1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.MAIL.UUCP

  • Re: INN batches over multiple intermediates

    From Martin Burmester@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 15 13:13:25 2024
    Hi,

    Am 14.06.2024 um 18:08 schrieb Kyonshi:
    One question we just came across when thinking about this and we
    couldn't find an answer:
    Assuming we have two INN2 installations on machines more than one hop
    away from one another, how would be the best way to move a batch from
    Machine 1 to Machine 3, without an installation of INN on Machine 2
    between them.
    Would this have to be defined in the send-uucp.cf of INN or rather in
    the port/sys settings of uucp itself?

    I came across this question a few years ago. This would have to be done
    in send-uucp. But as far as I know send-uucp does not support this. You
    would have to dive into the the source code of send-uucp and implement it.

    Cheers,
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From lkh@21:1/5 to Kyonshi on Sun Jun 16 10:02:28 2024
    Kyonshi <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 6/15/2024 1:13 PM, Martin Burmester wrote:
    Hi,

    Am 14.06.2024 um 18:08 schrieb Kyonshi:
    One question we just came across when thinking about this and we
    couldn't find an answer:
    Assuming we have two INN2 installations on machines more than one hop
    away from one another, how would be the best way to move a batch from
    Machine 1 to Machine 3, without an installation of INN on Machine 2
    between them.
    Would this have to be defined in the send-uucp.cf of INN or rather in
    the port/sys settings of uucp itself?

    I came across this question a few years ago. This would have to be done
    in send-uucp. But as far as I know send-uucp does not support this. You
    would have to dive into the the source code of send-uucp and implement it. >>
    Cheers,
    Martin


    ah, pity. I thought that would be easier to manage.

    although. I guess one could have a script running to push any
    batch-files further down the line.

    Maybe all it'd take would be editing the rnews command in the
    execute files for the remote system. Something like:

    sed 's/fakeremote/intermediate\!trueremote/' X.<file>

    run by a cron job?

    --
    https://social.sdfeu.org/@lkh
    IRC: lkh on Libera.chat and others

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Burmester@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 20 20:11:47 2024
    Hi,

    Am 16.06.2024 um 10:02 schrieb lkh:
    Kyonshi <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 6/15/2024 1:13 PM, Martin Burmester wrote:
    Hi,

    Am 14.06.2024 um 18:08 schrieb Kyonshi:
    One question we just came across when thinking about this and we
    couldn't find an answer:
    Assuming we have two INN2 installations on machines more than one hop
    away from one another, how would be the best way to move a batch from
    Machine 1 to Machine 3, without an installation of INN on Machine 2
    between them.
    Would this have to be defined in the send-uucp.cf of INN or rather in
    the port/sys settings of uucp itself?

    I came across this question a few years ago. This would have to be done
    in send-uucp. But as far as I know send-uucp does not support this. You
    would have to dive into the the source code of send-uucp and implement it. >>>
    Cheers,
    Martin


    ah, pity. I thought that would be easier to manage.

    although. I guess one could have a script running to push any
    batch-files further down the line.

    Maybe all it'd take would be editing the rnews command in the
    execute files for the remote system. Something like:

    sed 's/fakeremote/intermediate\!trueremote/' X.<file>

    run by a cron job?

    send-uucp is a pretty easy to read perl script. Adding it there is
    probably easier than those hacky ideas.

    Cheers
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)