XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
He expected someone to unlock a device he couldn't prove he owned!
On 2024-05-17 18:04, Andrew wrote:
Hank Rogers wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 19:22:44 -0500 :
They wanted his ID so that if it turned OUT that the device was stolen,
they could point the police in the right direction.
So, it turned out he was innocent?
Hard to believe, since he hates apple with all his soul.
Whoa. I do not hate Apple. I don't like Apple but I don't like Google or Microsoft either. But there's no difference to me. I simply tell the truth.
And, Apple told me its their policy that you need two things for them to unbrick a device that they themselves bricked because I didn't log into it for more than two years (even though the login/password were correct).
1. Proof of ownership
2. Government ID (which they copy)
So much for privacy on Apple devices.
Notice they unbricked the one that I bought at that store.
But they wouldn't unbrick the one I couldn't prove was mine.
Now let's look at this from an adult viewpoint since apparently Alan Baker has been claiming I stole the iPad that I brought to Apple to unbrick.
Only Alan Baker would say that someone would do that, because if it was stolen, there's been plenty of time for Apple to be informed of that.
Since they have my ID, they could call the cops at any time should it be reported stolen in the future. The point is Alan Baker is a moron.
What he's doing is making kindergarten excuses for Apple's behavior.
But I do enjoy your wit as I have Alan Baker & Jughead in my killfile.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)