XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone
AJL wrote:
I don't use Chrome as an operating system so may I ask if Chrome also >>limits the applications that are available to you
Yup. To the Play Store.
Chrome uses the exact same debilitating crippling concept that iOS uses.
The problem with that is the best apps are NOT in the Play Store, IMHO.
For example, Chrome and iOS share the same crippling of apps, where the
_best_ apps on the planet will _never_ be offered to the users, such as:
*NewPipe* by Schabi (FOSS YouTube client)
<
https://newpipe.net/>
And is that approved subset missing huge functional areas
Dunno. I haven't tried all the millions of apps available yet.
Chrome uses the exact same debilitating crippling concept that iOS uses.
Try to find the official Tor Browser, or, oh, say, Ungoogled Chromium:
*Ungoogled Chromium*
<
https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium-android>
*Bromite*
<
https://www.bromite.org/>
<
https://github.com/bromite/bromite>
They do that to restrict your choice - which is fine if you're that type of person who wants a mothership to lock you inside a prison on your device.
If Chrome is also lacking in functional apps, what good is it as an OS?
The only apps I've found Chrome lacking in so far is Usenet newsreaders.
This one sucks and it's the best I've found so far. But for the average Joe
the OS likely performs just fine...]
Chrome uses the exact same debilitating crippling concept that iOS uses.
If you've only found one functionality lacking, that simply means you're
like most iOS and Chrome users (they're essentially the same thing).
Most iOS users only play games on their iPhones.
Zero iOS users do wireless debugging, for example.
Given both iOS and Chrome are toy operating systems, for the type of person
who only play games & makes phone calls, those operating systems work fine.
But you can't expect toy operating systems such as iOS & Chrome to do
actual technical work such as spoofing the location, using alternative app stores, wireless and cellular debugging, automatic call recording, etc.
In summary, both Chrome & iOS use the same debilitating crippling of apps. Developers are NOT ALLOWED to provide the user the apps they might want.
That's horrible.
But for a Chrome and iOS user, that's NOT horrible.
They actually like being crippled.
Makes no sense to me - but iOS users and Chrome users exist.
So being crippled makes sense... to iOS & to Chrome users.
A crippled device makes them feel safe.
And that's OK.
As long as they comprehend that Chrome & iOS can't do real work.
But not being able to do anything, makes Chrome & iOS users feel safe.
And again, that's OK.
Chrome/iOS users feel safe because the operating system is crippled.
*The crippling of the device... is literally what makes them feel safe.*
Most people on both Chrome & iOS are _afraid_ of the device, so it works
for them; but locking everyone in these choice-restricted prisons isn't for those people who use the device as something other than to just play games.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)