On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 05:55:59PM -0400, Bill Horne wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 10:28:28PM -0400, Telecom Digest Moderator wrote:
Thanks for reading this, and thanks for your patience while I try various
solutions to the problem.
For the moment, I have found a way around the port blocking. One of
the readers, who prefers to remain anonymous, told me that Panix has a
"Shell In A Box" feature which allows for access to a Unix shell
through Panix's web server. [Snip] Again, my thanks to him.
Status report:
1. The new owners of the ISP I use are still blocking ssh. They claim
that they are not, and that I have to talk to a different department,
and then they hang up on me. This has happened three times.
2. I've started a Panix shell account, which includes shell access
through Panix's web site. It costs $10 per month. Although it gets
the job done, and will work from any browser, the connection
doesn't allow me to send certain control characters to the TD
server in its default configuration, so I'll be working to see if
that can be changed.
3. I upgraded my ProtonVPN service to the "Full" service, which also
coss $10 per month. The new paid service handles ssh without
trouble, and I'm using the Protonvpn connection to write this.
4. One of the readers recommended ExpressVPN. I looked at the web page
for ExpressVPN, and it doesn't show a "Free" or "Trial" option, so
I didn't try it: I'd already gone throgh the work of installing
ProtonVPN, so I figured that since I'd have to pay either way, I'd
just go with the one I already have installed.
5. Bottom line: I'll wait for a few months and see if the Protonvpn
works reliably, while I try out Panix's "Shell In A Box" and see if
it offers features I want to keep. I'll also start screeming to
whatever agency (if any) regulates ISPs in North Carolina, and ask
them to convince the new owners to change their policy.
FWIW.
Bill
--
Bill Horne
(Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)