XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican
On 2025-06-25 18:11, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:52:26 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-06-25 17:20, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:54:54 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-06-25 16:52, AlleyCat wrote:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1937994013354635264/vid/avc1/960x960/vlK
7zTfizmdIuD9U.mp4
Just look at all the women and children liberals said were the only ones >>>>> coming here.
1. There is no evidence of when either of those clips were taken.
https://i.imgur.com/g4drK48.mp4
2. How could a bill that hasn't been passed by responsible for anything yet?
A "bill"?
WHO said anything about a bill being responsible?
Your video did:
I didn't.
https://i.imgur.com/bgjhWQS.mp4
... it doesn't matter. I didn't post the video because of that line. I posted it to show the difference in Biden's border vs. Trump's, so your deflection means NOTHING.
But since there is no proof of when or where those videos were taken,
you can't say who was president during either of them.
If *I* had said something about the bill, only then would you have something to argue. But, I only stated "Biden's Border vs. Trump's", and the other truth
of the matter about women and children.
Like you said: "There is no evidence of when either of those clips were taken."
It doesn't MATTER when they were taken. Why the person who made the video decided to put that line in there, has ZERO bearing on what happened after Trump became President.
It has tremendous bearing on whether the claims about who was president
at the time of each are accurate.
THAT is why the illegal lawnmower traffic is next to nil... not the bill.
THIS is all because of Trump... the "bill" is irrelevant until it is not.
And yet it speaks to the credibility of the video's producer.
If he got a basic fact like that wrong, why should anyone believe any of
the text he chose to include?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)