Q: Exists the possibility to 'get back in history' on the wiki?
Perhaps someone has inadvertently changed something.
Helmut Giese <[email protected]> wrote:
Q: Exists the possibility to 'get back in history' on the wiki?
Perhaps someone has inadvertently changed something.
Yes, somewhere on the page in the menus will be a "history" link, with
that you can "go back in time" to any prior version of the page.
I predict you'll find that a Pooryorick edit for his personal style
beliefs of how the Wiki pages should appear has also broken the TCL code
in the page.
On 2022-12-22, Rich <[email protected]d> wrote:
Helmut Giese <[email protected]> wrote:
Q: Exists the possibility to 'get back in history' on the wiki?
Perhaps someone has inadvertently changed something.
Yes, somewhere on the page in the menus will be a "history" link,
with that you can "go back in time" to any prior version of the
page.
I predict you'll find that a Pooryorick edit for his personal style
beliefs of how the Wiki pages should appear has also broken the TCL
code in the page.
And in that history, creation and edits are all AMG, except the
latest, which is by the current OP - and all he did is reformat a
comment or two, as far as I can tell with a quick look.
Poor Yorick, I have been annoyed with him in the past, but surely he
need not be a permanent scapegoat.
I predict you'll find that a Pooryorick edit for his personal style
beliefs of how the Wiki pages should appear has also broken the TCL code
in the page.
And in that history, creation and edits are all AMG, except the latest,
which is by the current OP - and all he did is reformat a comment or
two, as far as I can tell with a quick look.
Poor Yorick, I have been annoyed with him in the past, but surely heMe too, but this time he is isn't the culprit.
need not be a permanent scapegoat.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 40:45:40 |
| Calls: | 12,109 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,399 |