XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic
On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:43:22 -0500, olcott wrote:
On 8/4/2025 12:36 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:
https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8
Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.
/Flibble
*None-the-less this is irrefutable*
*From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this* https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.∞,
if Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ halts, and
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn
if Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ does not halt.
"The contradiction in Linz's (or Turing's) self-referential
halting construction only appears if one insists that the machine
can and must decide on its own behavior, which is neither possible
nor required."
https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8
You have completely lost it: you are using this same reply to different
authors in completely different threads: you have no interest in debate at
all, you just want to shout your baseless assertions at people.
/Flibble
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)