am in the UK and can
    download the apps.
    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Mar 17 20:13:05 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:38:59 +0000, Andy Burns wrote :


    I don't have a Spanish VPN to see if this changes if I geolocate to Spain.

    Doesn't Opera Browser provide a free VPN?

    Hi Andy,

    To be helpful... Opera has a payware system-wide VPN; it's not free.
    ProtonMail has a freeware system-wide VPN; but it requires registration. FreeOpenVPN.org has a freeware system-wide VPN; which doesn't require it.

    There are plenty of others, but those are the three I'd point out.

    Back on Android, Aurora allows you to choose any account, so if the person asking has a "Spanish" account, I don't see that he has tested that out?

    It should work for him, right?

    Anyway, back to the VPN, it's just as simple on Android as it would be on Windows for *everyone* to already "Have a VPN" since it's so easy & free.

    1. Install a free openvpn APK on Android
    2. Download any of thousands of free openvpn config text files

    The prior instructions for Windows are the same for Android with the minor difference being the actual openvpn installer being an APK (not an EXE).
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.openvpn.openvpn>

    As before, you can get free no-registration required free VPN configs here:
    <https://www.freeopenvpn.org/>

    I have thousands of these config files on my system as I have an automatic rotator that constantly rotates between VPNs every moment that I'm online.

    In summary, nobody can ever complain that they "Don't have a VPN" since
    they're freely available to everyone who can copy a text file over the net.

    The goal is
    a. No registration (i.e., the credentials are the same for everyone!)
    b. Free & easy to use (often they have a public user/pass for everyone)
    c. You choose the VPN software & protocol (not the VPN provider!)

    Note to those who are "triggered" to lecture about how "unsafe" they feel
    with VPN. Notice the goals above. And notice it's for IP obfuscation at the
    end site. For that, the no-registration VPNs work perfectly, does they not?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 17 19:43:30 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17 Mar 2025 10:43:31 +0000 (GMT), Theo wrote :


    I tried a VPN and it changes nothing. Many of my "Facebook Friends" who
    own second homes in Spain have the same issues...

    I don't have a VPN, but tell me the ID (com.example.whatever) of a Spanish app that you can't see on the UK store and I can see if it can download it.

    Hi Theo,

    The "I don't have a VPN" can be "solved" instantly since they're free
    without login accounts needed. There are many that are free.

    In fact, I just counted over three thousand free "VPN's" on my system.
    From almost every country in the world. They're nothing but text files.

    To "Have VPN", all you need are two things, both of which are free:
    1. The free OpenVPN software
    2. A free openvpn configuration file (which is "the" VPN)

    This works on all platforms, but let's assume, for the moment, Windows:
    The free open source openvpn client I recommend for Windows is
    <https://openvpn.net/community-downloads/>
    Press the orange button for the "Windows 64-bit MSI installer".

    Once you have the openvpn client, then you just need free openvpn text configuration files that work with the openvpn server you just installed.

    One of the most common set of free openvpn files are here:
    <https://www.freeopenvpn.org/>

    From here on, it could get complicated as you don't know networking most
    likely but if you see a choice between "tcp" or "udp", don't worry about
    that - just pick one (I would pick "udp" but it doesn't really matter).

    The file you download will be something like "USA_freeopenvpn_tcp.ovpn".
    (There are many countries to choose from, the UK being another one.)

    Since this is a free solution, they change that ovpn file every few
    months (about twice a year) and they keep the username the same but they
    change the password every day or so, so you have to go to the web page
    and write down the password when using it.

    They make it a pain on purpose because they want to sell you a solution,
    but I've used it for a long time, as have probably millions daily.

    In summary, EVERYONE "has a VPN" since they're free and simple.
    All you need is the openvpn software and an openvpn configuration file.
    --
    Note that we don't need the lecture from people who are triggered by the
    mere mention of VPN who want to "teach" us how "unsafe" free stuff is.

    If all you're using the VPN for is to mask your IP address, those lectures
    are meaningless - and - in fact - the lectures indicate that the lecturer doesn't understand what a proxy does since that's how it's being used.

    Yes, I know full well there are other protocols other than openvpn.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Powell@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 17 16:16:31 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:55:17 +0000, David Wade wrote:

    As I said my experience with
    Spanish only apps is that they use the play-id country code rather than
    the network id for geolocation.

    Can you log into Aurora using your Play ID country code for Spain?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Mon Mar 17 20:28:52 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17 Mar 2025 15:44:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :


    Google has a specific term for this "country of the account"
    attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort to try
    to dig it up again.

    The term you're looking for is likely "Google Play country".
    Sometimes it's called the "Play Store country".
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/thread/299769746/important-information-regarding-google-play-country-settings-you-should-know?hl=en>

    It affects:
    a. Content Availability
    b. Pricing and Payment Methods
    c. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

    *How to change your Google Play country*
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en>

    Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!)
    before you can change it again, so don't change it lightly!
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en#:~:text=After%20you%20initially%20set%20up,you%20can%20make%20another%20change>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Bill Powell on Mon Mar 17 21:34:43 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17/03/2025 20:16, Bill Powell wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:55:17 +0000, David Wade wrote:

    As I said my experience with Spanish only apps is that they use the
    play-id country code rather than the network id for geolocation.

    Can you log into Aurora using your Play ID country code for Spain?

    Well it then means google is aware of what apps I am using?

    Does it mean Aurora can use the card attached to that Play Account?

    Don't I have to sign in to Google Play at some point to create the account?

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Mar 17 21:35:41 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17/03/2025 20:28, Marion wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2025 15:44:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :


    Google has a specific term for this "country of the account"
    attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort to try
    to dig it up again.

    The term you're looking for is likely "Google Play country".
    Sometimes it's called the "Play Store country". <https://support.google.com/googleplay/thread/299769746/important-information-regarding-google-play-country-settings-you-should-know?hl=en>

    It affects:
    a. Content Availability
    b. Pricing and Payment Methods
    c. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

    *How to change your Google Play country* <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en>

    Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!)
    before you can change it again, so don't change it lightly! <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en#:~:text=After%20you%20initially%20set%20up,you%20can%20make%20another%20change>

    Which is why I have two accounts on my phone...

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to David Wade on Mon Mar 17 22:37:19 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In comp.mobile.android David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 17/03/2025 20:16, Bill Powell wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:55:17 +0000, David Wade wrote:

    As I said my experience with Spanish only apps is that they use the
    play-id country code rather than the network id for geolocation.

    Can you log into Aurora using your Play ID country code for Spain?

    Well it then means google is aware of what apps I am using?

    Does it mean Aurora can use the card attached to that Play Account?

    Don't I have to sign in to Google Play at some point to create the account?

    Aurora can use either your Google account or one of their anonymous pool accounts. If you use your own account I think it works similar to the usual Play Store client. It won't let you buy apps, but will install paid apps
    you previously bought (either in Play Store app or on the website).

    However Aurora do say:

    "However, you may want to be careful as Google retains full rights to block
    any account under their Google Play Terms of Service §4, because using
    Aurora Store clearly violates their terms of services. Being banned means
    that the very Google account you used to sign in with will be blocked
    forever. It might be worth using a dummy account for that reason.

    If you do happen to get your Google account banned, you can try appealing, which may or may not work. If they reject your appeal then there's nothing much you can do about that account. You can try your luck by filling out
    their form here."

    https://auroraoss.gitbook.io/wiki/troubleshooting-and-faqs/faqs/aurora-store#why-would-i-use-my-own-account-is-it-safe

    As for geolocation, the Aurora folks say the apps you can access are based
    on IP location rather than the country of the Google account. Perhaps being
    an unofficial client allows them to do things that the official Play Store
    app won't do? I'm only repeating what it says in their FAQ - I have no
    ability to test this.

    However Aurora does show me UK apps even using their anonymous account. As
    I assume Aurora's anonymous accounts are not all for the UK, I can only
    assume it's using a generic account and it's Google who are geolocating.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 17 23:25:51 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17/03/2025 22:37, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 17/03/2025 20:16, Bill Powell wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:55:17 +0000, David Wade wrote:

    As I said my experience with Spanish only apps is that they use the
    play-id country code rather than the network id for geolocation.

    Can you log into Aurora using your Play ID country code for Spain?

    Well it then means google is aware of what apps I am using?

    Does it mean Aurora can use the card attached to that Play Account?

    Don't I have to sign in to Google Play at some point to create the account?

    Aurora can use either your Google account or one of their anonymous pool accounts. If you use your own account I think it works similar to the usual Play Store client. It won't let you buy apps, but will install paid apps
    you previously bought (either in Play Store app or on the website).

    However Aurora do say:

    "However, you may want to be careful as Google retains full rights to block any account under their Google Play Terms of Service §4, because using Aurora Store clearly violates their terms of services. Being banned means that the very Google account you used to sign in with will be blocked forever. It might be worth using a dummy account for that reason.


    I had no end of problems setting up a Spanish Play account. I have no
    wish to get it banned...


    If you do happen to get your Google account banned, you can try appealing, which may or may not work. If they reject your appeal then there's nothing much you can do about that account. You can try your luck by filling out their form here."

    https://auroraoss.gitbook.io/wiki/troubleshooting-and-faqs/faqs/aurora-store#why-would-i-use-my-own-account-is-it-safe

    As for geolocation, the Aurora folks say the apps you can access are based
    on IP location rather than the country of the Google account. Perhaps being an unofficial client allows them to do things that the official Play Store app won't do? I'm only repeating what it says in their FAQ - I have no ability to test this.


    This does not appear to be true.


    However Aurora does show me UK apps even using their anonymous account. As
    I assume Aurora's anonymous accounts are not all for the UK, I can only assume it's using a generic account and it's Google who are geolocating.

    Theo


    It appears that if you do anything slightly out of the ordinary you may
    need to violate google terms of service. It seems its not as simple as
    just saying skip when setting up the phone...

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Powell@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Mar 18 01:51:52 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 17 Mar 2025 22:37:19 +0000 (GMT), Theo wrote:

    I can only
    assume it's using a generic account and it's Google who are geolocating.

    I looked at my Aurora which is logged in as [email protected]

    How did that get such a perfect anonymous account name?
    It's so obvious that I would think Google would have to have approved it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Bill Powell on Tue Mar 18 09:49:59 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    In comp.mobile.android Bill Powell <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2025 22:37:19 +0000 (GMT), Theo wrote:

    I can only
    assume it's using a generic account and it's Google who are geolocating.

    I looked at my Aurora which is logged in as [email protected]

    How did that get such a perfect anonymous account name?
    It's so obvious that I would think Google would have to have approved it.

    I assume that's not actually the email address. They have a pool of emails/passwords which are fetched from their 'token server'. I presume
    they don't want to advertise the real email address to avoid them being blocked.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Mar 18 19:39:31 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 18/03/2025 19:17, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-03-17 22:35, David Wade wrote:
    On 17/03/2025 20:28, Marion wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2025 15:44:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :


    Google has a specific term for this "country of the account"
    attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort to
    try
    to dig it up again.

    The term you're looking for is likely "Google Play country".
    Sometimes it's called the "Play Store country".
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/thread/299769746/important-
    information-regarding-google-play-country-settings-you-should-know?hl=en> >>>
    It affects:
    a. Content Availability
    b. Pricing and Payment Methods
    c. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

    *How to change your Google Play country*
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en>

    Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!)
    before you can change it again, so don't change it lightly!
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?
    hl=en#:~:text=After%20you%20initially%20set%20up,you%20can%20make%20another%20change>

    Which is why I have two accounts on my phone...

    Caray.

    And this because entities like Eroski says you can only have their app
    if you are permanently living in Spain and have a Spanish phone.
    Visitors are not allowed. This is ridiculous.

    At least Eroski, which is a Spanish supermarket chain doesn't Geofence
    their on-line ordering web site. The Carrefore Spain web site blocks me
    when I am in the UK but give a spurious message about invalid e-mail
    address. I also have a dual-sim phone. Eroski won't deliver white goods
    without a Spanish mobile number.


    I have some Canadian applications because I visit there when I can.
    Things for finding the correct city bus, for instance. I see I have been fortunate that they did not geoblock it.


    Oddly, the first app I hit this with was for the local bus service. Just
    the sort of thing a tourist might need. However it seems to have gone altogether from the Web Store.

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Mar 18 19:23:22 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    entities like Eroski says you can only have their app if you are
    permanently living in Spain

    From the name, I half-expected that to be a Tindr/Grindr type app ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Mar 18 20:45:51 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-18 20:23, Andy Burns wrote:

    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    entities like Eroski says you can only have their app if you are
    permanently living in Spain

    From the name, I half-expected that to be a Tindr/Grindr type app ...

    It is a supermarket chain, owned by a cooperative. Based on Basque
    country. They had to sell a lot of venues, I see on the wikipedia map
    that they only have sites in the north coast of Spain, and Malaga in the
    south.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eroski

    I asked google the meaning of the word, and finally found it (I wondered
    for years):

    «If we look it up in Wikipedia, we find that EROSKI is a contraction of
    the Basque words ‘erosi’ (to buy) and ‘toki’ (place), so we could translate it as ‘place to buy’.»

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to David Wade on Tue Mar 18 20:17:02 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-17 22:35, David Wade wrote:
    On 17/03/2025 20:28, Marion wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2025 15:44:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :


    Google has a specific term for this "country of the account"
    attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort to try >>> to dig it up again.

    The term you're looking for is likely "Google Play country".
    Sometimes it's called the "Play Store country".
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/thread/299769746/important-
    information-regarding-google-play-country-settings-you-should-know?hl=en>

    It affects:
    a. Content Availability
    b. Pricing and Payment Methods
    c. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

    *How to change your Google Play country*
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en>

    Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!)
    before you can change it again, so don't change it lightly!
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?
    hl=en#:~:text=After%20you%20initially%20set%20up,you%20can%20make%20another%20change>

    Which is why I have two accounts on my phone...

    Caray.

    And this because entities like Eroski says you can only have their app
    if you are permanently living in Spain and have a Spanish phone.
    Visitors are not allowed. This is ridiculous.

    I have some Canadian applications because I visit there when I can.
    Things for finding the correct city bus, for instance. I see I have been fortunate that they did not geoblock it.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to David Wade on Tue Mar 18 21:36:03 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-18 20:39, David Wade wrote:
    On 18/03/2025 19:17, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-03-17 22:35, David Wade wrote:
    On 17/03/2025 20:28, Marion wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2025 15:44:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :


    Google has a specific term for this "country of the account"
    attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort
    to try
    to dig it up again.

    The term you're looking for is likely "Google Play country".
    Sometimes it's called the "Play Store country".
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/thread/299769746/important-
    information-regarding-google-play-country-settings-you-should-know?
    hl=en>

    It affects:
    a. Content Availability
    b. Pricing and Payment Methods
    c. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

    *How to change your Google Play country*
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en>

    Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!)
    before you can change it again, so don't change it lightly!
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?
    hl=en#:~:text=After%20you%20initially%20set%20up,you%20can%20make%20another%20change>

    Which is why I have two accounts on my phone...

    Caray.

    And this because entities like Eroski says you can only have their app
    if you are permanently living in Spain and have a Spanish phone.
    Visitors are not allowed. This is ridiculous.

    At least Eroski, which is a Spanish supermarket chain doesn't Geofence
    their on-line ordering web site. The Carrefore Spain web site blocks me
    when I am in the UK but give a spurious message about invalid e-mail
    address. I also have a dual-sim phone. Eroski won't deliver white goods without a Spanish mobile number.

    Yeah, I noticed when I send links to friends abroad pointing to some
    stuff at Leroy Merlin, they are blocked, can not even see it. Some days
    they can, some days they can not.



    I have some Canadian applications because I visit there when I can.
    Things for finding the correct city bus, for instance. I see I have
    been fortunate that they did not geoblock it.


    Oddly, the first app I hit this with was for the local bus service. Just
    the sort of thing a tourist might need. However it seems to have gone altogether from the Web Store.

    Right!


    Dave


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Mar 19 09:17:49 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    Marion <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2025 15:44:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :

    Google has a specific term for this "country of the account"
    attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort to try
    to dig it up again.

    The term you're looking for is likely "Google Play country".
    Sometimes it's called the "Play Store country".
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/thread/299769746/important-information-regarding-google-play-country-settings-you-should-know?hl=en>

    It affects:
    a. Content Availability
    b. Pricing and Payment Methods
    c. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

    *How to change your Google Play country*
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en>

    Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!)
    before you can change it again, so don't change it lightly!
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en#:~:text=After%20you%20initially%20set%20up,you%20can%20make%20another%20change>

    Thanks for that!

    And thanks for the warning. You can't only end up with the wrong
    country, but also with the wrong currency (for the correct country and
    vice versa). Been there, done that, got the T-shirt (which I had to pay
    in Australian dollars instead of in Euros).

    Sadly the webpage only talks about changing your 'Google Play country',
    but not how to check what it's currently set to.

    It's reasonable to assume it's the same as the country of the 'HOME'
    address of your account [1].

    [1] Strangely the 'HOME' address doesn't mention the country, only the
    street address and city and shows a Google Maps picture of that
    location.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Wed Mar 19 11:14:09 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 19/03/2025 09:17, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Marion <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2025 15:44:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :

    Google has a specific term for this "country of the account"
    attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort to try >>> to dig it up again.

    The term you're looking for is likely "Google Play country".
    Sometimes it's called the "Play Store country".
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/thread/299769746/important-information-regarding-google-play-country-settings-you-should-know?hl=en>

    It affects:
    a. Content Availability
    b. Pricing and Payment Methods
    c. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

    *How to change your Google Play country*
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en>

    Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!)
    before you can change it again, so don't change it lightly!
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en#:~:text=After%20you%20initially%20set%20up,you%20can%20make%20another%20change>

    Thanks for that!

    And thanks for the warning. You can't only end up with the wrong
    country, but also with the wrong currency (for the correct country and
    vice versa). Been there, done that, got the T-shirt (which I had to pay
    in Australian dollars instead of in Euros).

    Sadly the webpage only talks about changing your 'Google Play country', but not how to check what it's currently set to.

    It's reasonable to assume it's the same as the country of the 'HOME' address of your account [1].

    It might be reasonable, but I don't believe its true. My "Spanish"
    account has no home address set. If you read the instructions on
    changing the country it does not mention changing your address.

    To check what its set to just follow the instructions for changing, so

    1. On your Android device, open the Google Play Store app Google Play.
    2. At the top right, tap the profile icon.
    3. Tap Settings and then General and then Account and device preferences
    and then Country and profiles.

    you can then see your country...


    [1] Strangely the 'HOME' address doesn't mention the country, only the
    street address and city and shows a Google Maps picture of that
    location.

    I wonder if things work the other way round. It uses the Play Country to
    set the country for the home address.

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to David Wade on Wed Mar 19 13:38:47 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    David Wade <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 19/03/2025 09:17, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Marion <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2025 15:44:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :

    Google has a specific term for this "country of the account"
    attribute, but I can't remember the name and it's too much effort to try >>> to dig it up again.

    The term you're looking for is likely "Google Play country".
    Sometimes it's called the "Play Store country".
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/thread/299769746/important-information-regarding-google-play-country-settings-you-should-know?hl=en>

    It affects:
    a. Content Availability
    b. Pricing and Payment Methods
    c. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

    *How to change your Google Play country*
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en>

    Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!)
    before you can change it again, so don't change it lightly!
    <https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/7431675?hl=en#:~:text=After%20you%20initially%20set%20up,you%20can%20make%20another%20change>

    Thanks for that!

    And thanks for the warning. You can't only end up with the wrong country, but also with the wrong currency (for the correct country and
    vice versa). Been there, done that, got the T-shirt (which I had to pay
    in Australian dollars instead of in Euros).

    Sadly the webpage only talks about changing your 'Google Play country', but not how to check what it's currently set to.

    It's reasonable to assume it's the same as the country of the 'HOME' address of your account [1].

    It might be reasonable, but I don't believe its true. My "Spanish"
    account has no home address set. If you read the instructions on
    changing the country it does not mention changing your address.

    To check what its set to just follow the instructions for changing, so

    1. On your Android device, open the Google Play Store app Google Play.
    2. At the top right, tap the profile icon.
    3. Tap Settings and then General and then Account and device preferences
    and then Country and profiles.

    you can then see your country...

    Thanks for that! It correctly list my country ('Netherlands') and my
    name.

    [1] Strangely the 'HOME' address doesn't mention the country, only the street address and city and shows a Google Maps picture of that
    location.

    I wonder if things work the other way round. It uses the Play Country to
    set the country for the home address.

    Maybe, but in the old days there was no Play Store / Google Play and
    also now you can have a Google account without ever using the Play Store/ Google Play, so I think you 'HOME' address is set in the Google account,
    not in the Play Store part of your account.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Wed Mar 19 14:00:19 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    Carlos E.R. <[email protected]d> wrote:
    [...]

    Caray.

    And this because entities like Eroski says you can only have their app
    if you are permanently living in Spain and have a Spanish phone.
    Visitors are not allowed. This is ridiculous.

    I have some Canadian applications because I visit there when I can.
    Things for finding the correct city bus, for instance. I see I have been fortunate that they did not geoblock it.

    Yes, the geofencing in the Play Store /Google Play can be quite
    idiotic.

    Two examples for me, from The Netherlands:

    - I own (now owned) a 4WD campervan (small mobile home) in Australia and
    became a member of the CMCA (Campervan & Motorhome Club of Australia).
    I could not install or update their app(s), because of geofencing, not
    even when I was in Australia.

    - Same story for the app of the Australian weather bureau, BOM (Bureau
    of Meteorology).
    Why on earth did I - a tourist - expect to be able to check the
    weather of/in the country I was visiting!?

    Of course in both cases I solved the problem by downloading the APKs
    (and any updated APKs) from an APK archive site (apkpure.com).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Wed Mar 19 16:24:47 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 19 Mar 2025 09:17:49 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :


    And thanks for the warning. You can't only end up with the wrong
    country, but also with the wrong currency (for the correct country and
    vice versa). Been there, done that, got the T-shirt (which I had to pay
    in Australian dollars instead of in Euros).

    Sadly the webpage only talks about changing your 'Google Play country',
    but not how to check what it's currently set to.

    It's reasonable to assume it's the same as the country of the 'HOME' address of your account [1].

    [1] Strangely the 'HOME' address doesn't mention the country, only the
    street address and city and shows a Google Maps picture of that
    location.

    Thanks for that update & subsequent question of how to tell the country.

    I just checked my wife's Android because I don't have the Google Play Store
    app on my phone, where her app says her country is the "United States".

    Here's what I did:
    a. It took me a while to *find* her Google Play Store app to open it
    (I could never teach my wife or kids to be organized on a phone!)
    b. Inside the app, at the top right, I pressed her profile icon
    c. I selected Settings from the bottom of the resulting menu
    d. Then General from the top of the next resulting menu
    e. The second item down has a subset of "Account, country, & history"
    f. When I hit that second item, it took a long while to come back
    (which indicates you need Internet access for it to do a lookup)
    g. In the middle it says her full (real!) name & "United States"

    The weird thing is it worked differently the *second* time I did it.
    I did it a second time so that I could write up the steps for you above.

    So I "think" it's not normally populated inside the Google Play Store app.
    I "think" it populated only after doublechecking with Google over the net.

    It does say under "United States" the warning not to change the country
    unless you are moving to that country, but it doesn't explain why.

    It would be interesting to see what people in Europe & the UK see.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Wed Mar 19 17:00:24 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 19 Mar 2025 13:38:47 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :


    Maybe, but in the old days there was no Play Store / Google Play and
    also now you can have a Google account without ever using the Play Store/ Google Play, so I think you 'HOME' address is set in the Google account,
    not in the Play Store part of your account.

    This may be correct as some of us have had Google Accounts before Android.

    I checked my wife's phone for you before I read further to see that you had already found the Play Store Country to be the "Netherlands" in your app.

    Did you notice a looooooong lag before it came back with that information initially? I did. I think it was looking it up from the Google Account.

    You make a good point that her country was likely set long ago, even before
    she had an Android phone, by virtue of her having a Google Account.

    Since I set up a Google Account in the days when invitations were
    necessary, I probably also have a home country too, right?

    Here's what I did to check it out:
    a. I turned off VPN and opened my one non-hardened web browser
    b. I logged into <https://myaccount.google.com>
    c. At the bottom of the left side I hit "Payments & subscriptions"
    d. But then it asked me to "Verify it's you" (where I don't want that)
    e. Had I gone further, supposedly I'd then tap "Payment methods"
    f. Then I'd tap "Settings" under the Payments section
    g. Then under "Payments profile" I should see the registered country

    Since I can't pay for anything on Google, and since I don't have a phone associated with the account (as far as I'm aware), I was afraid to go
    further. But for most of the people reading this, that shouldn't be an
    issue for them.

    If someone who has a Google Account can check this for us, that would help
    us all to determine if the Google Account country and the Google Play Store country are the same or not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Mar 19 18:53:17 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    Marion <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 19 Mar 2025 13:38:47 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :


    Maybe, but in the old days there was no Play Store / Google Play and
    also now you can have a Google account without ever using the Play Store/ Google Play, so I think you 'HOME' address is set in the Google account, not in the Play Store part of your account.

    This may be correct as some of us have had Google Accounts before Android.

    I checked my wife's phone for you before I read further to see that you had already found the Play Store Country to be the "Netherlands" in your app.

    Did you notice a looooooong lag before it came back with that information initially? I did. I think it was looking it up from the Google Account.

    You make a good point that her country was likely set long ago, even before she had an Android phone, by virtue of her having a Google Account.

    Since I set up a Google Account in the days when invitations were
    necessary, I probably also have a home country too, right?

    Here's what I did to check it out:
    a. I turned off VPN and opened my one non-hardened web browser
    b. I logged into <https://myaccount.google.com>
    c. At the bottom of the left side I hit "Payments & subscriptions"
    d. But then it asked me to "Verify it's you" (where I don't want that)
    e. Had I gone further, supposedly I'd then tap "Payment methods"
    f. Then I'd tap "Settings" under the Payments section
    g. Then under "Payments profile" I should see the registered country

    Since I can't pay for anything on Google, and since I don't have a phone associated with the account (as far as I'm aware), I was afraid to go further. But for most of the people reading this, that shouldn't be an
    issue for them.

    If someone who has a Google Account can check this for us, that would help
    us all to determine if the Google Account country and the Google Play Store country are the same or not.

    On the 'Payment methods' page, it only lists my credit card (brand,
    last four digits of the number and the expiry date). But if I click the
    'Edit' button, it shows my name and my 'HOME' address, but again without
    the country and in this case without a map of the location. (While this
    is a laptop, i.e. no GPS, Google *Maps* knows how to show my location,
    so no idea, why it doesn't show it here.)

    So for me, the Google Account country and the Google Play Store
    country *are* the same, as is to be expected.

    BTW, the direct URL for the 'Payment methods' page is <https://payments.google.com/gp/w/u/0/home/paymentmethods>

    The 'Payment methods' page also has an 'Addresses' tab, which
    (indirectly) links to the 'Other addresses' page <https://myaccount.google.com/addressbook>

    That page lists:

    - 'Legal address', which is name, address *and* country.
    I have multiple entries here, including one of relatives in Australia.
    No idea why that one is there. The other ones are (same-spelled)
    duplicates and a duplicate without my name. Clicking on the
    duplicates, I see that they differ in yes/no phone number and have a
    different date.

    - 'Profile addresses' ("You can make these visible to others across
    Google apps and services").
    This has my name, no 'Profile picture', Gender, Birthday, only my
    email address as 'Contact info', no 'About' info and no 'Work &
    Education' info.
    I obviously limited this info to the sensible bare minimum.

    - 'Billing addresses'.
    Links back to the 'Payment methods' page.

    Hope this helps.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Mar 19 19:02:45 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    Marion <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 19 Mar 2025 09:17:49 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :

    And thanks for the warning. You can't only end up with the wrong
    country, but also with the wrong currency (for the correct country and
    vice versa). Been there, done that, got the T-shirt (which I had to pay
    in Australian dollars instead of in Euros).

    Sadly the webpage only talks about changing your 'Google Play country', but not how to check what it's currently set to.

    It's reasonable to assume it's the same as the country of the 'HOME' address of your account [1].

    [1] Strangely the 'HOME' address doesn't mention the country, only the street address and city and shows a Google Maps picture of that
    location.

    Thanks for that update & subsequent question of how to tell the country.

    I just checked my wife's Android because I don't have the Google Play Store app on my phone, where her app says her country is the "United States".

    Here's what I did:
    a. It took me a while to *find* her Google Play Store app to open it
    (I could never teach my wife or kids to be organized on a phone!)
    b. Inside the app, at the top right, I pressed her profile icon
    c. I selected Settings from the bottom of the resulting menu
    d. Then General from the top of the next resulting menu
    e. The second item down has a subset of "Account, country, & history"
    f. When I hit that second item, it took a long while to come back
    (which indicates you need Internet access for it to do a lookup)
    g. In the middle it says her full (real!) name & "United States"

    The weird thing is it worked differently the *second* time I did it.
    I did it a second time so that I could write up the steps for you above.

    So I "think" it's not normally populated inside the Google Play Store app.
    I "think" it populated only after doublechecking with Google over the net.

    It does say under "United States" the warning not to change the country unless you are moving to that country, but it doesn't explain why.

    It would be interesting to see what people in Europe & the UK see.

    For me in The Netherlands - a EU/EEA country -:

    Below 'Netherlands' and my name, there first is a comment about EEA countries, basically saying that you can only purchase and download
    (geofenced) for your own country, but you can browse content from other
    EEA countries if you use the Google Play website while not logged in.

    After this comment, there is the warning you mention but with a 'Learn
    more' link to the 'How to change your Google Play country' webpage.
    Don't you get that link?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Mar 19 21:28:45 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-03-19 17:24, Marion wrote:
    It does say under "United States" the warning not to change the country unless you are moving to that country, but it doesn't explain why.

    Probably related to what you said before: «Warning: There is a waiting
    period, and it's long (12 months!) before you can change it again, so
    don't change it lightly!»

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Thu Mar 20 04:13:24 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 21:28:45 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :


    It does say under "United States" the warning not to change the country
    unless you are moving to that country, but it doesn't explain why.

    Probably related to what you said before: �Warning: There is a waiting period, and it's long (12 months!) before you can change it again, so
    don't change it lightly!

    Yup. Agree. Almost certainly the warning is the long waiting period.

    In summary, it seems Frank found two ways (at least) to check his country,
    one being from the Google Play Store app and the other being from the
    Google Accounts web page using the links that Frank kindly supplied.

    I don't get a chance to use my wife's phone all that much as she thinks
    every time it doesn't work, that I "did something" to it, so I'll let those with a Google Account test further as I have the irresistible itchy urge to
    add the 1:1 replacement apps every time I touch *anyone's* Android phone!

    The Dirty Dozen:
    1. Google Play Store client ==> Aurora GPS client
    <https://gitlab.com/AuroraOSS/AuroraStore/-/releases>
    2. Google Play Store search engine ==> Skyica GSP search engine
    <https://skyica.com/appfinder/get/>
    3. Android App Drawer ==> Muntashirakon App Manager
    <https://github.com/MuntashirAkon/AppManager> (apk)
    <https://muntashirakon.github.io/AppManager/vi/> (doc)
    4. Google YouTube client ==> Newpipe youtube client
    <https://newpipe.net>
    5. Google Chrome web browser ==> Bromite web browser
    <https://www.bromite.org/>
    <https://github.com/bromite/bromite/releases>
    <https://www.bromite.org/fdroid>
    6. Google GBoard keyboard ==> OpenBoard keyboard or HeliBoard keyboard
    <https://github.com/openboard-team/openboard>
    <https://github.com/Helium314/HeliBoard>
    7. Google Contacts ==> OpenContacts
    <https://f-droid.org/en/packages/opencontacts.open.com.opencontacts/>
    8. Google GMail client (MUA) ==> FairEmail client (MUA) or K9 Mail
    <https://email.faircode.eu/>
    <https://github.com/M66B/FairEmail/releases>
    <https://f-droid.org/en/packages/eu.faircode.email/>
    <https://k9mail.app/>
    <https://f-droid.org/packages/com.fsck.k9/>
    <https://github.com/thundernest/k-9/releases>
    9. Google Calendar ==> Etar calendar
    <https://github.com/Etar-Group/Etar-Calendar>
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ws.xsoh.etar>
    <https://f-droid.org/packages/ws.xsoh.etar/>
    10. Google Messenger SMS/MMS ==> Pulse SMS free version
    (Pulse SMS 5.4.6.2816 by Luke & Jake Klinker - last known good version)
    <https://mobile.softpedia.com/apk/pulse/5.6.4.2880/>
    11. NetGuard Firewall
    <https://netguard.me/>
    <https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases>
    12. Pixel Launcher or Samsung One UI Home launcher ==> Nova free launcher
    (Nova Launcher 7.0.57 by TeslaCoil Apps - last known good version)
    <https://mobile.softpedia.com/apk/nova-launcher/7.0.57/>
    <https://filehippo.com/android/download_nova-launcher/7.0.57/>

    Back to the tangent of the Google Home Country & the Aurora Google Play
    Store replacement app, I suppose the answer is Aurora doesn't help, right?

    If that's the consensus, I'll send an email to the Aurora team as I've
    worked with them in the past to get them to add Skyica to their tool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Mar 20 09:06:48 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 19/03/2025 16:24, Marion wrote:

    I just checked my wife's Android because I don't have the Google Play Store app on my phone, where her app says her country is the "United States".

    Here's what I did:
    a. It took me a while to *find* her Google Play Store app to open it
      (I could never teach my wife or kids to be organized on a phone!)
    b. Inside the app, at the top right, I pressed her profile icon
    c. I selected Settings from the bottom of the resulting menu
    d. Then General from the top of the next resulting menu
    e. The second item down has a subset of "Account, country, & history"
    f. When I hit that second item, it took a long while to come back   (which indicates you need Internet access for it to do a lookup)
    g. In the middle it says her full (real!) name & "United States"

    It would be interesting to see what people in Europe & the UK see.

    With mobile data and wifi off, I see "Exception in CronetUrlRequest"
    With wifi but no data I get a "wait" icon, for several minutes.
    Go back and select 'Account and device preferences' again:
    Country and profiles is not selectable
    Option to "Switch to the United Kingdom Play Store."

    So possibly Google looked at my ISP to pick a country, and has nothing
    saved, and can't manage exception handling / testing. Eroski Supermercados "isn't available on Goggle Play in your Region"

    (The Google account on that phone is only used to enable Play Store, and
    had minimal information entered after buying the phone).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Thu Mar 20 09:52:35 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 20/03/2025 09:06, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 19/03/2025 16:24, Marion wrote:

    I just checked my wife's Android because I don't have the Google Play
    Store
    app on my phone, where her app says her country is the "United States".

    Here's what I did:
    a. It took me a while to *find* her Google Play Store app to open it
       (I could never teach my wife or kids to be organized on a phone!)
    b. Inside the app, at the top right, I pressed her profile icon
    c. I selected Settings from the bottom of the resulting menu
    d. Then General from the top of the next resulting menu
    e. The second item down has a subset of "Account, country, & history"
    f. When I hit that second item, it took a long while to come back
    (which indicates you need Internet access for it to do a lookup)
    g. In the middle it says her full (real!) name & "United States"

    It would be interesting to see what people in Europe & the UK see.

     With mobile data and wifi off, I see "Exception in CronetUrlRequest"
    With wifi but no data I get a "wait" icon, for several minutes.
    Go back and select 'Account and device preferences' again:
     Country and profiles is not selectable
     Option to "Switch to the United Kingdom Play Store."

     So possibly Google looked at my ISP to pick a country, and has nothing saved, and can't manage exception handling / testing. Eroski
    Supermercados "isn't available on Goggle Play in your Region"

     (The Google account on that phone is only used to enable Play Store,
    and had minimal information entered after buying the phone).

    So when in the UK, vi WiFi, If I look at my Spanish account it has:-

    Spain
    "Dave Wade"

    and of course "Dave" is not what is in my passport, driving licence or
    Spanish Tax records. It also gives me the option to switch to the UK
    play Store...

    If switch to my UK account it says

    "United Kingdom"
    "Mr. D. Wade"

    If I remember, next time I go to Spain I will see what happens.

    .. reminds me that for many years my Microsoft Certifications had "Dave
    Wade" on them as that matched my company ID card. This was OK until
    Microsoft switched to wanting official government IDs to sit exams...

    Dave
    G4UGM
    p.s. note my full name is in the headers so I don't think much exposed
    by quoting here. If you didn't know it googling G4UGM would probably
    reveal it and much more info, whereas there are several "Dave Wades"...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)