XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math
On 11/13/2021 12:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/13/21 1:09 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/13/2021 12:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/13/21 12:48 PM, olcott wrote:
Copyright 2021 Pete Olcott
Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Arthur Schopenhauer
Except that True Genius is actually able to show the target after
they have hit it, as they understand things so well.
Not to people that are stuck in rebuttal mode that don't really give a
rat's ass for the actual truth.
You are shooting at a target that doesn't actually exist, shown by
the fact that you can't even use the right terminology.
No, maybe there is a Target you can see that others don't, but you
don't seem to understand how to get there. If you really do have some
great idea of a new structure of knowledge, then you need to start at
the basics and work up, not start at the end of a road that has its
structure locked and disagrees with what you want.
No, True Genius understands what they are talking about well enough to
answer the rebuttals. You just ignore them, showing that you don't
really understand what you are talking about.
True Genius also understands how to distinguish the difference between
an actual rebuttal and a very subtle strawman error.
True Genius understands that any rebuttal to the strawman based fake
rebuttal is a total waste of time.
The only rational approach to the very persistent tactic of the strawman
error is to make the assertion so precise that fake rebuttals can be objectively discerned.
_P()
[00001a5e](01) 55 push ebp
[00001a5f](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00001a61](03) 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00001a64](01) 50 push eax // push P
[00001a65](03) 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001a68](01) 51 push ecx // push P
[00001a69](05) e810000000 call 00001a7e // call H
[00001a6e](03) 83c408 add esp,+08
[00001a71](01) 5d pop ebp
[00001a72](01) c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0021) [00001a72]
If when every H in the universe invoked from machine address 00001a7e
takes a 100% specific byte sequence as the definition of its P input and
no element of this infinite set ever results in P reaching its final
state then we know that this P never halts and every H that returns 0 is
a correct halt decider for this specific P.
There is no weasel wording around that one.
MAYBE, you have something in your ideas about what Truth means, but, it clearly isn't of the 'Genius' category because you don't understand
where to apply it. You CAN'T change the rules which a field of logic is
built on at the tail end, but you need to go to the start, and work from there.
It is clear that you don't understand that fundamentals of logic well
enough to work there, which proves that it isn't Genius. Maybe it is an inspired idea, but it isn't Genius.x
--
Copyright 2021 Pete Olcott
Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Arthur Schopenhauer
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)