On Thu, 15 May 2025 17:36:53 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wroteYears ago one had to have a card for adult sites, it failed These
Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media for
under-16s,
And it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.
No chance in reality
and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an interview, by
Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the Aussies insist on
calling the state Chief Ministers in their Federation -- don’t they
know that “Premier” is shortened journalese for “Prime Minister”?) >>> of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the instigator of the Aussie
law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law
would be “unworkable”.
Corse it is
Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage smoking, drinking and
now social media are never 100% effective. But they greatly reduce
the incidence of the activity, and that is what leads to harm
reduction.
That last remains to be seen
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police
themselves is never going to work.
Just as true of the ban
Because if it had worked, we would have seen the results, after more
than 20 years of their activities. The fact that things are, if
anything, worse now than when they started, shows the uselessness of
trusting them.
The ban is even more useless
snout and trotters in trough just rehashing what failed in past
It is more likely to be about pointing the finger of blame than
achieving anything. Once there is a law requiring social media companies
to ban, the government can say it is their fault for not doing it.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be "unworkable". Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
Rubbish, it'll be easy for kids to fake the ID requirement. That
idiotic law effectively just enforced a compulsory course on
identity fraud for under 16s. While of coure ensuring the
government can track every honest adult social media user who does
verify using their real ID.
That idiotic law effectively just enforced a compulsory course on
identity fraud for under 16s.
The government will only be more inept at it.
On 16 May 2025 09:20:54 +1000, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
That idiotic law effectively just enforced a compulsory course on
identity fraud for under 16s.
You mean, more than they do so already?
The government will only be more inept at it.
Who would do a better job? Certainly not the companies themselves. So who?
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:15:06 +0100, Richmond wrote:
It is more likely to be about pointing the finger of blame thanIt *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean up their act.
achieving anything. Once there is a law requiring social media companies
to ban, the government can say it is their fault for not doing it.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
It *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean up
their act.
yes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and mining
data
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote
MightyMouse wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote
It *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean up >>>> their act.
yes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and
mining data
Precisely. How do we make them care?
Not possible
The only force they understand is legal force.
Just not possible for that to work in this situation
On Fri, 16 May 2025 14:14:24 +1000, MightyMouse wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
It *is* their fault. Remember, they?ve had over 20 years to clean up
their act.
yes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and mining data
Precisely. How do we make them care? The only force they understand is
legal force.
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the �Premier� (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don�t they know that �Premier� is shortened journalese
for �Prime Minister�?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be �unworkable�. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro ><[email protected]d> wrote:Indeed so.
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for >>under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the �Premier� (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don�t they know that �Premier� is shortened journalese
for �Prime Minister�?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the >>instigator of the Aussie law >><https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be �unworkable�. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
Banning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access. This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not >politicians.
Bill.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media forBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese >> for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access.
This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not politicians.
Bill.
On Sat, 17 May 2025 12:39:36 +1000, MightyMouse
<[email protected]> wrote:
BR wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<[email protected]d> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media forBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese >>>> for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access.
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not
politicians.
Bill.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for >under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the ?Premier? (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don?t they know that ?Premier? is shortened journalese
for ?Prime Minister??) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the >instigator of the Aussie law ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be ?unworkable?. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
Banning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access. This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not politicians.
BR <[email protected]> wrote:
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not
politicians.
Indeed. And the majority of parents are doing *such* a good job of it
and know *exactly* what their children are (not) doing.
Which is why online controls won't work, because they won't have support
of many parents...
When I was 16 I snuck into movie theatres to watch x-rated movies, which
is probably more harmful than watching them on one's phone and certainly requires far more effort.
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Scott Dorsey wrote:
Which is why online controls won't work, because they won't have support
of many parents...
It is a given, is it not, that those below a certain age are not of >sufficient maturity to make certain decisions for themselves. That�s why
our species has the concept of �parents� and �parenting� at all. Only >nowadays, society has become so complex that the parents of a child
cannot, on their own, supply sufficient guidance and care to ensure the
child grows up the right way. That�s why we have schools and
schoolteachers, for one thing.
As the saying goes, �it takes a village to raise a child�. And as Marshall >McLuhan pointed out, that �village� is nowadays well and truly global.
When I was 16 I snuck into movie theatres to watch x-rated movies, which
is probably more harmful than watching them on one's phone and certainly
requires far more effort.
And therefore you did it less. That�s the difference.
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don�t they?
Petzl <[email protected]> wrote
Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
Petzl <[email protected]> wrote
Greg Warren Camden Liberal mayor, blown parachuted into Campbelltown
to be Labors state NSW member of parliament "snout and trotters in
trough". Labor pay him to go to local pubs for beer and photosgoots
<https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/news_article?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGMTE4NDc3Lmh0bWwmYWxsPTE%3D>
https://tinyurl.com/22usema3
Fantasy on Labor paying him
Not according to my Labor party comity mates
Just because some fool claims something...
About 3am on Tuesday 6 May 2025, officers from Campbelltown Police
Area Command attended a home on Copperfield Drive, Rosemeadow, after
three men allegedly threatened a 24-year-old female occupant with a
firearm during a home invasion.
Corse nothing like that ever happened under the Libs, eh ?
In my electorate which was guaranteed Labor one till boundaries
changed
Your electorate is completely irrelevant
When they did no doubt the Lib's were trying to make a good impression
Their MP was a Local cop that lived in Campbelltown, they most
certainty listened to him and got rid of the 3M streets
Bullshit
<https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/new-beginning-means-removing-kids-from-the-violence/news-story/d40e03b25b9103e87740e03e9f0a146b>
https://tinyurl.com/ycmb4nje
Just because some fuckwit journo claims something...
New beginning means removing kids from the violence
ROSEMEADOW residents tell tales of woe about failed attempts to get
help. They talk about the streets littered with rubbish, homes with
smashed walls, and junkies.
Corse nothing like that ever happened under the Libs, eh ?
Most Certainly when John Fahey went federal, his replacement was Pat
Farmer guaranteed Lib seat,
his inauguration speech was concerns about the new John Howard Flight
Paths, no uncertain terms was told to "Shut the fuck up" by the Lib's
Bullahir
Same was happing with their Labor representatives, booth parties are
not interested in looking after guaranteed seats, parachuting snout
and trotters in, they don't like locals representing them
Corse nothing like that ever happened under the Libs, eh ?
On Sat, 17 May 2025 22:38:44 +1000, MightyMouse
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2025 12:39:36 +1000, MightyMouse
<[email protected]> wrote:
BR wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<[email protected]d> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for >>>>>> under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is anBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the >>>>>> Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese
for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the >>>>>> instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law
would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage >>>>>> smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But >>>>>> they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what >>>>>> leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police
themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen >>>>>> the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact >>>>>> that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started,
shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required >>>>> for internet access.
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
people are already doing it
EVERYONE isnt
and isnt even doing that for their pets
even tho that is a legal requirement and no govt would
ever be stupid enough to require that for internet access
and complete trivial to bypass that even if they did
This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity,
not
politicians.
Bill.
As usual accomplish nothing and these parasites know it.
Kids under 21 should not be allowed smart phones, only be allowed dumb >>phones for text and voice.
eg Nokia 2780 >><https://www.amazon.com.au/Nokia-Unlocked-Universally-Compatible-Carriers/dp/B0D3RWZ39S>
https://tinyurl.com/y8rfvh9t
Also get to recognize spare the rod and spoil the child lessons to
parents how to flog them.
To many children have little respect nowadays, My town the local cop
would kick you on the bum, then tell your parents who also gave you a >>hammering then you would be mowing lawns at some oldies house for 12
months
make parents accountable for their louts actions $$$ >><https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/police-to-target-ringleaders-in-youth-crime-crackdown/105070820>
https://tinyurl.com/mu3fp8za
NSW Police to target 100 ringleaders in crackdown on youth crime
Uncontrollable youth gangs have always been a problem. The early 20th >century brought in legislation to have schooling compulsory up until
the age of 14. And reform and trade schools sequestered the worst.
Corporal punishment was routine, and read on...... >https://www.thefreelibrary.com/%22Give+him+a+doing%22%3a+the+birching+of+young+offenders+in+Scotland+(1).-a099019935
As usual accomplish nothing and these parasites know it.
Kids under 21 should not be allowed smart phones, only be allowed dumb
phones for text and voice.
eg Nokia 2780 ><https://www.amazon.com.au/Nokia-Unlocked-Universally-Compatible-Carriers/dp/B0D3RWZ39S>
https://tinyurl.com/y8rfvh9t
Also get to recognize spare the rod and spoil the child lessons to
parents how to flog them.
To many children have little respect nowadays, My town the local cop
would kick you on the bum, then tell your parents who also gave you a >hammering then you would be mowing lawns at some oldies house for 12
months
make parents accountable for their louts actions $$$
<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/police-to-target-ringleaders-in-youth-crime-crackdown/105070820>
https://tinyurl.com/mu3fp8za
NSW Police to target 100 ringleaders in crackdown on youth crime
On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Scott Dorsey wrote:
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't they?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Scott Dorsey wrote:
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social >objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it >provides no context.
--scott
Peter Jason <[email protected]> wroteIt is not bullshit. It's common sense.
[email protected] (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't
they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social
objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it
provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
Look it up! It is not bullshit.In the USA various venereal diseases, like clamidia andgonorrhea are
out of control, especially among blacks.
Bullshit
Yes it is. Flog them if they refuse to learn!The mechanics of sex must be combined with social skills&
responsibilities and should be taught from a young age.
Not even possible.
It's the main one!Various religions oppose this mainly inthe endeavor to breed more
adherents,
That's not why they do that
"Child benefits" do not knock them up?and the costs of caring for bastards and gravid mothers.
In fact the stupid child benefits system actually encourages that
BTW, I have a 300-meter steel tower in Paris for sale, quite cheap,
honest!
On 17 May 2025 17:29:05 GMT
Frank Slootweg <[email protected]d> wrote:
BTW, I have a 300-meter steel tower in Paris for sale, quite cheap,Don't buy his tower! Get a proper cast iron one.
honest!
Peter Jason <[email protected]> wrote
Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
Peter Jason <[email protected]> wrote
[email protected] (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't >>>>>> they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social >>>>> objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the >>>>> right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't >>>>> going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see >>>>> places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it >>>>> provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
It's common sense.
Control isnt even possible
In the USA various venereal diseases, like clamidia and
gonorrhea are out of control, especially among blacks.
Bullshit
Look it up!
Nothing to look up that says anything even remotely like that
The above is solid gold diamond encrusted truth. Why is everything "bullshit".?It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
Wot? All the best things are illegal. Look at the USA govt debt!The mechanics of sex must be combined with social skills&
responsibilities and should be taught from a young age.
Not even possible.
Yes it is. Flog them if they refuse to learn!
Even sillier than you usually manage and not even legal
Various religions oppose this mainly in
the endeavor to breed more adherents,
That's not why they do that
It's the main one!
Bullshit it is. If it was, they wouldnt be banning fucking outside marriage Yes they would given the roving stud could be of any religion.
Nevertheless the result is poor-quality bastards.and the costs of caring for bastards and gravid mothers.
In fact the stupid child benefits system actually encourages that
"Child benefits" do not knock them up?
But is the reason the dregs choose to have the brats, so they dont
have to work and just put their hand out to the govt instead
"Kerr-Mudd, John" <[email protected]> writes:
On 17 May 2025 17:29:05 GMT
Frank Slootweg <[email protected]d> wrote:
BTW, I have a 300-meter steel tower in Paris for sale, quite cheap,Don't buy his tower! Get a proper cast iron one.
honest!
Oh, well! If that's your inclination, I have a nice bridge in
Shropshire that might interest you.
Peter Jason <[email protected]> wrote
Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
Peter Jason <[email protected]> wrote
Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
Peter Jason <[email protected]> wrote
[email protected] (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't >>>>>>>> they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social >>>>>>> objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on >>>>>>> the right turn out to be social objections when carefully
inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't >>>>>>> going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice >>>>>>> thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see >>>>>>> places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that >>>>>>> it provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
It's common sense.
Control isnt even possible
Some control is possible.
Nope and it never has been
Well, you screw me over 100% of the time!No one gets it 100% of the time
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that it
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 07:48:20 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that it
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, they
had you ya inbred disease
On 6 Jun 2025 16:08:28 +1000, noel <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 07:48:20 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that itSex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, they
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
had you ya inbred disease
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have
the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
MightyMouse <[email protected]> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <[email protected]> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense
that it
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed,
they
had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
old farts who will not be tutored.� After all it's the adults who have
the feral kids.�� I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so
many social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching� societal
dictates.
More bullshit
Petzl <[email protected]> wroteI suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevant
Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
Retrograde <[email protected]d> wrote
For the love of god
There is no god
Not what George Washington believed
Its no news that there are plenty as stupid as you and him
George Washington
"The thing that sets the American Christian apart is that he will die
on his feet before he will live on his knees."
And that fucker grovelled to some sky fairy on his knees
please drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
please drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevantGet fucked
MightyMouse <[email protected]> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <[email protected]> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that it >>>>> does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, they >>>> had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have
the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so many
social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal
dictates.
More bullshit
Peter Jason <[email protected]> wroteSo? Perhaps the rest of Asia should follow!
Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
MightyMouse <[email protected]> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <[email protected]> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that >>>>>>> it does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, >>>>>> they had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid >>>>> old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have >>>>> the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so many >>>> social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal
dictates.
More bullshit
There is no bullshit.
It is nothing but bullshit
Singapore is famous for admonishing, catching,
sequestering and sentencing those refractory brats who daub wall with
their vandalisms.
Pity its a microscopic subset of asia
Picky picky, Bared then?These vandals are stripped and caned.
Bullshit on the stripped
Irrelevant!Hence Singapore is almost graffiti free.
Pity about the rest of asia which isnt
It is not bullshit at all. Clean-up crews are at it all the time!Curiously this has not been taken up in other countries, even though
it works, and is the cheapest form of punishment there is.
We, the long suffering taxpayer, has to fork out $quillions
More bullshit
Rubbish! A simple stake-out would do it.to finance
cleanup operations where a good flogging would so the job for almost
nothing.
Costs heaps to find the culprits, fuckwit
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:50:04 +1200
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevantplease drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
Well Rod Speed is clearly a special kind of aggressive shitpile to
manually re-add comp.misc to the list of newsgroups before going back
to his usual blathering stupidity.
Killfiled and problem solved.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 06:11:51 -0600, Retrograde
<[email protected]d> wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:50:04 +1200
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevantplease drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
Well Rod Speed is clearly a special kind of aggressive shitpile to
manually re-add comp.misc to the list of newsgroups before going back
to his usual blathering stupidity.
Killfiled and problem solved.
Relax; I'm still educating that Hominid.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 07:29:26 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,932 |
| Posted today: | 1 |