Well, I realize I am replying to a message of mine from 2017, but among 13thousand messages, this was a most adequate subject matching this current situation. Since that time, I not grab mail from a remote server, actually FastMail. Obviously still inconsistancies with the bell ringing as well as my earlier comments about times where it will just say "sorting mail 100%" The real `killer was just today, I came home opened an index of 50 messages, began useing an agregate command to mark items I didn't want. I expunged these items, when I discovered an index had advanced as 2 items arrived alphabeticly near the top of an index. Then I figured out because there were no notifications nor any bells that rang, I nuked a daily C-Span schedule which I cannot get back. And for the record I have a beep frequency set at the loudest at 1750. Sure, like now while I am writing, I am hearing a bell-and-new mail from whoever, but its mostly in an index where its rather inconsistant. Thanks so much in advance
Chime

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2022-04-13, Chime Hart <[email protected]> wrote:

Well, I realize I am replying to a message of mine from 2017, but among 13thousand messages, this was a most adequate subject matching this current situation. Since that time, I not grab mail from a remote server, actually FastMail. Obviously still inconsistancies with the bell ringing as well as my earlier comments about times where it will just say "sorting mail 100%" The real `killer was just today, I came home opened an index of 50 messages, began
useing an agregate command to mark items I didn't want. I expunged these items,
when I discovered an index had advanced as 2 items arrived alphabeticly near the top of an index. Then I figured out because there were no notifications nor
any bells that rang, I nuked a daily C-Span schedule which I cannot get back. And for the record I have a beep frequency set at the loudest at 1750. Sure, like now while I am writing, I am hearing a bell-and-new mail from whoever, but
its mostly in an index where its rather inconsistant. Thanks so much in advance

It is always better to mark and save the messages into some saved
folder. Then you can go into that and delete them all if you want. To
delete in an active mailbox can be pretty dangerous as you have
discovered. And I sure would not depend on a bell. There is lots that
could disrupt that, including you having gone to pour another cup of
coffee just at the wrong time.

Chime

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, Chime Hart wrote:

Well, I realize I am replying to a message of mine from 2017, but among 13thousand messages, this was a most adequate subject matching this current situation. Since that time, I not grab mail from a remote server, actually FastMail. Obviously still inconsistancies with the bell ringing as well as my earlier comments about times where it will just say "sorting mail 100%" The real `killer was just today, I came home opened an index of 50 messages, began useing an agregate command to mark items I didn't want. I expunged these items, when I discovered an index had advanced as 2 items arrived alphabeticly near the top of an index. Then I figured out because there were no notifications nor any bells that rang, I nuked a daily C-Span schedule which I cannot get back. And for the record I have a beep frequency set at the loudest at 1750. Sure, like now while I am writing, I am hearing a bell-and-new mail from whoever, but its mostly in an index where its rather inconsistant. Thanks so much in advance

It is not clear to me what the situation was. My understanding is that you selected messages using aggregate operations. Did the wrong messages get selected when you did that? (wrong in the sense that the messages that got selected included messages you were not aware of), or did the correct
messages get selected but when you applied the delete operation the
incorrect messages got deleted? (because the message numbers did not match
the selected messages due to the arrival of new messages.)

Thank you for clarifying.

--
Eduardo
https://tinyurl.com/yc377wlh (web)
http://repo.or.cz/alpine.git (Git)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Thank you Eduardo-and-William. Essentially William is correct, however, as an index changed without any notifications, 2 messages I thought were gone were still in an inbox, but 2 others were gone. With a screen-reader, it takes time to examin a large index. I realize there are options to prevent new mail from coming in while in an inbox. I also know I could set an intervill so mail wouldn't check as frequently, but none of these work arounds would actually fix Alpine's inconsistant behavior with both types of informing about "new mail" Thanks in advance
Chime

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2022-04-14, Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]> wrote:

On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, Chime Hart wrote:

Well, I realize I am replying to a message of mine from 2017, but among
13thousand messages, this was a most adequate subject matching this current >> situation. Since that time, I not grab mail from a remote server, actually >> FastMail. Obviously still inconsistancies with the bell ringing as well as my
earlier comments about times where it will just say "sorting mail 100%" The >> real `killer was just today, I came home opened an index of 50 messages,
began useing an agregate command to mark items I didn't want. I expunged
these items, when I discovered an index had advanced as 2 items arrived
alphabeticly near the top of an index. Then I figured out because there were >> no notifications nor any bells that rang, I nuked a daily C-Span schedule
which I cannot get back. And for the record I have a beep frequency set at >> the loudest at 1750. Sure, like now while I am writing, I am hearing a
bell-and-new mail from whoever, but its mostly in an index where its rather >> inconsistant. Thanks so much in advance

It is not clear to me what the situation was. My understanding is that you selected messages using aggregate operations. Did the wrong messages get selected when you did that? (wrong in the sense that the messages that got selected included messages you were not aware of), or did the correct messages get selected but when you applied the delete operation the
incorrect messages got deleted? (because the message numbers did not match the selected messages due to the arrival of new messages.)

I read it that the two new messages got included in the messages that
were deleted as well as the ones that had been chosen. But lets hopes he answers.

Thank you for clarifying.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)