1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.LANG.LISP

  • Re: Why not a setf-able NIL ?

    From B. Pym@21:1/5 to Pascal J. Bourguignon on Mon Jul 15 20:29:49 2024
    Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:

    You must be very very sad. I know of no programming language
    allowing you to redefined/reassing 42. I suppose you would like to do
    (let ((42 101010)) (* 42 2)) too...

    Ignorance.

    Forth:

    : 42 233 ; ok
    42 2 * . 466 ok

    Understand?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)