Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Destroying is not "cleaning".
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in
news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
How is
In article <vuqq2d$215p3$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in news:20250429.130342.1b805977
@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Destroying is not "cleaning".
What have you lost?
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted some news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
On 29 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]:
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in
news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
How is
Holman's stupid response deleted unread.
On 2025-04-29 21:48:40 +0000, The Right said:
On 29 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in
news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
How is
How is that "I will reduce prices on Day One"
thing coming along?
On 2025-04-29 14:46, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted some
news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
Trump's getting a good ol'*country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted some news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:No, spammy, you stupid mackerel-reeking cunt. It was by the *smallest* margin by
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
On 4/29/2025 3:09 PM, Alan wrote:And what percentages of the popular vote...
On 2025-04-29 14:46, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted some
news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
"He won 312 votes in the US electoral college compared with Harris’s 226."
"Trump received 304 electoral votes and Clinton 227"
On 4/29/2025 3:43 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2025-04-29 21:48:40 +0000, The Right said:
On 29 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in
news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
How is
How is that "I will reduce prices on Day One"
thing coming along?
Since eggs have gone from $10 a dozen under Biden, to $3.99 and falling
under Trump, I'll give him credit for that.
Read about the gas prices yourself.
https://gasprices.aaa.com/2025/04/
Except in California where they are closing refineries and prices are
going up. Thank your Democrats!
And how about that border drop?
95.5% reduction.
Illegal immigration costs us money. It would be cheaper to simply start shooting them.
In article <vuqq2d$215p3$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in news:20250429.130342.1b805977
@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Destroying is not "cleaning".
What have you lost?
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.427af09d72192f2998a0a9 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vuqq2d$215p3$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in
news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Destroying is not "cleaning".
What have you lost?
WE are losing Due Process of Law.
WE are losing our democracy
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted some news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
On 29 Apr 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some news:vus25s$3a407$[email protected]:
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.427af09d72192f2998a0a9
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vuqq2d$215p3$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in
news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Destroying is not "cleaning".
What have you lost?
WE are losing Due Process of Law.
WE are losing our democracy
You can't lose what you've already surrendered. As soon as you elected Obama, you set that in motion with Eric Holder, remember?
On 2025-04-29 14:46, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted some
news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
On 29/4/25 16:45, Jolsen wrote:
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary, instead invest
in the stock market?
On 2025-04-29 16:45, Jolsen wrote:
On 4/29/2025 3:09 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-04-29 14:46, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted some
news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
"He won 312 votes in the US electoral college compared with Harris’s
226."
"Trump received 304 electoral votes and Clinton 227"
And what percentages of the popular vote...
On 4/29/2025 2:46 PM, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted someNo, spammy, you stupid mackerel-reeking cunt. It was by the *smallest*
news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
margin by someone who won the popular vote
On 4/29/25 17:36, Alan wrote:
On 2025-04-29 16:45, Jolsen wrote:
On 4/29/2025 3:09 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-04-29 14:46, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted some
news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
"He won 312 votes in the US electoral college compared with Harris’s
226."
"Trump received 304 electoral votes and Clinton 227"
And what percentages of the popular vote...Enough to win.
And that is what matters isn't it?
Neither Hillary nor Kamala got majorities in their elections.
They both lost to jerk Trump.
And I understand that sticks in your Liberal craw.
But they lost! And if the liberal progressive DemocratsNo one wanted "mass unchecked immigration", Lee. That's simply a lie
want to run Kamala Harris again, they will LOSE!
They had bad candidates and they ran on bad policies.
Mass unchecked immigration, Constant DEI, defunding
police, and trans-boys taking spots on girls sports
teams are all losing positions.
Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financialIf my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary,
instead invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
Neither Hillary nor Kamala got majorities in their elections.
They both lost to jerk Trump.
And I understand that sticks in your Liberal craw.
On 30/4/25 10:33, a425couple wrote:
Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financialIf my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary,
instead invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
Save where? The stock market?
On 29 Apr 2025, J Carlson <[email protected]> posted some news:vurr4t$2vb0s$[email protected]:
On 4/29/2025 2:46 PM, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted someNo, spammy, you stupid mackerel-reeking cunt. It was by the *smallest*
news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
margin by someone who won the popular vote
When are you stupid people going to learn something about your own
electoral process and get off the "popular vote" crap? The electoral
process is there to keep emotionally charged morons from making
catastrophic long term mistakes affecting the majority.
On 4/30/25 15:00, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 30/4/25 10:33, a425couple wrote:Yes, absolutely.
Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financialIf my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary,
instead invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
Save where? The stock market?
On 4/30/25 15:00, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 30/4/25 10:33, a425couple wrote:Yes, absolutely. Your past negative statements on the stock market
Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financialIf my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary,
instead invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
Save where? The stock market?
read like a pessimist's bad dream. The stock market allows
everyone to own a piece of the companies (they choose) that
make up the business world. They will always over the long diversified
term outperform any type of savings or bond.
Do not spout looser opinions.
My Social Security benefit payments to me are less than I am getting
monthly as my Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) from my Individual Retirement Account (IRA / from 403b). From my age about 29 until
I retired at age 54 I participated in 403b / 401k savings accounts.
Every month I had money automatically buy from both Vangard and
Fidelity low cost mutual funds.
Odds are in the future the SS will continue to fall further behind.
The newer, younger workers are likely to be unhappy and very hesitant in their votes to endorse raising the Social Security withholding tax
for it to be immediately just given to Boomers.
On 29 Apr 2025, J Carlson <[email protected]> posted some >news:vurr4t$2vb0s$[email protected]:
On 4/29/2025 2:46 PM, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted someNo, spammy, you stupid mackerel-reeking cunt. It was by the *smallest*
news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the USA
and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
margin by someone who won the popular vote
When are you stupid people going to learn something about your own
electoral process and get off the "popular vote" crap? The electoral
process is there to keep emotionally charged morons from making
catastrophic long term mistakes affecting the majority.
On 4/29/25 17:28, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 29/4/25 16:45, Jolsen wrote:Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financial
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary, instead
invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
But workers need to know that Social Security is very bare minimum.
My Social Security benefit payments to me are less than I am getting
monthly as my Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) from my Individual Retirement Account (IRA / from 403b).
Odds are in the future the SS will continue to fall further behind.
The newer, younger workers are likely to be unhappy and very hesitant
in their votes to endorse raising the Social Security withholding tax
for it to be immediately just given to Boomers.
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Destroying is not "cleaning".
james wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 29 Apr 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some
news:vus25s$3a407$[email protected]:
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.427af09d72192f2998a0a9
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vuqq2d$215p3$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Trump Country USA <[email protected]> wrote in
news:20250429.130342.1b805977 @msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Destroying is not "cleaning".
What have you lost?
WE are losing Due Process of Law.
WE are losing our democracy
You can't lose what you've already surrendered. As soon as you elected
Obama, you set that in motion with Eric Holder, remember?
Obama! :-D
On 4/30/2025 6:12 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Obama! :-D
Trump is the direct result of the Obama presidency.
Tarek Anwar wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 4/30/2025 6:12 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Obama! :-D
Trump is the direct result of the Obama presidency.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/12/barack-obama-memoir-donald-trump>
Barack Obama: 'Americans spooked by black man in White House' led to Trump presidency
On 4/30/2025 11:59 AM, a425couple wrote:
On 4/29/25 17:36, Alan wrote:It's a shitty system when someone who doesn't win a majority of the
On 2025-04-29 16:45, Jolsen wrote:
On 4/29/2025 3:09 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-04-29 14:46, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted
some news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the
USA and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
"He won 312 votes in the US electoral college compared with
Harris’s 226."
"Trump received 304 electoral votes and Clinton 227"
And what percentages of the popular vote...
...the measure Donald Trump himself said should decide?
Enough to win.
And that is what matters isn't it?
vote can win the office, made even shittier by the electoral college,
which is not only undemocratic but actually anti-democratic *and* anti-republican.
On 30/4/25 11:59, a425couple wrote:
Neither Hillary nor Kamala got majorities in their elections.
They both lost to jerk Trump.
And I understand that sticks in your Liberal craw.
I think highly of a guy so unpopular he got nailed to a cross.
On 4/30/2025 11:59 AM, a425couple wrote:
On 4/29/25 17:36, Alan wrote:It's a shitty system when someone who doesn't win a majority of the
On 2025-04-29 16:45, Jolsen wrote:
On 4/29/2025 3:09 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-04-29 14:46, The Right wrote:
On 29 Apr 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> posted
some news:vuqi7m$1qsb9$[email protected]:
Trump Country USA wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Trump is cleaning house everywhere, even on Usenet.
Trump's getting a good ol' *country* ass-whuppin' in the polls.
Those same polls said Kamala would be the next president of the
USA and she got her town-pump ass beat by a historic margin.
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
"He won 312 votes in the US electoral college compared with
Harris’s 226."
"Trump received 304 electoral votes and Clinton 227"
And what percentages of the popular vote...
...the measure Donald Trump himself said should decide?
Enough to win.
And that is what matters isn't it?
vote can win the office,
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote in news:y9tQP.230000$[email protected]:
On 4/29/25 17:28, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 29/4/25 16:45, Jolsen wrote:Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financial
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary, instead
invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
But workers need to know that Social Security is very bare minimum.
My Social Security benefit payments to me are less than I am getting
monthly as my Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) from my Individual
Retirement Account (IRA / from 403b).
You're lucky. Not everyone could earn enough to save anything - and
didn't work for a company that contributed to an IRA (or other retirement account)
Odds are in the future the SS will continue to fall further behind.
The newer, younger workers are likely to be unhappy and very hesitant
in their votes to endorse raising the Social Security withholding tax
for it to be immediately just given to Boomers.
On 4/30/25 19:56, Baxter wrote:
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote inBaxter, quit talking dumbshit talking points.
news:y9tQP.230000$[email protected]:
On 4/29/25 17:28, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 29/4/25 16:45, Jolsen wrote:Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financial
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary, instead
invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
But workers need to know that Social Security is very bare minimum.
My Social Security benefit payments to me are less than I am getting
monthly as my Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) from my
Individual Retirement Account (IRA / from 403b).
You're lucky. Not everyone could earn enough to save anything - and
didn't work for a company that contributed to an IRA (or other
retirement account)
The biggest problem is not what 'they' earn, it is the discipline
of putting aside and delaying gratification. Too many workers
want to spend it all, or worse, spend more that they earn.
They lack the discipline to save.
On 4/30/25 19:56, Baxter wrote:
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote inBaxter, quit talking dumbshit talking points.
news:y9tQP.230000$[email protected]:
On 4/29/25 17:28, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 29/4/25 16:45, Jolsen wrote:Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financial
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary, instead
invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
But workers need to know that Social Security is very bare minimum.
My Social Security benefit payments to me are less than I am getting
monthly as my Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) from my
Individual Retirement Account (IRA / from 403b).
You're lucky. Not everyone could earn enough to save anything - and
didn't work for a company that contributed to an IRA (or other
retirement account)
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote in news:SzsRP.15337$[email protected]:
On 4/30/25 19:56, Baxter wrote:
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote inBaxter, quit talking dumbshit talking points.
news:y9tQP.230000$[email protected]:
On 4/29/25 17:28, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 29/4/25 16:45, Jolsen wrote:Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financial
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary, instead
invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
But workers need to know that Social Security is very bare minimum.
My Social Security benefit payments to me are less than I am getting
monthly as my Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) from my
Individual Retirement Account (IRA / from 403b).
You're lucky. Not everyone could earn enough to save anything - and
didn't work for a company that contributed to an IRA (or other
retirement account)
Stuff it up your ass! Not everyone gets paid a living wage, some have to supplement with Welfare, for many, every cent goes to food and bills with nothing for savings. for many more, one sickness or misfortune wipes away every cent they have saved.
On 5/3/2025 3:38 PM, Baxter wrote:
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote in
news:SzsRP.15337$[email protected]:
On 4/30/25 19:56, Baxter wrote:
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote inBaxter, quit talking dumbshit talking points.
news:y9tQP.230000$[email protected]:
On 4/29/25 17:28, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 29/4/25 16:45, Jolsen wrote:Well, I am OK with continuing Social Security but it's financial
If my "historic" you mean "historically low".
Free advice, don't play in the stock market.
What about people who say Social Security is unnecessary, instead
invest in the stock market?
problems need to be understood and shored up. Too many workers
lack the discipline to save for their future selves.
But workers need to know that Social Security is very bare minimum.
My Social Security benefit payments to me are less than I am getting >>>>> monthly as my Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) from my
Individual Retirement Account (IRA / from 403b).
You're lucky. Not everyone could earn enough to save anything - and
didn't work for a company that contributed to an IRA (or other
retirement account)
Stuff it up your ass! Not everyone gets paid a living wage,
Entirely unskilled young people who are *not expected* to earn a living
wage.
People earn what they're worth. If that's not enough to live on alone,
they just have to make alternate arrangements, don't they? A person does
not have a "right" to what you call a "living wage." Your idea of a
so-called "living wage" is one that provides lots of luxuries. No one
has a "right" to that, Bugster.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 19:14:03 |
| Calls: | 12,104 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,087 |