1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.GRAPHICS.APPS.LIGHTW

  • another Blade Runner test

    From [email protected]@21:1/5 to snowblind on Tue Nov 17 12:01:20 2015
    On Wednesday, 1 July 1998 02:00:00 UTC-5, snowblind wrote:
    Okay Frame 100 of blade.lws rendered in 141 sec in my PII 233 with 256 mb ram.
    FYI

    just out of curiosity, i rendered frame 100 from blade.lws in 7 seconds on an i7 16gig system. its neat to see how far things have progressed since the "good old days"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Izzy@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Mar 2 08:34:26 2023
    On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 14:01:21 UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
    On Wednesday, 1 July 1998 02:00:00 UTC-5, snowblind wrote:
    Okay Frame 100 of blade.lws rendered in 141 sec in my PII 233 with 256 mb ram.
    FYI
    just out of curiosity, i rendered frame 100 from blade.lws in 7 seconds on an i7 16gig system. its neat to see how far things have progressed since the "good old days"


    wow i forgot i even did this .. but here we are in 2023, rendered frame 100 from blade.lws in 6 seconds I9 9900k with 32gigs ram. ill post again in another 10 years

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tesselator@21:1/5 to Izzy on Wed Sep 20 05:23:09 2023
    On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 1:34:27 AM UTC+9, Izzy wrote:
    On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 14:01:21 UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
    On Wednesday, 1 July 1998 02:00:00 UTC-5, snowblind wrote:
    Okay Frame 100 of blade.lws rendered in 141 sec in my PII 233 with 256 mb ram.
    FYI
    just out of curiosity, i rendered frame 100 from blade.lws in 7 seconds on an i7 16gig system. its neat to see how far things have progressed since the "good old days"
    wow i forgot i even did this .. but here we are in 2023, rendered frame 100 from blade.lws in 6 seconds I9 9900k with 32gigs ram. ill post again in another 10 years

    So, ONLY 20 times faster in 25 years? Man, that sucks! 0 :-)
    Were you rendering the same frame size though? I think back then the size was 512x480 or something like that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)