From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 18 13:48:19 2024
Worth pointing out... and David Von Pein never answered these.
(Taken from my files of JFK related material - I cannot recall who
first posted this list.))
If you can wrap your head around this, Von Pein actually believes the
following nonsense:
1) Oswald shot at Gen. Walker even though Walker was shot at using a
30.06 steel-jacketed bullet
2) Oswald shot Officer Tippit even though Tippit was dead by 1:07 and
Oswald was nearly a mile away at 1:04
3) Oswald shot JFK even though Jesse Curry was not willing to say
there was any proof of that (but DVP knows better than Curry, of
course)
4) That one bullet caused 7 wounds in two men, hit ribs and bone and
came out looking virtually unscathed
5) That JFK's anterior neck wound was an exit wound even though all
medical personnel who saw it dispute that and even though it was 3-5
mm whereas WC tests showed M-C exit wounds are in the 10 mm range
6) That Oswald picked up a pistol mailed to him even though the proper
forms were not kept
7) That Oswald picked up a rifle mailed to him even though the proper
forms were not kept
8) That the backyard photos are real even though the nose shadow
remains the same and the heads from the different poses can be
superimposed to show they are exactly the same photo - he believes
this because a photo panel said they were not forgeries and we all
know that panels of experts can never be wrong
9) That Marina can be used to justify some bit of data even though the
WC and HSCA knew her to be a serial liar whose stories changed day to
day
10) No one impersonated Oswald in Mexico City even though everyone
else seems to be aware of this impersonation
11) That no one could forge Oswald's handwriting even though experts
validated the "Mr. Hunt" note which later was acknowledged a forgery
12) That Ruth Paine was merely a kind Quaker lady even though her CIA connections seem to have been well known to many people at that time
13) That Clay Shaw did not commit perjury when he denied in court that
he was a CIA asset even though the CIA later admitted he did work for
them
14) That there was no interference from the CIA and FBI in the
Garrison investigation and trial even though everyone else knows there
was
15) That the bullets "discovered" in Oswald's pocket two hours after
his arrest were there all along and were not planted by the DPD even
though they show bullet slide corrosion and Oswald owned no bullet
slide
16) That the DPD would file two detailed reports of the Mauser found
in the TSBD if it had not been found but was a Mannlicher-Carcano
instead
17) That a person would own a rifle and a pistol and have no gun
cleaning equipment
18) That the main goal of the plotters was to frame a lone assassin
even though that is merely an assumption made after the fact and used
over and over as one of the lamest arguments imaginable
19) That Capt. Fritz had a good reason for running ahead when Oswald
was being taken through the basement instead of remaining as a
protective shield, which was the point of his being in front
20) That the autopsy photos are genuine even though the autopsy
photographer said they aren't
21) That the X-rays are genuine even though we have proof of forgery
22) That the autopsy report is genuine even though Humes destroyed not
only his notes but the first report