So why are we defaulting to snap for Firefox?
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
So why are we defaulting to snap for Firefox?
It gets worse if you have Firefox synced to other computers.
If Snap/flatpak were the only options, I would not use Linux.
I /would/ use such as flatpak if it were my only avenue other than
compile, but I am more strongly anti-Snap, so I would remove Snap from a
Ub flavor or such as Neon.
These scripts are generated by unsnap.
00-backup - runs snap save for each installed snap being migrated
01-install-flatpak - if not already installed, will install flatpak package manager
02-enable-flathub - if not enabled, will add the remote flathub location in flatpak
03-install-flatpaks - installs equivalent flatpaks for each identified snap
04-remove-snaps - removes snaps for which the flatpaks have been installed
99-remove-snapd - removes snapd itself, which will remove all snaps
Mike Easter wrote:
I /would/ use such as flatpak if it were my only avenue other than compile, but I am more strongly anti-Snap, so I
would remove Snap from a Ub flavor or such as Neon.
There is a script, unsnap which can do everything w/ various options:
https://github.com/popey/unsnap/blob/main/unsnap
These scripts are generated by unsnap.
00-backup - runs snap save for each installed snap being migrated
01-install-flatpak - if not already installed, will install flatpak package manager
02-enable-flathub - if not enabled, will add the remote flathub location in flatpak
03-install-flatpaks - installs equivalent flatpaks for each identified snap
04-remove-snaps - removes snaps for which the flatpaks have been installed
99-remove-snapd - removes snapd itself, which will remove all snaps
Of course, if one starts off before any snaps or flatpaks are installed some of those install remove aren't needed.
The KDE Neon I booted recently has flatpaks default and in Discover, but it also has snap; I don't quite get how to
remove snap there, but it allows one to choose default to be conventional repo/s over flatpak over snap.
I think Ub has taken the wrong direction w/ its Snap
affection/affliction. I think Mint has taken the correct direction in breaking w/ Ub over that issue.
In <[email protected]> Mike Easter:
[Snip...]
I think Ub has taken the wrong direction w/ its Snap
affection/affliction. I think Mint has taken the correct direction in
breaking w/ Ub over that issue.
Seems someone at Canonical is reading the straws in the wind ...
Enough of it! Ubuntu to Ditch Snap Completely With 24.04 LTS Naughty Nightingale
https://news.itsfoss.com/ubuntu-ditch-snap/
https://news.itsfoss.com/ubuntu-ditch-snap/
On 15/05/2023 6:18, Mike Easter wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:
I /would/ use such as flatpak if it were my only avenue other than
compile, but I am more strongly anti-Snap, so I would remove Snap
from a Ub flavor or such as Neon.
There is a script, unsnap which can do everything w/ various
options:
https://github.com/popey/unsnap/blob/main/unsnap
These scripts are generated by unsnap.
00-backup - runs snap save for each installed snap being
migrated 01-install-flatpak - if not already installed, will
install flatpak package manager 02-enable-flathub - if not
enabled, will add the remote flathub location in flatpak
03-install-flatpaks - installs equivalent flatpaks for each
identified snap 04-remove-snaps - removes snaps for which the
flatpaks have been installed 99-remove-snapd - removes snapd
itself, which will remove all snaps
Of course, if one starts off before any snaps or flatpaks are
installed some of those install remove aren't needed.
The KDE Neon I booted recently has flatpaks default and inBeing quite anti-snap (and I don't like systemd, either) I am trying
Discover, but it also has snap; I don't quite get how to remove
snap there, but it allows one to choose default to be conventional
repo/s over flatpak over snap.
to move my life to mxlinux. Seems to be working, so far.
An aditional advantage is a Remastersys-style backup option, which
creates an .iso image that is usefule to reinstall, or install on a
different PC.
Just a data point.
Mike
Damn!! you really had me *HAPPY* for a minute there.
then I saw:
If you are arriving at this page now, let us clarify
that it was a humorous post on the occasion of April Fool.
Mike
Am 14.05.2023 schrieb "Jonathan N. Little" <[email protected]>:
So why are we defaulting to snap for Firefox?
Because Canonical wants to force users to snap. Because users don't like
it and don't use it voluntarily, it must be harder for them to avoid it.
So why are we defaulting to snap for Firefox?
Technically, systemd and snap are orthogonal. You can have either one without the other.
On 17/05/2023 13:33, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 14.05.2023 schrieb "Jonathan N. Little" <[email protected]>:
So why are we defaulting to snap for Firefox?
Because Canonical wants to force users to snap. Because users don't like
it and don't use it voluntarily, it must be harder for them to avoid it.
Well, all it really does is push users to try other distros (in my case mxlinux)
which have stuck with no systemd, and therefore no snap.
On 5/17/2023 4:08 AM, Henry Crun wrote:
On 17/05/2023 13:33, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 14.05.2023 schrieb "Jonathan N. Little" <[email protected]>:
So why are we defaulting to snap for Firefox?
Because Canonical wants to force users to snap. Because users don't like >>> it and don't use it voluntarily, it must be harder for them to avoid it. >>>
Well, all it really does is push users to try other distros (in my
case mxlinux)
which have stuck with no systemd, and therefore no snap.
Technically, systemd and snap are orthogonal. You can have either one without the other. Personally, I hate both, and am looking for a new distro. I'll probably suffer with systemd, but go for a snap-free one.
my dental anesthesia is wearing off.
Bobbie Sellers wrote:
my dental anesthesia is wearing off.
There was a funny Seinfeld episode of Kramer and his dental anesthesia.
1995 Mar 16, 6th season, 19th episode, The Jimmy, "He Thinks You're
Mentally Challenged"
And my dental anesthesia left me with a sore jaw today.
a 'bite' block
Am 14.05.2023 schrieb "Jonathan N. Little" <[email protected]>:
So why are we defaulting to snap for Firefox?
Because Canonical wants to force users to snap. Because users don't like
it and don't use it voluntarily, it must be harder for them to avoid it.
So why are we defaulting to snap for Firefox? Besides sandboxing wasn't
it do have the latest and greatest version right? In installed Ubuntu
23.04 on a laptop. Found that you cannot just copy the profile from deb install to snap, you have to create a new profile and just copy the "important files" to the new snap version. I use to just copy the whole profile directory, even when transferring from Windows to Linux just
worked. Any way created a scrip to simplify the process. But now to the latest and greatest version bit...
The snap version was 111.0 where on my other laptop with 22.04 LTS where
I dumped the snap for the deb using the mozillateam-ubuntu PPA it is
running 113.0.1 same a Windows.
firefox:
Installed: 113.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~mt1
Did another update on 23.04 Now firefox is at 113.0 but seemed to lag
the deb version...
firefox:
Installed: 1:1snap1-0ubuntu3
snap info firefox | grep installed installed: 113.0-2
(2655) 255MB -
So the whole snap thing just seemed to unnecessarily complicate things.
Hopefully, this can get someone through this for now. Very simple to
do. Apt, not snap!
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt- ubuntu-22-04
Am 17.06.2023 um 04:35:49 Uhr schrieb Spiral:
Hopefully, this can get someone through this for now. Very simple to
do. Apt, not snap!
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-
ubuntu-22-04
Possible, but still annoying. Think about the mess if they remove more
and more packages from the official Ubuntu repository.
On 17/06/2023 12:25, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 17.06.2023 um 04:35:49 Uhr schrieb Spiral:
Hopefully, this can get someone through this for now. Very simple
to do. Apt, not snap!
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-
ubuntu-22-04
Possible, but still annoying. Think about the mess if they remove
more and more packages from the official Ubuntu repository.
Well, so I thought about it, so now I am in the gradual process of
moving to MX Linux.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 152:34:35 |
| Calls: | 12,091 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,648 |