On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 03:27:46 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

There is also the ...

The proof of your cowardice:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 07:01:51 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<[email protected]> wrote:

On Sunday, February 18, 2024 at 9:58:30?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
< a lot of bullshit without answering the question --- as usual >

What time does Whaley's timesheet say he picked up Oswald ?
Any response other than a time proves your running from the question.

Don't *need* proof that Chickenshit's a coward... :)

He literally proves it EVERY SINGLE DAY!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 05:13:08 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<[email protected]> wrote:

If �they� were intent on framing Oswald...

If you had the facts on your side, you wouldn't need to lie , run, and
post logical fallacies all the time, would you?

Lest anyone forget:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:05:03 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

I Never apply reasoning ...

Nor truth.

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:51:17 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

Chickenshit can't tell time either...

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:58:25 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

And then I lie about it.

No lies here:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:11:21 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 10:15:09?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 06:58:28 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

I don`t care ...

Chickenshit is just playing games with the death of a President.

You...

This isn't about me.

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 07:27:46 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<[email protected]> wrote:

Called it!

Called it! Huckster to whine, cry, run to his safe place, and NEVER
answer questions that prove him a liar.

Such as:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 07:39:22 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<[email protected]> wrote:

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 10:26:41?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 10:15:09?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

But the truth is, Chickenshit would **NEVER** answer it, even if you gave him a paid account to stay here forever...

An examination of Whaley's timesheet indicates that all of his entries on 11/22 ended in either a "0" or a "5".
That tells me he was rounding off the times to the nearest 5 minutes. Not 15 as the Commission claimed.
I asked the Nutters to explain how a 12:47 fare got rounded off to "12:30" instead of 12:45 and they could not.

Wrong.

When a liar asserts that a person is wrong - that's high praise.

Run coward... RUN!!!

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:08:34 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

I'm looking at the wrong things incorrectly ...

Yep.

Coward, too!

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:53:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

I can`t figure out the simplest things.

Like this?

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:59:10 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 12:17:29?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:05:03 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

I Never apply reasoning ...

Nor truth.

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

No answer to a simple "Yes" or "No" question... Chickenshit's
cowardice knows no bounds...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:59:22 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 10:15:10?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 07:01:51 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<[email protected]> wrote:

On Sunday, February 18, 2024 at 9:58:30?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
< a lot of bullshit without answering the question --- as usual >

What time does Whaley's timesheet say he picked up Oswald ?
Any response other than a time proves your running from the question.

Don't *need* proof that Chickenshit's a coward... :)

He literally proves it EVERY SINGLE DAY!

You guys have your own little worlds going on.

Run coward... RUN!

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 10:31:26 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<[email protected]> wrote:

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 10:30:39?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 10:07:45?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:

Hello! 12:30 is a fifteen-minute interval.

From 12:47?

The 12:30 is Whaley�s *guess*. That's what he called it.

Coward, aren't you Huckster?

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)