• How should one answer a vide call so that the two can see each other.

    From micky@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 15 20:08:05 2025
    My brother is 84 and is deteriorating mentally more than the last time I
    posted about him . I visit him at least once a year but this year I'm
    sick myself, so I was hoping to call him on a video call. He called me
    as expected today because it's my birthday, and I asked to call him back
    on my cell , and i made a video call but I didn't see his face. I hung
    up and was very careful that I made a video call the second time...
    still no face .He answered the phone each time and I could talk to him
    and I thought since I made a video call, anytime he answered it would
    also be a video call from his end too. I have very little experience
    receiving video calls maybe once or twice . What is it that he was
    supposed to do so that I could see his image as as well as he could see
    mine ?

    I'd like to be assured that he still looks good anyhow .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to micky on Thu Jan 16 07:14:47 2025
    On 16.01.25 02:08, micky wrote:
    My brother is 84 and is deteriorating mentally more than the last time I posted about him . I visit him at least once a year but this year I'm
    sick myself, so I was hoping to call him on a video call. He called me
    as expected today because it's my birthday, and I asked to call him back
    on my cell , and i made a video call but I didn't see his face. I hung
    up and was very careful that I made a video call the second time...
    still no face .He answered the phone each time and I could talk to him
    and I thought since I made a video call, anytime he answered it would
    also be a video call from his end too. I have very little experience receiving video calls maybe once or twice . What is it that he was
    supposed to do so that I could see his image as as well as he could see
    mine ?

    I'd like to be assured that he still looks good anyhow .

    Nobody can be technically forced to accept a video call.
    How your brother can accept a video call depends on the used software.
    You did not say anything about it.


    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Jan 16 01:35:52 2025
    In comp.mobile.android, on Thu, 16 Jan 2025 07:14:47 +0100, J�rg Lorenz <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 16.01.25 02:08, micky wrote:
    My brother is 84 and is deteriorating mentally more than the last time I
    posted about him . I visit him at least once a year but this year I'm
    sick myself, so I was hoping to call him on a video call. He called me
    as expected today because it's my birthday, and I asked to call him back
    on my cell , and i made a video call but I didn't see his face. I hung
    up and was very careful that I made a video call the second time...
    still no face .He answered the phone each time and I could talk to him
    and I thought since I made a video call, anytime he answered it would
    also be a video call from his end too. I have very little experience
    receiving video calls maybe once or twice . What is it that he was
    supposed to do so that I could see his image as as well as he could see
    mine ?

    I'd like to be assured that he still looks good anyhow .

    Nobody can be technically forced to accept a video call.

    That makes sense.

    How your brother can accept a video call depends on the used software.
    You did not say anything about it.

    He has a new phone, but I didn't know the old phone either.

    Next time I'll try to get his wife to help, but she wasn't home today
    anyhow.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to micky on Thu Jan 16 10:06:47 2025
    On 16.01.25 07:35, micky wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android, on Thu, 16 Jan 2025 07:14:47 +0100, Jörg Lorenz <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 16.01.25 02:08, micky wrote:
    My brother is 84 and is deteriorating mentally more than the last time I >>> posted about him . I visit him at least once a year but this year I'm
    sick myself, so I was hoping to call him on a video call. He called me >>> as expected today because it's my birthday, and I asked to call him back >>> on my cell , and i made a video call but I didn't see his face. I hung
    up and was very careful that I made a video call the second time...
    still no face .He answered the phone each time and I could talk to him
    and I thought since I made a video call, anytime he answered it would
    also be a video call from his end too. I have very little experience
    receiving video calls maybe once or twice . What is it that he was
    supposed to do so that I could see his image as as well as he could see
    mine ?

    I'd like to be assured that he still looks good anyhow .

    Nobody can be technically forced to accept a video call.

    That makes sense.

    How your brother can accept a video call depends on the used software.
    You did not say anything about it.

    He has a new phone, but I didn't know the old phone either.

    Next time I'll try to get his wife to help, but she wasn't home today
    anyhow.

    The easiest case is if both devices use the same software (Skype,
    WhatsApp, Facetime whatever) that is video-capable.

    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 16 15:33:23 2025
    On 2025-01-16 10:06, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 16.01.25 07:35, micky wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android, on Thu, 16 Jan 2025 07:14:47 +0100, Jörg Lorenz
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 16.01.25 02:08, micky wrote:
    My brother is 84 and is deteriorating mentally more than the last
    time I
    posted about him . I  visit him  at least once a year but this year I'm >>>> sick myself, so I was hoping to call him on a video call.   He
    called me
    as expected today because it's my birthday, and I asked to call him
    back
    on my cell , and i made a video call but I didn't see his face. I hung >>>> up and was very careful that I made a video call the second time...
    still no face .He answered the phone each time and I could talk to him >>>> and I thought since I made a video call, anytime he answered it would
    also be a video call from his end too. I have very little experience
    receiving video calls maybe once or twice . What is it that he was
    supposed to do so that I could see his image as as well as he could see >>>> mine ?

    I'd like to be assured that he still looks good anyhow .

    Nobody can be technically forced to accept a video call.

    That makes sense.

    How your brother can accept a video call depends on the used software.
    You did not say anything about it.

    He has a new phone, but I didn't know the old phone either.

    Next time I'll try to get his wife to help, but she wasn't home today
    anyhow.

    The easiest case is if both devices use the same software (Skype,
    WhatsApp, Facetime whatever) that is video-capable.

    There is also video call given by the provider. I tap someone on the
    address book, and I have these direct options:

    call sms video mail share location

    no mention of the software used, but it is the default dialer.



    I tried to make one such call to my other phone. I tapped on the camera
    icon on the dialer, and got a plain call instead. I then tapped on the
    three dot vertical menu to activate the camera, and I saw myself. But it
    warned about confirming me wanting to do an "ancient call". On the other
    phone, the camera would not activate.

    And a charge may apply.


    It is easier to use an app such as whatsapp.


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From s|b@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 16 15:53:00 2025
    On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 10:06:47 +0100, J�rg Lorenz wrote:

    The easiest case is if both devices use the same software (Skype,
    WhatsApp, Facetime whatever) that is video-capable.

    Then he has install an app. I don't use it myself, but is Google Meet
    perhaps an option?

    --
    s|b

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Royal@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Thu Jan 16 19:33:56 2025
    "Carlos E.R." <[email protected]d> Wrote in message:

    On 2025-01-16 10:06, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 16.01.25 07:35, micky wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android, on Thu, 16 Jan 2025 07:14:47 +0100, Jörg Lorenz >>> <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 16.01.25 02:08, micky wrote:
    My brother is 84 and is deteriorating mentally more than the last
    time I
    posted about him . I visit him at least once a year but this year I'm >>>>> sick myself, so I was hoping to call him on a video call. He
    called me
    as expected today because it's my birthday, and I asked to call him
    back
    on my cell , and i made a video call but I didn't see his face. I hung >>>>> up and was very careful that I made a video call the second time...
    still no face .He answered the phone each time and I could talk to him >>>>> and I thought since I made a video call, anytime he answered it would >>>>> also be a video call from his end too. I have very little experience >>>>> receiving video calls maybe once or twice . What is it that he was
    supposed to do so that I could see his image as as well as he could see >>>>> mine ?

    I'd like to be assured that he still looks good anyhow .

    Nobody can be technically forced to accept a video call.

    That makes sense.

    How your brother can accept a video call depends on the used software. >>>> You did not say anything about it.

    He has a new phone, but I didn't know the old phone either.

    Next time I'll try to get his wife to help, but she wasn't home today
    anyhow.

    The easiest case is if both devices use the same software (Skype,
    WhatsApp, Facetime whatever) that is video-capable.

    There is also video call given by the provider. I tap someone on the
    address book, and I have these direct options:

    call sms video mail share location

    no mention of the software used, but it is the default dialer.



    I tried to make one such call to my other phone. I tapped on the camera
    icon on the dialer, and got a plain call instead. I then tapped on the
    three dot vertical menu to activate the camera, and I saw myself. But it warned about confirming me wanting to do an "ancient call". On the other phone, the camera would not activate.

    And a charge may apply.

    Not all carriers and calling contracts support old-fashioned video
    calling. It's plausible that the recipient's carrier might
    convert it to audio.

    It is easier to use an app such as whatsapp.

    It's what I would use.


    --
    Remove numerics from my email address.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)