XPost: can.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.home.repair, rec.arts.tv

theglobeandmail. com
view original
May 7, 2025
Opinion: Carney did what voters wanted him to do: Be the adult in the room

Prime Minister Mark Carney meets with U. S. President Donald Trump in the
Oval Office of the White House, in Washington, on May 6. Evan Vucci/The Canadian Press

Theres a philosophy of contemporary toddler-parenting that holds that
parents should strive to distinguish between behaviours that are harmful or dangerous, and those that are merely annoying. Dumping all your toys on the floor? Annoying. Throwing your toys? Harmful. Mashing food with your fork? Annoying. Mashing your hand with your fork? Dangerous. Parents are
instructed to intervene when actions could cause real harm, but to mostly
let the other stuff go.

The intention here is twofold: one, for parents, to preserve their sanity
(its liberating to realize you dont have to take up every battle) and two,
for toddlers, to encourage their creative expression. So your toddler wants
to make a mess of their dinner? So what. Let them do their thing, and get
them to help clean up the mess afterward. Otherwise, every meal turns into
a tantrum.

I have no insight as to whether Prime Minister Mark Carney follows @biglittlefeelings or similar influencer parenting accounts on Instagram.
But his conduct during his first public-facing meeting with U. S. President Donald Trump at the White House on Tuesday followed precisely what is prescribed by such accounts for dealing with highly irrational, emotionally volatile individuals who frequently test limits and insist on doing
everything themselves: two-year-olds, in other words, or on rare occasions, American presidents.

Mr. Carney spoke up when the President mused about Canada becoming the 51st state; you cannot let the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth talk openly about absorbing a sovereign nation any more than you can let a
toddler try to cut her dolls hair with nail clippers. Its too dangerous.
But you try to speak their language in order to soften your intervention.
As you know from real estate, there are some places that are never for
sale, Mr. Carney said to Mr. Trump. This is the geopolitical equivalent of saying, Yes, its fun to play hair-salon, but those clippers might give you
or your doll a boo-boo.

Mr. Carney continued: Having met with the owners of Canada over the course
of the campaign, over the last several months, its not for sale, it wont be
for sale ever. And before Mr. Trumps face could turn red, Mr. Carney redirected the conversation; he noted Canadas investment in strengthening
its border security, its commitment to its partnership with the U. S. , and
he ended with a little flattery: And Ill say this as well, that the
President has revitalized international security, revitalized NATO and us playing our full weight in NATO. You made your doll look so pretty with all that marker on her face.

Beyond that, the 30-minute dialogue was mostly an exercise in the Prime Minister biting his tongue. Mr. Carney didnt correct Mr. Trump when he said that Canadians are paying a tariff on cars and steel and aluminum, though
the economist in him was surely suffering a slow death behind his pursed
lips. Mr. Carney looked at his lap when Mr. Trump referred to former
finance minister Chrystia Freeland whom he didnt directly name as a
terrible person, and offered only the slightest side nod when Mr. Trump
turned to him and said, You know who Im talking about.

When Mr. Trump claimed that, We dont do much business with Canada.... They
do a lot of business with us, the Prime Minister waited about eight minutes
to deliver a gentle fact check, noting that Canada is the largest client of
the United States in the totality of all the goods. And though Mr. Carneys
body language suggested he wanted to speak up when Mr. Trump claimed that
the U. S. is subsidizing Canada to the tune of maybe $200-billion a year,
the President shut down the event before he had a chance to chime in.

Some might view Mr. Carneys restraint as a sign of weakness, but
challenging Mr. Trumps every statement would have been a foolish, counterproductive thing to do. Indeed, it was much better for everyone that
the Prime Minister picked his battles interjecting when Mr. Trump said something harmful or dangerous, but letting the annoying stuff go.
Otherwise, Canada might be dealing with an awful tantrum right about now.

Though expectations for this meeting were low, Mr. Carney performed just
about as well as Canada couldve hoped for its new Prime Minister. He did exactly what he was elected to do, which is to act as the adult in what is really a very silly but high-stakes situation. Mr. Trump seemed pleased
by the interaction, and quite taken by Mr. Carney personally. These are
good signs for Canada, and good signs for our collective sanity. We just
might make it through to the next dinnertime.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)