Rather than admit that he didn't even bother to read the citation he
responded incorrectly to - Huckster is simply going to remain silent
until the 22nd.

He's ALWAYS a coward when his lies are pointed out.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:01:33 -0800, Ben Holmes
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rather than admit that he didn't even bother to read the citation he >responded incorrectly to - Huckster is simply going to remain silent
until the 22nd.

He's ALWAYS a coward when his lies are pointed out.

Even Chickenshit - who usually kneejerk responds to every post I make,
is TERRIFIED of defending Huckster on this issue.

If, that is, he understands it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:32:03 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 1:57:55?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:01:33 -0800, Ben Holmes
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rather than admit that he didn't even bother to read the citation he >>>responded incorrectly to - Huckster is simply going to remain silent >>>until the 22nd.

He's ALWAYS a coward when his lies are pointed out.

Even Chickenshit - who usually kneejerk responds to every post I make,
is TERRIFIED of defending Huckster on this issue.

If, that is, he understands it.

No idea ...

ROTFLMAO!!! Chickenshit runs faster than Huckster!!

Certainly just as much a coward:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:19:14 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 1:57:55?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:01:33 -0800, Ben Holmes
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rather than admit that he didn't even bother to read the citation he >>>responded incorrectly to - Huckster is simply going to remain silent >>>until the 22nd.

He's ALWAYS a coward when his lies are pointed out.

Even Chickenshit - who usually kneejerk responds to every post I make,
is TERRIFIED of defending Huckster on this issue.

If, that is, he understands it.

No idea ...

ROTFLMAO!!! Chickenshit runs faster than Huckster!!

Certainly just as much a coward:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 20:08:30 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant <[email protected]>>wrote:

On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 2:32:07?PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:

On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 1:57:55?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:01:33 -0800, Ben Holmes >>>>><[email protected]>>wrote:

Rather than admit that he didn't even bother to read the citation he >>>>>>responded incorrectly to - Huckster is simply going to remain silent >>>>>>until the 22nd.

He's ALWAYS a coward when his lies are pointed out.

Even Chickenshit - who usually kneejerk responds to every post I make, >>>>>is TERRIFIED of defending Huckster on this issue.

If, that is, he understands it.

No idea what "this issue" is.

Hot air, most likely.

Nor do I have the slightest.

Ben, who lives here, would no doubt be shocked to find out I haven�t given this place a thought since my last post� too busy babysitting the grandkids and catching up on some reading.

He likes to be as vague as possible, but he really outdid himself here. No clue what issue I�m running from now, but if it helps Ben sleep at night to imagine me running from his nonsense, more power to him.

Of course, I quite explicitly detailed it - and like the proven coward
you are, you've refused to respond to that thread.

You're a proven coward, Huckster... as well as liar.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 04:01:12 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 07:59:52 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<[email protected]> wrote:

On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 11:02:10?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:

You make no sense.

I asked you to name someone who saw the throat wound prior to the tracheostomy and described it conclusively as a wound of exit.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/q5_hog-lXmA/m/nZN3tD4uAQAJ

You ran

I asked you how did Janie Taylor and/or her sources know that people were asked to leave the autopsy room almost TWO YEARS before Frank O'Neill revealed it to the ARRB ?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/4ppOk6akK9w/m/yktcXZuhAQAJ

You ran.

You claim 12:30 is a 15 minute interval from 12:47. >https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/RkYnswP6uuQ/m/YS7uJ4dCCQAJ

When it comes to making sense, you're the last person who should be casting aspersions.

I asked:


You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.


And all Huckster can do is run away...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 03:07:00 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<[email protected]> wrote:

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 10:59:54?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 11:02:10?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>> You make no sense.

I asked you to name someone who saw the throat wound prior to the tracheostomy and described it conclusively as a wound of exit.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/q5_hog-lXmA/m/nZN3tD4uAQAJ >>
You ran

No, that�s untrue. I answered here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/q5_hog-lXmA/m/fmAx3TLdAAAJ

I said this: �No one did. Only two doctors...

You contradict yourself.

But liars often do.

I asked you how did Janie Taylor and/or her sources know that people were asked to leave the autopsy room almost TWO YEARS before Frank O'Neill revealed it to the ARRB ?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/4ppOk6akK9w/m/yktcXZuhAQAJ >>
You ran.

No, I pointed out Taylor�s claims are hearsay...

That's not an answer to the question...

You claim 12:30 is a 15 minute interval from 12:47.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/RkYnswP6uuQ/m/YS7uJ4dCCQAJ

No, I never said that.

You're lying again.

When it comes to making sense, you're the last person who should be casting aspersions.

Only if you try to put words in my mouth...

Did you assert that Chickenshit speaks for you?

Yes.

Will you prove that a true statement?

No.

You're a coward and a liar. Good riddance.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)