Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
On 5/5/2025 9:36 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided
lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond
reasonable doubt.
You seem to suggest that it might be more cost effective to shoot the invaders as enemy combatants / terrorists in order to avoid costly legal expenses. AI enhanced unmanned drones could effectively be programmed
to profile illegal entrants and neutralize them. Good call, Siri.
On 5/5/25 12:04 PM, Dark Brandon wrote:
On 5/5/2025 9:36 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided
lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond
reasonable doubt.
You seem to suggest that it might be more cost effective to shoot the
invaders as enemy combatants / terrorists in order to avoid costly
legal expenses. AI enhanced unmanned drones could effectively be
programmed to profile illegal entrants and neutralize them. Good
call, Siri.
HATE to say it, but the political/lawfare tactics
of the further left DO favor just shooting any
who infringe on the border.
On 5/5/25 12:04 PM, Dark Brandon wrote:
On 5/5/2025 9:36 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided
lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond
reasonable doubt.
You seem to suggest that it might be more cost effective to shoot the
invaders as enemy combatants / terrorists in order to avoid costly
legal expenses. AI enhanced unmanned drones could effectively be
programmed to profile illegal entrants and neutralize them. Good
call, Siri.
HATE to say it, but the political/lawfare tactics
of the further left DO favor just shooting any
who infringe on the border.
The lefty tactic is to TIE UP EVERYTHING IN LEGAL
BULLSHIT *FOREVER* ... which must be DEFEATED.
c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On 5/5/25 12:04 PM, Dark Brandon wrote:
On 5/5/2025 9:36 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided
lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond
reasonable doubt.
You seem to suggest that it might be more cost effective to shoot the
invaders as enemy combatants / terrorists in order to avoid costly
legal expenses. AI enhanced unmanned drones could effectively be
programmed to profile illegal entrants and neutralize them. Good
call, Siri.
HATE to say it, but the political/lawfare tactics
of the further left DO favor just shooting any
who infringe on the border.
So why isn't Trump doing that?
And don't blame the courts, Trump
doesn't care what they say.
On 5/6/2025 7:00 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:the
c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On 5/5/25 12:04 PM, Dark Brandon wrote:
On 5/5/2025 9:36 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided
lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond
reasonable doubt.
You seem to suggest that it might be more cost effective to shoot
invaders as enemy combatants / terrorists in order to avoid costly
legal expenses. AI enhanced unmanned drones could effectively be
programmed to profile illegal entrants and neutralize them. Good
call, Siri.
HATE to say it, but the political/lawfare tactics
of the further left DO favor just shooting any
who infringe on the border.
So why isn't Trump doing that?
And don't blame the courts, Trump
doesn't care what they say.
No, do blame the courts. Courts are created to deter crime, not to
protect criminals. When their purpose is reversed, as when DHS
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas
flipped the Department of Homeland Securitythen
into its opposite so that it became a tool to destroy the Homeland,
they must be neutralized until new judges can replace the ones aiding
and abetting the demographic replacement of American citizens with
illegal invaders.
Courts are created to deter crime, not to protect criminals.
The border is Trump's now.
If every border crossing under Biden
was Biden's fault then every border crossing
under Trump is Trump's fault.
Wouldn't you agree?
On 5/6/2025 11:25 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:U.S.
The border is Trump's now.
If every border crossing under Biden
was Biden's fault then every border crossing
under Trump is Trump's fault.
Wouldn't you agree?
There are millions of legal border crossings every year between the
and Mexico, Canada, and between the Yukon Territory and Alaska. Then
there are the illegal / unlawful border crossing by illegal entrants, including drug smugglers. While the Biden Administration encouraged,
aided and abetted illegal entrants to illegally enter the U.S., the
Trump Administration is making an effort to keep the drug smugglers and illegal entrants from illegally entering the U.S..
Obama and Biden appointed activist judges are, in many cases,attempting
to sabotage the Trump Administration's efforts to allow only authorized foreigners entry through our borders. The ACLU is often at the
forefront of using the activist judges' courtrooms as a vehicle to
subvert national security and to aid and abet foreign gang members and
fake "asylum seekers" in their bid to destroy our way of life.
Dark Brandon <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdor9$3fb4g$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 11:25 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:U.S.
The border is Trump's now.
If every border crossing under Biden
was Biden's fault then every border crossing
under Trump is Trump's fault.
Wouldn't you agree?
There are millions of legal border crossings every year between the
and Mexico, Canada, and between the Yukon Territory and Alaska. Then
there are the illegal / unlawful border crossing by illegal entrants,
including drug smugglers. While the Biden Administration encouraged,
aided and abetted illegal entrants to illegally enter the U.S., the
Trump Administration is making an effort to keep the drug smugglers and
illegal entrants from illegally entering the U.S..
More diversion to Biden.
Obama and Biden appointed activist judges are, in many cases,attempting
to sabotage the Trump Administration's efforts to allow only authorized
foreigners entry through our borders. The ACLU is often at the
forefront of using the activist judges' courtrooms as a vehicle to
subvert national security and to aid and abet foreign gang members and
fake "asylum seekers" in their bid to destroy our way of life.
Funny how many of the "activist" judges
blocking Trump policy are Trump appointees.
Do explain.
Judges appointed by Donald Trump are
ruling against him during his second
presidential term.
May 6, 2025 https://theconversation.com/even-judges-appointed-by-trump-are-ruling- against-him-255835
Trump-appointed judge says president’s use
of Alien Enemies Act is unlawful
MAy 1 2025
https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/01/politics/alien-enemies-act-trump- rodriguez-ruling
Trump-Appointed Judge Deals Major Blow to
Admin's Use of Alien Enemies Act
May 01, 2025 https://www.newsweek.com/trump-appointed-judge-hands-migrants-legal-win- against-president-2066830
On 5/5/2025 9:36 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided
lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond
reasonable doubt.
You seem to suggest that it might be more cost effective to shoot the invaders as enemy combatants / terrorists in order to avoid costly legal expenses. AI enhanced unmanned drones could effectively be programmed
to profile illegal entrants and neutralize them. Good call, Siri.
On 5/5/25 12:04, Dark Brandon wrote:
On 5/5/2025 9:36 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided
lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond
reasonable doubt.
You seem to suggest that it might be more cost effective to shoot the
invaders as enemy combatants / terrorists in order to avoid costly
legal expenses. AI enhanced unmanned drones could effectively be
programmed to profile illegal entrants and neutralize them. Good
call, Siri.
Problem that you have is that if the policy is going to be to use lethal force at all domestic US bases against trespassers, there's going to be
a lot of dead native born white kids, as trespassing onto bases is a
very common pastime in some regions.
I can personally recall having one such kid hauled away in cuffs
trespassing on a dirt bike; before they were hauled away in cuffs, I
showed him what he barely escaped the consequences of (because our guys spotted him just barely in time).
-hh
My understanding is that this "newly created Military Zone along
the New Mexico border" (with "Old"Mexico) is the only zone where
intruders might be shot by armed soldiers. Most kids living in
New Mexico along the border are probably taught at an early age
that it is very dangerous to go into areas frequented by drug
smugglers, unlawful entrants and even wildcats, wolves, coyotes
and rattlers.
On 5/8/2025 2:44 PM, -hh wrote:
On 5/5/25 12:04, Dark Brandon wrote:
On 5/5/2025 9:36 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/5/25 7:59, Dark Brandon wrote:
Illegal border crossers in New Mexico are now facing criminal
charges under a section of U.S. law that protects military
installations from unauthorized entry.
Which costs thousands apop (sic). Defendants have to be provided
lawyers if they cannot pay for them. Charges have be proven beyond
reasonable doubt.
You seem to suggest that it might be more cost effective to shoot the
invaders as enemy combatants / terrorists in order to avoid costly
legal expenses. AI enhanced unmanned drones could effectively be
programmed to profile illegal entrants and neutralize them. Good
call, Siri.
Problem that you have is that if the policy is going to be to use
lethal force at all domestic US bases against trespassers, there's
going to be a lot of dead native born white kids, as trespassing onto
bases is a very common pastime in some regions.
My understanding is that this "newly created Military Zone along the New Mexico border" (with "Old"Mexico) is the only zone where intruders might
be shot by armed soldiers.
Most kids living in New Mexico along the border are probably
taught at an early age that it is very dangerous to go into
areas frequented by drug smugglers, unlawful entrants and even
wildcats, wolves, coyotes and rattlers.
I can personally recall having one such kid hauled away in cuffs
trespassing on a dirt bike; before they were hauled away in cuffs, I
showed him what he barely escaped the consequences of (because our
guys spotted him just barely in time).
-hh
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 21:10:43 |
| Calls: | 12,104 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,112 |