• Re: Lying meets the standard of losing defamation cases

    From Richard Damon@21:1/5 to olcott on Tue May 21 07:54:35 2024
    XPost: comp.theory

    On 5/21/24 1:03 AM, olcott wrote:
    On 5/20/2024 11:47 PM, immibis wrote:
    On 20/05/24 14:00, David Brown wrote:
    On 20/05/2024 11:16, immibis wrote:
    On 19/05/24 21:48, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    No shit. Sick. Puke! Wow.


    If olcott loves child porn and claims to be a god, well... Is there
    any hope? Puke! Gross. Sick fuck!

    I am not commenting on Olcott's habits but in this exchange, you are
    the troll. Please cease.

    Indeed.

    If someone has hard evidence of a crime (claiming to be "god" is not
    a crime), take it to the relevant authorities

    Be aware that Peter Olcott was already convicted, sentenced, jailed,
    and released for possession of child pornography. His legal defense of
    being God did not work. None of this was speculation by Chris, but he
    is still a troll.


    You are a liar to the extent of losing a defamation
    case against you. The authorities can hunt you down
    by your IP address.


    Be careful, you may find yourself on the flip side of that suit.

    You have admitted to your own nature of a reckless disregard for the truth.

    I will admit, that I don't know what the results of the case were, but
    it was factually established that you WERE arrested, and it was reported
    that you claim was that it was ok because you were God.

    I do wonder sometimes if your insane behavior is to maintain the
    appearance that you are not mentally competent to stand trial.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Damon@21:1/5 to olcott on Tue May 21 07:56:21 2024
    XPost: comp.theory

    On 5/21/24 1:05 AM, olcott wrote:
    On 5/20/2024 11:47 PM, immibis wrote:
    On 20/05/24 14:00, David Brown wrote:
    On 20/05/2024 11:16, immibis wrote:
    On 19/05/24 21:48, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    No shit. Sick. Puke! Wow.


    If olcott loves child porn and claims to be a god, well... Is there
    any hope? Puke! Gross. Sick fuck!

    I am not commenting on Olcott's habits but in this exchange, you are
    the troll. Please cease.

    Indeed.

    If someone has hard evidence of a crime (claiming to be "god" is not
    a crime), take it to the relevant authorities

    Be aware that Peter Olcott was already convicted, sentenced, jailed,
    and released for possession of child pornography. His legal defense of
    being God did not work. None of this was speculation by Chris, but he
    is still a troll.


    *Lying meets the standard of losing defamation cases*
    You are a liar to the extent of losing a defamation
    case against you. The authorities can hunt you down
    by your IP address.


    The "Authorities" will not do that.

    Defamation is a CIVIL issue, so if you think you have a case, you can
    file in court to bring suit, and YOU (or your legal team) need to do all
    the leg work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mikko@21:1/5 to Richard Damon on Tue May 21 17:28:45 2024
    On 2024-05-21 11:56:21 +0000, Richard Damon said:

    On 5/21/24 1:05 AM, olcott wrote:
    On 5/20/2024 11:47 PM, immibis wrote:
    On 20/05/24 14:00, David Brown wrote:
    On 20/05/2024 11:16, immibis wrote:
    On 19/05/24 21:48, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    No shit. Sick. Puke! Wow.


    If olcott loves child porn and claims to be a god, well... Is there any >>>>>> hope? Puke! Gross. Sick fuck!

    I am not commenting on Olcott's habits but in this exchange, you are >>>>> the troll. Please cease.

    Indeed.

    If someone has hard evidence of a crime (claiming to be "god" is not a >>>> crime), take it to the relevant authorities

    Be aware that Peter Olcott was already convicted, sentenced, jailed,
    and released for possession of child pornography. His legal defense of
    being God did not work. None of this was speculation by Chris, but he
    is still a troll.


    *Lying meets the standard of losing defamation cases*
    You are a liar to the extent of losing a defamation
    case against you. The authorities can hunt you down
    by your IP address.


    The "Authorities" will not do that.

    Defamation is a CIVIL issue, so if you think you have a case, you can
    file in court to bring suit, and YOU (or your legal team) need to do
    all the leg work.

    That depends on the place and time. In some places defamation is a crime
    worth of several years in prison, in others it is no crime at all, and
    laws may vary over time. Laws also vary on what is and what is not defamation.

    --
    Mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)