1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.AI.PHILOSOPHY

  • Re: Understanding Causality

    From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Feb 2 20:27:23 2022
    On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 4:44:06 AM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:
    For the scientific theory of causality you should look into theory of computation and particle physics.
    --
    Eray

    2022 Update: Not very good at all. (Some writings on metaphysics I did under another name are quite popular, though.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Stockbauer@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Thu Feb 3 05:27:18 2022
    On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:27:24 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 4:44:06 AM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:
    For the scientific theory of causality you should look into theory of computation and particle physics.
    --
    Eray
    2022 Update: Not very good at all. (Some writings on metaphysics I did under another name are quite popular, though.)

    And what name might that be?

    If what?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Don Stockbauer on Thu Feb 3 16:52:00 2022
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 5:27:19 AM UTC-8, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:27:24 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 4:44:06 AM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:
    For the scientific theory of causality you should look into theory of computation and particle physics.
    --
    Eray
    2022 Update: Not very good at all. (Some writings on metaphysics I did under another name are quite popular, though.)
    And what name might that be?

    If what?

    I guess I'm going with "Not telling". It's a well-known body of work, but the exigencies of anything like that are complicated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Stockbauer@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Thu Feb 3 19:23:04 2022
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 6:52:02 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 5:27:19 AM UTC-8, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:27:24 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 4:44:06 AM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:
    For the scientific theory of causality you should look into theory of computation and particle physics.
    --
    Eray
    2022 Update: Not very good at all. (Some writings on metaphysics I did under another name are quite popular, though.)
    And what name might that be?

    If what?
    I guess I'm going with "Not telling". It's a well-known body of work, but the exigencies of anything like that are complicated.

    k

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeffrey Rubard@21:1/5 to Don Stockbauer on Tue Feb 8 17:12:38 2022
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 7:23:06 PM UTC-8, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 6:52:02 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 5:27:19 AM UTC-8, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:27:24 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 4:44:06 AM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:
    For the scientific theory of causality you should look into theory of computation and particle physics.
    --
    Eray
    2022 Update: Not very good at all. (Some writings on metaphysics I did under another name are quite popular, though.)
    And what name might that be?

    If what?
    I guess I'm going with "Not telling". It's a well-known body of work, but the exigencies of anything like that are complicated.
    k

    Yeah, it is, it's pretty "k".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Stockbauer@21:1/5 to Jeffrey Rubard on Sat Feb 12 06:14:43 2022
    On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 7:12:39 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 7:23:06 PM UTC-8, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 6:52:02 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 5:27:19 AM UTC-8, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:27:24 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
    On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 4:44:06 AM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:
    For the scientific theory of causality you should look into theory of
    computation and particle physics.
    --
    Eray
    2022 Update: Not very good at all. (Some writings on metaphysics I did under another name are quite popular, though.)
    And what name might that be?

    If what?
    I guess I'm going with "Not telling". It's a well-known body of work, but the exigencies of anything like that are complicated.
    k

    Yeah, it is, it's pretty "k".

    Yes, is pretty K . better than an ugly K. and also , pecan oil is highly polyunsaturated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)