On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:46:36 -0700
"Chris M. Thomasson" <
[email protected]> boringly babbled:
On 9/17/2024 12:38 AM, [email protected] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:08:51 -0700
"Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]> boringly babbled:
Any thoughts?
Yes:
1)
Few people have time to examine 400 lines of C++ code on a newsgroup.
True. I was just wondering if somebody got really, really bored with >absolutely nothing to do, well, perhaps take a look? ;^)
I'm afraid I'm not the sort of person who finds languages and their
semantics interesting any more than I admire hammers. They're a means to an end. I lurk on this newsgroup (and occasionally post) to pick up any useful tips, not wade through code :)
Btw, even though it compiles for me, I forgot to include the
<functional> header wrt std::ref. But, it still compiles for me. Shit >happens. :^)
I didn't even know std::ref existed and now I've looked it up I'm not sure
when I'd ever use it though it looks like yet another C++ hack to get around poor initial language design. But still, you never know.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)