• Re: And To Think The MAGAs Complain About "Lawfare".....

    From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Sun Jul 27 11:30:07 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2025-07-27 07:02, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 16:17:05 -0400, -hh says...

    "Florida does have an anti-SLAPP law. Florida Statute §768.295, enacted
    in 2000 and expanded in 2015, protects individuals from lawsuits brought
    against them for exercising their right to free speech on public issues,
    as well as their rights to assemble, petition the government, and
    instruct representatives."

    Does it say anything about libel?

    Defamation?

    Slander?
    You should really do your homework, Phil?

    '(1) It is the intent of the Legislature to protect the right in Florida
    to exercise the rights of free speech in connection with public issues,
    and the rights to peacefully assemble, instruct representatives, and
    petition for redress of grievances before the various governmental
    entities of this state as protected by the First Amendment to the United
    States Constitution and s. 5, Art. I of the State Constitution. It is
    the public policy of this state that a person or governmental entity not
    engage in SLAPP suits because such actions are inconsistent with the
    right of persons to exercise such constitutional rights of free speech
    in connection with public issues. Therefore, the Legislature finds and
    declares that prohibiting such lawsuits as herein described will
    preserve this fundamental state policy, preserve the constitutional
    rights of persons in Florida, and assure the continuation of
    representative government in this state. It is the intent of the
    Legislature that such lawsuits be expeditiously disposed of by the courts.'

    '(a) “Free speech in connection with public issues” means any written or oral statement that is protected under applicable law and is made before
    a governmental entity in connection with an issue under consideration or
    review by a governmental entity, or is made in or in connection with a
    play, movie, television program, radio broadcast, audiovisual work,
    book, magazine article, musical work, news report, or other similar work.'

    So, yeah.

    It does.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Sun Jul 27 13:37:48 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2025-07-27 13:29, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 11:30:07 -0700, Alan says...

    So, yeah.

    It does.

    So, no.

    It does not.

    Slander not found.

    Defamation not found.

    Playing semantic games again!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)