1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.LANG.C

  • Re: C89 standard and rationale

    From Kaz Kylheku@21:1/5 to Paul Edwards on Sat Jan 20 03:30:28 2024
    On 2024-01-19, Paul Edwards <[email protected]> wrote:
    I found the ANSI X3.159-1989 standard here:

    https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/FIPS/fipspub160.pdf

    If I didn't know better, I'd call that TeX/LaTeX-ed.

    And it is the case that I don't know better.

    --
    TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
    Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
    Mastodon: @[email protected]
    NOTE: If you use Google Groups, I don't see you, unless you're whitelisted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Rentsch@21:1/5 to Kaz Kylheku on Sat Jan 20 18:08:04 2024
    Kaz Kylheku <[email protected]> writes:

    On 2024-01-19, Paul Edwards <[email protected]> wrote:

    I found the ANSI X3.159-1989 standard here:

    https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/FIPS/fipspub160.pdf

    If I didn't know better, I'd call that TeX/LaTeX-ed.

    I don't know how you're getting that impression. I
    have no reason to think any of the early versions of
    the ANSI or ISO C standards, including this document,
    were the product of TeX/LaTeX formatting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)