XPost: misc.legal, dc.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns
In a development that should send chills down the spine of every American
who cares about the rule of law, Judge James Boasberg � you remember this
guy, right? � has somehow ended up with case after case involving
President Donald Trump's second term.
The D.C. swamp's judicial machine continues its relentless assault on our
duly elected president, with Boasberg emerging as its not-so-secret
weapon. The so-called "random" assignment system has produced results that
defy probability and reek of deliberate manipulation.
The good news is that House Republicans are fighting back.
Reps. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Darrell Issa (R-Calif), and Chip Roy (R-Texas)
are demanding answers from Angela Caesar, the court clerk who oversees
this suspicious case assignment system. In a letter that Townhall obtained
on Monday, they are demanding explanations for what any rational observer
would recognize as a coordinated effort to undermine the Trump presidency.
"Many of these nationwide injunctions have raised concerns that Article
III judges are exceeding their constitutional authority by replacing the
policy decisions of the duly elected President with their own preferences, eroding public trust in the integrity and fairness of our judicial system.
Many high-profile cases challenging policy decisions of the Trump Administration have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District
of Columbia (District Court)," the letter states. "As Congress considers potential legislative reforms to address the abuse of nationwide
injunctions and adjust the national distribution and local assignment of
cases challenging Executive Branch policy decisions, we write to request information about the District Court�s assignment of cases."
Related: Trump Just Got a Game-Changing Legal Victory
Boasberg has been handed several significant cases within a remarkably
short timeframe relating to the Trump administration. His docket now
includes cases challenging the administration's implementation of the
Alien Enemies Act for deportations, as well as matters concerning administration officials' use of the Signal app, both assigned less than
two weeks apart. But that's not all.
The judge is also overseeing cases involving the Department of Government Efficiency and disputes over federal funding for programs allegedly
violating civil rights laws (though the latter was dismissed at the
plaintiff's request). While the D.C. District Court's local rules govern
case assignments, the concentration of such politically sensitive matters
under one judge has sparked legitimate questions about the process. The
timing and clustering of these assignments demand closer scrutiny.
Last month, the House passed critical legislation aimed at restraining
these activist judges who have abandoned their constitutional role in
favor of political warfare. But is it too little, too late? The Left's
judicial assault continues unabated while the mainstream media yawns or actively cheers it on.
The American people deserve to know: Who is pulling the strings behind
these courthouse doors? How deep does this corruption go? Furthermore,
will anyone be held responsible for the misuse of our judicial system
against the President of the United States?
The D.C. swamp's manipulation of our judicial system continues unchecked.
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/05/05/this-one-judge-keeps-getting- trump-cases-and-its-no-accident-n4939502
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)