I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

We are AI or was it borg?

btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
ball of wax.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

We are AI or was it borg?

btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
ball of wax.

Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:19:53 PM UTC-5, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

We are AI or was it borg?

btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
ball of wax.

Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?

Self-reference produces a lot of paradoxes like "this sentence is false ", the Epimenides
paradox . I guess what you call a We or an I paradox. if you study Douglas Hofstadter's work you'll see he put a lot of effort into defining the "I" , how it forms throughout one's life.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:40:26 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:19:53 PM UTC-5, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

We are AI or was it borg?

btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
ball of wax.

Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?

Self-reference produces a lot of paradoxes like "this sentence is false ", the Epimenides
paradox . I guess what you call a We or an I paradox. if you study Douglas Hofstadter's work you'll see he put a lot of effort into defining the "I" , how it forms throughout one's life.

Or maybe not. Who the hell knows in this complicated day and age?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 4:23:42 AM UTC-4, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:40:26 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:19:53 PM UTC-5, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

We are AI or was it borg?

btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
ball of wax.

Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?

Self-reference produces a lot of paradoxes like "this sentence is false ", the Epimenides
paradox accept. I guess what you call a We or an I paradox. if you study Douglas Hofstadter's work you'll see he put a lot of effort into defining the "I" , how it forms throughout one's life.

Or maybe not. Who the hell knows in this complicated day and age?

here are some links where I explain myself

https://douglasmeaglesonportal.yolasite.com https://platosschoolhouse.blogspot.com

The school house is a learning blog. The classical
Greek theorists I claim as fully sufficient for logic
of basic formal thought.

The basic challenge is to apply relation implication
as assumptive.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 3:31:41 PM UTC-6, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 4:23:42 AM UTC-4, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:40:26 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:19:53 PM UTC-5, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:

I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

We are AI or was it borg?

btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
ball of wax.

Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?

Self-reference produces a lot of paradoxes like "this sentence is false ", the Epimenides
paradox accept. I guess what you call a We or an I paradox. if you study Douglas Hofstadter's work you'll see he put a lot of effort into defining the "I" , how it forms throughout one's life.

Or maybe not. Who the hell knows in this complicated day and age?

here are some links where I explain myself

https://douglasmeaglesonportal.yolasite.com https://platosschoolhouse.blogspot.com

The school house is a learning blog. The classical
Greek theorists I claim as fully sufficient for logic
of basic formal thought.

The basic challenge is to apply relation implication
as assumptive.

That's nice.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)