Corr.: Typo change_arg/2 ~~> change_arg/3
you can do it with change_arg/3 and nothing else!
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
Why only phrase_from_file/2 and not also
phrase_from_url/2. Its not that difficult to
do, you can do it with change_arg/2 and
nothing else! Lets see what we have so far:
Trealla Prolog:
Base on memory mapping chars. So basically
this could be judged as a further argument
in favor of chars versus codes. But its
not Web 2.0, works only for files.
https://github.com/trealla-prolog/trealla/blob/main/library/pio.pl
SWI-Prolog:
Based on turning a stream into a lazy list.
Requires attributed variables and repositionable
streams. The stream is opened with open/3 but
maybe could be opened with http_open/3 as well?
https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/swipl-devel/blob/master/library/pio.pl
To be continued...
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Web 2.0 is all about incremental content!
don’t think it could really do
the “ghost text” effect.
It wouldn’t do the ghost text, only assist
it. There was a misunderstanding how “ghost
texts” work. Maybe you were thinking, that
the “ghost text” is part of the first response.
But usually the “ghost text” is a second response:
waiting for completion candidates to be suggested
Well you don’t use it for your primary
typing completion which is preferably fast.
The first response might give context information,
for the second request which provides a
different type of completion.
But the first response is not responsible
for any timing towards the second request.
That anyway happens in the client. And it
doesn’t hurt if the first response is
from a stupid channel.
Web 2.0 is all about incremental content!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)