So, you expected Trump to "prevail"?
And now, you're disappointed?
What do you want... war or peace?
=====
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:19:16 +0000, Lee says...
The war in Ukraine will continue and
Vladimir Putin has outmanoeuvred yet
another US president.
You mean like he did Biden, when they started the war on HIS watch.
Vladimir Putin CONFIRMS That The War In Ukraine NEVER Wouldn't Happened If Trump Was In Office
Trump was RIGHT!
"Today, when President Trump says that if he was President back then, there would be no war. And I'm quite sure that it would
indeed be. I can confirm that." - The Left's hero, Putin
Of course, that was until lying Hillary had the Steele Dossier MADE UP, and started using Russia as an excuse for losing, when we
ALL know... Russia's meddled in EVERY election since 1945.
"I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous
American colleague that it should not, the situation should not be brought to the point of no return, when it would come to
hostilities, and I said it quite directly back then that it's a big mistake. Today, when President Trump saying that IF HE WAS THE
PRESIDENT THERE WILL BE NO WAR, AND I'M QUITE SURE THAT IT WOULD INDEED BE SO. I can confirm that. I think that overall, me and
President Trump have built a very good business-like and trustworthy contact, and have every reason to believe that moving down
this path we can come and the sooner the better, to the end of the conflict in Ukraine." - Vladimir Putin
Such a colluder!
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1956798682252152832/vid/avc1/480x270/hOi3l-vtZt6Pu5zk.mp4?tag=14
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:33:37 +0000, Lee says...
Maybe Trump should not have promised
to end the Ukraine war even before he took
office.
Maybe Biden shouldn't have LET Russia go to war with Ukraine.
Whose fault is that?
Uhhh... Kamala's?
No...
=====
Vladimir Putin CONFIRMS That The War In Ukraine NEVER Wouldn't Happened If Trump Was In Office
Trump was RIGHT!
"Today, when President Trump says that if he was President back then, there would be no war. And I'm quite sure that it would
indeed be. I can confirm that." - The Left's hero, Putin
Of course, that was until lying Hillary had the Steele Dossier MADE UP, and started using Russia as an excuse for losing, when we
ALL know... Russia's meddled in EVERY election since 1945.
"I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous
American colleague that it should not, the situation should not be brought to the point of no return, when it would come to
hostilities, and I said it quite directly back then that it's a big mistake. Today, when President Trump saying that IF HE WAS THE
PRESIDENT THERE WILL BE NO WAR, AND I'M QUITE SURE THAT IT WOULD INDEED BE SO. I can confirm that. I think that overall, me and
President Trump have built a very good business-like and trustworthy contact, and have every reason to believe that moving down
this path we can come and the sooner the better, to the end of the conflict in Ukraine." - Vladimir Putin
Such a colluder!
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1956798682252152832/vid/avc1/480x270/hOi3l-vtZt6Pu5zk.mp4?tag=14
So, you expected Trump to "prevail"?
And now, you're disappointed?
What do you want... war or peace?
=====
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:19:16 +0000, Lee says...
The war in Ukraine will continue and Vladimir Putin has
outmanoeuvred yet another US president.
You mean like he did Biden, when they started the war on HIS watch.
Vladimir Putin CONFIRMS That The War In Ukraine NEVER Wouldn'tAnd you believe Putin?
Happened If Trump Was In Office
Putin may not agree with Trump but he respects him.
So do the other world leaders.
Flying the B2 and 4 F-35s over Trump and Biden was brilliant.
It shows that Trump is not Biden, and Putin knows that already.
The days of an appeasing walking corpse are over.
On 2025-08-16, AlleyCat <[email protected]> wrote:Let's see that quote, complete with context.
Well per Biden, a "small incursion into Ukraine" would be not
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:33:37 +0000, Lee says...
Maybe Trump should not have promised to end the Ukraine war even
before he took office.
Maybe Biden shouldn't have LET Russia go to war with Ukraine.
Whose fault is that?
Uhhh... Kamala's?
No...
=====
Vladimir Putin CONFIRMS That The War In Ukraine NEVER Wouldn't
Happened If Trump Was In Office
Trump was RIGHT!
"Today, when President Trump says that if he was President back
then, there would be no war. And I'm quite sure that it would
indeed be. I can confirm that." - The Left's hero, Putin
Of course, that was until lying Hillary had the Steele Dossier
MADE UP, and started using Russia as an excuse for losing, when we
ALL know... Russia's meddled in EVERY election since 1945.
"I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with
the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous
American colleague that it should not, the situation should not be
brought to the point of no return, when it would come to
hostilities, and I said it quite directly back then that it's a
big mistake. Today, when President Trump saying that IF HE WAS THE
PRESIDENT THERE WILL BE NO WAR, AND I'M QUITE SURE THAT IT WOULD
INDEED BE SO. I can confirm that. I think that overall, me and
President Trump have built a very good business-like and
trustworthy contact, and have every reason to believe that moving
down this path we can come and the sooner the better, to the end
of the conflict in Ukraine." - Vladimir Putin
Such a colluder!
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1956798682252152832/vid/
avc1/480x270/hOi3l-vtZt6Pu5zk.mp4?tag=14
responded to by the west, opened the door.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:35:55 -0700, Alan says...The difference is in the rest of what he said.
Well per Biden, a "small incursion into Ukraine" would be not
responded to by the west, opened the door.
Let's see that quote, complete with context.
OK.
Do it.
I'd like to see it too!
Lakehouse rich boy forgets... as usual...
Quotation marks can be used to "signal" ironic, sarcastic, or otherwise a non-standard sense. They indicate the writer is
distancing themselves from the term or casting doubt on its validity.
When doing this, the author or speaker can say whatever the fuck he wants, as long as it's in the ballpark. The author simply
substituted "small" for "minor".
Why do I have to teach you everything?
Now... does THAT satisfy your pedantic semantic bullshit?
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one
thing if it's a MINOR INCURSION and then we end up having a fight about what to do and not do."
"Minor"... "small"... does THAT make a difference to you?
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:19:33 -0700, Alan says...Literally, Biden did.
On 2025-08-17 19:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:35:55 -0700, Alan says...
Well per Biden, a "small incursion into Ukraine" would be not
responded to by the west, opened the door.
Let's see that quote, complete with context.
OK.
Do it.
I'd like to see it too!
Lakehouse rich boy forgets... as usual...
Quotation marks can be used to "signal" ironic, sarcastic, or otherwise a non-standard sense. They indicate the writer is
distancing themselves from the term or casting doubt on its validity.
When doing this, the author or speaker can say whatever the fuck he wants, as long as it's in the ballpark. The author simply
substituted "small" for "minor".
Why do I have to teach you everything?
Now... does THAT satisfy your pedantic semantic bullshit?
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one
thing if it's a MINOR INCURSION and then we end up having a fight about what to do and not do."
"Minor"... "small"... does THAT make a difference to you?
The difference is in the rest of what he said.
It doesn't matter.
Biden never said that there would not be a response
WHO said that?
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:17:04 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-18 17:06, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:19:33 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-17 19:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:35:55 -0700, Alan says...
Well per Biden, a "small incursion into Ukraine" would be not
responded to by the west, opened the door.
Let's see that quote, complete with context.
OK.
Do it.
I'd like to see it too!
Lakehouse rich boy forgets... as usual...
Quotation marks can be used to "signal" ironic, sarcastic, or otherwise a non-standard sense. They indicate the writer is
distancing themselves from the term or casting doubt on its validity. >>>>>
When doing this, the author or speaker can say whatever the fuck he wants, as long as it's in the ballpark. The author simply
substituted "small" for "minor".
Why do I have to teach you everything?
Now... does THAT satisfy your pedantic semantic bullshit?
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one
thing if it's a MINOR INCURSION and then we end up having a fight about what to do and not do."
"Minor"... "small"... does THAT make a difference to you?
The difference is in the rest of what he said.
It doesn't matter.
Biden never said that there would not be a response
WHO said that?
Literally, Biden did.
Double negative aside, Biden said there would never not be a response?
On 8/19/2025 1:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-08-18 19:49, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:17:04 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-18 17:06, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:19:33 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-17 19:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:35:55 -0700, Alan says...
Well per Biden, a "small incursion into Ukraine" would be not >>>>>>>>> responded to by the west, opened the door.
Let's see that quote, complete with context.
OK.
Do it.
I'd like to see it too!
Lakehouse rich boy forgets... as usual...
Quotation marks can be used to "signal" ironic, sarcastic, or
otherwise a non-standard sense. They indicate the writer is
distancing themselves from the term or casting doubt on its
validity.
When doing this, the author or speaker can say whatever the fuck >>>>>>> he wants, as long as it's in the ballpark. The author simply
substituted "small" for "minor".
Why do I have to teach you everything?
Now... does THAT satisfy your pedantic semantic bullshit?
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held
accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one >>>>>>> thing if it's a MINOR INCURSION and then we end up having a fight >>>>>>> about what to do and not do."
"Minor"... "small"... does THAT make a difference to you?
The difference is in the rest of what he said.
It doesn't matter.
Biden never said that there would not be a response
WHO said that?
Literally, Biden did.
Double negative aside, Biden said there would never not be a response?
You changed my sentence, Loser.
My sentence makes perfect sense.
I stated that Biden never made a particular statement.
You moved the "never" to an entirely different place in the sentence.
You're problem is you are too dumb to realize that people see right
through the bullshit you try to pull.
That's why he's down there with Kremlin Girl for least engagement in a.f.r.-l. In fact, you're just about the only person who consistently
engages with the lying troll.
On 2025-08-18 19:49, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:17:04 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-18 17:06, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:19:33 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-17 19:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:35:55 -0700, Alan says...
Well per Biden, a "small incursion into Ukraine" would be not
responded to by the west, opened the door.
Let's see that quote, complete with context.
OK.
Do it.
I'd like to see it too!
Lakehouse rich boy forgets... as usual...
Quotation marks can be used to "signal" ironic, sarcastic, or otherwise a
non-standard sense. They indicate the writer is
distancing themselves from the term or casting doubt on its validity. >>>>>>
When doing this, the author or speaker can say whatever the fuck he wants,
as long as it's in the ballpark. The author simply
substituted "small" for "minor".
Why do I have to teach you everything?
Now... does THAT satisfy your pedantic semantic bullshit?
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held accountable
if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one
thing if it's a MINOR INCURSION and then we end up having a fight about >>>>>> what to do and not do."
"Minor"... "small"... does THAT make a difference to you?
The difference is in the rest of what he said.
It doesn't matter.
Biden never said that there would not be a response
WHO said that?
Literally, Biden did.
Double negative aside, Biden said there would never not be a response?
You changed my sentence, Loser.
My sentence makes perfect sense.
I stated that Biden never made a particular statement.
You moved the "never" to an entirely different place in the sentence.
You're problem is you are too dumb to realize that people see right through the
bullshit you try to pull.
On 2025-08-19 13:23, J Carlson wrote:
On 8/19/2025 1:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-08-18 19:49, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:17:04 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-18 17:06, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:19:33 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-17 19:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:35:55 -0700, Alan says...
Well per Biden, a "small incursion into Ukraine" would be not >>>>>>>>>> responded to by the west, opened the door.
Let's see that quote, complete with context.
OK.
Do it.
I'd like to see it too!
Lakehouse rich boy forgets... as usual...
Quotation marks can be used to "signal" ironic, sarcastic, or otherwise
a non-standard sense. They indicate the writer is
distancing themselves from the term or casting doubt on its validity. >>>>>>>>
When doing this, the author or speaker can say whatever the fuck he >>>>>>>> wants, as long as it's in the ballpark. The author simply
substituted "small" for "minor".
Why do I have to teach you everything?
Now... does THAT satisfy your pedantic semantic bullshit?
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held
accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one >>>>>>>> thing if it's a MINOR INCURSION and then we end up having a fight about
what to do and not do."
"Minor"... "small"... does THAT make a difference to you?
The difference is in the rest of what he said.
It doesn't matter.
Biden never said that there would not be a response
WHO said that?
Literally, Biden did.
Double negative aside, Biden said there would never not be a response?
You changed my sentence, Loser.
My sentence makes perfect sense.
I stated that Biden never made a particular statement.
You moved the "never" to an entirely different place in the sentence.
You're problem is you are too dumb to realize that people see right through >>> the bullshit you try to pull.
That's why he's down there with Kremlin Girl for least engagement in a.f.r.-l.
In fact, you're just about the only person who consistently engages with the >> lying troll.
Oh, come on! It's fun!
The hilarious part is Phil thinks he's so clever!
On 8/19/2025 1:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-08-19 13:23, J Carlson wrote:
On 8/19/2025 1:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-08-18 19:49, AlleyCat wrote:
You changed my sentence, Loser.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:17:04 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-18 17:06, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:19:33 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-17 19:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:35:55 -0700, Alan says...
Well per Biden, a "small incursion into Ukraine" would be not >>>>>>>>>>> responded to by the west, opened the door.
Let's see that quote, complete with context.
OK.
Do it.
I'd like to see it too!
Lakehouse rich boy forgets... as usual...
Quotation marks can be used to "signal" ironic, sarcastic, or >>>>>>>>> otherwise a non-standard sense. They indicate the writer is
distancing themselves from the term or casting doubt on its
validity.
When doing this, the author or speaker can say whatever the
fuck he wants, as long as it's in the ballpark. The author simply >>>>>>>>> substituted "small" for "minor".
Why do I have to teach you everything?
Now... does THAT satisfy your pedantic semantic bullshit?
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held >>>>>>>>> accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's >>>>>>>>> one
thing if it's a MINOR INCURSION and then we end up having a
fight about what to do and not do."
"Minor"... "small"... does THAT make a difference to you?
The difference is in the rest of what he said.
It doesn't matter.
Biden never said that there would not be a response
WHO said that?
Literally, Biden did.
Double negative aside, Biden said there would never not be a response? >>>>
My sentence makes perfect sense.
I stated that Biden never made a particular statement.
You moved the "never" to an entirely different place in the sentence.
You're problem is you are too dumb to realize that people see right
through the bullshit you try to pull.
That's why he's down there with Kremlin Girl for least engagement in
a.f.r.-l. In fact, you're just about the only person who consistently
engages with the lying troll.
Oh, come on! It's fun!
The hilarious part is Phil thinks he's so clever!
That's the Dunning-Kruger effect in all its glory. He's too stupid to
know he isn't clever.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:05:54 +0000, Lee says...
Wah wah but Biden!
No wah wah... Biden MATTERS still, since he's the one that allowed the war to start, when Trump wouldn't have.
Here are 53 times Trump said he'd end
Ukraine war
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been President.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 07:28:04 -0400, -hh says...So as long as something started before Trump took office, he is never,
On 8/18/25 20:06, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:05:54 +0000, Lee says...
Wah wah but Biden!
No wah wah... Biden MATTERS still, since he's the one that allowed the war to start, when Trump wouldn't have.
Here are 53 times Trump said he'd end
Ukraine war
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
Russia's attacks on Ukraine started before Biden took office in 2021.
Off-topic non-sequitur.
Russia's myriad "attacks" are not the topic.
Russia "attacked" other countries during Obama's failed reign too, but that's all for another day to discuss.
Stay on topic, lakehouse rich boy clone.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 07:28:04 -0400, -hh says...Nothing is "over", Loser.
Because Russia did attack while Trump was POTUS.
And was over while Trump was POTUS.
Trump did that! (see below)
Winning.
First off... not a "war".
Did Biden stop the current war?
Researching your own claims helps stop you from looking stupid.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:34:24 -0700, Alan says...What bullshit?
Stay on topic, lakehouse rich boy clone.
So as long as something started before Trump took office, he is never,
ever responsible for how it progresses on his watch, Loser?
Is that question:
A) Rhetorical?
B) A non-sequitur?
C) A Red Herring?
D) A bullshit loaded question?
E) PLONK?
I'm leaning towards E, because, by you asking, you must have an answer in your puny little gay mind. Tell us EXACTLY how Trump can
be "responsible", your word, for the Russo-Ukrainian war?
Was Obama responsible, AT ALL, for the Afghanistan War that started under Bush? How? Obama did, after all, keep the war going. At
least Trump's trying to stop the war that started under Biden's watch.
You can't win, if you keep pulling your usual bullshit.
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 09:21:24 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-22 18:45, AlleyCat wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:34:24 -0700, Alan says...
Stay on topic, lakehouse rich boy clone.
So as long as something started before Trump took office, he is never, >>>> ever responsible for how it progresses on his watch, Loser?
Is that question:
A) Rhetorical?
B) A non-sequitur?
C) A Red Herring?
D) A bullshit loaded question?
E) PLONK?
I'm leaning towards E, because, by you asking, you must have an answer in your puny little gay mind. Tell us EXACTLY how Trump can
be "responsible", your word, for the Russo-Ukrainian war?
Was Obama responsible, AT ALL, for the Afghanistan War that started under Bush? How? Obama did, after all, keep the war going. At
least Trump's trying to stop the war that started under Biden's watch.
You can't win, if you keep pulling your usual bullshit.
What bullshit?
You seem to want to create a built-in excuse for all of Trump's failures.
"B,C,D and E" it is.
LOL... lakehouse rich shit, thinks if Trump asks Putin and Zelenskyy to stop killing each others' soldiers, it's Trump's "failure".
Biden spoke with Putin at least 9 times, and no telling how many times the little Azov Nazi Zelenskyy came to America to beg for
money, so if "failing" was even a possibility here, Biden "failed" WAY more times than Trump.
Where were you and your whining ways when Biden was "failing" at a peace agreement between Putin and Zelenskyy?
Seriously... get help.
PLONK!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 714 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 135:27:00 |
| Calls: | 12,087 |
| Files: | 14,997 |
| Messages: | 6,517,366 |